1-20 OF 2790 RESULTS FOR

bivariate

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2023
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2023) 99 (3): 370–376.
...Vikram Gupta; Pratap Ram; Ruchika S Tandon; Neeraj Vishwakarma Abstract Four bivariate methods viz frequency ratio, weight of evidence, Yule’s coefficients and information value were utilized for the preparation of the landslide susceptibility map of the hilly township of Mussoorie. Two scenarios...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 24 March 2021
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (4): 2399–2409.
...., Davis, 2002 ). In this study, we follow the formalism described in greater detail by Tibi et al. (2018 , 2019) and define a bivariate QDF to classify the events in the populations of nuclear explosions and earthquakes in NK. Let us assume that f n e ( r ) and f e q ( r...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 02 March 2021
Journal of the Geological Society (2021) 178 (3): jgs2020-215.
.... However, there is no commonly applied method of sample intercomparison, much less forward or inverse modeling of these bivariate data sets. In this paper we explore application of non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to bivariate data sets. Factorization of univariate mixed (a.k.a., sink or daughter...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 13 September 2019
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2020) 53 (2): 167–175.
...Ismail Chenini; Mohamed Haythem Msaddek Abstract A logistic regression model and a bivariate statistical analysis were used in this paper to evaluate the groundwater recharge susceptibility. The approach is based on the assessment of the relationship involving groundwater recharge and parameters...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/M44.13
EISBN: 9781862397118
.../probabilistic analysis and soft computing techniques ( Aleotti & Chowdhury 1999 ). Geotechnical approaches use deterministic methods (e.g. Gökceoglu & Aksoy 1996 ; Van Westen & Terlien 1996 ; Zhou et al. 2003 ; Wang & Lin 2010 ). Statistical/probabilistic methods include bivariate...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 25 March 2013
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2013) 46 (2): 221–236.
...Chong Xu; Xiwei Xu; Qi Yao; Yanying Wang Abstract The main purpose of this research is to evaluate the modelling capability and predictive power of a bivariate statistical method for earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility mapping. A weight index ( W i ) model was developed for the 2008...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2011
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2011) 77 (4): 377–380.
... the relationship of the variance of the parameters involved. We provide here a code in MATLAB TM that performs the weighted linear regression with (correlated or uncorrelated) errors in bivariate data which can handle 'force-fit' regression as well. MATLAB TM , a computing environment developed...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2007
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2007) 13 (4): 277–287.
... database of triggering parameters and raster characteristics to ensure comparable results, we created a new landslide susceptibility zonation using the bivariate method. Accuracy of the predictions for both methods was tested through comparisons with the landslide inventory map and new landslide activity...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1995
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1995) 46 (6): 675–677.
...A. S. Khadkikar; V. G. Phansalkar Copyright © 1995 Geological Society of India 1995 Geological Society of India JOURNAL GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA Vo1.46, Dec. 1995, pp. 675-677 RESEARCH NOTE DIAGNOSTIC BIVARIATE PLOT FOR THE DIFFERENTIATION OF SPECIES OF THE GENUS STENEOSAURUS Abstract...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1976
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1976) 46 (2): 301–304.
...R. B. McCammon Abstract A standard rule is given for eliminating the visual bias in bivariate scatter diagrams. Bias is eliminated if the reduced major axis is plotted at an angle of 45 degrees or else the scales chosen for the variables are proportional to the errors of observation. The rule...
Image
(a) Al2O3 vs MgO bivariate plot of spinel grains. (b) Spinel Cr# vs Mg# bivariate diagram showing analysed spinel grains. (c) Bivariate diagram of Cr# of spinel vs Mg# of olivine. (d) Fe2+/Fe3+ vs Al2O3 bivariate plot of analysed spinel grains. (e) TiO2 vs Cr # bivariate plot of analysed spinel grains. (f) Bivariate plot of Al2O3 wt% of spinel vs calculated Al2O3 wt% of melt. (g) Bivariate plot of ultramafic samples in Pt/Pt* vs Pd/Ir diagram.
Published: 01 May 2024
Fig.7. (a) Al 2 O 3 vs MgO bivariate plot of spinel grains. (b) Spinel Cr# vs Mg# bivariate diagram showing analysed spinel grains. (c) Bivariate diagram of Cr# of spinel vs Mg# of olivine. (d) Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ vs Al 2 O 3 bivariate plot of analysed spinel grains. (e) TiO 2 vs Cr
Image
(A) Comparison of trace element change (TEΔ, %; refer to text for details) calculated relative to the median black shale (Ketris and Yudovich, 2009) in the subunits of the T1. (B) A bivariate plot of Cu (ppm) vs. Co (ppm). (C) A bivariate plot of Zn (ppm) vs. Cd (ppm). (D) A bivariate plot of Pb (ppm) vs. Bi (ppm). (E) A bivariate plot of Cu (ppm) vs. Mo (ppm). (F) A bivariate plot of Zn (ppm) vs. Mo (ppm). (G) A bivariate plot of Pb (ppm) vs. Mo (ppm).
