1-20 OF 130 RESULTS FOR

suprasalt minibasins

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 January 2014
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.14.33.0428
EISBN: 978-0-9836097-9-0
... minibasin strata. Lithofacies distribution, thicknesses, and stratal geometries are analyzed to correlate suprasalt and subsalt Wonoka and Patsy Hill strata within a depositional and halokinetic sequence stratigraphic framework. Wonoka and Patsy Hill strata represent regional deposition in a storm...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2017
AAPG Bulletin (2017) 101 (7): 1035–1071.
... accommodated suprasalt minibasins associated with counterregional and roho salt systems. These three allochthonous salt layers were successively loaded by gravity-flow sediments, resulting in deep (above autochthonous or deep allochthonous salt layers) and shallow (supra-Neogene allochthonous salt) minibasin...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Regional structural setting and evolution of the M...
Second thumbnail for: Regional structural setting and evolution of the M...
Third thumbnail for: Regional structural setting and evolution of the M...
Image
Perspective view of Walker Ridge allochthonous salt mass, viewed at a low angle looking northeastward. TOS = red; BOS = green. Select interpreted salt source regions indicated by arrows; yellow regions (highlighted by north-directed horizontal yellow illumination) are suprasalt minibasins. Depth in meters.
Published: 01 May 2000
Figure 6. Perspective view of Walker Ridge allochthonous salt mass, viewed at a low angle looking northeastward. TOS = red; BOS = green. Select interpreted salt source regions indicated by arrows; yellow regions (highlighted by north-directed horizontal yellow illumination) are suprasalt
Image
NAZ and various WAZ configurations ray-traced in a NE–SW orientation show little difference in illumination over the Jack Field (roughly outlined in black). Fold scale is relative to individual survey design in order to demonstrate fold variability over the field within a particular survey. Areas of lower illumination correlate to top salt structure (white contours; deep suprasalt minibasins denoted in blue dashed lines). Receiver coverage with crossline-inline aspect ratios for a given shot are illustrated to the right of each acquisition design.
Published: 01 November 2007
survey. Areas of lower illumination correlate to top salt structure (white contours; deep suprasalt minibasins denoted in blue dashed lines). Receiver coverage with crossline-inline aspect ratios for a given shot are illustrated to the right of each acquisition design.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2017
AAPG Bulletin (2017) 101 (7): 1073–1108.
... allochthonous salt in and on the evolution of the subbasins and minibasins between 24 Ma and the present. Some of the limits between subbasins are arbitrary. Ages of allochthonous salt (pink rectangles) and timing of inversion of turtle structures (black rectangles) are shown. Where suprasalt basins...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Petroleum geology of the Mississippi Canyon, Atwat...
Second thumbnail for: Petroleum geology of the Mississippi Canyon, Atwat...
Third thumbnail for: Petroleum geology of the Mississippi Canyon, Atwat...
Image
Sequential isochron maps (left) and interpretive maps (right) for 11 stratigraphic intervals of the study area showing the regional stratigraphic and structural development: (A) 24–15.3 Ma, (B) 15.3–13.05 Ma, (C) 13.05–10.75 Ma, (D) 10.75–9.0 Ma, (E) 9.0–7.45 Ma, (F) 7.45–6.2 Ma, (G) 6.2–5.4 Ma, (H) 5.4–4.1 Ma, (I) 4.1–3.6 Ma, (J) 3.6–1.3 Ma, and (K) 1.3 Ma to present. For each interval, the left map includes isochron values (two-way traveltime [TWTT]). Pink shows present distribution of salt in relation to the intervals shown in map; that is, much of the interval may be subsalt. White solid line between salt indicates salt sutures where the shallow salt bodies amalgamated (see figure 4 in Bouroullec and Weimer, 2017, this issue). Ages of reservoirs deposited in each interval for each field are shown. Red outlines with cross hachures indicate the crests of Mississippi Fan fold belt (MFFB) folds where the interval was not deposited or was eroded (after Morris and Weimer, 2004). The right map shows the numbered interpreted minibasins and corresponding stratigraphic external forms (see Figures 7, 12, 14). Black arrows indicate direction of stratigraphic thickening. Groups of four divergent black arrows show position of depositional thick in bowl external forms. Dashed black lines are subbasin boundaries. Thick black dashed lines show sequence lapout limit in the northeastern part of the study area. White lines show the edge of suprasalt minibasins. Locations of seismic profiles in Figures 10–12 are shown. For the 1.3 Ma to present (K) interval, the channels’ outlines shown in the slope are from Shipp (1993), and those shown in the southern part are from the Mississippi Fan Complex (Weimer and Dixon, 1994). E. = East; MC = Mississippi Canyon; Mt. = Mountain; N. = North; NW = Northwest; S = South; W. = West. Note: A color version can be seen in the online version. Legend appears on page 1095.
