1-20 OF 3556 RESULTS FOR

garnet tonalite

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 October 1989
Geology (1989) 17 (10): 897–900.
... near-solidus amphiboles in partly melted, vapor-absent garnet tonalite at 10 kbar that provide some experimental support for the proposed geobarometer consistent with the extrapolated empirical result, and confirm its limited applicability to specific, multimineral assemblages. Geological Society...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1992
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1992) 29 (12): 2663–2676.
... (mean CaO/K 2 O = 1.12), but both groups of rocks have similar bulk Fe t /(Fe t + Mg) ratios (mean X Fe ≈ 0.75). In contrast with the PBGC, which contains abundant metabasites and thin coticule-like (garnet + quartz) seams, the Meelpaeg metapelites are associated with biotite + garnet "tonalitic" gneiss...
Image
Figure 4. Plots of Lu/Hf vs. Hf, Lu, and Lu/Sm for southern African lower-crustal xenoliths and various average protoliths and reservoirs. Most symbols as in Figure 2; labeled gray diamonds represent: B—average enriched mid-oceanic-ridge basalt (Sun and McDonough, 1989); L—average lower crust (Rudnick and Fountain, 1995); S—average shale, and U—average upper crust (Taylor and McLennan, 1985). Vector in C represents trend of melt extraction from garnet residue (ticks at 20% batch melt increments), calculated with garnet-tonalite partition coefficients of Klein et al. (2000)
Published: 01 May 2004
( Rudnick and Fountain, 1995 ); S—average shale, and U—average upper crust ( Taylor and McLennan, 1985 ). Vector in C represents trend of melt extraction from garnet residue (ticks at 20% batch melt increments), calculated with garnet-tonalite partition coefficients of Klein et al. (2000)
Published: 01 January 1992
DOI: 10.1130/SPE272-p259
... metamorphic layers and are classified into four depth types, namely upper, middle, lower and basal. The basal orthopyroxene-garnet (S-type) tonalities were intruded into granulite facies country rocks. Textural and compositional evidence from minerals in the basal tonalite indicates that the crystallisation...
Image
A) Type-3A garnet in Bog Island Lake tonalite (boulder sample KS08–060–F). Inclusions, particularly sillimanite, cluster toward the core. Some type-3A grains display a concentric pattern of inclusions around the core. B) Zoning profile across type-3A garnet along line shown in panel C. Note the bell-shaped Mn pattern in the core, with slight increase in Mn in the outer rim. C) X-ray maps of Mn and Fe in type-3A garnet shown in panel A. Line shows position of zoning profile (panel B); the numbers beside marked spots indicate mol.% Sps (Mn map) and mol.% Alm (Fe map). D) X-ray maps of Mn and Fe in type-3B garnet, sample KS08–106–B; the numbers beside marked spots indicate mol.% Sps (Mn map) and mol.% Alm (Fe map).
Published: 01 April 2011
F ig . 7. A) Type-3A garnet in Bog Island Lake tonalite (boulder sample KS08–060–F). Inclusions, particularly sillimanite, cluster toward the core. Some type-3A grains display a concentric pattern of inclusions around the core. B) Zoning profile across type-3A garnet along line shown in panel C
Image
A) Type-4A garnet in Bog Island Lake tonalite (sample KS08–102–B), which contains large, dispersed, euhedral crystals of garnet with inclusions of euhedral apatite and subhedral to euhedral ilmenite. B) Zoning profile along line shown in panel C. Note the relatively homogeneous core, with enrichment in Mn at the rim probably reflecting retrograde exchange with adjacent biotite. C) X-ray maps of Mn and Fe in garnet shown in panels A and B. Line shows the position of the zoning profile (panel B); the numbers beside marked spots indicate mol.% Sps (Mn map) and mol.% Alm (Fe map). The Fe-rich grains surrounding garnet are biotite; Fe-rich inclusions are ilmenite (yellow) and biotite (blue).