Published: 01 September 2023
Fig. 14. (A) Comparison of trace element change (TE Δ , %; refer to text for details) calculated relative to the median black shale ( Ketris and Yudovich, 2009 ) in the subunits of the T1. (B) A bivariate plot of Cu (ppm) vs. Co (ppm). (C) A bivariate plot of Zn (ppm) vs. Cd (ppm). (D
Image
Pair-correlation functions (PCFs) for the E surface. The x-axis is the interpoint distance between organisms in meters. On the y-axis, PCF=1 indicates complete spatial randomness (CSR), <1 indicates segregation, and >1 indicates aggregation. A, Charniid–Lobate Discs bivariate distribution and Lobate Discs univariate distribution. Gray shaded area is the boundaries of 99 Monte Carlo simulations of the CSR bivariate distribution. B, Charniid–Bradgatia bivariate distribution and Charniid univariate distribution. Gray shaded area is the boundaries of 99 Monte Carlo simulations of the CSR bivariate distribution. C, PCFs of non-Ivesheadiomorph bivariate distributions of Fractofusus and Plumeropriscum. Gray shaded area is the boundaries of 99 Monte Carlo simulations of the CSR bivariate distribution of Fractofusus–Plumeropriscum. D, Bivariate PCFs of Ivesheadiomorphs interactions. Gray shaded area is the boundaries of 99 Monte Carlo simulations of the CSR bivariate distribution of Ivesheadiormorphs–Plumeropriscum. E, Bivariate PCFs of Ivesheadiomorphs interactions showing the best-fit shared-source model of Ivesheadiomorphs–Charniodiscus. Gray shaded area shows the boundaries of 99 Monte Carlo simulations for the best-fit shared-source model of Ivesheadiomorphs–Charniodiscus. F, Random-labeling analysis results for the Ivesheadiomorphs distributions. On the y-axis, PCF=0 indicates CSR. Gray shaded area is the boundaries of 99 Monte Carlo simulations of the CSR randomly labeled distributions.
Published: 01 February 2018
Figure 3 Pair-correlation functions (PCFs) for the E surface. The x -axis is the interpoint distance between organisms in meters. On the y -axis, PCF=1 indicates complete spatial randomness (CSR), <1 indicates segregation, and >1 indicates aggregation. A, Charniid–Lobate Discs bivariate
Image
Bivariate plot using the width (in mm) as a function of the length (in mm) of (a) cephala and pygidia of Struveaspis maroccanica Alberti, 1970; (b) bivariate plot using the number of files as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (c) bivariate plot using the maximum number of lenses in one file as a function of the number of files; (d) bivariate plot using the number of lenses as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (e) bivariate plot using the number of lenses as a function of the number of files in Struveaspis maroccanica Alberti, 1970.
Published: 12 December 2016
Figure 8. Bivariate plot using the width (in mm) as a function of the length (in mm) of (a) cephala and pygidia of Struveaspis maroccanica Alberti, 1970 ; (b) bivariate plot using the number of files as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (c) bivariate plot using the maximum number
Image
Bivariate plots of P/S and Pprob−Sprob, with confusion matrices for joint classification and individual Pprob−Sprob and P/S classification. (a) Example bivariate scatter plot Mount St. Helens (MSH), which has separated earthquake (EQ) and explosion (EX) clusters and is dominated by source–receiver distances &lt;120 km. (b) Cumulative bivariate scatter plot for 10 different localities. Negative Pprob−Sprob explosion events are marked by the yellow dots (negEX), all of which come from the southeastern U.S. study regions B and E in Figure 1a. (c) Confusion matrix for only the MSH dataset. (d) Confusion matrix for cumulative results across 10 different localities. The four quadrants in the confusion matrix denote (true positive, false negative; false positive, true negative) event numbers.
