1-20 OF 2461 RESULTS FOR

synform

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 24 June 2016
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2016) 53 (7): 666–673.
...Petr Štorch; Štěpán Manda; Ladislav Slavík; Zuzana Tasáryová Abstract Wenlock–Ludlow boundary beds exposed near Nesvačily in the Prague Synform are documented in terms of their lithology, faunal content, high-resolution record of 19 graptolite species, graptolite biostratigraphy...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/SP414.14
EISBN: 9781862397156
... the dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm, were constrained by upgraded conodont biozonation across the Lau Event interval (LEI). Two sections (Pozary and Muslovka) representing shallow-water facies in the Prague Synform were studied. Conodont data and DTW alignment show that Muslovka represents a less...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2012
Geological Magazine (2012) 149 (6): 1089–1106.
...PETR ŠTORCH; JIŘÍ FRÝDA Abstract Study of the lower Silurian black shale succession of the Prague Synform has enabled detailed insight into graptolite faunal dynamics and diversity trends from the mid-Aeronian diversity maximum through to the late Aeronian crisis. Graptolite diversity decreased...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1144/SP349.10
EISBN: 9781862395978
... Abstract The Forcarei Synform is a kilometric fold developed in the hinterland of the NW Iberian Variscan belt. A detailed analysis of the synform, based on quartz fabrics and kinematic markers, shows pervasively deformed rocks that have been continuously deformed during the last two main...
FIGURES | View All (15)
... Silurian effusive basalts and volcaniclastics compose the Svatý Jan volcanic center, which is located in the northwestern limb of the Prague synform, where three major volcanic phases have been recognized: the first one of early to mid-Wenlock and the last of mid-Ludlow age. Two alkaline...
Published: 01 February 2002
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2364-7.17
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 October 2001
GSA Bulletin (2001) 113 (10): 1282–1298.
...K.A. Hickey; T.H. Bell Abstract Determining the timing of macroscopic folds of bedding in multiply deformed terrains is difficult, especially for rocks that have undergone a succession of overprinting near-orthogonal deformations. The Spring Hill synform in southeast Vermont is an example...
FIGURES | View All (21)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 1989
Geological Magazine (1989) 126 (1): 73–77.
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1981
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1981) 22 (8): 383–390.
...H. C. Khanduri; R. K. Srivastava; V. K. S. Dave Abstract Within the Dudhatoli Group in the southern limb of Dudhatoli synform four mappable units have been recognised viz., the Dudhatoli granitoids, Dudhatoli schist, Flaggy quartzite and the Manila phyllite. In the area under study two generations...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1975
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1975) 16 (4): 470–474.
...V. C. Thakur; A. K. Jain Abstract The deformed shapes of pebbles indicate that both the limbs of the Pangin Synform have suffered flattening-type deformation - the normal limb has undergone greater magnitude of flattening than the inverted limb. The longest axes of the pebbles, representing maximum...
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1964
Geological Magazine (1964) 101 (3): 260–270.
... of the Loch Tay nappe. Folds of the second episode are not known from adjacent areas but are identical to folds mapped in upper Glen Lyon. Those of the third deformation are associated with formation of the Ben Lawers synform. GeoRef, Copyright 2004, American Geological Institute. Reference includes data...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 18 July 2022
Geology (2022) 50 (10): 1121–1124.
... head gradients that typify deep saline aquifers. For example, a fluid contact with 0.5% density contrast exceeds 2° tilt for hydraulic head gradients of only 15 cm/km. Many large and basin-scale synformal traps are formed with structural dips of just a few degrees and therefore cannot trap CO 2...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 12 January 2022
Petroleum Geoscience (2022) 28 (1): petgeo2021-074.
... differences when exploring for negative as opposed to positive buoyancy traps are examined here. Trap spatial scale is a consideration due to the inherent long-wavelength synformal geometry of basins. Antiforms are areally restricted relative to synforms, which may be embedded within larger-scale synformal...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
(a) An antiform and synform in a reservoir interbedded with impermeable seals under hydrostatic conditions. Fluid contacts are horizontal. (b) The same reservoir geometry as in (a) under hydrodynamic conditions in brine, with the hydraulic head decreasing from left to right and causing the brine to flow along the pressure gradient and contacts to become tilted.
Published: 25 July 2024
Fig. 3. ( a ) An antiform and synform in a reservoir interbedded with impermeable seals under hydrostatic conditions. Fluid contacts are horizontal. ( b ) The same reservoir geometry as in (a) under hydrodynamic conditions in brine, with the hydraulic head decreasing from left to right
Image
Main Synform, Ps1, Ayagaq Lake formation stereoplots. Great circles are calculated mean planes for S0 and S1 using maximum pole concentrations. RP is the calculated rotation pole for cylindrical folding, i.e., the ideal fold axis: (a) poles to S0 with calculated mean S0 dipping 29° → 196° (b) to S1 dipping 29° → 224°. (c) Poles to S2; L1 and L2 fold axes and intersection lineations. Circled region (red) is mean vector for combined D2 fold axes and intersection lineations.
Published: 26 June 2023
Fig. 14. Main Synform , Ps1, Ayagaq Lake formation stereoplots. Great circles are calculated mean planes for S 0 and S 1 using maximum pole concentrations. RP is the calculated rotation pole for cylindrical folding, i.e., the ideal fold axis: ( a ) poles to S 0 with calculated mean S 0
Image
Main Synform, Ps2 stereograms. (a) Resort Lake formation π-plot of S0, S1, S2, L1, L2. (b) Aluminum River formation π-plot of S0, S1, S2, L1, L2. Mean S0 16° → 240°, mean S1 10° → 218°, and mean S2 78° → 152°. (c) Aluminum River D1 and D2 fold hinges and intersection lineations (see text).
