ABSTRACT The passive margins of Laurentia that formed during Neoproterozoic–Cambrian breakup of the supercontinent Rodinia record subsequent histories of contraction and translation. This contribution focuses on the northern margin of Laurentia, where recent geologic and geochronologic data have provided new insight into the evolution of northern North America. The Laurentian margin in East and North-East Greenland records synorogenic sedimentation and deformation associated with the Caledonian orogeny—the Silurian to Devonian continent-continent collision between Baltica and Laurentia that followed closure of the northern tract of the Iapetus Ocean. The timing of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism and simultaneous sinistral and dextral strike-slip faulting in North-East Greenland indicates that the Himalayan-style orogen persisted through the Devonian. In contrast, the Franklinian margin further west records sinistral strike-slip translation of allochthonous crustal blocks and arc fragments starting in the Ordovician–Silurian and culminating with the Devonian–Carboniferous Ellesmerian orogeny, the origin of which remains enigmatic. We suggest that Ellesmerian deformation was related to widespread transpression associated with northward motion of Laurentia during Acadian and Neo-Acadian deformation along the Appalachian margin rather than orthogonal ocean basin closure and microcontinent-continent collision. The Pearya terrane and North Slope subterrane of the Arctic Alaska terrane, separated from the Franklinian passive margin by the Petersen Bay fault and Porcupine shear zone, respectively, best preserve the Paleozoic translational and transpressional history of the northern Laurentian margin. These two major structures record a complex history of terrane accretion and translation that defines the Canadian Arctic transform system, which truncated the Caledonian suture to the east and ultimately propagated early Paleozoic subduction to the Cordilleran margin of western Laurentia.

ABSTRACT Eocene Eurekan deformation has proven to be an enigmatic sequence of tectonic episodes dominated by tectonic plate compression and translation in the circum-Arctic region. Prins Karls Forland on western Spitsbergen is composed of Neoproterozoic siliciclastic metasediments of Laurentian affinity regionally metamorphosed to greenschist facies conditions. A crustal-scale ductile to brittle deformation zone, here named the Bouréefjellet fault zone, contains the amphibolite facies Pinkiefjellet Unit exposed between the lower metamorphic grade, upper structural unit of the Grampianfjella Group and the Scotiafjellet Group in the footwall. A preliminary age for the amphibolite facies metamorphism (ca. 360–355 Ma) indicates Ellesmerian tectonism, unlike other higher-grade basement rocks on Svalbard. Ten metasedimentary rocks from within the fault zone were collected for multiple single-grain fusion 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology, with up to ten muscovite crystals dated per sample. High strain in the rocks is evinced by mylonitic structure, mica fish, and C’ shear zones, and dynamically recrystallized quartz with significant grain bulging and subgrain rotation, indicative of >350 °C temperatures. There is notable dispersion in the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages between samples, with single muscovite dates ranging from ca. 300 Ma to as young as 42 Ma, reflecting recrystallization and resetting of the muscovite. Younger, reproducible ages were obtained from samples that possess chemically homogeneous muscovite, yielding dates of 55–44 Ma for the Eurekan deformation on Prins Karls Forland. We suggest that Ellesmerian structures on Prins Karls Forland were reactivated during the Eocene (commencing as early as 55 Ma) progressing under warm, yet brittle, conditions that continued to 44 Ma. These 40 Ar/ 39 Ar muscovite dates are the first documented Eurekan deformation ages from Svalbard and enable a better understanding of the stages of Eurekan deformation in the Eocene to improve correlations across the circum-Arctic region.

