1-20 OF 164 RESULTS FOR

amphorae

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 11 September 2019
DOI: 10.1130/2019.2542(27)
EISBN: 9780813795423
... TABLE 1. FABRICS AND PETROGRAPHIC OBSERVATION OF AMPHORAE FROM PHAROS (RESULTS OF THE OPTICAL MICROSCOPY) TABLE 2. WAVELENGTH-DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (WD-XRF) RESULTS FOR THE MAJOR (wt%) AND TRACE (ppm) ELEMENTS OF AMPHORAE FROM PHAROS AND OTHER STUDIED SAMPLES TABLE 3...
FIGURES | View All (27)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2018
European Journal of Mineralogy (2018) 30 (4): 759–772.
...Siwar Baklouti; Lara Maritan; Lluis Casas Duocastella; Ramon Járrega; Marta Prevosti; Claudio Mazzoli; Néjia Laridhi Ouazaa This work presents the results of the archaeometric study of Keay 25.2 amphorae from some sites along the Catalan coast (the ancient Roman province of Hispania Tarraconensis...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 30 September 2021
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2022) 55 (2): qjegh2021-074.
... to 20 m excess head) to provide additional reinjection capacity Colchester Northern Gateway Heat Network is being developed by Colchester Borough Council and Colchester Amphora Energy Ltd (which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Colchester Borough Council) to provide heating for a mixed...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Published: 01 September 2018
6 Ancient Montelabate – kiln 2a–2b 9 Modern Montelabate 55 Ancient Montelabate – below kiln 2a 56 Modern Valley of Montelabate 41 Amphora Type 1 Montelabate – kiln site 25 Amphora Type 2 Montelabate – kiln site 32 Amphora Type 3 Montelabate – kiln site 28
Image
The typology of amphorae produced at Montelabate.
Published: 01 September 2018
Fig. 3. The typology of amphorae produced at Montelabate.
Image
Photomicrographs of samples of amphorae from: (a) El Mojón, (b, d) Early Roman times from Catalonia. Cross-polarised light. (Online version in colour)
Published: 01 July 2018
Fig. 4 Photomicrographs of samples of amphorae from: (a) El Mojón, (b, d) Early Roman times from Catalonia. Cross-polarised light. (Online version in colour)
Image
Canonical functions of discriminant analysis of Keay 25.2 amphorae from Catalan sites, Early Roman Amphorae (ERA) from Catalonia, and Sidi Zahruni reference group (Baklouti et al., 2016) and amphorae from north-east and central Tunisia (Fantuzzi et al., 2015a and b; Fantuzzi & Cau Ontiveros, 2016). Red crosses represent the centroids of the a priori defined groups.
Published: 01 July 2018
Fig. 7 Canonical functions of discriminant analysis of Keay 25.2 amphorae from Catalan sites, Early Roman Amphorae (ERA) from Catalonia, and Sidi Zahruni reference group ( Baklouti et al. , 2016 ) and amphorae from north-east and central Tunisia ( Fantuzzi et al. , 2015a and b ; Fantuzzi
Image
Cluster analysis of XRPD patterns of Keay 25.2 amphorae from Catalan sites, with representative samples of Sidi Zahruni reference group (Baklouti et al., 2016) in italics, according to Euclidean distance and average linkage method on position and intensity of peaks. (Online version in colour.)
Published: 01 July 2018
Fig. 9 Cluster analysis of XRPD patterns of Keay 25.2 amphorae from Catalan sites, with representative samples of Sidi Zahruni reference group ( Baklouti et al. , 2016 ) in italic s, according to Euclidean distance and average linkage method on position and intensity of peaks. (Online version
Image
Comparison of the XRD spectra of raw clay material, circulated amphora and a discarded amphora.
Published: 01 September 2018
Fig. 14. Comparison of the XRD spectra of raw clay material, circulated amphora and a discarded amphora.