Published: 06 June 2025
Figure 4. Bivariate plots of P/S and P prob − S prob , with confusion matrices for joint classification and individual P prob − S prob and P/S classification. (a) Example bivariate scatter plot Mount St. Helens (MSH), which has separated earthquake (EQ
Image
Bivariate plot using the cephalic width (in mm) as a function of the cephalic length (in mm) of three species of Austerops McKellar &amp; Chatterton, 2009; (b) bivariate plot using the number of files as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (c) bivariate plot using the maximum number of lenses in one file as a function of the number of files; (d) bivariate plot using the number of lenses as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (e) bivariate plot using the number of lenses as a function of the number of files in three species of Austerops McKellar &amp; Chatterton, 2009.
Published: 12 December 2016
Figure 9. Bivariate plot using the cephalic width (in mm) as a function of the cephalic length (in mm) of three species of Austerops McKellar & Chatterton, 2009 ; (b) bivariate plot using the number of files as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (c) bivariate plot using the maximum
Image
Bivariate plot using the cephalic width (in mm) as a function of the cephalic length (in mm) of Chotecops hoseri (Hawle &amp; Corda, 1847) and C. aff. hoseri; (b) bivariate plot using the number of files as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (c) bivariate plot using the maximum number of lenses in one file as a function of the number of files; (d) bivariate plot using the number of lenses as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (e) bivariate plot using the number of lenses as a function of the number of files in Chotecops hoseri (Hawle &amp; Corda, 1847) and C. aff. hoseri.
Published: 12 December 2016
Figure 10. Bivariate plot using the cephalic width (in mm) as a function of the cephalic length (in mm) of Chotecops hoseri (Hawle & Corda, 1847 ) and C. aff . hoseri ; (b) bivariate plot using the number of files as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (c) bivariate plot using
Image
Bivariate plot using the cephalic width (in mm) as a function of the cephalic length (in mm) of four taxa of Phacops Emmrich, 1839 and Barrandeops McKellar &amp; Chatterton, 2009; (b) bivariate plot using the number of files as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (c) bivariate plot using the maximum number of lenses in one file as a function of the number of files; (d) bivariate plot using the number of lenses as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (e) bivariate plot using the number of lenses as a function of the number of files in four taxa of Phacops Emmrich, 1839 and Barrandeops McKellar &amp; Chatterton, 2009.
Published: 12 December 2016
Figure 11. Bivariate plot using the cephalic width (in mm) as a function of the cephalic length (in mm) of four taxa of Phacops Emmrich, 1839 and Barrandeops McKellar & Chatterton, 2009 ; (b) bivariate plot using the number of files as a function of the cephalic length (in mm); (c
Image
Trace element data of pyrite obtained by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry from hydrothermal grains in auriferous V3 veins and the intermediate alteration zone within the Gruyere intrusion, as well as from disseminated, orthomagmatic grains in the Kansas Basalt and mafic to intermediate dikes. (A) Box-and-whisker diagrams of selected trace elements. Sample symbols of outliers are shown in the legend of 13B. (B) Au-Ag bivariate diagram. (C) Au-As bivariate diagram including the solubility curves separating gold appearing as nanoparticles (Au0) or as solid solution (Au1) in orogenic gold deposits (Deditius et al., 2014) as well as in Carlin-type and epithermal deposits (Reich et al., 2005). (D) Co-Ni bivariate diagram. (E) Au vs. 100 × Te/(As + Te) diagram separating Te-rich (Au-Te) from Te-poor (Au-As) mineralization assemblages in orogenic gold deposits as defined by Belousov et al. (2016). (F) Au-δ34S bivariate diagram for grains with both trace element and S isotope data. Abbreviations: Alt. = alteration, GYI = Gruyere intrusion.
Published: 01 January 2025
Basalt and mafic to intermediate dikes. (A) Box-and-whisker diagrams of selected trace elements. Sample symbols of outliers are shown in the legend of 13B. (B) Au-Ag bivariate diagram. (C) Au-As bivariate diagram including the solubility curves separating gold appearing as nanoparticles (Au 0
Image
Plot of depth-profiled core U-Pb ages vs. rim U-Pb ages for individual zircons. Symbols and colors represent each formation. Core-rim age pairs are plotted overtop a bivariate kernel density estimate (KDE) plot to accentuate prominent core-rim age-pair clusters. The bivariate KDE bandwidth was automatically selected using Scott’s rule and then scaled by a factor of 0.3. The bivariate KDE plot was normalized such that the integral of the full KDE curve is equal to one. DZ—detrital zircon.
Published: 10 October 2023
Figure 8. Plot of depth-profiled core U-Pb ages vs. rim U-Pb ages for individual zircons. Symbols and colors represent each formation. Core-rim age pairs are plotted overtop a bivariate kernel density estimate (KDE) plot to accentuate prominent core-rim age-pair clusters. The bivariate KDE