1-20 OF 1927 RESULTS FOR

damping modification factor

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2025
Earthquake Spectra (2025) 41 (1): 782–823.
... in marine structures, it was necessary to scale spectral ordinates using damping modification factor (DMF). This statistical study was conducted based on 6676 records of offshore ground motion, obtained from S-net located in the Japan Trench. Conducting an examination into source parameters (magnitude...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Effects of source, path, and site conditions on <s...
Second thumbnail for: Effects of source, path, and site conditions on <s...
Third thumbnail for: Effects of source, path, and site conditions on <s...
Journal Article
Published: 08 October 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (6): 3103–3126.
...Mingji Liu; Jinjun Hu; Jingyang Tan; Hao Shi ABSTRACT This study develops a damping modification factor (DMF) model for offshore ground motion from subduction slab earthquakes that is a function of the damping ratio, spectral period, moment magnitude, focal depth, and rupture distance. The DMF...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Second thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Third thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Journal Article
Published: 18 October 2023
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (2): 1033–1047.
...Lili Kang; Yanxu Jiang; Hao Wu; John X. Zhao ABSTRACT This article presents damping modification factors (DMFs) for the horizontal component of the strong‐motion records generated by the shallow crustal and upper‐mantle earthquakes in Japan. This model can be used to scale a 5% damped design...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Second thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Third thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Journal Article
Published: 26 May 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (4): 1942–1959.
...John X. Zhao; Mingxiu Jiang; Xiaonan Zhang; Lili Kang ABSTRACT We present a damping modification factor (DMF) model for the total acceleration spectrum from subduction slab earthquakes. The model can be used for scaling a 5% damped design spectrum not associated with a particular earthquake...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Second thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Third thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Journal Article
Published: 07 April 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (3): 1231–1246.
...Jun Zhou; John X. Zhao ABSTRACT This article presents a damping modification factor (DMF) model without source and path parameters for subduction interface earthquakes in Japan using a similar dataset as the one used in the Zhao, Liang, et al. (2016) study. Site effect was modeled by site classes...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Second thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Third thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Journal Article
Published: 21 January 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (2): 647–665.
...Jun Zhou; John X. Zhao ABSTRACT A damping modification factor (DMF) model without source and path parameters is presented in this article for subduction slab earthquakes in Japan, using a similar dataset in the Zhao, Jiang, et al. (2016) study. Site classes based on site periods were used...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Second thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Third thumbnail for: A <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <s...
Journal Article
Published: 12 November 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (6): 2594–2613.
...John X. Zhao; Qingsong Yang; Kaiwei Su; Jiguan Liang; Jun Zhou; Heng Zhang; Xinge Yang Abstract Damping modification factors (DMFs) are important for estimating the response spectrum for the design of structures with different damping ratios. This study investigated the effects of earthquake source...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Effects of Earthquake Source, Path, and Site Condi...
Second thumbnail for: Effects of Earthquake Source, Path, and Site Condi...
Third thumbnail for: Effects of Earthquake Source, Path, and Site Condi...
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2020
Earthquake Spectra (2020) 36 (4): 2086–2111.
...Sebastián Miranda, M.EERI; Eduardo Miranda, M.EERI; Juan Carlos de la Llera, M.EERI The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of spectral shape on damping modification factors η used in equivalent static and response spectrum analyses of structures with damping ratios...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: The effect of spectral shape on <span class="searc...
Second thumbnail for: The effect of spectral shape on <span class="searc...
Third thumbnail for: The effect of spectral shape on <span class="searc...
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2015
Earthquake Spectra (2015) 31 (2): 745–759.
...Brendon A. Bradley Response spectrum damping modification factors are key components of displacement-based seismic design methods. This paper examines the period dependence of damping modification factors as a result of near-source forward directivity, basin-induced surface waves, and surficial...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Period Dependence of Response Spectrum <span class...
Second thumbnail for: Period Dependence of Response Spectrum <span class...
Third thumbnail for: Period Dependence of Response Spectrum <span class...
Image
A comparison of damping modification factor (DMF) mean values at a damping ratio of 1% for acceleration and displacement spectra for (a) site class (SC) I and II sites and (b) SC III and IV sites. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 26 May 2020
Figure 2. A comparison of damping modification factor (DMF) mean values at a damping ratio of 1% for acceleration and displacement spectra for (a) site class (SC) I and II sites and (b) SC III and IV sites. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
Comparisons of damping modification factor (DMF) values. The left panel compares the acceleration spectrum, and the right panel compares the displacement spectrum. (a,b) Records at site class (SC) I and IV sites from shallow crustal and upper (SCU) mantle events with a damping ratio of 1% and 30%, respectively. (c,d) Comparisons of the DMF values from three types of events at SC IV sites for a damping ratio of 1%. (e,f) A damping ratio of 30% in the bottom row. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 12 November 2019
Figure 1. Comparisons of damping modification factor (DMF) values. The left panel compares the acceleration spectrum, and the right panel compares the displacement spectrum. (a,b) Records at site class (SC) I and IV sites from shallow crustal and upper (SCU) mantle events with a damping ratio
Image
Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for crustal events corresponding to soil class D.
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 12. Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for crustal events corresponding to soil class D.
Image
Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for interface events corresponding to soil class C.
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 15. Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for interface events corresponding to soil class C.
Image
Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for interface events corresponding to soil class D.
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 16. Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for interface events corresponding to soil class D.
Image
Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for crustal events corresponding to soil class C.
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 11. Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for crustal events corresponding to soil class C.
Image
Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for inslab events corresponding to soil class C.
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 13. Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for inslab events corresponding to soil class C.
Image
Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for inslab events corresponding to soil class D.
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 14. Error percentages associated with different damping modification factor prediction equations available in the literature and the proposed equation at (a) 10%, (b) 20%, and (c) 30% damping for inslab events corresponding to soil class D.
Journal Article
Published: 05 August 2022
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (5): 2621–2641.
...Jinjun Hu; Mingji Liu; Jingyang Tan ABSTRACT Damping modification factors (DMFs) are used to scale the 5%‐damped response spectra for the seismic design of structures with different damping ratios. However, there is no DMF model for offshore engineering response spectra at present. Using 892...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <spa...
Second thumbnail for: <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <spa...
Third thumbnail for: <span class="search-highlight">Damping</span> <spa...
Image
Comparison of mean damping modification factors (DMFs) (a) with a damping ratio of 1% and (b) with a damping ratio of 30% for four site classes (SCs). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 07 April 2020
Figure 1. Comparison of mean damping modification factors (DMFs) (a) with a damping ratio of 1% and (b) with a damping ratio of 30% for four site classes (SCs). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
A comparison of average damping modification factors (DMFs) between offshore and onshore (a) with 1% damping ratio and 3% damping ratio and (b) with 6% damping ratio and 30% damping ratio.
Published: 05 August 2022
Figure 3. A comparison of average damping modification factors (DMFs) between offshore and onshore (a) with 1% damping ratio and 3% damping ratio and (b) with 6% damping ratio and 30% damping ratio.