1-20 OF 529 RESULTS FOR

western Bhutan

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2017
Italian Journal of Geosciences (2017) 136 (1): 5–14.
...Chiara Montomoli; Rodolfo Carosi; Daniela Rubatto; Dario Visonà; Salvatore Iaccarino Abstract In Western Bhutan Himalayas leucogranite dykes emplaced in sub-vertical hybrid fractures that cut across the high-grade rocks of the upper Greater Himalayan Sequence just below to the South Tibetan...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1992
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1992) 40 (2): 115–125.
...H. Sarvothaman Abstract The quartzo-feldspathic protoliths associated with the Central Crystalline gneisses of the western Bhutan-eastern Sikkim Himalayan segment are of peraluminous adamellite, granite ( s.s .) and trondhjemite compositions. Peraluminous granite melt of first event is generated...
Image
(a) The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of Bhutan and Western Arunachal Himalaya with main shear zones and tectonic Units (Gansser, 1983, Grujic et al. 2002, 2006): MFT-Main Frontal Thrust, MBT-Main Boundary Thrust, MCT-Main Central Thrust, STD-South Tibetan Detachment, PW-Paro Window, JKT-Jimithang-Kakhtang Thrust, SK-Sakteng Klippen, UK-Ura Klippen, BMK-Black Mountain Klippen, TCK-Tang Chu Klippen, KCW – Kuru-Chu Window, LS –Lingshi Syncline, YCS – Yadong Cross Structure, ISL – INDEPTH Seismic Lines. Mean exhumation rates plot from, (b) Western Bhutan, (c) eastern Bhutan based on the AFT data set of Grujic et al. (2006) and (d) Temporal and spatial variation in exhumation across the Lesser Himalayan Sequence (LHS) and the Higher Himalayan Crystalline (HHC) in western Arunachal Himalaya (Vikas, 2010).
Published: 01 April 2013
Fig. 10. ( a ) The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of Bhutan and Western Arunachal Himalaya with main shear zones and tectonic Units ( Gansser, 1983 , Grujic et al. 2002 , 2006 ): MFT-Main Frontal Thrust, MBT-Main Boundary Thrust, MCT-Main Central Thrust, STD-South Tibetan Detachment, PW-Paro
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2006
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.268.01.20
EISBN: 9781862395169
... Abstract Recent fieldwork in western Bhutan, dedicated to unravelling the tectonic structure of the mid-crustal rocks, indicates a complex deformation pattern in the Greater Himalayan Slab (GHS). A system of normal shear zones, striking NE–SW and steeply to moderately dipping to the SE, has...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
(a). Map view plot of rectangle A as identified in Figure 4 displays distinct cluster types along three profiles designated as (1, 2, 3). (b) Cross section and histogram plot in the direction of the semimajor axis of the cluster 1 ellipse marked as AB, spanning western Bhutan, demarcating the boundary between western Bhutan and northern Sikkim. (c) Cross section and histogram plot in the direction of the semimajor axis of the cluster 2 ellipse marked as line CD, exhibiting a consistent pattern positioned along the Goalpara lineament. (d) Cross section and histogram plot in the direction of the semimajor axis of the cluster 3 ellipse marked as line EF, showcasing a consistent seismic pattern along the Dhubri–Chungthang fault zone (DCFZ), a significant strike‐slip fault in the region. The seismicity distribution indicates shallower earthquakes along profiles 2 and 3 compared to profile 1, possibly attributed to the increasing thickness of the seismogenic crust from profile 1 to profile 3 in the westward direction. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 10 March 2025
Figure 5. (a). Map view plot of rectangle A as identified in Figure  4 displays distinct cluster types along three profiles designated as (1, 2, 3). (b) Cross section and histogram plot in the direction of the semimajor axis of the cluster 1 ellipse marked as AB, spanning western Bhutan
Image
 Figure 3. Age-elevation diagram of apatite fission-track (AFT) data. Data from western Bhutan are in bright red; data from periphery of Paro window are in pale red; data from eastern Bhutan are in pale blue. Dark blue indicates data from vertical profile at ∼91°E (inset). In white are published AFT ages from western Himalayas (Sorkhabi et al., 1996; Thiede et al., 2004; Vannay et al., 2004) and central Nepal (Burbank et al., 2003)
Published: 01 October 2006
Figure 3. Age-elevation diagram of apatite fission-track (AFT) data. Data from western Bhutan are in bright red; data from periphery of Paro window are in pale red; data from eastern Bhutan are in pale blue. Dark blue indicates data from vertical profile at ∼91°E (inset). In white are published AFT
Journal Article
Published: 31 October 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2025) 115 (1): 248–259.
