1-20 OF 2391 RESULTS FOR

double shocks

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 29 June 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (5): 2625–2639.
...Huainan Zhu; Jinli Huang Abstract We apply the graphics processing unit‐based match and locate method to detect missing small aftershocks of the 2014 M 6.4 and 5.9 Kangding double shocks (hereafter KD1 and KD2, respectively) in Sichuan, southwestern China. KD1 and KD2 occurred on two adjacent...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
Space–time analysis of b‐values for the Kangding double‐shock sequence. The region of (a) represents the background region. The black rectangular box represents the aftershock zone that consists of six 5 km wide subregions. The blue dots denote the background earthquakes occurred in the background region between 1 January 2009 and KD1 (M 6.4 mainshock; 2009‐KD1). The red dots denote the aftershocks occurred between KD1 and KD2 (M 5.9 mainshock; KD1–KD2). The gray dots denote the aftershocks occurred between KD2 and 30 November 2014 (KD2‐30 November 2014). (a) Distributions of earthquakes in the background region, aftershock zone, and subregions within different time periods. The earthquake legend of different time periods is shown in the upper right corner. The area between two green dashed lines represents seismicity gap. Other symbols are the same as those in Figure 3. (b) Statistical distributions of b‐values in different space‐time windows. The division of the space‐time windows are shown in panel (a). The b‐value is estimated based on 1000 randomly drawn subsets of 200 events. The vertical solid black lines denote the mean b‐value, whereas the dashed lines mark the one and two standard deviations. The blue transparent areas denote the background b‐value range within two standard deviations for the 2009‐KD1 period. (c) The b‐values in the aftershock zone and its subregions in the KD1‐KD2 period, and the background b‐value in the 2009‐KD1 period. The background b‐value is calculated based on the background earthquakes shown in panel (a), and the calculated results corresponds to the BG on the horizontal axis. The black, blue, and red squares represent b‐values calculated with the magnitude of completeness (Mc) correction values of 0, 0.2, and 0.4, respectively. The error bars represent the uncertainty of the b‐values (Shi and Bolt, 1982). The dashed green line marks the background b‐value with the Mc correction value of 0. The b‐values could not be obtained when the number of events above the Mc is less than 50. The corresponding frequency‐magnitude distributions are shown in Figure S11. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 29 June 2022
Figure 8. Space–time analysis of b ‐values for the Kangding doubleshock sequence. The region of (a) represents the background region. The black rectangular box represents the aftershock zone that consists of six 5 km wide subregions. The blue dots denote the background earthquakes occurred
Journal Article
Published: 04 March 2025
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2025)
... surface rupture after these events exceeded 567 km, with measured permanent displacements reaching 8.8 m near Ekinözü. Within the scope of this study, probabilistic fault displacement hazard assessment was carried out for the fault sources of the 6 February 2023 double shocks. Computed displacements...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Map showing the tectonic setting of the Xianshuihe fault zone (XSHFZ) and the 2014 Kangding double shocks and distribution of the seismic stations used in this study. The two red stars show the epicenters of the Kangding M 6.4 (KD1) and 5.9 (KD2) earthquakes. The focal mechanisms of the two earthquakes are from Fang, Wu, Liu, et al. (2015). Stations are marked by black triangles for permanent stations from Sichuan seismic network, cyan triangles for temporary stations deployed after KD1, blue triangles for stations from Lushan temporary seismic array, brown triangle for station from Xichang temporary seismic array, and orange triangles for other temporary stations. The legend of stations is shown in the lower left corner. The red and gray lines denote the XSHFZ and other active faults in the study region, respectively. The red circles represent eight strong earthquakes with M ≥ 7 occurring along the XSHFZ since 1700. The purple squares show the cities along the XSHFZ. The inset in the upper right corner marks the study region in a larger map of China. Abbreviations are Xianshuihe fault zone (XSHFZ) and its five branches: MXF, Moxi branch fault; SLHF, Selaha branch fault; XSHF, Xianshuihe branch fault; YLHF, Yalahe branch fault; and ZDTF, Zheduotang branch fault. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 29 June 2022
Figure 1. Map showing the tectonic setting of the Xianshuihe fault zone (XSHFZ) and the 2014 Kangding double shocks and distribution of the seismic stations used in this study. The two red stars show the epicenters of the Kangding M  6.4 (KD1) and 5.9 (KD2) earthquakes. The focal mechanisms
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 1943
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1943) 33 (1): 21–60.
...Frank Neumann Abstract Summary Accuracy of displacement curves computed from accelerograph records by numerical double integration .—The following results were obtained from Coast and Geodetic Survey accelerograph records in shaking-table tests made at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2005
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2005) 95 (4): 1250–1262.
..., Dagdibi, and Kaynasli fault segments, separated by left-restraining step-overs at Beykoy and Kaynasli. To the west of the main shock, 3.5 m of average slip on the Eften fault segment propagated into the 2-km-wide Cevizlik releasing double bend, where it was largely arrested, with smaller (<0.5 m) slip...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Image
Regional cmt solutions. Location and double-couple mechanism of the main shock and largest aftershocks obtained from the Regional cmt. Numbers follow numeration in Table 1.
Published: 01 August 2006
Figure 5. Regional cmt solutions. Location and double-couple mechanism of the main shock and largest aftershocks obtained from the Regional cmt . Numbers follow numeration in Table 1 .
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1999
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1999) 89 (4): 1004–1018.
