1-20 OF 161 RESULTS FOR

tetraferroplatinum

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Top part of ternary diagram of the tetraferroplatinum group of Pt-Fe alloys (PtFe–Pt2FeNi–Pt2FeCu) from Mooihoek (n = 34) in terms of Fe–Ni–Cu. Tetraferroplatinum = red, ferronickelplatinum = yellow, and tulameenite = blue.
Published: 20 July 2023
Fig. 8. Top part of ternary diagram of the tetraferroplatinum group of Pt-Fe alloys (PtFe–Pt 2 FeNi–Pt 2 FeCu) from Mooihoek (n = 34) in terms of Fe–Ni–Cu. Tetraferroplatinum = red, ferronickelplatinum = yellow, and tulameenite = blue.
Image
The associations of PGMs in the Mt. Rudnaya fine-grained ores; backscattered electron images. (A) Atokite crystals and Pt3Fe2 rim around a coarser grain of tetraferroplatinum (sample RM 10). (B) Porous tetraferroplatinum grain with dissemination and overgrowths of smaller PGM grains (sample RM 1). (C) Porous texture of a PGM intergrowth; detail of B (sample RM 1). (D) Skeletal tetraferroplatinum overgrown by smaller PGM grains (sample RM 30). (E) Porous Pt2Fe intergrown with cooperite (sample RM 1). (F) Porous Pt3Fe2 with smaller rustenburgite and atokite crystals attached (sample RM 10). PtFe = tetraferroplatinum, PtS = cooperite, (Pt, Pd)3Sn = Pd-rich rustenburgite, (Pd, Pt)3Sn = Pt-rich atokite. Black background = mainly ISS.
Published: 01 September 2020
Fig. 8. The associations of PGMs in the Mt. Rudnaya fine-grained ores; backscattered electron images. (A) Atokite crystals and Pt 3 Fe 2 rim around a coarser grain of tetraferroplatinum (sample RM 10). (B) Porous tetraferroplatinum grain with dissemination and overgrowths of smaller PGM grains
Image
Back-scattered electron images of PGE minerals from the placer deposit of the Levtyrinyvayam River. A. Osmium crystals with hollingworthite, which is rimmed by tulameenite in a grain of isoferroplatinum. B. Osarsite and hollingworthite occurring at the margin of osmium crystals in a grain of isoferroplatinum. C. Osarsite and erlichmanite associated with tetraferroplatinum occuring at the margin of a grain of isoferroplatinum. D. Osmium is intergrown with a erlichmanite in isoferroplatinum. Tetraferroplatinum rims the host isoferroplatinum. E. Platarsite with tetraferroplatinum replaces isoferroplatinum along the periphery. F. Isoferroplatinum grain with erlichmanite inclusion rimmed by tulameenite.
Published: 01 April 2004
in a grain of isoferroplatinum. C. Osarsite and erlichmanite associated with tetraferroplatinum occuring at the margin of a grain of isoferroplatinum. D. Osmium is intergrown with a erlichmanite in isoferroplatinum. Tetraferroplatinum rims the host isoferroplatinum. E. Platarsite with tetraferroplatinum
Journal Article
Published: 29 September 2023
The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology (2023) 61 (5): 1021–1030.
... extracted from a heavy-mineral concentrate obtained from crushed lode chromitites and alluvial material. Sidorovite occurs either as a part of complex grains comprising tetraferroplatinum, native iron, hollingworthite, magnetite, serpentine, and chromite or as part of secondary rims which formed together...
FIGURES
Image
Various textures in Pt-Fe alloys; all BSE images. (A) A 140 μm composite grain of isoferroplatinum (Ifp) and tetraferroplatinum (Tfpl). The three arrows point to differences in their contacts; the two outer arrows shows a close sharp contact, whereas the middle arrow indicates a gap. (B) An 80 μm irregular composite grain of isoferroplatinum (Ifp) with areas of tulameenite (Tul). Two arrows indicate gaps between the two phases. (C) A 120 μm euhedral crystal of tetraferroplatinum with darker bands of Ni-rich tetraferroplatinum (arrows). The bottom-right arrow shows possible deformation of the bands along the edge. (D) The banded portion of a 90 μm isoferroplatinum (Ifp) grain with dark (BSE) bands (arrows) of tulameenite (Tul). The dashed lines follow the curved pattern that suggests deformation after band formation. (E) A 160 μm composite grain with irregular areas (dark BSE) of tetraferroplatinum (Tfpl) and tulameenite (Tul) in isoferroplatinum (Ifp). The contact between the Tfpl and Ifp does not have any gaps for most areas. The arrow indicates a magnetite inclusion with <1 wt.% TiO2 (EDS).