ABSTRACT Detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic data from Ordovician to Devonian–Carboniferous sedimentary rocks sampled from the Pearya terrane and adjacent areas, northern Ellesmere Island, record temporal variation in detrital zircon signature on the northeastern Arctic margin of Laurentia. Ordovician to Silurian clastic sediments deposited on the Pearya terrane record a provenance signal from before terrane accretion. This signal is dominated by Ordovician arc material and grains derived from recycling of Proterozoic metasedimentary and metaigneous basement. This pattern is similar to Neoproterozoic detrital zircon spectra from the Svalbard and East Greenland Caledonides, supporting the exotic nature of the Pearya terrane and links between Pearya and the Arctic Caledonides. Sedimentary rock deposited in the late Ordovician and early Silurian deep water basin of the Clements Markham fold belt likewise record a recycled source containing abundant early Neoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic aged zircon. This contrasts with similarly aged units on Franklinian shelf, which contain much more abundant Paleoproterozoic zircon ages. The provenance of the late Devonian–Carboniferous(?) Okse Bay Formation is dominated by sediment reworked from the units exposed in Pearya or the East Greenland Caledonides, with new sources derived from Paleoproterozoic domains of the Canadian-Greenland shield and late Devonian igneous rocks documented in Ellesmere and Axel Heiberg Islands, and Arctic Alaska. In contrast, detrital zircon age spectra from Devonian sedimentary rocks in the western Ellesmerian Clastic Wedge and northern Cordilleran clastic wedge of the Mackenzie Mountains contain abundant zircon grains yielding ages characteristic of the Caledonian and Timanian Orogens. This contrast suggests that the northeastern and northwestern sectors of the Paleozoic Laurentian Arctic margin received sediments from different terranes, with the northeast being dominated by reworked Caledonide terrane and Laurentian craton detritus, and the northwest likely receiving sediment from elements of Arctic Alaska–Chukotka. These detrital zircon data indicate that the Pearya terrane was isolated from northern Laurentia until after the late Silurian. The accretion of the Pearya terrane is constrained between the late Silurian and middle Devonian by stratigraphy, detrital zircon provenance shifts indicating a Laurentian cratonic source by the early Carboniferous, metamorphism in the orthogneiss basement observed between ca. 395 and 372 Ma, and the emplacement of the Cape Woods post-tectonic pluton at 390 Ma.

ABSTRACT The unit previously mapped as the lower Upper Devonian Okse Bay Formation in the Yelverton Pass area of northern Ellesmere Island, considered indicative of syn-orogenic foreland (Devonian clastic wedge) basin deposition along the apex of the Ellesmerian Orogen, is in fact Early Carboniferous (Serpukhovian) in age and belongs to the Borup Fiord Formation of the successor Sverdrup Basin. The principal lines of evidence in favor of the original Okse Bay formational assignment were: (1) the presence of late Middle (Givetian) or early Late (Frasnian) Devonian palynomorphs; (2) a set of lithofacies presumably different from that of the Borup Fiord Formation; and (3) an angular unconformity between the so-called Okse Bay strata and overlying Pennsylvanian carbonates of the Nansen Formation. Here we demonstrate that the Devonian palynomorphs were eroded from the Devonian clastic wedge, transported for some distance, and deposited into the Sverdrup Basin in the Early Carboniferous. We also show that the units mapped as Okse Bay and Borup Fiord formations share the same clastic lithofacies assemblages, albeit in different proportions. We report the presence of Early Carboniferous palynomorphs in the uppermost part of a section assigned to the Okse Bay Formation, and show that detrital zircons contained in the middle part of the Okse Bay Formation yield dates as young as 358 Ma, thus demonstrating that the rocks that contain them are considerably younger than the assumed youngest age (Frasnian) based on palynology. We conclude that the Okse Bay Formation is the same unit as the Borup Fiord Formation and should be remapped as such. Both units are part of the same unconformity-bounded syn-rift Serpukhovian sequence that was rotated and differentially eroded prior to the widespread Pennsylvanian transgression. The Serpukhovian sequence comprises three lithofacies assemblages: meandering stream clastic, braided stream/alluvial fan clastic, and shallow marine carbonate. These lithofacies assemblages were deposited as part of a differentially subsiding rift system likely bounded to the south by one or more master listric faults and associated footwall uplift, and to the north by hanging wall ramp uplift. The Serpukhovian sequence comprises three fourth-order sequences, each interpreted as corresponding to a rift pulse. Relatively coarse terrigenous sediments derived from the erosion of the Franklinian basement (Laurentia margin) and the Devonian clastic wedge entered the rift basin at a high angle through broad alluvial fans and braided river systems. These streams fed into a NE-flowing basin-axial meandering system, which met a shallow sea to the northeast. An additional source of sediments is Crockerland to the north, including syn- to post-Ellesmerian intrusions that shed detrital zircons of latest Devonian age once sufficient unroofing of these had occurred during the Serpukhovian.

