1-20 OF 254 RESULTS FOR

planimetric

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 1987
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1987) 30 (5): 414–422.
... of Malabar are less severely eroded than those of Southern and Central Kerala. Copyright © 1987 Geological Society of India 1987 Geological Society of India JOURNA.L GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA Vol. 30. Nov. 1987, pP. 414 to 422 Planimetric response of the Kerala shoreline to· the monsoon of 1979 K. P...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1976
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1976) 46 (1): 258–261.
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1975
GSA Bulletin (1975) 86 (1): 47–50.
...DAVID N. WILCOCK Abstract Analyses of relief distribution and drainage distribution within individual drainage basins suggest that relative density (F/D 2 ), a dimensionless variable describing a planimetric characteristic of stream organization in a basin, is related to the hypsometric integral...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1974
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1974) 44 (4): 1155–1165.
...J. M. Bremner; P. H. LeBlond Abstract The planimetric shape of Wreck Bay has been studied by fitting various segments of the bay to theoretical logarithmic spiral curves, and by using the characteristics of incident swell to estimate longshore sediment transport along the beach GeoRef, Copyright...
Image
(A) Planimetric and cross-sectional views of a sample channel stretch representing the boundaries of the active channel bed as mapped in 2009 and 2019, and the combined active channel (AC) footprint, together with the spatial partitioning of topographic change (i.e., aggradation and degradation) into in-channel and lateral change in alluvial sediment storage. (B) Planimetric and cross-sectional views of a sample canyon stretch representing the boundaries of the active channel bed (solid lines) and the canyon walls (dotted lines) as mapped in 2009 and 2019, and the combined active channel (AC) footprint, together with the spatial partitioning of topographic change into three geomorphic components: landslide-related (L), purely fluvial (F), and mixed (M). The latter represents a transition zone where landslide footprints (in 2009) and the active channel bed (in 2019) overlap.
Published: 22 June 2023
Figure 3. (A) Planimetric and cross-sectional views of a sample channel stretch representing the boundaries of the active channel bed as mapped in 2009 and 2019, and the combined active channel (AC) footprint, together with the spatial partitioning of topographic change (i.e., aggradation
Image
Shows (a) the planimetric shift of the streams and (b) systematic sampling points for RMS error calculation.
Published: 01 August 2017
Fig.2. Shows (a) the planimetric shift of the streams and (b) systematic sampling points for RMS error calculation.
Image
Planimetric map and measurement of apparent right-lateral offset of channel margin of glacial-fluvial unit 3b in Aplodontia slot trenches. Projection lines illustrate three estimates of right-lateral offset: blue lines show our best estimate, projected on same trend as channel margin in south slot trench; purple and orange lines illustrate estimates of minimum and maximum right-lateral slip, respectively. Note the numerous fault traces in the east wall (Fig. 5A) that coalesce into a simple single trace at the base of the west wall. See Supplemental Figure S4 (see text footnote 4) for detailed logs of slot trench walls.
Published: 01 December 2014
Figure 8. Planimetric map and measurement of apparent right-lateral offset of channel margin of glacial-fluvial unit 3b in Aplodontia slot trenches. Projection lines illustrate three estimates of right-lateral offset: blue lines show our best estimate, projected on same trend as channel margin
Image
Planimetric map and measurement (with sources of uncertainties) of apparent right-lateral offset of distinctive bedrock fault zone in Boundary slot trench. See Supplemental Figure S5 (see text footnote 5) for detailed logs of slot trench walls.
Published: 01 December 2014
Figure 9. Planimetric map and measurement (with sources of uncertainties) of apparent right-lateral offset of distinctive bedrock fault zone in Boundary slot trench. See Supplemental Figure S5 (see text footnote 5 ) for detailed logs of slot trench walls.
Image
The planimetric distribution of the faults at the bottom of Pliocene sequence (A, about 5.3 Ma) and Oligocene sequence (B, about 38 Ma), in Bohai Bay. Map C is the 3D seismic coherency time slice (800 ms) within the Neogene sequence of the area marked in Map A.
Published: 01 July 2014
Figure 6 The planimetric distribution of the faults at the bottom of Pliocene sequence (A, about 5.3 Ma) and Oligocene sequence (B, about 38 Ma), in Bohai Bay. Map C is the 3D seismic coherency time slice (800 ms) within the Neogene sequence of the area marked in Map A.
Image
Planimetric map of lithologies and sample location points in the central Noranda area, Quebec.
Published: 01 February 2010
Plate 28 Planimetric map of lithologies and sample location points in the central Noranda area, Quebec.
Image
Figure 3. Planimetric maps showing canyon of the side-valley tributary, upper- and lower-fan segments, and main axial valley channel floodplain at the four study sites. Cross section (XS) and core and auger sediment sample locations are indicated. (A) Sisters Gulch. (B) Hamilton Gulch. (C) Lost Gulch. (D) Buried Log Gulch. LF—lower fan, FP—floodplain. In A and B, south points up.
Published: 01 July 2004
Figure 3. Planimetric maps showing canyon of the side-valley tributary, upper- and lower-fan segments, and main axial valley channel floodplain at the four study sites. Cross section (XS) and core and auger sediment sample locations are indicated. (A) Sisters Gulch. (B) Hamilton Gulch. (C) Lost
Image
Planimetric development of cliff top recession, average scenario.
