Abstract This chapter reviews previously published North Sea Jurassic sequence stratigraphy schemes. Some of these works have applied the originally published J sequence schemes, while 18 have established new schemes. The most significant of these are discussed and compared to the newly defined J sequences. Most of these additional documented schemes have been defined for the Upper Jurassic interval, with a more limited number of schemes for the Lower and Middle Jurassic. Different authors have adopted a wide range of sequence notation methods while none of the publications describing the new sequence schemes has offered detailed sequence definitions. Due to the ensuing confusion, it is recommended that a more formal method of sequence definition is adopted in future sequence stratigraphic studies. In intervals in which reservoir successions are developed, such as the Fulmar Sandstone Member in the J56–J63 sequences, particularly in fields in which extensive coring has taken place, authors have usually been able to recognize additional sequences, which are probably at fourth-order scale, at a higher resolution than the defined third-order J sequences.

Abstract The most recent advance in infrared spectroscopy is in the use of real-time imaging reflectance spectrometers to study cores and cuttings. These are non-contact and non-destructive, and acquire continuous mineral and hydrocarbon data in a detailed sub-millimetre pixel image format. The main strength of this approach is the unique ability to accurately discriminate and quantify the clays, carbonates and sulfates, along with hydrocarbon information. Three hyperspectral core-scanning projects from the UK and Norwegian Continental Shelf highlight how these detailed, continuous mineral and hydrocarbon data can be used in geological and petrophysical evaluations. In the Dunbar Field of the Northern North Sea, UK, the spectral recognition of illite and kaolinite polytypes associated with faulted sandstone units contributed to a successful revision of lithostratigraphic correlation between wells with core material and those with only cuttings. These had been hitherto problematical. In Norway, hyperspectral mineral data from mixed carbonate–siliciclastic sequences across the Permo-Triassic boundary in the Alta Field, Barents Sea, helped in the delineation of a karstified dolomitic reservoir. A kaolinite cyclicity associated with an Upper Triassic stacked alluvial fan sequence was also identified in the Lorry Prospect, Norwegian Sea. Finally, it is demonstrated how hyperspectral data can be applied quantitatively to help to calibrate downhole petrophysical data, improve gamma log scaling for shale volume calculations and link mineralogy to permeability.

Abstract Unocal discovered the Acorn South Field with wells 29/8b-2 and 29/8b-2s in 1983. The well and its side-track found a small accumulation of oil in Upper Jurassic, Fulmar Formation sandstones in an inter-pod setting. Well 29/8b-3 drilled two years later on what was thought to be the same structure found Acorn North, a larger accumulation of oil in a Triassic Skagerrak Formation reservoir on the crest of a Triassic pod. Premier discovered the Beechnut Field two years later, well 29/9b-2 finding oil in the Fulmar and Skagerrak formations in a faulted, inter-pod setting. Both Acorn and Beechnut are deep, high-pressure and high-temperature fields with complex reservoir stratigraphy due to halokinesis during sedimentation and post-depositional structuration. The Skagerrak Formation reservoir in Acorn North is appreciably poorer than similar-age reservoirs further north whilst the Fulmar Formation in Beechnut is relatively poorly developed. Acorn's mid-case oil in place is 90 MMbbl in the Skagerrak Formation and 13 MMbbl in the Fulmar Formation and, for Beechnut, is 15 MMbbl in the Fulmar Formation. Neither field has been developed. Limiting factors include the resource size, variable reservoir development (Beechnut), modest reservoir quality (Acorn North), compartmentalization concerns and development costs.