Published: 01 July 2017
. Groups of four divergent black arrows show position of depositional thick in bowl external forms. Dashed black lines are subbasin boundaries. Thick black dashed lines show sequence lapout limit in the northeastern part of the study area. White lines show the edge of suprasalt minibasins. Locations
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 2023
AAPG Bulletin (2023) 107 (12): 2119–2139.
... and Jackson (2011) argue that the remaining salt must be removed by dissolution. However, they also propose that viscous flow with a shear component, for example due to the horizontal translation of a suprasalt minibasin onto and along base-salt relief, may promote the complete removal of salt from a weld...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Salt welding during canopy advance and shortening ...
Second thumbnail for: Salt welding during canopy advance and shortening ...
Third thumbnail for: Salt welding during canopy advance and shortening ...
Book Chapter

Author(s)
Mark G. Rowan
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.04.24.0390
EISBN: 978-0-9836096-6-7
.... There is a tendency to link subsalt and suprasalt migration scenarios without considering the evolution of the overburden with respect to the timing of hydrocarbon generation and migration. Two possible problems can occur. First, if a suprasalt minibasin is still floored by salt when migration was occurring...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 2014
AAPG Bulletin (2014) 98 (2): 213–226.
...Andrew D. Hanson Abstract Thirty-seven mudstone samples were collected from the uppermost Lower Mudstone Member of the Potrerillos Formation in El Gordo minibasin within La Popa Basin, Mexico. The unit is exposed in a circular pattern at the earth's surface and is intersected by El Gordo diapir...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A surprising asymmetric paleothermal anomaly aroun...
Second thumbnail for: A surprising asymmetric paleothermal anomaly aroun...
Third thumbnail for: A surprising asymmetric paleothermal anomaly aroun...
Image
Chronostratigraphic chart summarizing the succession of stratigraphic external forms (shown by color) for 33 subbasins or minibasins. The subdivision of the study area into subbasins and minibasins is based on the relative position of shallow allochthonous salt in and on the evolution of the subbasins and minibasins between 24 Ma and the present. Some of the limits between subbasins are arbitrary. Ages of allochthonous salt (pink rectangles) and timing of inversion of turtle structures (black rectangles) are shown. Where suprasalt basins in the central to western parts of the area (17–25, 27–33) begin to merge or quickly change geometry after 5.4 Ma, they are shown by undifferentiated purple. The directions of salt evacuation related to wedging are shown for each minibasin or subbasin (several directions are shown if multiple wedges are present per subbasin or minibasin). Orientations of the axes of the trough forms are also shown. See Figure 13 for locations of subbasins and minibasins. Note: A color version can be seen in the online version.
Published: 01 July 2017
of the subbasins and minibasins between 24 Ma and the present. Some of the limits between subbasins are arbitrary. Ages of allochthonous salt (pink rectangles) and timing of inversion of turtle structures (black rectangles) are shown. Where suprasalt basins in the central to western parts of the area (17–25, 27–33
Image
Arbitrary seismic line extracted from a multichannel three-dimensional seismic data set. This line shows several allochthonous salt bodies accommodated between Lower Jurassic (J1) and Middle Jurassic (J2) primary minibasins and Lower Cretaceous (K1) secondary minibasins. A detached suprasalt J1 layer is also interpreted as a megaflap remnant vertically juxtaposed to salt, as it rapidly ascended toward shallower depths. Cz = Cenozoic; Dg = Dagorda; J3 = Upper Jurassic; K2 = Upper Cretaceous; MTD = mass-transport deposits (see Figure 1 for line location); Tr = Triassic; TWT = two-way time.