Published: 26 June 2023
Fig. 15. Main Synform , Ps2 stereograms. ( a ) Resort Lake formation π-plot of S 0 , S 1 , S 2 , L 1 , L 2 . ( b ) Aluminum River formation π-plot of S 0 , S 1 , S 2 , L 1 , L 2 . Mean S 0 16° → 240°, mean S 1 10° → 218°, and mean S 2 78° → 152°. ( c ) Aluminum River D 1 and D 2 fold hinges
Image
Main Synform, Ps3 stereoplots. (a) Three Lakes formation. π-plot of S0 (32° → 210°) and S1 foliations (33° → 218°). (b) Oora Lake formation. Plot of S0, S1, S2, L1, and L2 (see text). (c) Showing Lake formation. Plot of S0, S1, S2, L1, and L2. (c) Showing Lake formation. Rotation poles of best-fit models and D1 and D2 lineations are tightly clustered.
Published: 26 June 2023
Fig. 16. Main Synform , Ps3 stereoplots. ( a ) Three Lakes formation. π-plot of S 0 (32° → 210°) and S 1 foliations (33° → 218°). ( b ) Oora Lake formation. Plot of S 0 , S 1 , S 2 , L 1 , and L 2 (see text). ( c ) Showing Lake formation. Plot of S 0 , S 1 , S 2 , L 1 , and L 2 . ( c
Image
Oval Synform stereoplots. (a) Ayagaq Lake formation. Plot of S0, (13° → 037°) S1, S2 (53° → 173°), L1, and L2. (b) Resort Lake formation. Plot of S0, S1, L1, and L2. (c) Five Mile Lake, Three Lakes formations. Plot of S0, S1, S2, L1, and L2. (d) Oora Lake formation. Plot of S0, S1, S2, L1, and L2. (e) Showing Lake formation. π-plot of S0 foliations. Great circle is mean S0 plane to S0-pole maximum. (f) Showing Lake formation. π-plot of S1 foliations. Great circle is mean S1 plane to S1-pole maximum.
Published: 26 June 2023
Fig. 17. Oval Synform stereoplots. ( a ) Ayagaq Lake formation. Plot of S 0 , (13° → 037°) S 1 , S 2 (53° → 173°), L 1 , and L 2 . ( b ) Resort Lake formation. Plot of S 0 , S 1 , L 1 , and L 2 . ( c ) Five Mile Lake, Three Lakes formations. Plot of S 0 , S 1 , S 2 , L 1 , and L 2 . ( d ) Oora
Image
Detailed geometric interpretation of the Main Synform. (a) Detail of northeastern synform closure from Fig. 3. Fold axial traces shown as examples on Fig. 3 can be seen in detail here. A large initially recumbent F1b fold (yellow axial trace) defined within the Showing Lake formation is overprinted by shorter amplitude F1c folds with axial traces (purple lines). The main structure is defined by D2 folds with orientations of D2 axial traces varying between Ps1 and Ps3; the degree of mismatch suggests relative displacement of the sequences within Ps2. Vergence of the traced F1b minor folds on the limbs of F2 are antisymmetric for a westerly plunging syncline and demonstrate overprinting character of F2. (b) Orthographic block diagram of Main Synform (see Fig. 3 for location. Details of construction are given in the text). The block diagram is an extended view of the Main Synform of which (a) formed the central surface map. Individual blocks within the synform have been adjusted for late fault displacements to provide a common reference elevation. The overturned F2 axial plane (skeletal orange plane) defines the open regional structure. The southeast limit is determined by the steeply dipping, faulted Medial Zone. The 3D structure comprises formal projection of the Oora Lake–Showing Lake contact as the cross-hatched surface. The resulting structure is that of large, early D1 noncoaxial folds (NCF). Removal of D2 rotations reveals sheath folds orientated generally northeast–southwest.
Published: 26 June 2023
Fig. 20. Detailed geometric interpretation of the Main Synform . ( a ) Detail of northeastern synform closure from Fig. 3 . Fold axial traces shown as examples on Fig. 3 can be seen in detail here. A large initially recumbent F 1b fold (yellow axial trace) defined within the Showing Lake
Image
Retrodeformed cross-section of the Oval Synform along Line 6NW–6SE in Fig. 3 constructed to represent end-D1 geometry. A lowermost recumbent syncline comprising Ps1 and Ps2 units (minus Aluminum River) is separated by a detachment along Three Lakes formation that juxtaposes Ps3 (Oora Lake) units onto Ps1 (Ayagaq Lake). Another detachment along Three Lakes duplicates the upper Ps3 sequence that in turn is recumbently folded with these units onto other Ps3 units. The view is along–plunge of large noncoaxial folds in Oora Lake and Showing Lake units with inferred vergences similar to Type 2 interference (sheath) fold. The current surface intersection of the Medial Zone with Line 6NW–6SE is indicated (blue hexagon). An unknown thickness of material overlies the section as presented, but given the observed ductility of the Ps1 orthoquartzite, an additional 7–12 km of structural thickness is conservatively estimated at this point in Oval Synform history.
Published: 26 June 2023
Fig. 21. Retrodeformed cross-section of the Oval Synform along Line 6NW–6SE in Fig. 3 constructed to represent end-D 1 geometry. A lowermost recumbent syncline comprising Ps1 and Ps2 units (minus Aluminum River) is separated by a detachment along Three Lakes formation that juxtaposes Ps3