1-20 OF 150 RESULTS FOR

brabantite

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2007
The Canadian Mineralogist (2007) 45 (3): 503–508.
.... The name cheralite has priority over brabantite , which hereby is discredited. A six-fold diagram is replaced by a three-fold nomenclature diagram to conform to IMA rules. The parameters of cheralite are redefined. This proposal, IMA 2005/F, was approved by the CNMMN in April 2006. Abstract La nomenclature...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1998
American Mineralogist (1998) 83 (3-4): 259–272.
... of brabantite and the first occurrence of this mineral in a granite. Many new occurrences of cheralite-(Ce), as well as a monazite-group mineral intermediate between monazite-(Ce) and huttonite for which the term huttonitic monazite is proposed, were discovered. Even "common" monazite-(Ce) may show extreme...
Image
Diagram illustrating the amount of Ca-<span class="search-highlight">brabantite</span>, Sr-<span class="search-highlight">brabantite</span>, and hutton...
Published: 01 August 2004
F igure 4. Diagram illustrating the amount of Ca-brabantite, Sr-brabantite, and huttonite s.s. component in the analysed monazites expressed by Ca, Sr, and Si formula units. Note that for ideal substitution, the sum of Sr + Ca + Si (apfu) must equal Th + U (apfu), which is approximately
Image
Bivariate plot depicting the variation in composition of monazite from Sona...
Published: 15 January 2020
Fig. 5. Bivariate plot depicting the variation in composition of monazite from Sonapahar (SMGC). (a) For sample S-11, the monazite grain is enriched in brabantite (Th/U + Ca↔2REE) substitution. (b) For sample Sn-24, all grains are enriched in brabantite substitution. (c) For sample Sn-26
Image
( a ) <span class="search-highlight">Brabantite</span> Ca(Th,U)REE –2  vs. huttonite (Th,U)SiREE –1 P –1  exchang...
Published: 01 July 2017
Figure 8. ( a ) Brabantite Ca(Th,U)REE –2 vs. huttonite (Th,U)SiREE –1 P –1 exchange in monazite shown in the plot 4*(Th+U+Si) vs. 4*(REE+Y+P). ( b ) The relationship between (Ca+Ti) and (REE + divalent and trivalent cations in the C site) for chevkinite-(Ce) indicates the coupled substitution
Image
<span class="search-highlight">Brabantite</span> Ca(Th,U)REE −2  vs. huttonite (Th,U)SiREE −1 P −1  exchange in m...
Published: 01 February 2012
Figure 7. Brabantite Ca(Th,U)REE −2 vs. huttonite (Th,U)SiREE −1 P −1 exchange in monazite and xenotime showed in a plot 4×(Th + U + Si) vs. 4×(REE + Y + P).
Image
COMPOSITIONS OF TYPE CHERALITE AND OF DISCREDITED TYPE <span class="search-highlight">BRABANTITE</span>
Published: 01 June 2007
TABLE 2. COMPOSITIONS OF TYPE CHERALITE AND OF DISCREDITED TYPE BRABANTITE
Image
U–Pb ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR MONAZITE AND <span class="search-highlight">BRABANTITE</span> FROM A GRANITE IN THE S...
Published: 01 February 2006
TABLE 5. U–Pb ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR MONAZITE AND BRABANTITE FROM A GRANITE IN THE SERIDÓ REGION, NORTHEASTERN BRAZIL
Image
( a ) Wavelength scan of Pb M  region (PET) from <span class="search-highlight">brabantite</span> [CaTh(PO 4 ) 2 ...
Published: 01 April 2005
F igure 17. ( a ) Wavelength scan of Pb M region (PET) from brabantite [CaTh(PO 4 ) 2 ]. Brabantite contains 50.5 wt% Th and the interference of the Th M ζ lines on Pb M α is evident. ( b ) Deconvolution results of filtered (Savitsky-Golay) spectra showing detail of the Pb M α region
Image
Deconvolutions of Th M γ from <span class="search-highlight">brabantite</span> and monazite spectra. Profiles are...
