1-20 OF 1819 RESULTS FOR

lithofacies in isopach maps

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1971
AAPG Bulletin (1971) 55 (6): 893–896.
... as a whole or defines all its geologic terms. Our paper merely deals with the nature of Carboniferous sedimentation through isopach and lithofacies maps. It is clearly stated ( Soliman and El Fetouh, 1970 , p. 1918, 1928) that the maps are based only on well-sieved, authenticated data from drilled wells...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1971
AAPG Bulletin (1971) 55 (6): 891–893.
... of Egypt: isopach and lithofacies maps : Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull. , v. 54 , no. 10 , p. 1918 - 1930 . Soliman , S. M. , and M. A. El Fetouh , and M. F. Hassan , 1965 , Geologic setting of the Gulf of Suez province during the Eocene period : 5th Arab Petroleum Cong...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1970
AAPG Bulletin (1970) 54 (10): 1918–1930.
... on the ancient Paleozoic shorelines. Shata (195) reviewed thoroughly the distribution of Carboniferous formations in Egypt. Kostandi (1959) presented the first detailed lithofacies and isopach maps of the Carboniferous for the Gulf of Suez province. Hassan (1967) presented highly generalized isopach...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Carboniferous of Egypt: <span class="search-highli...
Second thumbnail for: Carboniferous of Egypt: <span class="search-highli...
Third thumbnail for: Carboniferous of Egypt: <span class="search-highli...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1976
AAPG Bulletin (1976) 60 (3): 389–413.
... around the Somali embayment and around the Nogal uplift. Lithofacies-isopach maps are of much assistance in determining areas of limestone buildup for subsequent geophysical surveys. Secondary prospective oil and gas regions in Somalia are the coastal and offshore marine Tertiary sedimentary rocks which...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Geology and Oil Prospects of Somalia, East Africa
Second thumbnail for: Geology and Oil Prospects of Somalia, East Africa
Third thumbnail for: Geology and Oil Prospects of Somalia, East Africa
Image
—Desert Creek cross section and lithofacies-isopachous map, Aneth area.
Published: 01 November 1965
FIG. 10. —Desert Creek cross section and lithofacies-isopachous map, Aneth area.
Image
—Lithofacies-isopach map of Maestrichtian in central and southern Egypt (see Fig. 4).
Published: 01 August 1972
FIG. 5 —Lithofacies-isopach map of Maestrichtian in central and southern Egypt (see Fig. 4 ).
Image
—Lithofacies-isopach map of Paleocene in central and southern Egypt (see Fig. 4).
Published: 01 August 1972
FIG. 6 —Lithofacies-isopach map of Paleocene in central and southern Egypt (see Fig. 4 ).
Image
Isopach maps of thickness of Eau Claire lithofacies (A–G) and total Eau Claire thickness (H).
Published: 01 September 2014
Figure 9 Isopach maps of thickness of Eau Claire lithofacies (A–G) and total Eau Claire thickness (H).
Image
Isopach maps of shale lithofacies in the Union Springs Member modeled by sequential indicator simulation method. (A) Organic siliceous shale isopach (OSS). (B) Organic mixed shale isopach (OMS). (C) Organic mudstone isopach (OMD). (D) Gray siliceous shale isopach (GSS). (E) Gray mixed shale isopach (GMS). (F) Gray mudstone isopach (GMD). (G) Carbonate isopach (CARB). (H) Isopach of composite organic-rich lithofacies (OSS, OMS, and OMD). (I) Isopach of composite brittle lithofacies (OSS, OMS, GSS, and GMS). The yellow dashed line indicates the inferred location of the shoreline during the deposition of the Union Springs Member of the Marcellus Shale, and the blue lines indicate the Marcellus outcrops. Contour interval is 5 ft (1.5 m).
