1-20 OF 1207 RESULTS FOR

upper Ness Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1144/SP444.3
EISBN: 978-1-78620-374-8
... of upper coastal plain deposits of the late Bajocian Ness Formation in the Brent Field reservoir, UK North Sea. These coastal plain deposits accumulated during the progradation and retrogradation of the wave-dominated ‘Brent Delta’. Sedimentological facies analysis and palaeosol characterization in cores...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1998
AAPG Bulletin (1998) 82 (9): 1627–1651.
... of reservoir rock within the upper Ness Formation has been the focus of detailed geological and three-dimensional (3-D) seismic mapping. Inverted seismic data, integrated with geological well data, give an empirical correlation between acoustic impedance and sandstone proportion. In turn, these relationships...
FIGURES | View All (27)
Image
Core photographs of key sequence stratigraphic surfaces in ‘type well’ 3/4-12 (Fig. 4). (A) Lag of coarse-grained, extrabasinal sandstone near the base of the Tarbert Formation (9524’), marking a sequence boundary reworked during subsequent transgression. Note the presence of clay drapes in sandstones above the lag. (B) Distinctive palaeosol in the Upper Ness Formation (9735’), which comprises mottled red-brown siltstone containing green-coloured root traces (labelled ‘r’) and calcite-filled, post-depositional fractures (labelled ‘c’) around rhizoconcretions. The high degree of mottling and abundance of rhizoconcretions implies prolonged soil formation, while the pervasive red-brown colour and scarcity of carbonaceous material suggests soil development under oxidizing conditions above the water table. In the context of the coal-prone Ness Formation, this palaeosol records anomalous groundwater drainage conditions and is interpreted to mark a sequence boundary (see text for details). (C) Basal part of a multi-storey, fluvial channel-fill sandstone in the Upper Ness Formation (9710’), containing granule-sized, lithic extraclasts (labelled ‘e’) and mudstone intraclasts (labelled‘ i’).
Published: 01 July 2003
drapes in sandstones above the lag. ( B ) Distinctive palaeosol in the Upper Ness Formation (9735’), which comprises mottled red-brown siltstone containing green-coloured root traces (labelled ‘r’) and calcite-filled, post-depositional fractures (labelled ‘c’) around rhizoconcretions. The high degree
Image
Schematic palaeogeographical maps for fluvial channel-belt sandstones in selected stratigraphic intervals of the Upper Ness Formation, based on well-log correlations (e.g. Fig. 5). (a) Channel belt overlying SB500; (b) channel belt overlying SB550; (c) channel belt overlying SB600; (d) channel belt overlying SB700. The maps show extensional fault trends that are interpreted from seismic data (e.g. Figs 8, 9) to have been active during deposition of the Upper Ness Formation. The faults appear to have had little influence on channel-belt location, width and orientation during older stratigraphic intervals (a, b) and are shown as dashed, inactive features. However, the younger channel belts (c, d) appear to be diverted around a horst bounded by two active faults, shown as solid lines.
Published: 01 July 2003
Fig. 10 Schematic palaeogeographical maps for fluvial channel-belt sandstones in selected stratigraphic intervals of the Upper Ness Formation, based on well-log correlations (e.g. Fig. 5 ). ( a ) Channel belt overlying SB500; ( b ) channel belt overlying SB550; ( c ) channel belt overlying SB600
Image
Seismic section of the Strathspey Field highlighting gross thickness variations of the Brent Group reservoir. Note that the Upper Brent Group (between ‘top B4’ and ‘top-Brent’ reflectors) thins abruptly across a fault (shown in blue) that does not penetrate the overlying Heather Formation. Well-log correlation between the two wells suggests that the thickness variation across the fault is confined to reservoir zone B5 in the Upper Ness Formation (Fig. 4). See Figure 2 for location.
Published: 01 July 2003
. Well-log correlation between the two wells suggests that the thickness variation across the fault is confined to reservoir zone B5 in the Upper Ness Formation ( Fig. 4 ). See Figure 2 for location.
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 17 November 2023
DOI: 10.1144/SP527-2022-65
EISBN: 9781786209597
... of the Upper, Mid and Lower Ness formations. These sediments were deposited from a prograding Mid Jurassic delta within a deepening basin nestled between the East Shetland Basin and the Viking Graben ( Ball and Gluyas 2020 ). The Dunlin reservoirs were split into two (Tarbert/Upper Ness and Lower Ness...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
—Southeast-northwest—trending correlation panel for the Gamma area. The basal Ness sandstone “climbs” up toward the southeast to a stratigraphic position above the lowermost coal beds of the Ness Formation. Note the lateral restriction of sandstones in the upper Ness interval (e.g., wells 30/9-B27 and 30/9-B26) and the presence of possible clay plugs (e.g., top upper Ness, well 30/9-B39). See Figure 4 for line location and Figure 10 for legend. On vertical thickness scale, mTVT = meters true vertical thickness.
