Abstract This chapter describes Lower Jurassic second-order sequences J00 and J10, and their component third-order sequences J1–J6 and J12–J18. Two sequences (J1 and J3) are new, four sequences (J2, J4, J12 and J16) are amended and one sequence (J17) is renamed. A significant unconformity at the base of the J12 sequence (Upper Sinemurian) is present near the base of the Dunlin Group in the North Viking Graben–East Shetland Platform and in the Danish Central Graben, and correlates with an equivalent unconformity around the margins of the London Platform, onshore UK. A marked unconformity at the base of the J16 sequence is recognized in the North Viking Graben and onshore UK, where it is related to structural movements on the Market Weighton High, eastern England. Several levels of carbon enrichment (carbon isotope excursions (CIEs)) and associated geochemical changes tie to J sequences defining maximum flooding surfaces: the Upper Sinemurian CIE equates to the base J6 maximum flooding surface (MFS), the basal Pliensbachian CIE ties to the base J13 MFS, the basal Toarcian CIE relates to the base J17 MFS and the Toarcian Ocean Anoxic Event corresponds with the base J18 MFS.

Abstract This chapter describes uppermost Middle Jurassic–lowermost Cretaceous second-order stratigraphic sequences J40, J50, J60 and J70, and their component third-order sequences J42–J46, J52–J56, J62–J66 and J71–J76. The latest Callovian–Berriasian was an interval of significant tectonism that led to the development of complex stratigraphy and highly variable successions, the elucidation of which is aided by the recognition of the correlation of the J sequences. Marine sedimentation dominated the Callovian–Berriasian interval, with the development of multiple sandstone members comprising reservoir units in many hydrocarbon fields, charged by marine source rocks (e.g. the Kimmeridge Clay Formation). Each of these units is subdivided and correlated by a succession of J sequences. Several sequences are renumbered (e.g. J54, J55, J65 and J66), some sequence definitions are amended or their basal boundaries recalibrated chronostratigraphically (J52, J54, J72, J73, J74 and J76) and new sequence subdivisions are recognized (J64a, J64b, J72a–J72c, J73a and J73b). Significant unconformities are recognized at the bases of the J54, J55, J62, J63, J64, J71 and J73 sequences. The top of J70 (J76) equates to the major ‘Base Cretaceous Unconformity’ seismic sequence boundary.

Abstract Many of the stratigraphic sequences recognized in North Sea Jurassic well sections correspond to mappable surfaces on seismic sections. Typically, however, sequences are only mappable seismically within individual sub-basins, and seismic correlation between sub-basins, or across highs, is generally impossible without independent control from wells. Particularly prominent seismic sequence boundaries occur at near-base J54 in the Inner Moray Firth (‘Intra-Oxfordian Event’) the Viking Graben (‘Top Heather’ in this area), base J62 (‘Top Heather’, Moray Firth), base J66 (‘Top Lower Hot Shale’, Inner and Outer Moray Firth), base J71 (East Shetland Platform), base J73 (‘Top Siltstone Member’, Moray Firth) and top J70/base K10 (‘Base Cretaceous Unconformity’ (BCU), basin-wide). The BCU is the most frequently mapped seismic horizon in the North Sea Basin in Jurassic–basal Cretaceous studies. This surface, at the base of the Cromer Knoll Group, separates synrift sediments from post-rift successions above and marks a major shift in the tectonic evolution of the North Sea Basin.

Abstract The application of sequence stratigraphic concepts and methods augments the efficient development of North Sea hydrocarbon fields with Jurassic reservoirs. In particular, the approach provides enhancements to the development of robust reservoir zonations, more accurate assessments of the extent and continuity of reservoir zones and flow units, clearer identification and prediction of the most productive reservoir intervals, improved understanding of field-wide pressure barriers or baffles to fluid flow, and enhanced reservoir models. In addition, carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects in Jurassic rocks will benefit from the adoption of a sequence stratigraphic approach by enhancing the understanding of storage unit architecture, connectivity and top seals. In this chapter, these applications are discussed with reference to around 20 case studies from the North Sea Basin.

Abstract The application of sequence stratigraphic concepts and methods significantly enhances the evaluation of stratigraphic traps. In this chapter, five examples of, as yet undrilled, potential UK North Sea Jurassic combination stratigraphic traps, from the East Shetland Platform, South Viking Graben, Inner Moray Firth and Central Graben, are discussed and the potential application of sequence stratigraphic methods in their evaluation considered.

