Abstract: This study investigated the extent to which deep-dwelling, infaunal foraminifera bias modern and fossil distributions in the subtropical mangroves of the Everglades (southwest Florida), and which sediment interval should be used as a modern analog for paleoenvironmental studies in this area. Typically, these studies are based on modern analogs from the upper 1 to 2 cm of sediments, as most benthic foraminifera live in the surface 1 cm, but in tropical mangrove environments, deep-dwelling infaunal foraminifera may be more common. The vertical distributions of live assemblages in cores from a mudflat and three mangrove sites were investigated. To examine the preservation potential of dead tests, distributions of wall types and inner test linings were recorded. The living depths of benthic foraminifera showed a landward deepening from 1 to 3 cm in mudflats and low mangroves and from 7 to 10 cm in middle and high mangroves, possibly due to a landward increase in oxygenation of the subsurface sediments. Modern assemblages from the top 2 cm included species common in the deep infauna and contained, on average, 36% of the total standing crop. Additions to total assemblages at greater depths by subsurface production were negligible. Thus, the upper 2 cm of the sediment column would be sufficient as a modern analog for paleoenvironmental studies in the southwestern Everglades. Preservation of dead tests is influenced by a landward increase in the degradation of agglutinated taxa through oxidation/bacterial breakdown of organic cements. Fortuitously, calcareous taxa preserve well in the carbonate-buffered sediments of the Everglades.

A geochemical investigation (major cations and anions, stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen, pH, and salinity) was conducted to identify the sources of groundwater recharge to the surficial aquifer system in Everglades National Park. The weighted mean values of δ 18 O and δD of rainfall were −2.83‰ and −10.59‰, respectively. A mean deuterium excess value of 12 suggests that evaporation of Everglades surface water contributes between 7% and 12% to the local precipitation. Most shallow groundwater in the surficial aquifer system (<28 m) is recharged throughout the year by Everglades surface water and or canal water exposed to evaporation. Recharge rates between 2 cm/yr and 12 cm/yr were obtained, with the higher rates in areas of little to no standing water. Deep groundwater in the surficial aquifer system (>28 m) is recharged directly from rainfall far upgradient of the northern boundary of Everglades National Park. Groundwater from the underlying Hawthorn Group is geochemically distinct from the surficial aquifer system and recharges the surficial aquifer system from below. There is no geochemical evidence of surface water or shallow groundwater flow between the two major waterways (Shark Slough and Taylor Slough) in Everglades National Park. In this investigation, a combination of stable isotopes (δ 18 O and δD) and major-ion data was necessary to identify different sources of groundwater recharge to the karst aquifer. The stable isotopes (δ 18 O and δD) were most useful in deciphering between rainfall and surface-water recharge to the shallow aquifer, whereas the major-ion data were used to identify recharge from deeper aquifers and seawater intrusion.

Abstract Organic soil subsidence occurs mainly with drainage and development of peat for agriculture. Subsidence occurs either from densification (loss of buoyancy, shrinkage, and compaction) or from actual loss of mass (biological oxidation, burning, hydrolysis and leaching, erosion, and mining). Densification usully occurs soon after drainage is established. Slow, continuous loss of mass is due mainly to biological oxidation. Erosion is minor except in specific sites. Mining losses vary greatly and depend upon direct removal of the materials. Subsidence rates are determined mainly by type of peat, depth to water table, and temperature. Subsidence losses have been carefully measured in several locations (e.g., the Florida Everglades), and predictions of future subsidence developed in 1950 have proved reliable. Peat drainage and subsidence have several consequences: loss of plant rooting depth where the substrate is unfavorable (stony, acidic, saline), increased pumping for drainage, instability of roads and other structures, increase in nutrient outflows, colder surface temperature during winter nights, and increase of CO2 flux to the global atmosphere The water table for organic soils should be held as high as crop and field conditions allow to reduce subsidence. Computer models offer methods for refining oxidation rate processes and prediction of subsidence losses where adequate calibration data are available. Remote sensing offers a method of assessing organic soil area and drainage changes. These new technologies should improve our assessment, and guide our management, of organic soil resources.