Published: 01 September 1998
Figure 11 —Southeast-northwest—trending correlation panel for the Gamma area. The basal Ness sandstone “climbs” up toward the southeast to a stratigraphic position above the lowermost coal beds of the Ness Formation. Note the lateral restriction of sandstones in the upper Ness interval (e.g
Image
Core description for well 30/6-23 (refer to Figure 1 for location). The Ness Formation rests conformably upon wave-dominated prograding shoreline sandstones (Rannoch Formation) and comprises intercalated fluvial channel sandstones and finer grained flood-plain deposits, including shallow lake deposits and sandy crevasse splay deposits. Notably, the bulk of coal beds occur within the lower part of the Ness Formation, whereas the main fluvial sandstones are present in the upper part. Late Bathonian marine mudrocks rest unconformably upon the Ness Formation. (Depths shown are measured depths [in meters]. The wells are near vertical.)
Published: 01 December 2000
shallow lake deposits and sandy crevasse splay deposits. Notably, the bulk of coal beds occur within the lower part of the Ness Formation, whereas the main fluvial sandstones are present in the upper part. Late Bathonian marine mudrocks rest unconformably upon the Ness Formation. (Depths shown
Image
—Southwest-northeast—trending correlation panel for the central Gamma area. The lower Ness Formation comprises a basal fluvial sandstone incised into the Oseberg Formation, with a generally coal-bearing, mudrock-dominated interval above. The upper part of the Ness Formation generally is more sandstone prone, but is capped by a laterally persistent coal-bearing interval at the transition of the Ness and Tarbert formations. Truncation of the Brent Group in the western parts of the profile is due to uplift and erosion of crestal fault-block areas during Late Jurassic rifting. See Figure 4 for line location. On vertical thickness scale, mTVT = meters true vertical thickness. Modified from Tj0lsen et al. (1995).
Published: 01 September 1998
Figure 10 —Southwest-northeast—trending correlation panel for the central Gamma area. The lower Ness Formation comprises a basal fluvial sandstone incised into the Oseberg Formation, with a generally coal-bearing, mudrock-dominated interval above. The upper part of the Ness Formation generally
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1998
AAPG Bulletin (1998) 82 (7): 25–49.
... sequence ( Shanley and McCabe, 1993 ; Aitken and Flint, 1995 ). Thus, the Etive LST, the Lower Ness TST, and the Upper Ness (possibly both TST and HST) should be assigned channel geometry data only from analogous (i.e., different) systems tracts. The Scalby Formation has been interpreted sequence...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Image
Figure 5.
Published: 19 July 2013
stromatolites developed along the upturned margins of desiccation polygons within the Upper Stromness Flagstone Formation, Quoynalonga Ness, Rousay. (j) A domal stromatolite mound in the Lower Stromness Flagstone Formation, Skerry of Ness, Stromness. (k) Jelly
Image
CL colors of albite overgrowths on detrital albite in sandstone samples. From left to right, micrographs of the same field of view with PPL, XN, and CL. A–C) Albite overgrowths with brown CL on three grains of detrital albite with red CL. Middle Jurassic Ness Formation, well 34/8-8, 2965.50 m, 112°C. D–F) A grain of detrital albite with red CL with an overgrowth of albite with brown CL. Middle Jurassic Ness Formation, well 30/3-7 S, 4723.70 m, 113°C. G–I) Two grains of detrital albite with red CL (center) and overgrowths of albite with brown CL. Upper Jurassic Ula Formation, well 7/12-2, 3410.29 m, 147°C. J–L) Brown fracture fillings and thin overgrowths on detrital albite with yellow CL, Triassic Skagerrak Formation, well 15/12-7 S, 3043.75 m, 108°C.
Published: 09 June 2025
, 2965.50 m, 112°C. D – F) A grain of detrital albite with red CL with an overgrowth of albite with brown CL. Middle Jurassic Ness Formation, well 30/3-7 S, 4723.70 m, 113°C. G – I) Two grains of detrital albite with red CL (center) and overgrowths of albite with brown CL. Upper Jurassic Ula Formation
Image
—Sub-Pennsylvanian subcrop of Mississippian rocks in western Kansas (upper map) and distribution of Lower Meramecian reservoirs in Ness and Hodgeman counties (lower map). In upper map CH = Chesteran, SG = Ste. Genevieve formation, SL=St. Louis formation, OSKH = Osagian-Kinderhookian.