Published: 01 April 2011
F ig . 8. A) Type-4A garnet in Bog Island Lake tonalite (sample KS08–102–B), which contains large, dispersed, euhedral crystals of garnet with inclusions of euhedral apatite and subhedral to euhedral ilmenite. B) Zoning profile along line shown in panel C. Note the relatively homogeneous core
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2008
DOI: 10.1144/SP.308.16
EISBN: 9781862395565
... Abstract Xenocrystic garnet and kyanite, in addition to clinopyroxene and rare orthopyroxene, are newly found to occur in middle Proterozoic slightly metamorphosed adakitic trondhjemites and tonalites (meta-tonalites) at Cape Hinode on the eastern Prince Olav Coast in the latest Proterozoic...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
Outcrop photographs of the Svarthopen quarry. (A) Mingled K-feldspar–phyric granite and quartz dioritic enclaves. (B) Mingled granite with quartz dioritic–tonalitic enclaves back-veined by the host granite. (C) Net-veined hybrid tonalitic enclaves. Units on scale are cm. (D) Deformed (stretched?) tonalitic enclaves in foliated granitic host. (E) Cluster of garnets in tonalitic hybrid. (F) A pod of garnet-bearing granite enclosed in garnet-bearing tonalitic hybrid.
Published: 01 April 2012
(stretched?) tonalitic enclaves in foliated granitic host. (E) Cluster of garnets in tonalitic hybrid. (F) A pod of garnet-bearing granite enclosed in garnet-bearing tonalitic hybrid.
Published: 01 January 2004
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2389-2.161
... terrane. The granitic rocks are mainly tonalitic and granodioritic in composition, and are classified into peraluminous (S-type) and metaluminous (I-type) granitoids. A large amount of pyroxene-bearing S-type tonalites (garnet-orthopyroxene tonalite) is distributed in the Niikappu river region...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 September 2007
Geology (2007) 35 (9): 807–810.
... metamorphism and garnet-orthopyroxene tonalite generation to mafic magma under-accretion and lithosphere thinning due to the opening of the Japan Sea at 19 Ma. The Hidaka granulites are thus among the youngest exposed granulites on Earth, and manifest the thermal response to continental growth. 11 04...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
Field relationships of metagabbro, granulite, and tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG)–like leucosome and pluton. (A) Largest molten metagabbro outcrop in Dulan unit. (B–C) Thin and laterally persistent bands of leucosomes or melt channels oriented parallel to the major plane of anisotropy in the metagabbro. (D) Leucosome in the stromatic metatexite migmatite flows, becoming folded together with rootless isoclinal folds of the residue. (E–F) Melt segregation resulting in large-scale channel flow. (G) Lenses or blocks of garnet pyroxenite within quartzofeldspathic leucosome. (H) Coarse-grained euhedral-subhedral garnet grains within diatexite migmatite. (I) Garnet- and clinopyroxene-rich layers folded together in the residue. (J) Discordant dike-like bodies or patches of the tonalite pluton crosscutting the amphibolite. (K) Array of interconnected leucosomes in the metagabbro coalescing in small tonalite pluton. (L) Mafic granulitic enclaves in the tonalite pluton.