Published: 01 January 2023
Figure 12. Arbitrary seismic line extracted from a multichannel three-dimensional seismic data set. This line shows several allochthonous salt bodies accommodated between Lower Jurassic (J1) and Middle Jurassic (J2) primary minibasins and Lower Cretaceous (K1) secondary minibasins. A detached
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 May 2012
The Leading Edge (2012) 31 (5): 528–537.
... shown that both absolute and relative acoustic impedance (AAI and RAI, respectively) derived from poststack seismic amplitude inversion can be useful for quantitative estimates of summary reservoir properties such as average porosity, net-to-gross, and others. This includes suprasalt and minibasin...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Quantitative application of poststack acoustic imp...
Second thumbnail for: Quantitative application of poststack acoustic imp...
Third thumbnail for: Quantitative application of poststack acoustic imp...
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 April 2009
The Leading Edge (2009) 28 (4): 448–452.
... tomography. Again, the correct ϵ and δ were used in the migration. As a result of ignoring the tilted symmetry axes, the tomography sped up the velocity by about 6% within the minibasin. The updated velocity field resulted in flat CIGs in the suprasalt layer, but distorted the subsalt structure underneath...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Subsalt imaging using TTI reverse time migration
Second thumbnail for: Subsalt imaging using TTI reverse time migration
Third thumbnail for: Subsalt imaging using TTI reverse time migration
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 15 September 2019
AAPG Bulletin (2019) 103 (9): 2177–2217.
...-southwest salt wedge, where the seismic unit is faulted by a series of southeast-dipping suprasalt faults ( Figure 9 ). To the eastern part of the central subbasin, SU4 increases thickness in the southernmost minibasin and displays diapiric contacts with west-northwest–east-southeast–striking salt...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Structural style and evolution of the Nordkapp Bas...
Second thumbnail for: Structural style and evolution of the Nordkapp Bas...
Third thumbnail for: Structural style and evolution of the Nordkapp Bas...
Image
Sequential structural restoration of the interpreted seismic section in Figure 8 (vertical exaggeration [V.E.] ×2). (A) Cenozoic uplift and erosion resulting in the present-day geometry. (B) Cenozoic contraction and diapir rejuvenation. (C) Early Cretaceous–Cenozoic reconstruction. Most of the welding and salt depletion occurred at the end of the Cretaceous. (D) Late Triassic–Jurassic minor salt withdrawal and diapir burial. A weld formed in the northern minibasin. (E) Middle–Late Triassic minor minibasin subsidence and passive growth. (F) Shift in salt withdrawal to the northern minibasin and growth of a central passive diapir. Suprasalt fault arrays developed in response to basin subsidence. (G) Early Triassic initial salt mobilization by thick-skinned extension and differential loading. Depocenter located at the basin axis and formation of a salt roller. (H) Synrift to early postrift layered evaporite sequences precipitated in a half graben and were covered by upper Permian carbonates. The inset map shows the location of the section. Open white circles connected by white lines highlight the location of depocenters within each sequence. F1 = facies 1; F2 = facies 2; SU = seismic unit.
Published: 15 September 2019
minibasin and growth of a central passive diapir. Suprasalt fault arrays developed in response to basin subsidence. (G) Early Triassic initial salt mobilization by thick-skinned extension and differential loading. Depocenter located at the basin axis and formation of a salt roller. (H) Synrift to early
Image
(A) Overhead views of model B at end of canopy amalgamation and after shortening. Colored lines are bowed and deformed allosutures. (B) Depth slice through the model voxel illustrating suprasalt depocenters above and along feeders, the lobate outline of the initial canopy, and the expulsion rollover adjacent to the seaward edge of the older, proximal canopy system. Note the flanking thrusts. (C) Dip line through the center of the model. Line orientation shown in (B). Note that this section extends further east than the depth slice, whose extent and location is marked by a dashed yellow line. Line shows shortened feeders 1, 5, and 8 and the deflated proximal canopy. The shallower distal canopy climbs seaward from the original edge of the shortened canopy with a ramp-flat geometry. Note primary, secondary, and tertiary welds. (D) Arbitrary line shows flanking thrusts, steep tear faults, and minibasins above feeders 5 and 6. The high block that separates these minibasins was the former window in the canopy that was structurally uplifted during shortening.