Published: 01 May 1994
Figure 1 —Sub-Pennsylvanian subcrop of Mississippian rocks in western Kansas (upper map) and distribution of Lower Meramecian reservoirs in Ness and Hodgeman counties (lower map). In upper map CH = Chesteran, SG = Ste. Genevieve formation, SL=St. Louis formation, OSKH = Osagian-Kinderhookian.
Image
Core photograph from 30/6-19 illustrating the uppermost part of the Rannoch, Etive and lowermost part of the Ness formations. LEF, lower Etive Formation; UEF, upper Etive Formation; RF, Rannoch Formation. (For location of well see Fig. 7 and for location of cored interval see Fig. 3.)
Published: 01 December 2010
Fig. 4. Core photograph from 30/6-19 illustrating the uppermost part of the Rannoch, Etive and lowermost part of the Ness formations. LEF, lower Etive Formation; UEF, upper Etive Formation; RF, Rannoch Formation. (For location of well see Fig. 7 and for location of cored interval see Fig. 3.)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 14 July 2023
DOI: 10.1144/M59-2022-68
EISBN: 9781786209498
... of the J22–J24 sequences), combined with a base J30 (J32) unconformity that truncates and omits the J26 sequence (upper part of the Ness Formation). In addition, the Tarbert Formation, of the J32–J34 sequences, disappears by a combination of lateral onlap onto the base J32 unconformity and lateral passage...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Series: GSA Memoirs
Published: 01 January 1967
DOI: 10.1130/MEM103-p1
... in the lower part of the upper Devils Gate Limestone in central Nevada and in an unnamed formation in north-central Nevada from which thousands of specimens have been recovered. The Ancyrognathus triangularis zone has been recognized above the dubia (= asymmetrica ?) zone in the Devils Gate Limestone...
Image
Upper Devonian to Lower Permian chrono-, and lithostratigraphical summary of the Firth of Forth and surrounding area (modified after Browne et al. 1996). The seismo-stratigraphical surfaces mapped are arrowed and numbered (see also Fig. 3). Explanations for abbreviated formation names within the Strathclyde Group and Bathgate Group (KVF) are given in the caption to Figure 5. FNB, Fife Ness Formation.
Published: 01 November 2003
Fig. 4. Upper Devonian to Lower Permian chrono-, and lithostratigraphical summary of the Firth of Forth and surrounding area (modified after Browne et al. 1996 ). The seismo-stratigraphical surfaces mapped are arrowed and numbered (see also Fig. 3 ). Explanations for abbreviated formation
Image
Stratigraphic cross section, illustrating the main lithological features of the Ness Formation in the wells studied. Depths are cored depths, the intervals shown are fully cored, and the graphic core log is shown in each case (for legend to the graphic core description and interpretation of facies, refer to Figure 3.). A lower coal-bearing interval having little fluvial sandstone can be distinguished from a more sandy, upper Ness interval (Ryseth et al., 1998). The fault illustrated near well 30/6-22 was initially proposed from the DST analysis and subsequently confirmed on 1998-vintage three-dimensional seismic data. No offset is shown across fault as section is hung on an intra-Ness biostratigraphic marker (80R). Positions of analyzed DSTs are shown for reference. Evidence for the sand between wells 30/6-19 and 30/6-22 exists in other wells in the field. The location of the tested intervals studied in this article are indicated for each well. Figure numbers refer to the intervals of core photographs in Figures 6-8.
Published: 01 December 2000
Figure 4 Stratigraphic cross section, illustrating the main lithological features of the Ness Formation in the wells studied. Depths are cored depths, the intervals shown are fully cored, and the graphic core log is shown in each case (for legend to the graphic core description and interpretation
Image
Sketch map of part of southwestern Westray (Orkney), Mae Sand to Ness of Tuquoy (see Fig. 3) showing the locations of fish beds and line of section c–d in a continuous sequence from the top five cycles of the Upper Stromness Flagstone Formation (USF) and the first four cycles of the Rousay Formation (RF). Biozone fishes are Op, Osteolepis panderi (Lower Rousay) and Dt, Dickosteus threiplandi (Upper Stromness). Based on British Geological Survey (1999) 1:100,000 map of Orkney and reproduced with the permission of the British Geological Survey ©NERC. All rights Reserved.
Published: 22 September 2017
Fig. 5. Sketch map of part of southwestern Westray (Orkney), Mae Sand to Ness of Tuquoy (see Fig. 3 ) showing the locations of fish beds and line of section c–d in a continuous sequence from the top five cycles of the Upper Stromness Flagstone Formation (USF) and the first four cycles
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2019-46
EISBN: 9781786205070
.... In addition to the Brent reservoir, hydrocarbon-bearing Upper Jurassic sandstones were also found. These were tested, but did not flow. It is thought that these sandstones are linked to localized erosion from the crest of South Cormorant Block II where the Tarbert Formation and some of the Upper Ness interval...
FIGURES | View All (9)