1-20 OF 614 RESULTS FOR

underwater explosions

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 22 November 2022
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2023) 113 (4): 1542–1560.
...Mickaël Bonnin; E. Diego Mercerat; Éric Beucler; Nathalie Favretto‐Cristini; Anne Deschamps; David Ambrois; Thierry Garlan ABSTRACT This study presents the analysis of the seismic records of eight underwater explosions triggered by the French Navy Mine Warfare Office in December 2018 in the Bay...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Short‐Range Recordings of Shallow <span class="sea...
Second thumbnail for: Short‐Range Recordings of Shallow <span class="sea...
Third thumbnail for: Short‐Range Recordings of Shallow <span class="sea...
Journal Article
Published: 16 October 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (6): 3612–3624.
...Ross Heyburn; Stuart E. J. Nippress; David Bowers Abstract In this study, seismic and hydroacoustic signals from underwater explosions in 2001, 2008, and 2016 near Florida are analyzed. These 10,000 lb chemical explosions were detonated by the United States Navy to validate the ability of new...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Seismic and Hydroacoustic Observations from <span ...
Second thumbnail for: Seismic and Hydroacoustic Observations from <span ...
Third thumbnail for: Seismic and Hydroacoustic Observations from <span ...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2003
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2003) 93 (2): 804–816.
...Dominique Reymond; Olivier Hyvernaud; Jacques Talandier; Emile A. Okal Abstract We studied two presumed underwater explosions, detonated on 13 April 2000 (approximate times 00:19 and 23:29 coordinated universal time), at a site located approximately 215 km southwest of Oahu, Hawaii, and detected...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: T -Wave Detection of Two <span class="search-highl...
Second thumbnail for: T -Wave Detection of Two <span class="search-highl...
Third thumbnail for: T -Wave Detection of Two <span class="search-highl...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2003
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2003) 93 (1): 215–223.
...Edoardo Del Pezzo; Anna Esposito; Flora Giudicepietro; Maria Marinaro; Marcello Martini; Silvia Scarpetta Abstract We report on the implementation of an automatic system able to discriminate between explosion-generated artificial seismic events and local earthquakes in the Phlegraean Fields (Italy...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Discrimination of Earthquakes and <span class="sea...
Second thumbnail for: Discrimination of Earthquakes and <span class="sea...
Third thumbnail for: Discrimination of Earthquakes and <span class="sea...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1981
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1981) 71 (4): 1049–1059.
...Avi Shapira abstract T phases from underwater explosions off the coast of Israel were recorded at three temporarily installed seismograph stations. The T waves propagated as sound waves through the water with a velocity of about 1.53 km/sec, possibly in the so-called SOFAR channel. Three phases...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1976
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1976) 66 (3): 1009–1011.
... by underwater explosions , Seism. Inst., Uppsala, Report No. 2-75 , 21 pp. Meyer K. (1975) . Secondary pressure pulses from underwater explosions , Seism. Inst. Uppsala, Report No. 9-75 , 24 pp. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 1009 A STUDY...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 01 June 1972
Geophysics (1972) 37 (3): 431–444.
...R. E. White; R. F. Mereu Abstract The P-wave spectra of seismograms from large underwater explosions are frequently dominated by reverberations. When this is so, a simple reverberation model similar to that of Backus (1959) gives a good approximation to the source spectrum. The basic wavelet...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 01 June 1970
Geophysics (1970) 35 (3): 419–435.
...M. Lavergne Abstract Theoretical and experimental investigations of the seismic effects of underwater explosions of dynamite charges are described. We investigate the acoustic efficiency in a broad frequency band and in the seismic frequency band, the partition of energy between the shock wave...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1969
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1969) 59 (3): 1137–1147.
...R. Plutchok; P. Broome abstract A model is presented which makes it possible to accurately predict the power spectrum and the covariance function of seismic signals generated by large under-water shots. It is shown by comparison of predicted and measured data for several large underwater explosions...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 01 February 1967
Geophysics (1967) 32 (1): 17–32.
... spreading), nonelastic effects, and the influence of the recording system. Source functions appropriate to atmospheric explosions, underwater explosions, and underground explosions in a variety of rock types are derived. The effects of elastic and nonelastic behavior are combined to define a standard...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1998
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1998) 88 (2): 581–595.
...-2211, 29 August 1991 , ENSCO, Inc. , Springfield, Virginia . Cole R. H. (1948) . Underwater Explosions , Princeton U Press , Princeton, New Jersey . Der Z...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1954
GSA Bulletin (1954) 65 (10): 941–956.
... the highest, and the only subaerially exposed, portion of the caldera rim. A series of great explosions accompanied the extrusion of augite-hypersthene dacite. Since 26 September, when the main series of explosions ended, there has been only sporadic activity. Because of its remoteness, only a few visual...