Abstract New deep seismological data from Ellesmere Island and the adjacent Arctic continental margin provide new information about the crustal structure of the region. These data were not available for previous regional crustal models. This paper combines and redisplays previously published results – a gravity-derived Moho map and seismological results –to produce new maps of the Moho depth, the depth to basement and the crystalline crustal thickness of Ellesmere Island and contiguous parts of the Arctic Ocean, Greenland and Axel Heiberg Island. Northern Ellesmere Island is underlain by a thick crustal block (Moho at 41 km, c. 35 km crust). This block is separated from the Canada–Greenland craton in the south by a WSW–ENE-trending channel of thinned crystalline crust (Moho at 30–35 km, <20 km thick crust), which is overlain by a thick succession of metasedimentary and younger sedimentary rocks (15–20 km). The Sverdrup Basin in the west and the Lincoln Sea in the east interrupt the crustal architecture of central Ellesmere Island, which is interpreted to be more representative of its initial post-Ellesmerian Orogen structure, but with a later Sverdrup Basin and Eurekan overprint.

Abstract The 400 km long transect through Ellesmere Island is located perpendicular to the North American continental margin between the Arctic Ocean in the NNW and the Greenland–Canadian Shield in the SSE. It provides an insight into the structural architecture and tectonic history of the upper parts of the continental crust. The northernmost segment of the transect is dominated by the composite Pearya Terrane, which amalgamated with the Laurentian margin during the Late Devonian–Early Carboniferous Ellesmerian Orogeny. The Neoproterozoic to Devonian Franklinian Basin is exposed south of the terrane boundary and most probably overlies the crystalline basement of the Greenland–Canadian Shield. The structures along the transect in this area are dominated by kilometre-scale Ellesmerian folding of the Franklinian Basin deposits above a deep-seated detachment, which is suggested to be located at the boundary between the basement of the Canadian Shield and the overlying >8 km thick Franklinian Basin. Following the development of the Late Mississippian–Palaeogene Sverdrup Basin, the complex Eurekan deformation reactivated Ellesmerian thrust faults and probably parts of the associated deep-seated detachment. In addition, large Eurekan strike-slip faults affected and displaced pre-Eocene deposits and tectonic structures, particularly in the northern part of the transect. Supplementary material: The complete transect (Segment 1 to 5) through Ellesmere Island between the Arctic Ocean in the NNW and Kane Basin in the SSE is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3783608

Abstract This paper considers the lithospheric structure and evolution of the wider Barents–Kara Sea region based on the compilation and integration of geophysical and geological data. Regional transects are constructed at both crustal and lithospheric scales based on the available data and a regional three-dimensional model. The transects, which extend onshore and into the deep oceanic basins, are used to link deep and shallow structures and processes, as well as to link offshore and onshore areas. The study area has been affected by numerous orogenic events in the Precambrian–Cambrian (Timanian), Silurian–Devonian (Caledonian), latest Devonian–earliest Carboniferous (Ellesmerian–svalbardian), Carboniferous–Permian (Uralian), Late Triassic (Taimyr, Pai Khoi and Novaya Zemlya) and Palaeogene (Spitsbergen–Eurekan). It has also been affected by at least three episodes of regional-scale magmatism, the so-called large igneous provinces: the Siberian Traps (Permian–Triassic transition), the High Arctic Large Igneous Province (Early Cretaceous) and the North Atlantic (Paleocene–Eocene transition). Additional magmatic events occurred in parts of the study area in Devonian and Late Cretaceous times. Within this geological framework, we integrate basin development with regional tectonic events and summarize the stages in basin evolution. We further discuss the timing, causes and implications of basin evolution. Fault activity is related to regional stress regimes and the reactivation of pre-existing basement structures. Regional uplift/subsidence events are discussed in a source-to-sink context and are related to their regional tectonic and palaeogeographical settings.