1-20 OF 4281 RESULTS FOR

water tanks

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1963
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1963) 53 (2): 381–387.
...George W. Housner abstract During the Chilean earthquakes of May, 1960, a number of large elevated water tanks were severely damaged whereas others survived without damage. An analysis of the dynamic behavior of such tanks must take into account the motion of the water relative to the tank as well...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 30 July 2008
Geophysics (2008) 73 (5): E153–E164.
... and seismoelectric conversions in rock samples. Our method is designed to overcome the shortcoming of previous attempts to separate signals generated by a continuous electric or seismic source in a small container. We first observed acoustic fields around electrodes excited by an electric pulse in a water tank...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Image
Published: 01 February 2025
Table 5. Detailed information about water tanks of Kahramanmaras system Number Name Volume (m 3 ) Intake-output elevation (m) Number Name Volume(m 3 ) Intake-outputelevation (m) 1 Kavlakli 5000 544.75-540.00 13 DM3 3000 859.37-854.87 2 Ungut 1000 −606.00
Image
Filling portable water tanks at the Mochita WTP for deployment in Concepción.
Published: 01 June 2012
Figure 13. Filling portable water tanks at the Mochita WTP for deployment in Concepción.
Image
Large water tanks at roof (Muz).
Published: 01 March 2008
Figure 21. Large water tanks at roof (Muz).
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1978
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1978) 68 (2): 487–499.
... of predicted and measured free-surface displacements of a model cylindrical water tank subjected to both sinusoidal and seismic accelerations on a shaking table indicate close agreement between theory and experiment. Finally, the solutions for seismic accelerations in one horizontal direction are generalized...
Image
Photographs of measurement tanks. (a) Water tank, 10 electrodes, and a temperature probe in the center. (b) Sand tank, 10 electrodes, and central water-fill tube.
Published: 18 January 2008
Figure 1. Photographs of measurement tanks. (a) Water tank, 10 electrodes, and a temperature probe in the center. (b) Sand tank, 10 electrodes, and central water-fill tube.
Image
Schematic representation of water tank physical simulation experiment. This experiment used a monopole acoustic source and an eight-element acoustic receiver station within a water tank of size of 5.0 m × 5.0 m × 4.0 m. The acoustic source and acoustic receiver station were positioned on the same horizontal plane, separated by a distance of 2.0 m, which considerably exceeds the diameter of the acoustic receiver station (0.075 m).
Published: 05 November 2024
Figure 1. Schematic representation of water tank physical simulation experiment. This experiment used a monopole acoustic source and an eight-element acoustic receiver station within a water tank of size of 5.0 m × 5.0 m × 4.0 m. The acoustic source and acoustic receiver station were positioned
Image
Sketch of experimental setup in the water tank. The hydrophones are indicated as H1, H2, and H3 in which the x-, y-, and z-coordinates in m are given in brackets. The water depth in the tank is 1.25 m, and the width and length of the tank are 2.5 and 6 m, respectively.
Published: 08 August 2019
Figure 3. Sketch of experimental setup in the water tank. The hydrophones are indicated as H 1 , H 2 , and H 3 in which the x -, y -, and z -coordinates in m are given in brackets. The water depth in the tank is 1.25 m, and the width and length of the tank
Image
Photos and sketch of experimental setup in the water tank. The hydrophones are indicated as H1 and H2 where the x-, y-, and z-coordinates in m are given in brackets. The water depth in the tank is 1.25 m. The total width of the tank is 2.5 m (walls at y1=−1.25  m, y2=1.25  m), and the length is 6 m (walls at x1=−2.5  m, x2=3.5  m). The length of the metal frame is denoted with L.
Published: 12 February 2020
Figure 3. Photos and sketch of experimental setup in the water tank. The hydrophones are indicated as H 1 and H 2 where the x -, y -, and z -coordinates in m are given in brackets. The water depth in the tank is 1.25 m. The total width of the tank is 2.5
Image
(3 in Table 1) Destroyed Point Reyes Station railroad water tank in the foreground, obstructing the track and sidetrack. Looking toward west–northwest. In the background, the destroyed Salvador Grandi General Merchandise is just left of center. At left, the Galen Burdell Saloon and Hotel suffer little damage except a fallen chimney. Photo courtesy of the Jack Mason Museum of West Marin History.
Published: 03 November 2021
Figure 3. (3 in Table  1 ) Destroyed Point Reyes Station railroad water tank in the foreground, obstructing the track and sidetrack. Looking toward west–northwest. In the background, the destroyed Salvador Grandi General Merchandise is just left of center. At left, the Galen Burdell Saloon
Image
Wellbore self-circulation experiment system. (a): (1) water tank, (2) advection pump, (3) intermediate container, (4) thermotank, (5) temperature sensor (four points, probe type), (6) granite jacket, (7) temperature sensor (three points, patch type), (8) outer casing, (9) inner tubing (hollow inside, filled with thermal conductivity materials or vacuum), (10) pedestal, (11) low-temperature water bath, (12) buffer tank, (13) plunger metering pump, (14) pressure sensor (two points), (15) data collection box, and (16) computer. (a) Schematic diagram of experimental equipment; (b) heat exchange tube.
