Abstract To meet targets for greenhouse gas emission reduction set by the Kyoto Protocol, many countries are considering a range of near-term options such as, fuel switching, energy efficiency improvements and use of renewable sources of energy, to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. However, to meet the goal of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, namely stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, it is likely that deeper reductions in emissions will be needed. This will require additional measures such as the geological storage of CO 2 . Geological storage of CO 2 would be used to sequester CO 2 captured from large anthropogenic sources, such as power and large industrial plants. There are a number of reservoirs suitable for geological storage of CO 2 including depleted oil and gas fields and deep saline aquifers. Many of these reservoirs have stored hydrocarbons and fluids for million of years, which gives confidence that CO 2 can be stored for similar durations, but research is needed to confirm this.

Abstract At COP26, India announced strong climate commitments of reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2070. Meeting this target would likely require substantial deployment of CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) to decarbonize existing large-point sources of CO 2 . This study attempts to evaluate opportunities for deployment of CCS in India in the forthcoming decades. A geographic information system-based approach was adopted for mapping existing sources of CO 2 with the sinks. The results show that regionally-appropriate ways of moving towards CCS at scale exist in both the power and industrial sectors. Coupled analysis of these sectors with sinks shows that eight clusters may be developed throughout the country to sequester 403 Mt-CO 2 annually. These clusters are concentrated near Category-I oil basins and the Category-I coalfields (Damodar Valley), which may also create suitable financial incentives by incremental oil and coalbed methane recovery, respectively. Furthermore, a first-order costing analysis evaluates that the cost of avoidance across basins may range from –$31 to $107/t-CO 2 , depending on the type of storage reservoir and the proximity to large-point sources. A total of 12 suitable hubs and clusters were created based on annual emissions above 1 Mt-CO 2 of each large-point source and their proximity with geological sinks.