1-20 OF 1288 RESULTS FOR

tomograms

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 26 May 2015
Interpretation (2015) 3 (3): SY27–SY40.
... zone. We evaluated the seismic data interpretations by comparison with data obtained by trenching and logging deposits across the Washington fault, and by drill-core sampling and video logging of boreholes penetrating imaged deposits along the Mercur fault. The seismic tomograms provided critical...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Outcrops and well logs as a practicum for calibrat...
Second thumbnail for: Outcrops and well logs as a practicum for calibrat...
Third thumbnail for: Outcrops and well logs as a practicum for calibrat...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2013
Vadose Zone Journal (2013) 12 (3): vzj2012.0208.
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Morphological Functions to Quantify Three-Dimensio...
Second thumbnail for: Morphological Functions to Quantify Three-Dimensio...
Third thumbnail for: Morphological Functions to Quantify Three-Dimensio...
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.9781560802259.ch22
EISBN: 9781560802259
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 20 June 2007
Geophysics (2007) 72 (4): J31–J41.
... an image (tomogram) of the distribution of velocity between the boreholes. Because of the strong contrast that exists between the EM-wave velocity of water ( 0.03 m / ns ) and that of dry earth materials (∼0.15 m/ns), the velocities obtained with crosshole GPR tomography are highly correlated...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Improving crosshole radar velocity <span class="se...
Second thumbnail for: Improving crosshole radar velocity <span class="se...
Third thumbnail for: Improving crosshole radar velocity <span class="se...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 01 June 1995
Geophysics (1995) 60 (3): 651–659.
...Mark E. Mathisen; Paul Cunningham; Jesse Shaw; Anthony A. Vasiliou; J. H. Justice; N. J. Guinzy Abstract S-wave, P-wave, and Poisson's ratio tomograms have been used to interpret the 3-D distribution of rock and fluid properties during an early phase of a California heavy oil sand steamflood. Four...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 06 March 2017
Geophysics (2017) 82 (3): U37–U48.
.... The final investigation is the application of the new polynomial sand curve prior to the polynomial test tomogram for the whole 3D survey. The production and polynomial test tomograms and application of statics are compared. Soil mechanics provides the theoretical basis for a relationship between...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Sand curve facelift: Empirical to polynomial model...
Second thumbnail for: Sand curve facelift: Empirical to polynomial model...
Third thumbnail for: Sand curve facelift: Empirical to polynomial model...
Image
Velocities near the wells from the tomogram panels. The black lines are for well B5; solid line from tomogram C5-B5; dashed line from tomogram B5-B3. The gray lines are for well B3; solid line from tomogram B3-C2; dashed line from tomogram B5-B3. Except for a zone between 5 to 8 m, the velocities are very similar between tomograms.
Published: 01 September 2006
Figure 11 Velocities near the wells from the tomogram panels. The black lines are for well B5; solid line from tomogram C5-B5; dashed line from tomogram B5-B3. The gray lines are for well B3; solid line from tomogram B3-C2; dashed line from tomogram B5-B3. Except for a zone between 5 to 8 m
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 01 June 1995
Geophysics (1995) 60 (3): 631–650.
...Mark E. Mathisen; Anthony A. Vasiliou; Paul Cunningham; J. Shaw; J. H. Justice; N. J. Guinzy Abstract Time-lapse crosswell seismic data acquired with a cemented receiver cable have been processed into P - and S -wave tomograms which image heavy oil sand lithofacies and changes as a result of steam...
Image
The (a) FWI, (b) WT, and (c) NML tomograms. (d) The FWI tomogram using the NML tomogram as the initial model.
Published: 10 June 2020
Figure 14. The (a) FWI, (b) WT, and (c) NML tomograms. (d) The FWI tomogram using the NML tomogram as the initial model.
Image
P-wave velocity tomogram obtained from (a) the 2D tomogram, (b) 2D raypath density image, (c) 3D tomogram over the Washington fault scarp in Arizona, and (d) ground truth extracted from a nearby trench log obtained several years after the seismic experiment. The solid-black slanted lines indicate faults shown on the tomogram and trench, the dashed-black lines are possible faults shown on tomogram but not on the trench, and the green blob delineates a colluvial wedge.
Published: 26 May 2015
Figure 6. P-wave velocity tomogram obtained from (a) the 2D tomogram, (b) 2D raypath density image, (c) 3D tomogram over the Washington fault scarp in Arizona, and (d) ground truth extracted from a nearby trench log obtained several years after the seismic experiment. The solid-black slanted
Image
Comparisons of the velocity models for the (a) initial model, (b) FWI tomogram, (c) RFWI tomogram, and (d) MRPI + MD tomogram.
Published: 19 December 2019
Figure 20. Comparisons of the velocity models for the (a) initial model, (b) FWI tomogram, (c) RFWI tomogram, and (d) MRPI + MD tomogram.
