1-20 OF 7298 RESULTS FOR

amphibole facies

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2000
American Mineralogist (2000) 85 (11-12): 1606–1616.
..., and increasing the Mn content causes changes in the mineralogy that mimic the same progression of assemblages that is seen in mafic rocks undergoing the amphibolite- to granulite-facies transition. The samples at localities I38 and I34 (Fig. 1 ) in this investigation are part of the garnet-amphibole-magnetite...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Multiple pyroxene and <span class="search-highligh...
Second thumbnail for: Multiple pyroxene and <span class="search-highligh...
Third thumbnail for: Multiple pyroxene and <span class="search-highligh...
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 1982
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (1982) 9B (1): 113–138.
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2012
American Mineralogist (2012) 97 (4): 713–726.
... trioctahedral phyllosilicates reported in the literature. This, together with the experimental reversibility of the reaction observed here, indicates that smectite can form as a progressive metamorphic mineral at greenschist- and amphibole-facies conditions, particularly at the expense of chlorite...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: The lower-pressure stability of glaucophane in the...
Second thumbnail for: The lower-pressure stability of glaucophane in the...
Third thumbnail for: The lower-pressure stability of glaucophane in the...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1983
Journal of the Geological Society (1983) 140 (4): 577–599.
... facies conditions as a result of mixing of fluids of varying f O 2 , initiated by thermal expansion of water during heating, decompression and consequent hydraulic fracturing. In the epidote-amphibole facies (garnet zone), dehydration reactions in metabasites generated large quantities of water, which...
Image
A histogram showing Ti-Amp in rocks metamorphosed under different metamorphic facies based on Raase (1974) with supplementary natural amphibole data from the literature (Ernst 1988; Liao and Wei 2019; Liou et al. 1981; Prakash et al. 2007, 2010; Qian and Wei 2016; Zhang et al. 2018). Temperature values shown on the right side along the vertical axis are calculated using the new Ti-Amp thermometer Equation 6. Ep-AM refers to the epidote-amphibole facies, and other metamorphic facies abbreviations are the same as in Figure 1. (Color online.)
Published: 01 February 2021
Figure 9. A histogram showing Ti-Amp in rocks metamorphosed under different metamorphic facies based on Raase (1974) with supplementary natural amphibole data from the literature ( Ernst 1988 ; Liao and Wei 2019 ; Liou et al. 1981 ; Prakash et al. 2007 , 2010 ; Qian and Wei 2016 ; Zhang
Image
Scheme of metamorphic zoning in the rocks of the eastern part of the Central Pamir (Shatput thermal anticline) according to [1]. 1 — Shatput granites; 2 — zones of distribution of rocks formed under the conditions of: I — high-temperature subfacies of greenschist facies; II — epidote-amphibole facies and III — amphibolite facies of regional metamorphism; 3 — Kukurt scapolite deposit.
Published: 01 February 1994
— epidote-amphibole facies and III — amphibolite facies of regional metamorphism; 3 — Kukurt scapolite deposit.
Image
Diagram (La/Yb)N versus LaN (chondrite normalized) of the lavas of southern Baja California. Lines A–D illustrate the evolution of liquid compositions during eutectic melting of corresponding A′–C′ sources (insets) with different mineralogies. Line A=eutectic  melting of A′ mantle source (57.8% ol., 11.9% cpx, 27% opx, 3% sp) in the spinel facies (McKenzie and O'Nions 1991). Line B=eutectic  melting of B′ mantle source (59.9% ol., 3.8% cpx, 24.7% opx, 11.6% amph) in the amphibole facies (McKenzie and O'Nions 1991). Line C=eutectic  melting of C′ mantle source (85% peridotite plus 15% adakitic liquid; mineralogy: 70% ol., 14% cpx, 10% opx, 5% amph, 1% gt; Sajona et al. 2000). Line D=step  melting of mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) crust with garnet amphibolite mineralogy (see Sajona et al. 2000). Partition coefficients come from Arth (1976), Irving (1978), McKenzie and O'Nions (1991), Hart and Dunn (1993), and Bédard (1994).
Published: 01 November 2002
  melting of A′ mantle source (57.8% ol., 11.9% cpx, 27% opx, 3% sp) in the spinel facies (McKenzie and O'Nions 1991 ). Line B = eutectic   melting of B′ mantle source (59.9% ol., 3.8% cpx, 24.7% opx, 11.6% amph) in the amphibole facies (McKenzie and O'Nions 1991 ). Line C = eutectic
Image
A. Amphibole and biotite replacement of clinopyroxene, Border facies. Plane-polarized light. B. Subophitic quartz and K-feldspar with subhedral to euhedral plagioclase chadacrysts, Guichon facies. Cross-polarized light. C. Amphibole phenocryst poikilitically enclosing plagioclase + magnetite + apatite, Bethlehem facies. Plane-polarized light. D. Oscillatoryzoned plagioclase glomerocryst with resorption surfaces common to the Bethlehem, Skeena, and Bethsaida facies; Bethlehem facies. Cross-polarized light. E. Amoeboidal quartz phenocryst that has undergone grain size reduction along its margins, Bethsaida facies. Cross-polarized light. F. Titanite, apatite, and magnetite cluster with plagioclase and quartz, Bethsaida facies. Cross-polarized light. Abbreviations: Amp = amphibole, Ap = apatite, Bt = biotite, Chl = chlorite, Cpx = clinopyroxene, Kfs = K-feldspar, Mag = magnetite, Ol = olivine, Pl = plagioclase, Qz = quartz, Srp = serpentine, and Ttn = titanite.
Published: 01 December 2017
Fig. 3. A. Amphibole and biotite replacement of clinopyroxene, Border facies. Plane-polarized light. B. Subophitic quartz and K-feldspar with subhedral to euhedral plagioclase chadacrysts, Guichon facies. Cross-polarized light. C. Amphibole phenocryst poikilitically enclosing plagioclase
Image
TiO2 content versus 100Fe/(Fe + Mg) value in amphiboles. Fields: I: granulite-facies amphiboles, II: amphibolite-facies amphiboles. Symbols here and in other figures are kaersutite (1), granulite-grade amphibole (2), high-T (3) and low-T (4) amphibolite-grade amphiboles, and metasomatic amphibole (5).