Image
(a) Thermogravimetric analysis and (b) differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) curves of raw clay material, a circulated amphora and a discarded amphora.
Published: 01 September 2018
Fig. 12. (a) Thermogravimetric analysis and (b) differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) curves of raw clay material, a circulated amphora and a discarded amphora.
Image
Comparison of FTIR spectra of raw clay material, a circulated amphora and a discarded amphora: (a) 600–1600 cm–1 region and (b) 680–750 cm–1 region.
Published: 01 September 2018
Fig. 13. Comparison of FTIR spectra of raw clay material, a circulated amphora and a discarded amphora: (a) 600–1600 cm –1 region and (b) 680–750 cm –1 region.
Image
Normalised elemental distribution of some trace and rare earth elements of representative potsherds of Early Roman Amphorae (ERA) and three Keay 25.2 amphorae of petro-group 3 from Catalan sites.
Published: 01 July 2018
Fig. 8 Normalised elemental distribution of some trace and rare earth elements of representative potsherds of Early Roman Amphorae (ERA) and three Keay 25.2 amphorae of petro-group 3 from Catalan sites.
Image
fig. 1.Cymbella proxima Reimer. figs 2, 3.Encyonema silesiacum (Bleisch) D.G. Mann. fig. 4.Encyonema procerum Krammer. figs 5, 6.Encyonema neogracile Krammer. fig. 7.Amphora copulata (Kützing) Schoeman & Archibald. figs 8, 9. Amphora veneta Kützing. figs 10-12.Amphora inariensis Krammer. fig. 13.Diploneis petersenii Hustedt. figs 14-16.Diploneis pseudovalis Hustedt. fig. 17.Neidium apiculatum Reimer. fig. 18.Aneumastus rostratus Lange-Bertalot. figs 1-12, 14-18 LM micrographs (magnification × 1500); fig. 13 SEM micrograph (scale bar: 10 μm).
Published: 01 November 2003
Explanation of Plate 5. fig. 1. Cymbella proxima Reimer. figs 2, 3. Encyonema silesiacum (Bleisch) D.G. Mann. fig. 4. Encyonema procerum Krammer. figs 5, 6. Encyonema neogracile Krammer. fig. 7. Amphora copulata (Kützing) Schoeman & Archibald. figs 8, 9. Amphora veneta
Image
 Figure 4. Frustules of colonial Tabellaria-like araphid (A–D) and single biraphid Amphora-like diatoms (E–G). A: Tabellaria-like frustule in valvar view. B: Ribbon-like colony of Tabellaria-like frustules in girdle view. C: Valvar view of stunted, isodiametric Tabellaria-like form. D: Girdle view of stunted Tabellaria-like frustules in ribbon-like colony. E: Amphora-like frustule in valvar view. F and G: Optical sections through Amphora-like frustules in apical view. Note flat valvar surfaces with raphes (arrows) on edges of concave (ventral) side of frustules. Scale bar in A, F, and G = 20 μm; B = 25 μm; C and E = 10 μm; and D = 30 μm
Published: 01 March 2002
Figure 4. Frustules of colonial Tabellaria -like araphid (A–D) and single biraphid Amphora -like diatoms (E–G). A: Tabellaria -like frustule in valvar view. B: Ribbon-like colony of Tabellaria -like frustules in girdle view. C: Valvar view of stunted, isodiametric Tabellaria -like form. D
Journal Article
Journal: Clay Minerals
Published: 01 September 2018
Clay Minerals (2018) 53 (3): 413–429.
... 6 Ancient Montelabate – kiln 2a–2b 9 Modern Montelabate 55 Ancient Montelabate – below kiln 2a 56 Modern Valley of Montelabate 41 Amphora Type 1 Montelabate – kiln site 25 Amphora Type 2 Montelabate – kiln site 32 Amphora Type 3 Montelabate – kiln site 28...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 03 May 2016
Journal of Micropalaeontology (2016) 35 (2): 133–142.