Published: 09 November 2018
) Coarse-grained euhedral-subhedral garnet grains within diatexite migmatite. (I) Garnet- and clinopyroxene-rich layers folded together in the residue. (J) Discordant dike-like bodies or patches of the tonalite pluton crosscutting the amphibolite. (K) Array of interconnected leucosomes in the metagabbro
Image
Representative field photographs for the lower crust in the Cucamonga terrane (A–J) and base of the middle crust in the San Antonio terrane (K–P). Zircon ages and 2σ uncertainties are indicated. (A) Foliated (S1) metasedimentary sequence consisting of quartzite, quartzofeldspathic gneiss, schist, and marble; (B) tightly folded (F2) S1 foliation planes in mafic orthogneiss and paragneiss enveloped by an S2 foliation; (C) foliated (S2) migmatitic paragneiss interlayered with mafic granulite (black) metatexite and charnockite (leucocratic layer); (D) stromatic metatexite with folded granitic leucosomes; (E) granulite-facies mafic orthogneiss with diffuse leucosomes grading into metatexite; (F) metatexite with remnant metasedimentary layers and leucosomes segregation; (G) large fold of garnet granulite gneiss, mylonitic tonalite, and paragneiss in Cucamonga Canyon; (H) coarse-grained granitic orthogneiss and strongly foliated biotite gneiss; (I) garnet granulite-facies migmatitic orthogneiss interlayered within metasedimentary sequence; (J) close-up view of migmatitic orthogneiss from part I showing peritectic garnet associated with leucosomes; (K) weakly foliated biotite hornblende tonalite with mafic enclaves and thin centimeter-scale crosscutting veins (Cucamonga Canyon); (L) cataclastic and mylonitic biotite-hornblende tonalite from the Black Belt shear zone (Cucamonga Canyon); (M) massive outcrop of folded biotite hornblende tonalite orthogneiss in the Black Belt shear zone (Cucamonga Canyon); (N) strongly foliated and folded tonalite from the Black Belt shear zone (Cucamonga Canyon); (O) strongly foliated, biotite hornblende tonalite orthogneiss intruded by undeformed biotite granodiorite at the southern end of the Black Belt shear zone (Deer Canyon); (P) close-up view of biotite hornblende tonalite orthogneiss at same location as part O. Leucosome is folded into an F3 M-fold. bt—biotite; hbl—hornblende.
Published: 23 August 2024
with folded granitic leucosomes; (E) granulite-facies mafic orthogneiss with diffuse leucosomes grading into metatexite; (F) metatexite with remnant metasedimentary layers and leucosomes segregation; (G) large fold of garnet granulite gneiss, mylonitic tonalite, and paragneiss in Cucamonga Canyon; (H) coarse
Image
Representative field photographs for the lower crust in the Cucamonga terrane (A–J) and base of the middle crust in the San Antonio terrane (K–P). Zircon ages and 2σ uncertainties are indicated. (A) Foliated (S1) metasedimentary sequence consisting of quartzite, quartzofeldspathic gneiss, schist, and marble; (B) tightly folded (F2) S1 foliation planes in mafic orthogneiss and paragneiss enveloped by an S2 foliation; (C) foliated (S2) migmatitic paragneiss interlayered with mafic granulite (black) metatexite and charnockite (leucocratic layer); (D) stromatic metatexite with folded granitic leucosomes; (E) granulite-facies mafic orthogneiss with diffuse leucosomes grading into metatexite; (F) metatexite with remnant metasedimentary layers and leucosomes segregation; (G) large fold of garnet granulite gneiss, mylonitic tonalite, and paragneiss in Cucamonga Canyon; (H) coarse-grained granitic orthogneiss and strongly foliated biotite gneiss; (I) garnet granulite-facies migmatitic orthogneiss interlayered within metasedimentary sequence; (J) close-up view of migmatitic orthogneiss from part I showing peritectic garnet associated with leucosomes; (K) weakly foliated biotite hornblende tonalite with mafic enclaves and thin centimeter-scale crosscutting veins (Cucamonga Canyon); (L) cataclastic and mylonitic biotite-hornblende tonalite from the Black Belt shear zone (Cucamonga Canyon); (M) massive outcrop of folded biotite hornblende tonalite orthogneiss in the Black Belt shear zone (Cucamonga Canyon); (N) strongly foliated and folded tonalite from the Black Belt shear zone (Cucamonga Canyon); (O) strongly foliated, biotite hornblende tonalite orthogneiss intruded by undeformed biotite granodiorite at the southern end of the Black Belt shear zone (Deer Canyon); (P) close-up view of biotite hornblende tonalite orthogneiss at same location as part O. Leucosome is folded into an F3 M-fold. bt—biotite; hbl—hornblende.