Image
Peak water pressure versus distance for underwater explosions of TNT in ocean waters and measurements of the Dead Sea shots.
Published: 01 March 2001
Figure 7. Peak water pressure versus distance for underwater explosions of TNT in ocean waters and measurements of the Dead Sea shots.
Image
Location map of the underwater explosion estimated by (a) a stack of just the hydroacoustic arrival and (b) a combined P, S, and hydroacoustic stack. Brighter colors indicate regions with higher stacking power, with maximum marked by a green point with the yellow point marking the catalog location estimated by the Royal Observatory of Belgium using surface seismic stations. (c) A time snapshot of the grid of stacked traces at 1 min after the estimated explosion. The green point is the inverted source location from panel (b). (d) Modeled travel times of the P, S, and hydroacoustic arrivals using the catalog location (dashed lines) and our new estimate (solid line). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 15 January 2025
Figure 9. Location map of the underwater explosion estimated by (a) a stack of just the hydroacoustic arrival and (b) a combined P , S , and hydroacoustic stack. Brighter colors indicate regions with higher stacking power, with maximum marked by a green point with the yellow point marking
Image
An Mw 1.1 event generated by a commercial underwater explosion (1375 kg) was registered on the Vancouver (British Columbia, Canada) urban network (triangles) on 23 February 2006. Voronoi polygon intersections up to order 4 are shown for the first four stations (circles), which detected the event in the order indicated. The hatched area is the ordered, fourth order Voronoi polygon associated with the arrival order. The actual blast site is shown with a star and is located close to the southern most vertex of the final (hatched) polygon.
Published: 01 June 2009
Figure 3. An M w  1.1 event generated by a commercial underwater explosion (1375 kg) was registered on the Vancouver (British Columbia, Canada) urban network (triangles) on 23 February 2006. Voronoi polygon intersections up to order 4 are shown for the first four stations (circles), which
Image
▴ Recordings of an underwater explosion set off by a fisherman that occurred on 7 May 2008 in Pozzuoli Bay and was recorded by CUMAS (station code CFSB) from the hydrophone (top) and by the three-component seismometer.
Published: 01 March 2009
Figure 8. ▴ Recordings of an underwater explosion set off by a fisherman that occurred on 7 May 2008 in Pozzuoli Bay and was recorded by CUMAS (station code CFSB) from the hydrophone (top) and by the three-component seismometer.
Journal Article
Published: 15 January 2025
Seismological Research Letters (2025) 96 (2A): 691–705.
...Figure 9. Location map of the underwater explosion estimated by (a) a stack of just the hydroacoustic arrival and (b) a combined P , S , and hydroacoustic stack. Brighter colors indicate regions with higher stacking power, with maximum marked by a green point with the yellow point marking...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Ocean Space Surveillance and Real‐Time Event Chara...
Second thumbnail for: Ocean Space Surveillance and Real‐Time Event Chara...
Third thumbnail for: Ocean Space Surveillance and Real‐Time Event Chara...
Image
(a) Strain recording of an underwater controlled explosion. (b) Spectrogram for observed underwater explosion records at position 24.5 km. The waveform at the arrival of the hydroacoustic wave, in the time interval 12:45:50–12:46:00 in the plot, has a leading low‐frequency component (below 20 Hz) before the arrival of the main energy at a higher frequency. (c) Frequency–wavenumber power spectrum of the seaward propagating energy for the white color cable segment in Figure 1a for the underwater explosion. The yellow dashed lines are plotted along contours of constant apparent velocity. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 15 January 2025
Figure 3. (a) Strain recording of an underwater controlled explosion. (b) Spectrogram for observed underwater explosion records at position 24.5 km. The waveform at the arrival of the hydroacoustic wave, in the time interval 12:45:50–12:46:00 in the plot, has a leading low‐frequency component
Journal Article
Published: 03 January 2024
The Seismic Record (2024) 4 (1): 1–10.
... and infrasound signals from these two events and compare the seismic signals with those from other nearby seismic events such as underwater explosions and presumed earthquakes. Arrival times of seismic signals from the events on 26 September 2022 are used to show that the epicenters for both the events...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: The 26 September 2022 Nord Stream Events: Insights...
Second thumbnail for: The 26 September 2022 Nord Stream Events: Insights...
Third thumbnail for: The 26 September 2022 Nord Stream Events: Insights...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1990
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1990) 80 (6B): 1874–1892.
... modulations indicative of ripple-firing. These include a number of offshore events, which appear to be underwater explosions. The modulations for the offshore events may have been caused by bubble pulse interference effects and/or underwater reverberations. Amplitude ratios of Pn/Sn and Pn/Lg , measured off...