... Clay Formation. The best preserved sample yielded an assemblage of twelve morphospecies, including Diacanthocapsa ovoidea , Theocapsomma amphora and Theocapsomma sp. aff. T . amphora sensu Popova-Goll et al. 2005 , suggesting an original Santonian–Campanian age, and more likely only the Campanian...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
Example of Rietveld refinement of an amphora.
Published: 01 September 2018
Fig. 4. Example of Rietveld refinement of an amphora.
Image
Scanning electron micrographs of radiolaria from samples 42.0 m (figs 1–2), 43.0 m (figs 3–6), 45.0 m (figs 7–9b), 48.0 m (figs 10–24) and 48.42 m (figs 25–28). Scale bars 50 µm for all specimens. 1, Cryptamphorella sp. cf. C. sphaerica (White); 2, Praeconocaryomma (?) sp. cf. P. californiaensis Pessagno; 3, ?Orbiculiforma multa Kozlova; 4, Praestylosphaera (?) sp.; 5, Theocapsomma amphora Campbell & Clark; 6, Amphipyndax stocki (Campbell & Clark); 7, Rhopalosyringium (?) sp.; 8, Cryptamphorella (?) sp. cf. C. sphaerica (White); 9a, b, Diacanthocapsa ovoidea Dumitrica, profile and apertural view (respectively) of the same specimen; 10, Theocapsomma amphora Campbell & Clark; 11–12, Theocapsomma sp. aff. T. amphora Campbell & Clark sensu Popova-Goll et al.; 13, Diacanthocapsa ovoidea Dumitrica; 14, Diacanthocapsa sp. A; 15, Rhopalosyringium (?) sp.; 16, Cryptamphorella (?) sp. cf. C. sphaerica (White); 17, ?Sethocapsa orca Foreman; 18–19, ?Dictyomitra napaensis Pessagno; 20, Archaeodictyomitra sp. cf. A. simplex Pessagno; 21, Amphipyndax stocki (Campbell & Clark); 22, Archaeodictyomitra sp. cf. A. simplex Pessagno; 23, Archaeodictyomitra sp. cf. A. squinaboli Pessagno; 24, Stichomitra sp. cf. S. manifesta Foreman; 25, Stichomitra sp. A; 26, Archaeodictyomitra sp. cf. A. squinaboli Pessagno; 27, Theocapsomma amphora Campbell & Clark; 28, ?Crucella crux (Lipman).
Published: 03 May 2016
. P. californiaensis Pessagno; 3 , ? Orbiculiforma multa Kozlova; 4 , Praestylosphaera (?) sp.; 5 , Theocapsomma amphora Campbell & Clark; 6 , Amphipyndax stocki (Campbell & Clark); 7 , Rhopalosyringium (?) sp.; 8 , Cryptamphorella (?) sp. cf. C. sphaerica (White); 9a , b
Image
The so-called Gaza amphora (LRA 4).
Published: 01 July 2016
Figure 3 The so-called Gaza amphora (LRA 4).
Image
—Scanning electron micrographs of late Tertiary diatoms from seam of white opal enclosed in beds of Hualapai Limestone Member at locality 2 (Fig. 1). A, Navicula cf. N. cuspidata, widespread in freshwater habitats. B, Navicula halophila, brackish-water diatom that can tolerate considerable variations in salinity. C, Melosira moniliformis? Marine to brackish-water diatom common in coastal littoral habitats. D, Melosira moniliformis?, interior view. E, Amphora arcus var. sulcata, diatoms that are common in estuarine environments. F, Amphora hyalina, marine to brackish-water diatoms common in coastal to littoral habitats.
Published: 01 July 1978
considerable variations in salinity. C , Melosira moniliformis ? Marine to brackish-water diatom common in coastal littoral habitats. D , Melosira moniliformis ?, interior view. E , Amphora arcus var. sulcata, diatoms that are common in estuarine environments. F , Amphora hyalina , marine to brackish