... in PgQ 0 ‐values across Bhutan. The western region exhibits low PgQ 0 values, indicating high seismic attenuation, whereas the central region shows medium‐to‐high PgQ 0 values, suggesting lower attenuation. Notably, these results are consistent with the geometry of the Moho, providing valuable insights...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
 Figure 2. Topographic and precipitation profiles, in 40-km-wide swaths, across Bhutan Himalayas and Shillong plateau show that an orographic barrier of 1.5–2 km is sufficient to hinder moisture transport. A—eastern Bhutan; B—western Bhutan. Topography (orange) has been derived from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data; precipitation (blue) is taken from the calibrated Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission data (Appendix DR1, see text footnote 1). There is a strong E-W precipitation gradient: at ∼1–1.5 km elevation in the east it is ∼4 m/yr, while in the west it is ∼6 m/yr. The orographic effect is also strongly pronounced with only Indian summer monsoon (ISM) precipitation (i.e., 0.5 versus 3.5 m/yr, respectively; Bookhagen et al., 2005). Geographic locations are shown on Figure DR1 (see text footnote 1). MFT—Main Frontal thrust, MBT—Main Boundary thrust, MCT—Main Central thrust, KT— Kakhtang thrust, STD—South Tibetan detachment, LHS—Lesser Himalayan Sequence, GHS—Greater Himalayan Sequence, TK—Tethyan Klippen, PW—Paro window, TSS—Tethyan Sedimentary Sequence
Published: 01 October 2006
Figure 2. Topographic and precipitation profiles, in 40-km-wide swaths, across Bhutan Himalayas and Shillong plateau show that an orographic barrier of 1.5–2 km is sufficient to hinder moisture transport. A—eastern Bhutan; B—western Bhutan. Topography (orange) has been derived from Shuttle Radar
Image
Simplified geologic map of Bhutan and surrounding region, after Gansser (1983), Bhargava (1995), Grujic et al. (2002), and our own mapping. Study area shown in Figure 2 outlined. Upper-left inset shows generalized geologic map of central and eastern Himalayan orogen (modified from Gansser, 1983). Structural detail left out of Tethyan Himalayan section north of Bhutan; map patterns of NE-striking, cross-cutting normal faults northwest of Lingshi Syncline (Yadong cross structure on figure 1 of Grujic et al. [2002]) are simplified. Jaishidanda Formation zircon sample locations in central and western Bhutan are shown. Abbreviations: (1) Inset: GH—Greater Himalaya, LH—Lesser Himalaya, TH—Tethyan (or Tibetan) Himalayan; (2) structures from north to south: STD—South Tibetan detachment, KT—Kakhtang thrust, MCT—Main Central thrust, MBT—Main Boundary thrust, MFT—Main Frontal thrust; (3) windows and klippen from west to east: LS—Lingshi syncline, PW—Paro window, TCK—Tang Chu klippe, UK—Ura klippe, SK—Sakteng klippe, LLW—Lum La window (location from Yin et al., 2010b).
Published: 01 July 2011
locations in central and western Bhutan are shown. Abbreviations: (1) Inset: GH—Greater Himalaya, LH—Lesser Himalaya, TH—Tethyan (or Tibetan) Himalayan; (2) structures from north to south: STD—South Tibetan detachment, KT—Kakhtang thrust, MCT—Main Central thrust, MBT—Main Boundary thrust, MFT—Main Frontal
Image
Geological map of western and central Bhutan, adapted from Greenwood et al. (2016), showing sample localities. Note that those granite localities which lie in the Greater Himalayan Series are from exposures too small to be mapped as granite at the scale of this figure. STD—South Tibetan detachment; MCT—Main Central thrust; MBT—Main Boundary thrust.