Published: 01 December 2013
Figure 16 Isopach maps of shale lithofacies in the Union Springs Member modeled by sequential indicator simulation method. (A) Organic siliceous shale isopach (OSS). (B) Organic mixed shale isopach (OMS). (C) Organic mudstone isopach (OMD). (D) Gray siliceous shale isopach (GSS). (E) Gray mixed
Image
Isopach maps of shale lithofacies in the entire interval of the Marcellus Shale modeled by the sequential indicator simulation method and the overlaying contour lines of the thickness ratio of each lithofacies to the entire Marcellus Shale. (A) Organic siliceous shale isopach (OSS). (B) Organic mixed shale isopach (OMS). (C) Organic mudstone isopach (OMD). (D) Gray siliceous shale isopach (GSS). (E) Gray mixed shale isopach (GMS). (F) Gray mudstone isopach (GMD). (G) Carbonate isopach (CARB). (H) Isopach of composite organic-rich lithofacies (OSS, OMS, and OMD). (I) Isopach of composite brittle lithofacies (OSS, OMS, GSS, and GMS).The red and yellow dashed lines indicate the inferred locations of the shorelines during the deposition of the Oatka Creek and the Union Springs Members, respectively, and the blue lines indicate the Marcellus outcrops. The color-filled contour interval is 5 ft (1.5 m), and the contour interval for thickness ratio is 0.1.
Published: 01 December 2013
Figure 17 Isopach maps of shale lithofacies in the entire interval of the Marcellus Shale modeled by the sequential indicator simulation method and the overlaying contour lines of the thickness ratio of each lithofacies to the entire Marcellus Shale. (A) Organic siliceous shale isopach (OSS). (B
Image
Isopach maps of the composite organic lithofacies (organic siliceous shale, organic mixed shale, and organic mudstone isopach) predicted by the three-dimensional lithofacies models using the core training set (A), and multiple realization using the pulsed neutron spectroscopy training set (B–D). All realizations show similar patterns, but areas of relatively thick organic-rich lithofacies are located in the areas of north-central West Virginia–southwest Pennsylvania and northeastern Pennsylvania and south-central New York. The blue lines indicate the Marcellus outcrops, and the contour interval is 10 ft (3 m).
Published: 01 December 2013
Figure 20 Isopach maps of the composite organic lithofacies (organic siliceous shale, organic mixed shale, and organic mudstone isopach) predicted by the three-dimensional lithofacies models using the core training set (A), and multiple realization using the pulsed neutron spectroscopy training
Image
Isopach maps of shale lithofacies in the Oatka Creek Member, modeled by sequential indicator simulation method. (A) Organic siliceous shale isopach (OSS). (B) Organic mixed shale isopach (OMS). (C) Organic mudstone isopach (OMD). (D) Gray siliceous shale isopach (GSS). (E) Gray mixed shale isopach (GMS). (F) Gray mudstone isopach (GMD). (G) Carbonate isopach (CARB). (H) Isopach of composite organic-rich lithofacies (OSS, OMS, and OMD). (I) Isopach of composite brittle lithofacies (OSS, OMS, GSS, and GMS). The red dashed line indicates the inferred location of the shoreline during the deposition of the Oatka Creek Member of the Marcellus Shale, and the blue lines indicate the Marcellus outcrops. Contour interval is 5 ft (1.5 m).
Published: 01 December 2013
Figure 15 Isopach maps of shale lithofacies in the Oatka Creek Member, modeled by sequential indicator simulation method. (A) Organic siliceous shale isopach (OSS). (B) Organic mixed shale isopach (OMS). (C) Organic mudstone isopach (OMD). (D) Gray siliceous shale isopach (GSS). (E) Gray mixed
Image
Isopach maps of the composite brittle lithofacies (siliceous shale, organic mixed shale, gray siliceous shale isopach. and gray mixed shale isopach) predicted by the three-dimensional lithofacies models using a core training set (A), and multiple realization using a pulsed neutron spectroscopy training set (B–D). All realizations show similar patterns, areas, or relatively thin brittle lithofacies and are concentrated in west-central Pennsylvania. The blue lines indicate the Marcellus outcrops, and the contour interval is 10 ft (3 m).