Published: 23 August 2024
with folded granitic leucosomes; (E) granulite-facies mafic orthogneiss with diffuse leucosomes grading into metatexite; (F) metatexite with remnant metasedimentary layers and leucosomes segregation; (G) large fold of garnet granulite gneiss, mylonitic tonalite, and paragneiss in Cucamonga Canyon; (H) coarse
Image
(A) High-pressure mafic granulite in the Hengshan complex with white plagioclase corona texture. (B) Medium-pressure mafic granulite in the Hengshan complex with red garnet corona texture. (C) Strongly deformed banded felsic gneiss. (D) Oriented plagio-amphibolite samples in the Zhujiafang ductile shear zone, bearing lineations defined by plagioclase and amphibole. (E) Garnet-sillimanite–bearing mica schist in the Zhujiafang ductile shear zone with dextrally deformed garnet porphyroclast. (F) In the Zhujiafang ductile shear zone, meta-gabbro intruded tonalitic gneiss, resulting in chilled contact and deformation together with the tonalitic gneiss. Abbreviations for minerals: Q—quartz; Grt—garnet; Pl—plagioclase; Py—pyroxene; Hb—hornblende; Ms—muscovite.
Published: 29 October 2020
in the Zhujiafang ductile shear zone, bearing lineations defined by plagioclase and amphibole. (E) Garnet-sillimanite–bearing mica schist in the Zhujiafang ductile shear zone with dextrally deformed garnet porphyroclast. (F) In the Zhujiafang ductile shear zone, meta-gabbro intruded tonalitic gneiss, resulting
Image
Deformed mafic dike from northwest Gallatin Peak terrane. (A) Field photograph of the dike intruding into tonalite gneiss, showing location of sample AA09-61. (B) Field photograph of discordant dike contact with tonalitic orthogneiss. (C) Corresponding sketch of the dike’s discordant contact. (D) Hand sample photograph of garnet porphyroblasts surrounded by plagioclase haloes and pervasive S2 fabric; Grt—garnet.
Published: 01 December 2015
Figure 5. Deformed mafic dike from northwest Gallatin Peak terrane. (A) Field photograph of the dike intruding into tonalite gneiss, showing location of sample AA09-61. (B) Field photograph of discordant dike contact with tonalitic orthogneiss. (C) Corresponding sketch of the dike’s discordant
Image
Figure 1. Trace element experimental partition coefficients (Ds) for garnet (A), amphibole (B), and clinopyroxene (C) coexisting with tonalitic melts (Ds with arrow pointing down are maximum estimates) compared with previously published Ds for these minerals specific to tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) melts. Ds determined for garnet and amphibole and those calculated for clinopyroxene (see text for details) are generally in range of previous results, but pres ent work provides complete, consanguineous sets of Ds including rarely published values of Cs, Cr, Co, and Ni for amphibole and Cr, Co, and Ni for garnet.
Published: 01 November 2006
Figure 1. Trace element experimental partition coefficients (Ds) for garnet (A), amphibole (B), and clinopyroxene (C) coexisting with tonalitic melts (Ds with arrow pointing down are maximum estimates) compared with previously published Ds for these minerals specific to tonalite-trondhjemite
Image
Photomicrographs of rocks from the Svarthopen intrusion. The length dimension of all images is 2 mm. (A) Relict diabasic texture in quartz diorite sample N58.99. Pyroxene replaced by hornblende. (B) Relict pyroxene (augite?) replaced by granular hornblende, plagioclase, and quartz, from quartz diorite sample N59.99. Primary, olive-green hornblende partly rims relict pyroxene. (C) Plagioclase porphyroclast with ∼An70 core and An40 rim in hybrid tonalite N57.99A. (D) Ragged garnet (left) and plagioclase porphyroclast (right) separated by biotite, plagioclase, and quartz in tonalitic hybrid N132.00. (E) Sheared garnet with ragged and idiomorphic boundaries, tonalitic hybrid sample N57.99A. (F) Fine-grained cluster of elongate, blue-green amphibole, quartz, and plagioclase (relict augite?) partly surrounded by biotite in tonalitic hybrid sample N132.00.