Abstract The Alma Field (formerly Argyll and then Ardmore) is located within Blocks 30/24 and 30/25 on the western margin of the Central Graben. Hamilton drilled the first discovery well 30/24-1 in 1969 and the field, named ‘Argyll’, became the first UK offshore oilfield when production commenced in 1975. Oil was produced from the Devonian Buchan Formation, Permian Rotliegend and Zechstein groups, and Jurassic Fulmar Formation from 1976 until 1992, when the field was abandoned for economic reasons. In 2002, Tuscan Energy and Acorn Oil & Gas redeveloped the field and renamed it as ‘Ardmore’. A further 5 MMbbl were produced until 2005, when the field was again abandoned due to commercial considerations. In 2011, EnQuest was awarded the licence to redevelop the field and renamed it as ‘Alma’. The field came on stream in October 2015 and has produced oil at an average c. 6000 bopd since start-up. Total ultimate recovery was expected to be about 100 MMbbl. As of end 2005, the field had produced 72.6 MMbbl as Argyll and 5 MMbbl as Ardmore. A further 4.3 MMbbl has been produced from the Alma Field to September 2017 (which includes about 0.5 MMbbl from a long-reach well drilled into the Duncan/Galia Field immediately west of Alma). In January 2020 EnQuest announced that the Alma Field would cease production early. The total production from the three phases of field development will be about 85 MMbbl of oil.

Abstract The Elgin, Franklin, Glenelg and West Franklin fields lie approximately 240 km (150 miles) east of Aberdeen in Blocks 22/30b, 22/30c, 29/4d, 29/5b and 29/5c of the UK Central Graben. Franklin was discovered in 1985, Elgin in 1991, Glenelg in 1999 and West Franklin in 2003. Elgin is a complex faulted anticline comprising four panels, while the others are simpler, tilted fault block structures. The main reservoir is the Upper Jurassic Fulmar Formation shoreface sandstone, although the Middle Jurassic Pentland and Triassic Skagerrak formations have also been produced on Franklin. Initial pressure was c. 1100 bar (16 000 psi), with a reservoir temperature of around 190°C (375°F). Production wells are drilled from four wellhead platforms; all connected to a central process, utilities and quarters facility above Elgin. Gas and condensate production started in 2001 from six wells on each of Elgin and Franklin, with the plateau being extended by satellite and infill wells. The project remains the world's largest high-pressure–high-temperature development, requiring continued innovations in geoscience, drilling, completion and operations. Cumulative production at end 2017 is 886 Mboe, with estimated ultimate recovery around 1300 Mboe.

Abstract The Howe and Bardolino fields lie in UK Blocks 22/12a and 22/13a, respectively, on the eastern flank of the Forties–Montrose High. The Howe Field was discovered in 1987 by well 22/12a-1, and Bardolino in 1988 with well 22/13a-1ST. Both share common Jurassic reservoirs, have Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay Formation top seals, require some form of lateral seal and have similar fluids. Howe has been producing relatively dry oil throughout its production life, indicating relatively good connectivity across the field area. In contrast, the Bardolino accumulation is proven to be compartmentalized. Bardolino is likely to be segmented through some fault-related mechanism. In place volumes at the Howe Field are 46.8 MMbbl, with 17 MMbbl produced thus far through a combination of natural aquifer and solution gas cap drive by subsea development well 22/12a-9Z. In place volumes at the Bardolino Field are 11.2 MMbbl, with 1.1 MMbbl produced to date through depletion drive by a subsea development well 22/13a-8. This represents recovery rates of 35% for Howe and 10% for Bardolino to date. In place volumes for the undeveloped Pentland Formation at Howe are 5 MMbbl. In place estimates for the undeveloped Kimmeridge Clay Formation sandstones at Bardolino are 8 MMbbl.

Abstract The abandoned Innes Field was within Block 30/24 on the western margin of the Central Trough in the UK sector of the North Sea. Hamilton Brothers Oil Company operated the licence, and Innes was the third commercially viable oil discovery in the block after Argyll and Duncan. It was discovered in 1983 with well 30/24-24. Three appraisal wells were drilled, one of which was successful. Oil occurs in the Early Permian Rotliegend Group sandstones sealed by Zechstein Group dolomites and Upper Jurassic shale. The discovery well and successful appraisal well were used for production. Export of light, gas-rich crude was via a 15 km pipeline to Argyll. Innes was produced using pressure decline. It was abandoned in 1992 having produced 5.8 MMbbl of oil and possibly 9.8 bcf of gas. Water cut was a few percent. Innes was re-examined between 2001 and 2003 by the Tuscan Energy/Acorn Oil and Gas partnership with a view to tying the field back to the newly redeveloped Argyll (Ardmore) Field but marginal economics and financial constraints for the two start-up companies prevented any further activity. Enquest currently owns the licence and the company has redeveloped Argyll/Ardmore, as Alma. There are no plans to redevelop Innes.