Published: 01 December 2013
Figure 21 Isopach maps of the composite brittle lithofacies (siliceous shale, organic mixed shale, gray siliceous shale isopach. and gray mixed shale isopach) predicted by the three-dimensional lithofacies models using a core training set (A), and multiple realization using a pulsed neutron
Image
—Geologic situation of Group 1 crude oils. Isopach-lithofacies maps from McCrossan and Glaister (1964). Numbered sample locations (also in Figures 2, 3) correspond to trace-element analyses reported by Hitchon and Filby (1983). 1 WS = First White Speckled Zone, 2 WS = Second White Speckled Zone, BFSc = Base of the Fish Scales.
Published: 01 July 1984
Figure 1 —Geologic situation of Group 1 crude oils. Isopach-lithofacies maps from McCrossan and Glaister (1964) . Numbered sample locations (also in Figures 2 , 3 ) correspond to trace-element analyses reported by Hitchon and Filby (1983) . 1 WS = First White Speckled Zone, 2 WS = Second
Image
—Geologic situation of Group 3 crude oils. Isopach-lithofacies maps and carbonate-reef distribution from McCrossan and Glaister (1964). Carbonate reef complexes of Leduc Formation are indicated as follows: PR = Peace River; SL = Sturgeon Lake; W = Windfall; HRM = Homeglen Rimbey-Meadowbrook; R = Redwater; B = Bashaw; FBV = Fenn-Big Valley; SAS = Southern Alberta Shelf.
Published: 01 July 1984
Figure 3 —Geologic situation of Group 3 crude oils. Isopach-lithofacies maps and carbonate-reef distribution from McCrossan and Glaister (1964) . Carbonate reef complexes of Leduc Formation are indicated as follows: PR = Peace River; SL = Sturgeon Lake; W = Windfall; HRM = Homeglen Rimbey
Image
—Comparison of isopach (A, C) and lithofacies (B) maps with block framework; A, Lower Mississippian Madison Group (Michelson, 1956); B, Upper Mississippian Big Snowy Group (Sonnenberg, 1956); C, Jurassic Rierdon Formation (Rayl, 1956).
Published: 01 July 1974
Fig. 5 —Comparison of isopach ( A, C ) and lithofacies ( B ) maps with block framework; A, Lower Mississippian Madison Group ( Michelson, 1956 ); B, Upper Mississippian Big Snowy Group ( Sonnenberg, 1956 ); C, Jurassic Rierdon Formation ( Rayl, 1956 ).
Image
Published: 01 January 1962
Table I. SOURCES OF DATA USED IN COMPILING LITHOFACIES AND ISOPACH MAPS OF THIS STUDY (See the references cited at end of article for complete titles)
Image
Cambrian isopach and lithofacies maps, after L. L. Sloss. Post-Laramide erosion reconstructed; geosynclinal isopachs generalized.
Published: 01 October 1948
Fig. 3. Cambrian isopach and lithofacies maps, after L. L. Sloss. Post-Laramide erosion reconstructed; geosynclinal isopachs generalized.
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1988
GSA Bulletin (1988) 100 (2): 234–246.
...KENNETH O. HASSON; C. STEPHEN HAASE Abstract A comprehensive data base for the Conasauga Group (Middle and Late Cambrian) throughout the Valley and Ridge province in east Tennessee was compiled from published and unpublished sources. Lithofacies and isopach maps and stratigraphic cross sections...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1962
AAPG Bulletin (1962) 46 (10): 1966.
... various zones occur, and the relationship between the lithologic and paleontological markers. The correlations are extended as deep as possible and include the tops of the Hackberry, Nonion struma and Nodosaria blanpiedi . Isopachous maps of the Camerina and Cibicides hazzardi intervals, isopachous maps...