Published: 19 November 2019
Figure 1. Geological map of western and central Bhutan, adapted from Greenwood et al. (2016) , showing sample localities. Note that those granite localities which lie in the Greater Himalayan Series are from exposures too small to be mapped as granite at the scale of this figure. STD—South
Image
 Figure 1. Digital elevation model (DEM) of Bhutan Himalayas with main shear zones and tectonic units (Grujic et al., 2002): MFT—Main Frontal thrust, MBT—Main Boundary thrust, MCT—Main Central thrust, KT—Kakhtang thrust, STD—South Tibetan detachment, LHS— Lesser Himalayan Sequence, GHS—Greater Himalayan Sequence, TK—Tethyan Klippen, PW—Paro window, TSS—Tethyan Sedimentary Sequence. Locations of the apatite fission-track (AFT) ages: red—western Bhutan, blue—eastern Bhutan. Dark blue indicates group of data from vertical profile at ∼91°E (Fig. 3). Positions of topographic and precipitation profiles (Fig. 2) are indicated at bottom. Swaths are 500 km long and thus extend to south of map. Patches of low-relief relict landscape are contoured by white dashed lines, to be interpreted as erosional boundaries. A shaded local-relief map (inset A) was used to draw contours of relict landscape. Linear scale is for standard deviation of elevations within a 375 m radius (Appendix DR1, see text footnote 1). Small orphan remnants (see example within diagram circle) separated from main remnant by drainage divide strongly support concept of relict landscape. Gray box in inset B indicates geographic area of map
Published: 01 October 2006
Himalayan Sequence, TK—Tethyan Klippen, PW—Paro window, TSS—Tethyan Sedimentary Sequence. Locations of the apatite fission-track (AFT) ages: red—western Bhutan, blue—eastern Bhutan. Dark blue indicates group of data from vertical profile at ∼91°E ( Fig. 3 ). Positions of topographic and precipitation
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 October 2006
Geology (2006) 34 (10): 801–804.
...Figure 3. Age-elevation diagram of apatite fission-track (AFT) data. Data from western Bhutan are in bright red; data from periphery of Paro window are in pale red; data from eastern Bhutan are in pale blue. Dark blue indicates data from vertical profile at ∼91°E (inset). In white are published AFT...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 10 March 2025
Seismological Research Letters (2025)
...Figure 5. (a). Map view plot of rectangle A as identified in Figure  4 displays distinct cluster types along three profiles designated as (1, 2, 3). (b) Cross section and histogram plot in the direction of the semimajor axis of the cluster 1 ellipse marked as AB, spanning western Bhutan...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 08 October 2019
DOI: 10.1144/SP483-2018-127
EISBN: 9781786204523
... wedge. In this synthesis, we illustrate these variations in crustal structure by comparing the seismic structure of the crust in four regions: the Western Syntaxis, the Garhwal–Kumaon, the Eastern Nepal–Sikkim and the Bhutan– Northeastern India region. In the section ‘Seismological data analysis’ we...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 November 2016
GSA Bulletin (2016) 128 (11-12): 1679–1695.
... paleontological and geochronologic data suggest that the Kumaon and Bhutan conglomerate units, and possible equivalents in Tibet, correlate with those of the western Himalaya. This increases their known along-strike extent by over 1000 km, bringing the total extent to ∼1200 km. Thus, the Kurgiakh orogeny spanned...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2024
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2024) 100 (10): 1457–1465.
.... These probable locations are mostly concentrated in Kanchenjunga, Bhutan and the Everest region. Most of the dangerous zones are located in the central Himalaya (53) followed by eastern (21) and western (12). These regions can be considered as critical pertaining to future zone of proglacial lake formation...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 March 2013
GSA Bulletin (2013) 125 (3-4): 499–522.
... detachment were active, surface-breaching faults during early-middle Miocene GHC emplacement. However, the South Tibet detachment map pattern in the western and Bhutan Himalaya ( Yin, 2006 ) and field, structural, and U-Pb geochronologic studies in the western and central Himalaya ( Webb et al., 2007...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2023
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2023) 99 (9): 1187–1190.
... a paleoseismic record for 2600 years from the Himalayan Main Frontal Thrust in western Bhutan. They observe that paleoseismological studies along the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT) between Wang Chu and Ramphu Chu rivers provides an excellent window to the chronology and deposition phases going back to ∼2600 years...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 01 October 2011
Lithosphere (2011) 3 (5): 346–366.
... in Continental Collision Zones : Geological Society, London , Special Publication , v. 268 , p. 425 – 444 . Carosi R. Montomoli C. Rubatto D. Visoná D. , 2009 , Different generations of higher Himalayan leucogranites in western Bhutan and their tectonic setting , in Proceedings...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 06 November 2020
Journal of the Geological Society (2021) 178 (1): jgs2019-197.
... ). Its eastern boundary is marked by the west-dipping Jomolhari fault and its western boundary by the east-dipping Lingshi fault in NW Bhutan ( Cooper et al. 2015 ) ( Fig. 2 ). Burchfiel et al. (1992) proposed that the Zherger La detachment is offset by c . 70 km in a sinistral sense across...
FIGURES | View All (11)