Published: 01 August 2001
Fig. 16. Planimetric development of cliff top recession, average scenario.
Image
—Planimetric map showing location of Pierce Canyon deposit, Black Range, Sierra County.
Published: 01 October 1951
FIG. 4. —Planimetric map showing location of Pierce Canyon deposit, Black Range, Sierra County.
Image
—Planimetric, geologic, and assay map of ore beds of Bliss sandstone in part of south end of Caballo Mountains, Sierra County.
Published: 01 October 1951
FIG. 7. —Planimetric, geologic, and assay map of ore beds of Bliss sandstone in part of south end of Caballo Mountains, Sierra County.
Image
Summary of fault topology from virtual outcrop models, after Sanderson and Nixon (2015). (a) Sample windows and topology superimposed onto a planimetrically correct orthorectified outcrop model of Alltan Na Bradhan. Right, topological results plotted onto a ternary diagram (Sanderson and Nixon 2015). (b) Sample windows and topology superimposed onto a planimetrically correct orthorectified outcrop model of Cathair Dhubh. (c) Summary of node and branch classifications from outcrops shown. (d) Maximum magnification of model in (b) showing the resolution of the model and extreme density of fractures present including uninterpreted fractures below viewing resolution during interpretation.
Published: 17 February 2023
Fig. 10. Summary of fault topology from virtual outcrop models, after Sanderson and Nixon (2015) . ( a ) Sample windows and topology superimposed onto a planimetrically correct orthorectified outcrop model of Alltan Na Bradhan. Right, topological results plotted onto a ternary diagram
Journal Article
Published: 17 February 2025
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2025) 31 (1): 51–65.
... that the volume ( V ) and planimetric area ( A ) data for these landslides plot within the scatter of landslide data points used by Griswold and Iverson (2008) to develop the best-fit power-law relationship ( A = 20 V 2/3 ) for planimetric area of non-volcanic debris flows. The landslides from the 2014–2017...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Empirical Analysis of Landslide Runout in Late Ple...
Second thumbnail for: Empirical Analysis of Landslide Runout in Late Ple...
Third thumbnail for: Empirical Analysis of Landslide Runout in Late Ple...
Image
Bar graphs to show statistical analysis of results in Experiment 2; bentonite clays only; asterisk denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); graphs show means while statistics were conducted on medians. A) Comparison of impression depths before and after rewetting of surface in Experiment 2 (N = 8). B) Comparison of impression planimetric areas before and after rewetting of surface (N = 8). C) Effects of factors on impression depth difference (N = 24 for two variables, N = 16 for three variables). D) Effects of factors on planimetric area difference (N = 24 for two variables, N = 16 for three variables).
Published: 01 July 2010
in Experiment 2 ( N = 8). B) Comparison of impression planimetric areas before and after rewetting of surface ( N = 8). C) Effects of factors on impression depth difference ( N = 24 for two variables, N = 16 for three variables). D) Effects of factors on planimetric area difference ( N = 24 for two
Image
Bar graphs to show statistical analysis of Experiment 1. Asterisk denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); graphs show means while statistics were conducted on medians. A) Comparison of impression depth before and after drying in Experiment 1 for bentonite only (N = 8). B) Comparison of planimetric area before and after drying (N = 24 for bentonite, N = 12 for kaolinite). C) Effects of experimental factors on impression depth difference (after drying minus before drying) (N = 36 for two variables, N = 24 for three variables). D) Effects of experimental factors on planimetric area difference (after drying minus before drying) (N = 36 for two variables, N = 24 for three variables).
Published: 01 July 2010
) Comparison of planimetric area before and after drying ( N = 24 for bentonite, N = 12 for kaolinite). C) Effects of experimental factors on impression depth difference (after drying minus before drying) ( N = 36 for two variables, N = 24 for three variables). D) Effects of experimental factors
Image
Bar graphs to show statistical analysis of results in Experiment 2 after drying of the rewetted surfaces, bentonite clays only; asterisk denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05); graphs show means while statistics were conducted on medians. A) Comparison of impression depths before and after drying of rewetted surface (N = 8). B) Comparison of impression planimetric areas before and after drying of rewetted surface (N = 8). C) Effects of factors on impression depth difference (after drying minus before drying) (N = 24 for two variables, N = 16 for three variables). D) Effects of factors on planimetric area difference (after drying minus before drying) (N = 24 for two variables, N = 16 for three variables).
Published: 01 July 2010
before and after drying of rewetted surface ( N = 8). B) Comparison of impression planimetric areas before and after drying of rewetted surface ( N = 8). C) Effects of factors on impression depth difference (after drying minus before drying) ( N = 24 for two variables, N = 16 for three variables
Image
- Orthophoto mosaic of Museo di Zoologia whit representation of different forms of degradation on the façades of building. On the bottom right, the planimetric plan is shown (for the location see the Fig. 2).
Published: 01 October 2021
Fig. 9 - Orthophoto mosaic of Museo di Zoologia whit representation of different forms of degradation on the façades of building. On the bottom right, the planimetric plan is shown (for the location see the Fig. 2 ).