Image
(a) West well and (d) East well gamma ray and resistivity logs with main sand zones highlighted correlated to the interpretation of the sand zones on (b) P-wave velocity (Vp) tomogram and (c) S-wave velocity (Vs) tomogram. The dashed white lines mark the estimated borders of the sand zones on the tomograms.
Published: 14 December 2023
Figure 15 (a) West well and (d) East well gamma ray and resistivity logs with main sand zones highlighted correlated to the interpretation of the sand zones on (b) P-wave velocity (Vp) tomogram and (c) S-wave velocity (Vs) tomogram. The dashed white lines mark the estimated borders of the sand
Image
Magnified views of the dashed box A in Figure 9 for the (a) true model, (c) FWI, and (e) MPI tomograms and magnified views of the dashed box B in Figure 9 for the (b) true model, (d) FWI, and (f) MPI tomograms. The MPI tomograms more closely resemble the Marmousi model compared with the FWI tomograms.
Published: 13 February 2018
Figure 10. Magnified views of the dashed box A in Figure  9 for the (a) true model, (c) FWI, and (e) MPI tomograms and magnified views of the dashed box B in Figure  9 for the (b) true model, (d) FWI, and (f) MPI tomograms. The MPI tomograms more closely resemble the Marmousi model compared
Image
Comparisons of the migration images computed from the (a) initial model, (b) FWI tomogram, (c) RFWI tomogram, and (d) MRPI + MD tomogram.
Published: 19 December 2019
Figure 21. Comparisons of the migration images computed from the (a) initial model, (b) FWI tomogram, (c) RFWI tomogram, and (d) MRPI + MD tomogram.
Image
Slices through the 3D tomographic model. (a) Line 500 tomogram with colormap optimized for the region above the chimney. The black star marks the depth of burial. (b) Line 600 tomogram with colormap optimized for the region above the chimney. (c) Line 500 tomogram with colormap optimized for the region around the detonation point. (d) Line 600 tomogram with colormap optimized for the region around the detonation point.
Published: 27 October 2020
Figure 8. Slices through the 3D tomographic model. (a) Line 500 tomogram with colormap optimized for the region above the chimney. The black star marks the depth of burial. (b) Line 600 tomogram with colormap optimized for the region above the chimney. (c) Line 500 tomogram with colormap
Image
Slices through tomograms of a quartz crystal. (A) Imaged using no binning. (B) Edge-detected version of the unbinned tomogram. (C) Imaged using 2 × 2 binning of pixels in the charge-coupled device detector. (D) Edge-detected version of the binned tomogram. The higher spatial resolution in the unbinned tomograms is evident.
Published: 01 December 2013
Figure 4. Slices through tomograms of a quartz crystal. (A) Imaged using no binning. (B) Edge-detected version of the unbinned tomogram. (C) Imaged using 2 × 2 binning of pixels in the charge-coupled device detector. (D) Edge-detected version of the binned tomogram. The higher spatial resolution
Image
(a) Comparison of the misfit curves for the production tomogram and (b) the polynomial test tomogram. The significance of these curves is the lower misfit for the polynomial test compared with the production tomogram.
Published: 06 March 2017
Figure 21. (a) Comparison of the misfit curves for the production tomogram and (b) the polynomial test tomogram. The significance of these curves is the lower misfit for the polynomial test compared with the production tomogram.
Image
Comparisons of the migration images computed from (a) true velocity model, (b) initial velocity model, (c) FWI tomogram, (d) RFWI tomogram, and (e) MRPI + MD tomogram.
Published: 19 December 2019
Figure 18. Comparisons of the migration images computed from (a) true velocity model, (b) initial velocity model, (c) FWI tomogram, (d) RFWI tomogram, and (e) MRPI + MD tomogram.
Image
Qademah COG and associated tomograms (Li and Schuster, 2016): (a) The COG (offset = 50 m), (b) P-wave velocity tomogram inverted from the first-arrival traveltimes, (c) 1D S-wave velocity tomogram inverted from the dispersion-curve data, and (d) S-wave velocity tomogram inverted from the 2D WD inversion of the dispersion-curves data.
Published: 01 June 2017
Figure 7. Qademah COG and associated tomograms ( Li and Schuster, 2016 ): (a) The COG (offset = 50 m), (b) P-wave velocity tomogram inverted from the first-arrival traveltimes, (c) 1D S-wave velocity tomogram inverted from the dispersion-curve data, and (d) S-wave velocity tomogram inverted from
Image
Resistivity tomograms obtained at the railway tunnel construction site in Korea. (a) Resistivity tomogram with a fixed Lagrangian multiplier in the inversion, a conventional approach. (b) Resistivity tomogram using the ACB method along with acoustic televiewer image and borehole logging data. Also shown on the resistivity tomogram are the geologic interpretation results.
Published: 10 February 2003
F IG . 10. Resistivity tomograms obtained at the railway tunnel construction site in Korea. (a) Resistivity tomogram with a fixed Lagrangian multiplier in the inversion, a conventional approach. (b) Resistivity tomogram using the ACB method along with acoustic televiewer image and borehole