Published: 01 April 2005
F igure 21. Deconvolutions of Th M γ from brabantite and monazite spectra. Profiles are placed positionally on the graph by relative Th content. The gray profile is the deconvoluted U M β+Th M 3- N 4 line. Separating Th M 3- N 4 from U M β is difficult, even with very detailed scanning. Heavy
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2002
The Canadian Mineralogist (2002) 40 (6): 1649–1655.
... )] are: 4.647(5)(011), 4.164(8)(1̅11), 3.492(4)(111,020), 3.264(7)(200), 3.065(10)(120), and 2.857(9)(1̅12,012). The monazite-(Sm) contains, in wt.%, up to 14.29 Sm 2 O 3 , 13.48 Gd 2 O 3 and 6.28 Nd 2 O 3 , and moderate percentages of the huttonite and brabantite components. The most Sm-rich composition gives...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2000
American Mineralogist (2000) 85 (1): 22–32.
.... These inclusions are dominated by anhedral allanite, although allanite also occurs rarely as discrete grains not enclosed by monazite. The monazite studied here is relatively homogeneous and characterized by high Th contents with proportions of huttonite (ThSiO 4 ) and brabantite [CaTh(PO 4 ) 2 ] up to 14.6...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
Plots of monazite composition illustrating chemical exchanges. (a) Th + U v...
Published: 01 January 2002
Figure 11. Plots of monazite composition illustrating chemical exchanges. (a) Th + U versus Si + Ca. The strong linear trend suggests that most Th + U is accommodated by a combination of the brabantite ((Th,U)Ca(PO 4 ) 2 ) and huttonite ((Th,U)SiO 4 ) exchanges. (b) Th + U versus Ca. (c) Th + U
Image
Plots of monazite composition illustrating chemical exchanges. (a) Th + U v...
Published: 01 January 2002
Figure 11. Plots of monazite composition illustrating chemical exchanges. (a) Th + U versus Si + Ca. The strong linear trend suggests that most Th + U is accommodated by a combination of the brabantite ((Th,U)Ca(PO 4 ) 2 ) and huttonite ((Th,U)SiO 4 ) exchanges. (b) Th + U versus Ca. (c) Th + U
Image
Calculated correction factors for the total Th interference on U M β as a f...
Published: 01 April 2005
F igure 22. Calculated correction factors for the total Th interference on U M β as a function of Th content. Curve 1 represents the polynomial fit of monazite points only. Curve 2 is the exponential fit of monazite points, curve 3 includes brabantite (polynomial). Figure 21 predicts
Image
The frequently used, but now discredited, six-fold division of  Bowie &amp;...
Published: 01 June 2007
F ig . 1. The frequently used, but now discredited, six-fold division of Bowie & Horne (1953) . After Rose (1980) . A marks the type cheralite, and B, the now-discredited type “brabantite”.
Image
( a ) La vs. Nd plot. ( b ) Discrimination of monazite with different origi...
Published: 01 October 2024
Figure 6. ( a ) La vs. Nd plot. ( b ) Discrimination of monazite with different origins including igneous, metamorphic, and hydrothermal monazite, the arrow arrange was referred from Wu et al. (2019) . ( c ) Ternary diagram of LREE, HREE, and (Th + U). ( d ) Brabantite Ca(Th,U) REE –2 vs
Image
Plot of REE+Y+P  vs . Th+U+Si concentrations of monazites from the metapeli...
Published: 01 July 2006
Fig. 8. Plot of REE+Y+P vs . Th+U+Si concentrations of monazites from the metapelites (a and b) and their hosts (c). The linear arrangement of the data, which is close to the brabantite substitution vector, indicates that the compositional variation is mainly controlled by this exchange.
Image
Si+Ca  vs . Th+U variation of investigated monazites, illustrating a unifor...
Published: 01 July 2006
and brabantite exchange vector.
Image
Monazite compositional end-members expressed by Th variation diagrams. ( a ...
Published: 01 January 2000
F igure 3. Monazite compositional end-members expressed by Th variation diagrams. ( a ) Monazite (Mo) content in (REE + Y) vs. (Th+Ca) plot; ( b ) Huttonite (Hu) content in Si vs. Th plot; ( c ) Brabantite (Br) and huttonite (Hu) contents in Ca vs. Th plot.