Published: 13 September 2021
Fig. 9. Various textures in Pt-Fe alloys; all BSE images. (A) A 140 μm composite grain of isoferroplatinum (Ifp) and tetraferroplatinum (Tfpl). The three arrows point to differences in their contacts; the two outer arrows shows a close sharp contact, whereas the middle arrow indicates a gap. (B
Image
PGM grains extracted from clinopyroxenite and gabbro. A. Isoferroplatinum from clinopyroxenite. B. Skeletal grain of isoferroplatinum (light-colored) with tetraferroplatinum (grey), from clinopyroxenite. C. Isoferroplatinum with a margin of tetraferroplatinum, from gabbro. D. Sperrylite from gabbro.
Published: 01 December 2011
Fig. 8 PGM grains extracted from clinopyroxenite and gabbro. A. Isoferroplatinum from clinopyroxenite. B. Skeletal grain of isoferroplatinum (light-colored) with tetraferroplatinum (grey), from clinopyroxenite. C. Isoferroplatinum with a margin of tetraferroplatinum, from gabbro. D. Sperrylite
Image
Platinum-group minerals extracted from the fine-grained dunite. A. Native Os (1) with isoferroplatinum 2), tetraferroplatinum (3) from allotriomorphic dunite. B. Native Os (1) and isoferroplatinum (2) with a margin of tetraferroplatinum (3). C. Idiomorphic grains of isoferroplatinum from allotriomorphic dunite. D. Idiomorphic grain of isoferroplatinum from cumulus dunite.
Published: 01 December 2011
Fig. 7 Platinum-group minerals extracted from the fine-grained dunite. A. Native Os (1) with isoferroplatinum 2), tetraferroplatinum (3) from allotriomorphic dunite. B. Native Os (1) and isoferroplatinum (2) with a margin of tetraferroplatinum (3). C. Idiomorphic grains of isoferroplatinum from
Image
Composition of the tulameenite–tetraferroplatinum series from the Goodnews Bay placer in terms of PtCu –PtFe – PtNi, in comparison with some occurrences in Alaskan-type complexes; Yubdo (Cabri et al. 1981, Evstigneeva et al. 1992), Tulameen (Nixon et al. 1990), Nizhne Tagil’skiy (Genkin 1997). Ideal compositions: tulameenite: Pt2CuFe, tetraferroplatinum: PtFe, ferro-nickelplatinum: Pt2FeNi.
Published: 01 April 2002
F ig . 4. Composition of the tulameenite–tetraferroplatinum series from the Goodnews Bay placer in terms of PtCu –PtFe – PtNi, in comparison with some occurrences in Alaskan-type complexes; Yubdo ( Cabri et al. 1981 , Evstigneeva et al. 1992 ), Tulameen ( Nixon et al. 1990 ), Nizhne
Image
Published: 29 September 2023
TABLE 2. X-RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION DATA (d IN Å) FOR SIDOROVITE AND TETRAFERROPLATINUM
Journal Article
Published: 26 February 2021
Mineralogical Magazine (2021) 85 (2): 254–261.
... in isoferroplatinum (Pt 3 Fe) grains extracted from a heavy-mineral concentrate, together with tetraferroplatinum (PtFe), tulameenite (Pt 2 FeCu), native iridium, hollingworthite (RhAsS) and Cr-rich spinel. Kufahrite occurs as part of alteration rims which are formed together with tetraferroplatinum after...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Top part of ternary diagram of the tetraferroplatinum group Pt-Fe alloys (in at.%) from Onverwacht (n = 28) in terms of (Fe + Sb) – Ni – Cu).
Published: 08 November 2021
Fig. 9. Top part of ternary diagram of the tetraferroplatinum group Pt-Fe alloys (in at.%) from Onverwacht (n = 28) in terms of (Fe + Sb) – Ni – Cu).
Image
Composition diagrams for tetraferroplatinum group minerals (at.%) from chromitites (a–d) and placers (e–h). For explanation, see Fig. 2.