Published: 01 December 2023
Figure 7. (A) Overhead views of model B at end of canopy amalgamation and after shortening. Colored lines are bowed and deformed allosutures. (B) Depth slice through the model voxel illustrating suprasalt depocenters above and along feeders, the lobate outline of the initial canopy
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 April 2004
The Leading Edge (2004) 23 (4): 354–365.
... below the mud line), dips landward, and shows significantly more variation on the top-salt surface with multiple local salt highs—diapirs—and minibasins with different structural trends ( Figures 7b and 7c ). By examining reflector packets in the suprasalt section, we can determine how the salt has...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Geologic and shallow salt tectonic setting of the ...
Second thumbnail for: Geologic and shallow salt tectonic setting of the ...
Third thumbnail for: Geologic and shallow salt tectonic setting of the ...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2017
AAPG Bulletin (2017) 101 (9): 1385–1394.
... minibasin containing an approximately 3100-m-thick (∼10,170-ft-thick) sequence of suprasalt sediments ( Figure 3A ). The salt unit could be an allochthonous sheet or an autochthonous salt; the stratigraphy used for the surrounding sediments is illustrated in Figure 2 . 01 07 2016 01 07 2016...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A new approach to backstripping and sequential res...
Second thumbnail for: A new approach to backstripping and sequential res...
Third thumbnail for: A new approach to backstripping and sequential res...
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 21 December 2017
Interpretation (2018) 6 (1): T127–T144.
... the typical extensional minibasins because salt-detached ramp synclines can be a hundred times wider and the subsalt fault geometry is the main factor controlling these sedimentary basins, with or without the presence of salt. The salt acts as an effective décollement decoupling subsalt and suprasalt...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Tectonic inversion of salt-detached ramp-syncline ...
Second thumbnail for: Tectonic inversion of salt-detached ramp-syncline ...
Third thumbnail for: Tectonic inversion of salt-detached ramp-syncline ...
Image
Chronostratigraphic charts summarizing some of the petroleum system elements for each field (86 in total) within minibasins and other provinces: (A) Jurassic eolian fields, undifferentiated subsalt fields, as well as fields located in the fold belt, unconfined provinces, and subbasins 1–4; (B) fields located in minibasins 5, 7, 9–21, and 26. Several elements are shown: (1) stratigraphic external forms shown by color, (2) ages of reservoirs (black arrows), (3) timing of trap formation for four-way and three-way closure (white arrows) and for stratigraphic traps (gray arrows), and (4) trap types (labeled above trap formation; see Figures 4, 5: four-way closure: 1a = anticline, 1b = compaction drape, 1c = turtle-related anticline, 1d = fault-bounded trap; combined three-way closure: 2a = fault bounded, 2b = suprasalt against flank, 2c = subsalt against salt; stratigraphic = 3). Neogene allochthonous salt is shown as pink rectangles, whereas timing of turtle structure inversion is shown as black rectangles. See Figure 13 for location of minibasins; Figures 4, 6, and 13 for ages of reservoirs; and Weimer et al. (2017c, this issue) for more details of each field. MC = Mississippi Canyon; Mt. = Mountain; N. = North; NW = Northwest; S = South. Note: A color version can be seen in the online version.
Published: 01 July 2017
Figure 14. Chronostratigraphic charts summarizing some of the petroleum system elements for each field (86 in total) within minibasins and other provinces: (A) Jurassic eolian fields, undifferentiated subsalt fields, as well as fields located in the fold belt, unconfined provinces, and subbasins