Published: 01 April 2012
quartz diorite sample N59.99. Primary, olive-green hornblende partly rims relict pyroxene. (C) Plagioclase porphyroclast with ∼An 70 core and An 40 rim in hybrid tonalite N57.99A. (D) Ragged garnet (left) and plagioclase porphyroclast (right) separated by biotite, plagioclase, and quartz in tonalitic
Image
Key trace-element plots for zircon in (A–C) tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG; sample NWS17/6) and (D) monzogranite (sample NWS17/7) from the Lewisian Gneiss Complex of northwest Scotland. (A) Nb versus Yb composition of zircon from tonalite shows two distinct trends to define three time periods. (B) Nb/Yb ratios of zircon from tonalite are lower for the oldest ages (group 1), increase within the intermediate age period (group 2), and then return to lower values for the majority of grains in age group 3. (C) Discrimination diagram of U/Yb versus Nb/Yb for zircon from tonalite shows that group 2 zircon compositions overlap with mantle array. (D) Monzogranite cores are similar to TTG zircon compositions, whereas rim compositions are distinct and display a “garnet signature,” despite the lack of garnet in the rock.
Published: 17 December 2019
Figure 4. Key trace-element plots for zircon in (A–C) tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG; sample NWS17/6) and (D) monzogranite (sample NWS17/7) from the Lewisian Gneiss Complex of northwest Scotland. (A) Nb versus Yb composition of zircon from tonalite shows two distinct trends to define
Image
Representative photomicrographs of the Western Chugach tonalite-trondhjemite plutons: plane polarized light (left); cross-polars (right). (A) Typical biotite-muscovite leucotonalite in the Wolverine Creek pluton. (B) Almandine garnet muscovite-biotite trondhjemite dike from Wolverine Creek pluton. (C) Biotite-muscovite tonalite from Carpenter Creek pluton. Photomicrographs of other rock types in the study area, including border zone cumulate hornblende-biotite gabbro, hornblende-biotite quartz diorite, trondhjemite dike, and hornblende-biotite tonalite, are given in the supplementary file S1 (see text footnote 1). Pl—plagioclase; Qtz—quartz; Bi—biotite; Gt—garnet; Ep—epidote; Mu—muscovite.
Published: 31 October 2018
Figure 3. Representative photomicrographs of the Western Chugach tonalite-trondhjemite plutons: plane polarized light (left); cross-polars (right). (A) Typical biotite-muscovite leucotonalite in the Wolverine Creek pluton. (B) Almandine garnet muscovite-biotite trondhjemite dike from Wolverine
Image
The Eu–Yb diagram [28] demonstrating the probable conditions of formation of initial melts for tonalite-trondhjemites of the Arzybei and Shumikha blocks. 1–12 — see Fig. 5; 13 — domains of calculated contents of trace elements in model tonalite-trondhjemite melts generated from metabasic sources TH1, TH2, and N-MORB equilibrated with five types of restites: 1 — plagioclase-pyroxene, 2 — plagioclase-amphibole, 3 — garnet-pyroxene-plagioclase-amphibole (Gar ≤ 20%), 4 — plagioclase-pyroxene-garnet-amphibole (Gar ≥ 20%), 5 — garnet-pyroxene. The pressures at which TT melts are equilibrated with corresponding types of restites are given [4, 6].
Published: 01 May 2002
Fig. 6. The Eu–Yb diagram [ 28 ] demonstrating the probable conditions of formation of initial melts for tonalite-trondhjemites of the Arzybei and Shumikha blocks. 1 – 12 — see Fig. 5 ; 13 — domains of calculated contents of trace elements in model tonalite-trondhjemite melts generated from