... at a depth of 50 km in two main sources separated by ∼10 sec. The non-double-couple components values are −0.004 and −0.01 for the May and December events, respectively, indicating that the December shock has a small contribution of non-double-couple radiation that could be the result of a changing mechanism...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1974
GSA Bulletin (1974) 85 (9): 1425–1428.
... waves than massive crystalline rocks show. Both Libyan structures are post-Nubian in age. Their similar degree of erosion suggests a simultaneous origin by a double impact. Geological Society of America 1974 extraterrestrial geology terrestrial impact craters shock metamorphism...
Journal Article
Published: 26 November 2013
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2014) 104 (1): 551–559.
... single event location and double‐difference methods, and source time functions determined using empirical Green’s function analysis. 11 May 2013 The shock on 9 February 2010 was well recorded by more than 32 broadband seismographic stations in South Korea within the 10–390 km distance...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
(a) Map view of the double‐difference relocations using phase and waveform cross‐correlation data; all 12 events were located. Events 2 and 4 are located outside of the window. The beach ball indicates the possible fault plane. Shocks are aligned along a west‐northwest–east‐southeast trend, and the shaded bar along the mainshock indicates the extents of the source radius (0.12 km). (b) The across‐strike cross section (A–B) of DD locations using phase and waveform cross‐correlation data. Notice that the majority of the shocks are aligned along the plane dipping 77° to the south.
Published: 26 November 2013
Figure 5. (a) Map view of the double‐difference relocations using phase and waveform cross‐correlation data; all 12 events were located. Events 2 and 4 are located outside of the window. The beach ball indicates the possible fault plane. Shocks are aligned along a west‐northwest–east‐southeast
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 13 June 2023
Geophysics (2023) 88 (5): WB23–WB35.
... the double-porosity thermoelasticity theory to interpret ultrasonic measurements on granite under water-cooling conditions. We consider an isotropic porous host embedded with fractures. A plane-wave analysis yields the classical P and S waves and three slow P waves, namely the slow (Biot) P1, the slow (Biot...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1967
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1967) 57 (5): 1025–1046.
...N. N. Ambraseys abstract Between March 1965 and September 1966, two strong earthquakes occurred in central Peloponnesus (Greece). The first shock was connected with the west wall of the Megalopolis depression and it was followed by another shock connected with the opposite wall. The cumulative...
Image
Maps of b-values in cross sections defined in Figure 4. (a) East–West, 15 km wide and passing through both June mainshock hypocenters with N = 110 events per sample on a grid with node spacing of 0.2 km. (b) North–South, and 5 km wide through the hypocenter of the shock of 17 June 2000, N = 100. (c) North–South through the hypocenter of the shock of 21 June 2000, N = 100. Stars mark mainshock hypocenters, a double line delineates the approximate bottom of the dense seismic activity. Data period 1991–2000.46 (before the mainshocks).
Published: 01 April 2006
2000, N = 100. (c) North–South through the hypocenter of the shock of 21 June 2000, N = 100. Stars mark mainshock hypocenters, a double line delineates the approximate bottom of the dense seismic activity. Data period 1991–2000.46 (before the mainshocks).
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2006
Seismological Research Letters (2006) 77 (1): 65–73.
...Won-Young Kim; Savka Dineva; Shutian Ma; David Eaton Abstract A M w 3.1 earthquake occurred in Lake Ontario along the United States–Canada border, about 30 km south from Port Hope, Ontario, Canada, on 4 August 2004. Despite its small size, the shock was very well recorded by broadband seismographic...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1983
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1983) 73 (1): 219–236.
... showed that events with m b < 4.8 were not reported consistently over time. The seismicity rate as defined by m b ≧ 4.8 events was examined quantitatively and systematically in the source volumes of three recent main shocks and within two seismic gaps. A clear case of seismic quiescence could be shown...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1979
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1979) 69 (1): 207–220.
... IST A =64.82 ° Az =303.3 ° MAL A =87.39 ° Az=317.2 ° FBC A = 76.87 ° A Az=554'9° FIG. 11. Observed long-period P waves from the principal aftershock of the Tangshan sequence. The arrows indicate the two shocks of this double event. the large normal aftershock of the Tangshan earthquake was nearly half...
Journal Article
Published: 13 September 2016
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2016) 106 (5): 2244–2257.
... in 2003–2004); (2) it was initiated by an M L 4.3 shock and reactivated, more than two years later, by another M L 4.8 shock with an identical epicenter but a deeper focus. We present here the corresponding data set of ∼13,000 events, of which ∼3000 were relocated using a double‐difference algorithm...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
(a) Reprocessed CF-1 seismic profile (time domain), with a line drawing of the main reflectors and the position of earthquakes with depth greater than 3 km. The main shock is shown in magenta. (b) The reprocessed and unmarked CF-1 seismic profile, in which the time scale has been doubled with respect to (a) to better illustrate the recovered seismic signal.
Published: 07 March 2006
Figure 11. (a) Reprocessed CF-1 seismic profile (time domain), with a line drawing of the main reflectors and the position of earthquakes with depth greater than 3 km. The main shock is shown in magenta. (b) The reprocessed and unmarked CF-1 seismic profile, in which the time scale has been
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2003
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2003) 93 (4): 1633–1648.
... inversion technique in which the best-fitting double-couple mechanism is obtained through a grid search over strike, dip, and rake angles. Most of the 16 events and 10 previous ones with well-determined focal mechanisms show horizontal compression with near-horizontal P axes striking northeasterly, which...
FIGURES | View All (10)