Abstract The Shearwater Field is a high-pressure–high-temperature (HPHT) gas condensate field located 180 km east of Aberdeen in UKCS Blocks 22/30b and 22/30e within the East Central Graben. Shell UK Limited operates the field on behalf of co-venturers Esso Exploration and Production UK Limited and Arco British Limited, via a fixed steel jacket production platform and bridge-linked wellhead jacket in a water depth of 295 ft. Sandstones of the Upper Jurassic Fulmar Formation constitute the primary reservoir upon which the initial field development was sanctioned; however, additional production has been achieved from intra-Heather Formation sandstones, as well as from the Middle Jurassic Pentland Formation. Following first gas in 2000, a series of well failures occurred such that by 2008 production from the main field Fulmar reservoir had ceased. This resulted in a shut-in period for the main field from 2010 before a platform well slot recovery and redevelopment drilling campaign reinstated production from the Fulmar reservoir in 2015. In addition to replacement wells, the redevelopment drilling also included the design and execution of additional wells targeting undeveloped reservoirs and near-field exploration targets, based on the lessons learned during the initial development campaign, resulting in concurrent production from all discovered reservoirs via six active production wells by 2018.

Abstract The Upper Jurassic Wood, Godwin, Shaw and Cayley fields lie in Quadrant 22 on the Forties–Montrose High (FMH), a major intra-basinal high bisecting the Central Graben. The Wood Field was the first to be discovered in 1996 by Amoco. The field was later developed by Talisman Energy in 2007 via a single subsea horizontal producer tied back to the Montrose Alpha Platform. The Cayley, Godwin and Shaw discoveries followed during a drilling campaign carried out by Talisman Energy between 2007 and 2009 and were later developed, with the last field coming online in 2017. The fields are all complex structural and stratigraphic traps with reservoir in the Fulmar Formation. The Fulmar Formation on the FMH records an overall transgression, becoming progressively younger updip, with each field exhibiting a different diagenetic and depositional history in response to the unique evolution of the inter-pod in which they reside. The combined oil in place for the fields is currently estimated at 222 MMboe with an expected ultimate recovery of 84 MMboe. The addition of these reserves has been instrumental in helping to extend the life of the Montrose and Arbroath Platforms beyond 2030.

Abstract The Maria oilfield is located on a fault-bounded terrace in Block 16/29a of the UK sector of the North Sea, at the intersection of the South Viking Graben and the eastern Witch Ground Graben. The field was discovered in December 1993 by the 16/29a-11Y well and was confirmed by two further appraisal wells. The reservoir consists of shoreface sandstones of the Jurassic Fulmar Formation. The Jurassic sandstones, ranging from 100 to 180 ft in thickness, have variable reservoir properties, with porosities ranging from 10 to 18% and permeabilities from 1 to 300 mD. Hydrocarbons are trapped in a truncated rotated fault block, striking NW–SE. The reservoir sequence is sealed by Kimmeridge Clay Formation and Heather Formation claystones. Geochemical analysis suggests that Middle Jurassic Pentland Formation and Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay Formation mudstones have been the source of the Maria hydrocarbons. Estimated recoverable reserves are 10.6 MMbbl and 67 bcf (21.8 MMboe). Two further production wells were drilled in 2018 to access unexploited areas.