Abstract Exploration drilling activity, discovery history and creaming curves in the offshore UK are analysed for each UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) basin and each play in the North Sea from the earliest wells drilled in 1965 until the end of 2017. Around 52 Bboe of commercially recoverable oil and gas has been discovered, with around half of this volume found in the first 10 years of exploration. UKCS exploration plays are generally at a mature or super-mature stage and the exploration challenges reflect this. Although technical success rates have steadily increased since the 1990s, pool sizes are becoming smaller. In the last 10 years the average commercial discovery size has been 27 MMboe recoverable, and since 2010 only 10% of discoveries have been bigger than 43 MMboe recoverable. The UK Oil and Gas Authority's 6 Bboe mid-case yet-to-find estimate, as published in 2018, would take 40 years to unlock at the current rate of discovery. Future exploration in the mature UKCS is intertwined with prolonging the life of production infrastructure and is increasingly dependent on the development of new low-cost development concepts. Increased focus on the search for subtle traps, and more reliable pre-drill risk and volume estimation through improved benchmarking and calibration will be key to future exploration success.

Abstract Located 160 km NE of the Shetland Islands in the East Shetland Basin, the Dunlin Cluster comprises four produced fields, Dunlin, Dunlin SW, Osprey and Merlin, in addition to some near-field satellite discoveries, Skye and Block 6. Dunlin was discovered in July 1973 and production began in August 1978. The field was developed using a concrete gravity-base platform, Dunlin Alpha, which also served as the production facility for the rest of the Dunlin Cluster. Osprey was discovered in 1974 but not tied-in until January 1991. Dunlin SW was discovered in 1973 but not brought onto production until 1996. Merlin was discovered in February 1997 and tied-in later that same year. Fairfield Energy acquired the Dunlin Cluster in 2008, and a programme of investment and facilities improvements, primarily in fuel gas infrastructure and power generation, sought to boost water-injection rates and bolster production, thereby extending the life of the asset. Ultimately, the Dunlin Cluster ceased production on 15 June 2015 after having maximized economic hydrocarbon recovery. The total Dunlin Cluster production exceeded 500 MMbbl of oil (Dunlin and Dunlin SW, 395 MMbbl oil; Osprey, 92 MMbbl oil; and Merlin, 27 MMbbl oil).

Abstract The Kraken and Kraken North fields lie in the UK Continental Shelf Block 9/2b on the East Shetland Platform. Hydrocarbons are stratigraphically trapped within Heimdal Sandstone Member of the Lista Formation. The fields lie at around 3900 ft true vertical; depth subsea and the oil is heavy (13–15°API) and viscous. The field is developed via a waterflood scheme with long horizontal production and injection wells, alternating across the field. To date, 21 development wells have been drilled, with further wells planned. Reservoir quality is extremely good with porosity around 36% and permeabilities in the range of 2–10 D. The field is produced via the Armada Kraken floating production storage and offloading vessel. Developed stock tank oil originally in place is in the region of 400 MMbbl, with further currently undeveloped resources to the west of the field.

Abstract The Pelican Field lies in the East Shetland Basin, in Block 211/26, roughly 150 km NE of the Shetland Islands. It was discovered in 1975 by exploration well 211/26-4. Development was delayed until 1995 when economic development became feasible as a subsea tie back to the Cormorant Alpha Platform. The reservoir is the Middle Jurassic Brent Group, comprising sands deposited in a fluvio-deltaic, shallow-marine, wave-dominated system. The reservoir interval has an average thickness of around 300 ft, ranging from 220 ft on the crest to 400 ft in down-flank areas. The crest of the field lies at around 10 500 ft true vertical depth subsea. Current estimate of oil in place for the field is c. 500 MMbbl. The Pelican Field suffers from significant deterioration of reservoir properties with depth, leading to low recovery factors of 15–20%. To date, 21 production and injection wells have been drilled recovering a total of 76 MMbbl. Oil production started in 1996 and peak oil production was achieved at 50 000 bopd in the same year. Rates declined due to water-cut development in most of the wells and current production rates are around 2000 bopd.

Abstract A review is given of the development of the understanding of the structure and stratigraphy of a classic petroleum province through 35 years of NW European Petroleum Geology Conferences, using new examples to illustrate the interplay between tectonics and sedimentation in the development of some of the major hydrocarbon plays. Cimmerian tectonics is discussed, with regard to the evidence for regional-scale truncation beneath the Mid Cimmerian unconformity, and the stratal motifs characteristic of rifting associated with the Early and Late Cimmerian events. New data revealing the structural geometries associated with polyphase rifting in the East Shetland Basin are presented. The seismic and sequence stratigraphy of Jurassic and Cenozoic sequences are reviewed and new data presented, with a discussion of generic play controls in North Sea Jurassic deepwater reservoirs. The development of integrated hydrocarbon system studies is reviewed, and the remaining challenges to predictive capabilities discussed. The impact of advances in geoscience and technology on North Sea creaming curves is discussed.