1-20 OF 799 RESULTS FOR

pipette

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1980
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1980) 50 (2): 624–626.
... orientation mounts. The pipette mount method is useful for the identification of clay minerals with small particle size in low concentration, especially mixed-layer clays. For routine clay mineral analysis, a combination of both methods is recommended. GeoRef, Copyright 2006, American Geological Institute...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1978
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1978) 48 (4): 1213–1217.
...E. W. Behrens Abstract Mean grain sizes as determined by electronic particle counting have been reported as coarser than those determined by pipette analysis. This has been attributed to possible particle shape effects, possible coincidence error in particle counting, or an omission of some...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1976
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1976) 46 (4): 1017–1025.
...G. L. Shideler Abstract Electronic particle counting and pipette size-analysis techniques are compared for their relative effectiveness in large-scale routine mud analysis. Optimum laboratory procedures for conducting electronic analyses with a Model TA Coulter Counter are presented. Comparative...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1963
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1963) 33 (2): 462–466.
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1961
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1961) 31 (1): 96–100.
...Richard Walter Sternberg; Joe Scott Creager Abstract A large sample of silt and clay was divided into 9 subsamples, with concentrations increasing from 3 g./l. to 25 g./l. These subsamples were first subjected to the hydrometer analysis, after which they were shaken and re-analyzed by the pipette...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1943
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1943) 13 (1): 21–27.
... force incurred by particles in the spinning microcentrifuge for the gravitational force incurred by particles falling freely through water. Several sediments with average sizes in the [1]/[16]-[1]/[8] mm. or [1]/[32]-[1]/[16] mm. Wentworth grade are analysed by the pipette method of Krumbein...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1941
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1941) 11 (1): 3–9.
...N. N. Hellman; V. E. McKelvey Abstract A small, sensitive hydrometer, reading in grams per liter, is enclosed within a pipette case similar to that holding the ordinary battery hydrometer. Pipette samples are taken from a suspension of known concentration as in the standard pipette method; instead...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1935
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1935) 5 (2): 93–95.
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1933
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1933) 3 (1): 44–45.
Image
A: Particle size distribution determined by pipette method. B, C: Particle size distribution determined by laser granulometry using a Coulter LS 200. B: Results for all 26 samples after carbonate removal using acetic acid. C: Results for subset of 10 samples after carbonate removal using HCl. Gray bars denote paleosol samples, and light bars denote loess.
Published: 01 September 2008
Figure 2. A: Particle size distribution determined by pipette method. B, C: Particle size distribution determined by laser granulometry using a Coulter LS 200. B: Results for all 26 samples after carbonate removal using acetic acid. C: Results for subset of 10 samples after carbonate removal
Image
Figure 2. Stratigraphy, soil horizonation, and pipette clay percentage depicted for an array of study sites with increasing subsurface clay content. Study sites are located in Figure 1. Site 1 is Wauneta old road cut (495 mm precipitation, uncultivated), a proximal stratigraphic setting with an isolated Brady Soil; site 2 is 519 mm, site 5 is 577 mm, uncultivated, and site 6 is 664 mm, uncultivated. Sites 2, 5, and 6 are profiles that have a buried soil with characteristics associated with the Brady Soil. The stippled pattern indicates the location of the burrowed zone. Lines mark the top of the Brady Soil and the top of C horizon Peoria Loess (base of the solum). Note change in vertical scale from site 1 to sites 2 through 6.
Published: 01 March 2007
Figure 2. Stratigraphy, soil horizonation, and pipette clay percentage depicted for an array of study sites with increasing subsurface clay content. Study sites are located in Figure 1 . Site 1 is Wauneta old road cut (495 mm precipitation, uncultivated), a proximal stratigraphic setting
Image
Figure 3. Statistical relationships between pipette clay percentage of horizons with clay maxima and C horizon Peoria Loess and predictor variables (A) distance from northwest edge of loess (km) or (B) precipitation (mm).
Published: 01 March 2007
Figure 3. Statistical relationships between pipette clay percentage of horizons with clay maxima and C horizon Peoria Loess and predictor variables (A) distance from northwest edge of loess (km) or (B) precipitation (mm).
Image
—Mechanical analysis (Krumbein pipette method) of core sample from Burntside Lake, Station 10.
Published: 01 April 1956
Fig. 20. —Mechanical analysis (Krumbein pipette method) of core sample from Burntside Lake, Station 10.
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 September 2008
Geology (2008) 36 (9): 727–730.
...Figure 2. A: Particle size distribution determined by pipette method. B, C: Particle size distribution determined by laser granulometry using a Coulter LS 200. B: Results for all 26 samples after carbonate removal using acetic acid. C: Results for subset of 10 samples after carbonate removal...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1946
American Mineralogist (1946) 31 (9-10): 503–506.
...F. C. Calkins Abstract Mrs. Lindberg’s ingenious method of fishing grains from oil 1 is better adapted to young, deft hands than to old, clumsy ones; mine, at any rate, have not been able to make it work with the straight pipette that she describes. I have had good success, however, with a curved...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1971
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1971) 41 (2): 489–496.
...Clifton F. Jordan; Glenn E. Fryer; Elze H. Hemmen Abstract The photo-extinction method of fine particle size analysis by hydrophotometer is significantly faster and more precise than pipette analysis. Six samples are analyzed per hour by the hydrophotometer and calculations can be performed...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1959
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1959) 29 (2): 233–245.
..., continuous size distribution curves were constructed for samples of silt, loess, and volcanic ash. In order to compare the photo-extinction method with the more familiar pipette, hydrometer, and microscope methods, samples of the loess were analyzed using the 4 techniques. Results obtained with the photo...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1932
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1932) 2 (3): 140–149.
...William Christian Krumbein Abstract Older methods of mechanical analysis are briefly discussed and contrasted with the newer precision methods. The pipette method is chosen from the latter as one based on sound principles and yet simple in operation. The principles of the method, its range...
Image
Some instruments used in entomopalynological techniques: a probe (P); an applicator stick (A); several insect pins (I); a bulb (B) and a glass pipette (G).
Published: 01 June 2012
Figure 2 Some instruments used in entomopalynological techniques: a probe (P); an applicator stick (A); several insect pins (I); a bulb (B) and a glass pipette (G).
Image
Relationships between (a) ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME)-measured versus water vapor sorption isotherms (WSI)-derived soil specific surface area (SSA), and (b) pipette-measured versus WSI-derived clay content for selected soils. The denotes the gravimetric soil water content at a relative humidity of 0.5.
Published: 01 January 2014
Fig. 4. Relationships between (a) ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME)-measured versus water vapor sorption isotherms (WSI)-derived soil specific surface area (SSA), and (b) pipette-measured versus WSI-derived clay content for selected soils. The denotes the gravimetric soil water content