1-20 OF 521 RESULTS FOR

third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 28 February 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (3): 1049–1081.
... for the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3), with the goal being to represent aftershocks, induced seismicity, and otherwise triggered events as a potential basis for operational earthquake forecasting (OEF). Specifically, we add an epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) component...
FIGURES | View All (27)
Journal Article
Published: 09 September 2021
The Seismic Record (2021) 1 (2): 117–125.
...Edward H. Field; Kevin R. Milner; Morgan T. Page; William H. Savran; Nicholas van der Elst Abstract We describe recent improvements to the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast ETAS Model (UCERF3‐ETAS), which continues to represent our most advanced and complete earthquake forecast...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 12 July 2017
Seismological Research Letters (2017) 88 (5): 1259–1267.
.... Arrowsmith R. J. Biasi G. P. Bird P. Dawson T. E. Felzer K. R. Jackson D. D. Johnson K. M. Jordan T. H. , and Madden C. , et al. 2015 . Long‐term, time‐dependent probabilities for the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 10 March 2015
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2015) 105 (2A): 511–543.
... Abstract The 2014 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP 2014) presents time‐dependent earthquake probabilities for the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3). Building on the UCERF3 time‐independent model published previously, renewal models are utilized...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Journal Article
Published: 04 March 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (3): 1567–1578.
... min of the 4 July 2019 M 6.4 Searles Valley earthquake. UCERF3‐ETAS, an extension of the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3), is the first comprehensive, fault‐based, epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. It produces ensembles of synthetic aftershock sequences both...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 08 June 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (5): 2846–2861.
... time or lognormal models. For other datasets drawn from the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast study of California earthquakes and from the southern Alpine fault of New Zealand, MaxEnt recurrence probabilities similarly differ by up to a factor of nearly 2.0 from estimates published...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 25 May 2022
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (4): 1806–1824.
...Kevin R. Milner; Bruce E. Shaw; Edward H. Field ABSTRACT We propose a new model for determining the set of plausible multifault ruptures in an interconnected fault system. We improve upon the rules used in the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) to increase connectivity...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Published: 13 February 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (2): 729–741.
...Morgan T. Page; Nicholas J. van der Elst Abstract Epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) catalogs generated from the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) model are unique in that they are the first to combine a complex, fault‐based long‐term forecast with short‐term...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 25 September 2023
Seismological Research Letters (2023)
... faults. The first edition version 1.0 (v.1.0) was modeled on datasets underpinning the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) and builds on and significantly improves previous NZ compilations. Key improvements include documentation of the data underlying these parameters...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2017
Earthquake Spectra (2017) 33 (4): 1279–1299.
...Edward Field, M. EERI; Keith Porter, M. EERI; Kevin Milner, M. EERI We present a prototype operational loss model based on UCERF3-ETAS, which is the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast with an Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) component. As such, UCERF3-ETAS represents...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 03 November 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (1): 391–397.
...Morgan T. Page ABSTRACT Did the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) go overboard with multifault ruptures? Schwartz (2018) argues that there are too many long ruptures in the model. Here, I address his concern and show that the UCERF3 rupture‐length distribution matches...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 03 October 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (6): 2337–2346.
...Edward H. Field; Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities ABSTRACT This article discusses ways in which earthquake rupture forecast models might be improved. Because changes are most easily described in the context of specific models, the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 18 April 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (4): 1420–1434.
... developed the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (UCERF3‐ETAS) model. We find that the inclusion of faults only makes a difference for hazard and risk metrics that are dominated by large‐event likelihoods. We also show how the ShakeMap of a mainshock...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 05 October 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (1): 527–537.
...Edward H. Field; Kevin R. Milner; Nicolas Luco ABSTRACT We use the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model (UCERF3‐ETAS) to evaluate the effects of declustering and Poisson assumptions on seismic hazard estimates. Although...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 17 November 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (1): 371–390.
... be a high priority in any hazard assessment). Opportunity is also taken to address common concerns and misunderstandings associated with the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, including the seemingly disproportionate number of large‐magnitude events, and how well hazard is resolved given...
FIGURES | View All (22)
Image
Observed historical <span class="search-highlight">rupture</span> lengths ( Wells and Youngs, 2013 ) compared wit...
Published: 03 November 2020
Figure 1. Observed historical rupture lengths ( Wells and Youngs, 2013 ) compared with rupture lengths from Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, version 2 (UCERF2) and the mean long‐term time‐dependent third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3‐TD) model. Error bars
Image
The southern San Andreas fault ( SSAF ) and southern <span class="search-highlight">California</span> seismicity ...
Published: 16 June 2015
Figure 1. The southern San Andreas fault ( SSAF ) and southern California seismicity (the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast [UCERF3] catalog; Felzer, 2013 ). The historical earthquake epicenters (1850–1931) are based on felt reports and have rather large errors compared
Image
Example 100‐year slice from a 10,000‐year <span class="search-highlight">third</span> <span class="search-highlight">Uniform</span> <span class="search-highlight">California</span> Earthqua...
Published: 18 April 2018
Figure 1. Example 100‐year slice from a 10,000‐year third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (U3ETAS) simulation (red) and comparison to a Poisson model (black), for which event times have been randomized to produce the latter. (a) Occurrence
Image
Three‐dimensional perspective view of the <span class="search-highlight">third</span> <span class="search-highlight">Uniform</span> <span class="search-highlight">California</span> Earthqua...
Published: 10 March 2015
Figure 1. Three‐dimensional perspective view of the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3). The small black rectangular elements represent the 2606 fault subsections used in the forecast (for one of the two fault models, FM3.1). The along‐strike length of each subsection
Image
An example 100 yr statewide time series of  M  ≥ 6 events (upper panel) and...
Published: 09 September 2021
Figure 1. An example 100 yr statewide time series of M ≥ 6 events (upper panel) and the monthly rate of M ≥ 2.5 events (lower panel). The red line and circles represent results from the third uniform California earthquake rupture forecast epidemic‐type aftershock sequence model (UCERF3‐ETAS