Published: 27 August 2021
Figure 3 Wellbore self-circulation experiment system. (a): (1) water tank, (2) advection pump, (3) intermediate container, (4) thermotank, (5) temperature sensor (four points, probe type), (6) granite jacket, (7) temperature sensor (three points, patch type), (8) outer casing, (9) inner tubing
Image
Ultrasonic acquisition: (a) photograph of physical model inside water tank acquisition apparatus and (b) estimate of the wavelet of the acquired ultrasonic data.
Published: 15 June 2020
Figure 3. Ultrasonic acquisition: (a) photograph of physical model inside water tank acquisition apparatus and (b) estimate of the wavelet of the acquired ultrasonic data.
Image
High-speed photos of a 600 Bolt air gun in a water tank. In (a), we see that some air has been released from the upper chamber (the small air bubble marked with a yellow arrow). In (b), the air from the main chamber (the lower chamber) starts to escape through the ports, and (d) clearly shows four bubbles (corresponding to the four ports of the gun) that will merge into one big bubble some milliseconds later (photos from Langhammer, 1994).
Published: 31 March 2020
Figure 4. High-speed photos of a 600 Bolt air gun in a water tank. In (a), we see that some air has been released from the upper chamber (the small air bubble marked with a yellow arrow). In (b), the air from the main chamber (the lower chamber) starts to escape through the ports, and (d) clearly
Image
The water tank used for the experiments: (a) two axes support the two transducers; the movement of the source (four degrees of freedom) and that of the receiver (three degrees of freedom) are ensured by stepping-motors installed on the axes and controlled by a PC, whereas the recently installed optical rulers provide a posteriori control of the transducer movements and (b) the WAVES model placed inside the water tank.
Published: 04 March 2020
Figure 2. The water tank used for the experiments: (a) two axes support the two transducers; the movement of the source (four degrees of freedom) and that of the receiver (three degrees of freedom) are ensured by stepping-motors installed on the axes and controlled by a PC, whereas the recently
Image
Concept of the laboratory experiment using a water tank. (a) The size of the water tank and the position of the boreholes. (b) The concept of making a jointed-rock model by piling bricks. (c) Electrode positions of resistivity tomography using two boreholes.
Published: 01 January 2001
F IG . 2. Concept of the laboratory experiment using a water tank. (a) The size of the water tank and the position of the boreholes. (b) The concept of making a jointed-rock model by piling bricks. (c) Electrode positions of resistivity tomography using two boreholes.
Image
Received full waveform of the (a) water-tank data and (b) reflection signals using MSTC.
Published: 12 July 2017
Figure 14. Received full waveform of the (a) water-tank data and (b) reflection signals using MSTC.
Image
Water-tank model with a size of 15×50  m. The source-receiver spacing of the sonic tool in the tank is 5.3 m. A 2 m long steel pad is located 3 m away from the tool with a dip angle of 20° toward the vertical direction.
Published: 12 July 2017
Figure 13. Water-tank model with a size of 15 × 50    m . The source-receiver spacing of the sonic tool in the tank is 5.3 m. A 2 m long steel pad is located 3 m away from the tool with a dip angle of 20° toward the vertical direction.
Image
CMP data from the 150 m acrylic plate inside a water tank. (a) Physical modeled, (b) numerical modeled (primaries and internal multiple reflections), (c) numerical modeled (full elastic response). The red Roman numerals indicate the main events: (I) water-air reflection, (II) water-acrylic PP reflection, (III) acrylic-water PP reflection, (IV) one leg converted waves (PS+SP) inside the acrylic layer (see Figure 10b), (V) two legs converted wave inside the acrylic layer (see Figure 10c), (VI) source and receiver ghost, and (VII) water tank base reflection. The colored dots indicate the locally converted waves in the 15 m acrylic model.
Published: 16 May 2017
Figure 12. CMP data from the 150 m acrylic plate inside a water tank. (a) Physical modeled, (b) numerical modeled (primaries and internal multiple reflections), (c) numerical modeled (full elastic response). The red Roman numerals indicate the main events: (I) water-air reflection, (II) water
Image
A vertical schematic diagram of the model in a water tank. The model is sustained by two organic glass blocks at the bottom.
Published: 28 January 2016
Figure 4. A vertical schematic diagram of the model in a water tank. The model is sustained by two organic glass blocks at the bottom.