Published: 01 January 2020
Fig. 3. Composition diagrams for tetraferroplatinum group minerals (at.%) from chromitites ( a – d ) and placers ( e – h ). For explanation, see Fig. 2 .
Image
Cu–Ni–Fe composition diagrams for tetraferroplatinum group minerals (at.%) from chromitites of the Nizhnii Tagil (1) and Veresovyi Bor (2) massifs. Asterisks mark the points of the ideal compositions of minerals.
Published: 01 January 2020
Fig. 4. Cu–Ni–Fe composition diagrams for tetraferroplatinum group minerals (at.%) from chromitites of the Nizhnii Tagil ( 1 ) and Veresovyi Bor ( 2 ) massifs. Asterisks mark the points of the ideal compositions of minerals.
Image
Metasomatic aggregates of tetraferroplatinum group minerals replacing primary Pt–Fe minerals of the Veresovyi Bor (a–d) and Nizhnii Tagil (e, f) massifs. Pt–Ox, oxygen-containing platinum-group minerals. SEM (BSE mode) and reflected-light (with a microprobe) images (c).
Published: 01 January 2020
Fig. 13. Metasomatic aggregates of tetraferroplatinum group minerals replacing primary Pt–Fe minerals of the Veresovyi Bor ( a – d ) and Nizhnii Tagil ( e , f ) massifs. Pt–Ox, oxygen-containing platinum-group minerals. SEM (BSE mode) and reflected-light (with a microprobe) images ( c ).
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1996
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (1996) 37 (5): 38–47.
...E. F. Sinyakova; Zh. N. Fedorova; V. S. Pavlyuchenko Moderate sulfur part of the Fe–Ni–S system with an addition of 1 wt.% Pt was investigated by means of synthesis from melt and further annealing at 800 °C and 600 °C. Three forms of platinum were established: 1) tetraferroplatinum, (Fe, Ni) Pt...
FIGURES
Image
Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002) in terms of the plot of Fe versus Cu + Ni (A), of the atomic PGE:(Fe + Cu + Ni) ratio versus a total PGE content (B), versus Fe (C), and versus Cu + Ni (D), Fe versus PGE (E), and Cu + Ni versus PGE (F). The values are expressed in apfu (∑atoms = 4).
Published: 01 October 2005
F ig . 8. Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002 ) in terms of the plot of Fe
Image
Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002) in terms of the plot of Fe versus Cu + Ni (A), of the atomic PGE:(Fe + Cu + Ni) ratio versus a total PGE content (B), versus Fe (C), and versus Cu + Ni (D), Fe versus PGE (E), and Cu + Ni versus PGE (F). The values are expressed in apfu (∑atoms = 4).
Published: 01 October 2005
F ig . 8. Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002 ) in terms of the plot of Fe
Image
Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002) in terms of the plot of Fe versus Cu + Ni (A), of the atomic PGE:(Fe + Cu + Ni) ratio versus a total PGE content (B), versus Fe (C), and versus Cu + Ni (D), Fe versus PGE (E), and Cu + Ni versus PGE (F). The values are expressed in apfu (∑atoms = 4).
Published: 01 October 2005
F ig . 8. Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002 ) in terms of the plot of Fe
Image
Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002) in terms of the plot of Fe versus Cu + Ni (A), of the atomic PGE:(Fe + Cu + Ni) ratio versus a total PGE content (B), versus Fe (C), and versus Cu + Ni (D), Fe versus PGE (E), and Cu + Ni versus PGE (F). The values are expressed in apfu (∑atoms = 4).
Published: 01 October 2005
F ig . 8. Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002 ) in terms of the plot of Fe
Image
Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002) in terms of the plot of Fe versus Cu + Ni (A), of the atomic PGE:(Fe + Cu + Ni) ratio versus a total PGE content (B), versus Fe (C), and versus Cu + Ni (D), Fe versus PGE (E), and Cu + Ni versus PGE (F). The values are expressed in apfu (∑atoms = 4).
Published: 01 October 2005
F ig . 8. Compositional variations of the tetraferroplatinum–tulameenite series observed in placer deposits from British Columbia (squares with inscribed crosses: this study) and from the Salmon River placer, Goodnews Bay, Alaska (triangles: Tolstykh et al. 2002 ) in terms of the plot of Fe