Abstract The application of production geochemistry techniques has been shown to provide abundant and often low-cost high-value fluid information that helps to maximize and safeguard production. Critical aspects to providing successful data relate to the appropriate sampling strategy and sampling selection which are generally project-aim-specific. In addition, the continuous direct integration of the production geochemistry data with subsurface and surface understanding is pivotal. Examples from two specific areas have been presented including: (a) the effective use of IsoTubes in the production realm; and (b) the application of geochemical fingerprinting primarily based on multidimensional gas chromatography. Mud gas stable carbon isotopes from low-cost IsoTubes have been shown to be very effective in recognizing within-well fluid compartments, as well as recognizing specific hydrocarbon seals in overburden section, including the selective partial seal for only C 2+ gas species. With respect to geochemical fingerprinting, examples have been presented related to reservoir surveillance including compartmentalization, lateral and vertical connectivity, as well as fluid movements and fault/baffle breakthrough. The production-related examples focus on fluid allocation within a single well, as well as on its application for pipeline residence times, fluid identification and well testing.

Abstract The UK Oil & Gas Authority carried out post-well failure analyses of exploration and appraisal wells in the Moray Firth and the UK Central North Sea to fully understand the basis for drilling the prospects and the reasons why the prospects failed. The data consisted of Tertiary, Mesozoic and Palaeozoic targets/segments associated with 97 wells drilled from 2003 to 2013. Seal was the primary reason for failure followed by trap, reservoir and charge. Root causes for failure were a lack of lateral seal, the absence of the target reservoir and the lack of a trap. The main pre-drill risk was not accurately predicted in over one-third of the cases and a third of the segments were targeted on the basis of perceived Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators. This study identified a number of interpretation gaps and pitfalls that ultimately contributed to the well failures. These included poor integration, improper application of geophysics, lack of regional play context, and absent or ineffective peer review. Addressing these gaps in a comprehensive and systematic way is fundamental to improving exploration success rates.

Abstract The Bacchus Field, discovered in 2004, is a small borderline high-pressure–high-temperature (HPHT) oil field 6.8 km east of the Forties Alpha Platform. The reservoir is Fulmar Sandstone with a rotated fault-block trap. The reservoir is typically thin (10–50 m) and difficult to image seismically. Compartmentalization was anticipated due to significant in-field faulting. The Bacchus development decision was made when considerable geological uncertainty remained. The key risk-mitigation strategies employed during the development of Bacchus were to drill long horizontal wells, contacting multiple reservoir compartments, while maintaining a flexible development plan. The ability to react to unexpected results was facilitated by optimizing the development data-acquisition programme. Drilling risk and cost were minimized by exploiting existing well control for landing development wells, combined with pilot drilling in untested parts of the reservoir. Development wells were designed to be geometrically robust, minimizing the requirement for geo-steering. This ensured low wellbore tortuosity that did not compromise the completions. Bacchus was successfully developed despite the final distribution of reserves being radically different from the pre-development perception. It is argued that maintaining a flexible development plan was far more effective in maximizing the value of the Bacchus development than more extensive pre-development appraisal or modelling.

Abstract The Shearwater Field, located in Block 22/30b in the UK Central Graben, remains one of the best-known fields in the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS). At the time of the initial development, Shearwater represented one of the most complex and technically challenging high-pressure and high-temperature (HPHT) developments of its kind in the North Sea. During the early life of the field, pressure depletion resulted in compaction of the Fulmar reservoir, leading to mechanical failure of the development wells. The compaction also resulted in weakening of the overburden due to an effect known as stress arching. Over time, this resulted in in situ stress changes in the overburden which have been observed from 4D seismic datasets and are in line with geomechanical modelling. This is particularly true for the Hod Formation in the Chalk Group, and resulted in the need to make changes to infill well design, including the use of new drilling technologies, to ensure safe and effective well delivery. The insights presented here, which relate to the understanding of pore pressure and fluid fill in the overburden, and how the overburden has responded to stress changes over time, are of relevance to current and future HPHT field developments in both the UK North Sea and elsewhere.