1-20 OF 373 RESULTS FOR

acanthomorphic

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2024
Journal of Paleontology (2024) 98 (2): 308–330.
.... Among these diverse microfossils, acanthomorphic acritarchs have played a significant role in the biostratigraphic subdivision and correlation of the lower-middle Ediacaran System. However, most previous studies on the biostratigraphy of the Doushantuo Formation in the Weng'an area have focused on large...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2019
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2019) 94 (5): 471–479.
... Tappania Yin is one of the most ancient known morphologically complex acanthomorphic acritarch that has been widely accepted as Proterozoic eukaryotic fossil. It was originally documented from the latest Palaeoproterozoic to early Mesoproterozoic rocks of Beidajian Formation of Ruyang Group of China ( Yin...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2014
Journal of Paleontology (2014) 88 (1): 1–67.
... phosphatized acanthomorphic acritarchs, which are useful in the biostratigraphic subdivision and correlation of the lower–middle Ediacaran System. These acritarchs can be studied using both thin sectioning and acid maceration techniques, thus have the potential to resolve taxonomic inconsistencies between...
FIGURES | View All (40)
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 February 2005
PALAIOS (2005) 20 (1): 27–36.
...BARBARA KREMER Abstract Enigmatic microfossils from the early Silurian of Poland known as mazuelloids (= muellerisphaerids) have been identified as Baltisphaeridium -like acanthomorphic acritarchs that have been subject to post-mortem phosphatization. These acritarchs were the dominant components...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 27 April 2020
Geology (2020) 48 (7): 708–712.
... in the Ediacaran (635–542 Ma). These microfossils, collectively known as the Doushantuo-Pertatataka–type acanthomorphs, have been variously interpreted as a polyphyletic assortment of resting stages of eukaryotes, including animals. The stratigraphic range of the acanthomorphs has long been thought...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
Published: 01 November 2024
Table 3. Paleoenvironmental distribution of reported acanthomorphic acritarchs from the Doushantuo Formation in South China. Numbers in each cell refer to data sources, as detailed below. Hashtag sign (#) indicates that the reported specimen was mistakenly assigned to Briareus vasformis Liu
Image
The distribution of the Ediacaran small and medium-sized acanthomorphic acritarchs in the present study (modified from Li et al., 2008).
Published: 01 March 2024
Figure 12. The distribution of the Ediacaran small and medium-sized acanthomorphic acritarchs in the present study (modified from Li et al., 2008 ).
Image
Published: 01 March 2024
Table 1. Summary of previous reports of acanthomorphic acritarchs from the Infra-Krol and Krol A formations in Lesser Himalaya.
Image
Pie diagram showing relative abundance of acanthomorphic and herkomorphic taxa from the Krol A Formation. The four acanthomorph groups, as discussed in the text, are color coded (blue, thin and short processes; brown, thin and long processes; green, large and thick processes; red, obtuse processes) to show that the assemblage is dominated by acanthomorphs with thin processes. Schematic diagrams denoting the vesicle size and ornament morphology are shown. Note that scales are different for vesicles and ornaments (processes in acanthomorphs and reticula in herkomorphs).
Published: 01 March 2024
Figure 29. Pie diagram showing relative abundance of acanthomorphic and herkomorphic taxa from the Krol A Formation. The four acanthomorph groups, as discussed in the text, are color coded (blue, thin and short processes; brown, thin and long processes; green, large and thick processes; red
Image
Medium-sized (20–60 µm) acanthomorphic acritarchs. 1–19, acritarchs from the genus Skiagia. 1, S. scottica Downie 1982. 2–3, S. ciliosa (Volkova 1969) Downie 1982, morphotypes A (2) and morphotype B (3). 4, S. orbiculare (Volkova 1968) Downie 1982. 5, S. ornata (Volkova 1968) Downie 1982. 6, S. compressa (Volkova 1968) Downie 1982. 7–8, S. pura Moczydłowska 1988, emend. 9, S. cf. compressa. 10–15, 18–19, vesicles interpreted as taphonomic variants of Skiagia, including forms resembling Baltisphaeridium (10–12), Globosphaeridium cerinum (13–14) or Lophosphaeridium dubium (14–15, 18–19). 16–17, S. ciliosa (morphotype C). 20, Parmasphaeridium implicatum (Fridrichsone 1971) Jachowicz-Zdanowska, 2013. Black arrowheads point to funnel-shaped process termination; white arrowheads point to plug-like or septum-like structures. 1, MGUH 33960; 2, MGUH 184004-B2-0580; 3, MGUH 33962; 4, MGUH 33963; 5, PMU 184004(1)-36189; 6, MGUH 33964; 7, MGUH 184004-B-0609; 8, MGUH 184003-2-0297; 9, MGUH 33966; 10, PMU 184004(2)-54; 11, MGUH 184004-A2-0769; 12, MGUH 184003-1-1188; 13, MGUH 184003-2-0663; 14, MGUH 184002-1-0185; 15, MGUH 184002-2-1969; 16, MGUH 34002; 17, MGUH 184002-1-0681; 18, MGUH 184004-B1-0591; 19, MGUH 184004-B1-0017; 20, MGUH 184003-2-0211. Scale bar equals 10 µm except enlargements in 1a–20a (5 µm).
Published: 06 October 2023
Plate 6. Medium-sized (20–60 µm) acanthomorphic acritarchs. 1–19, acritarchs from the genus Skiagia . 1, S. scottica Downie 1982 . 2–3, S. ciliosa (Volkova 1969 ) Downie 1982 , morphotypes A (2) and morphotype B (3). 4, S. orbiculare (Volkova 1968 ) Downie 1982 . 5, S. ornata
Image
Thin-section photomicrographs of Cambrian acanthomorphic acritarchs from the Yanjiahe Formation. (a–c) Asteridium tornatum; (d) A. tornatum (upper and lower right) and H. ampliatum (lower right); (e–g) Heliosphaeridium ampliatum; (h) A. tornatum (left) and H. ampliatum (right); (i) Heliosphaeridium dissimilare; (j–l) Comasphaeridium annulare. Scale bars represent 10µ for a-l. (a) YB 0.6_1a_4_2; (b) SY2 2.0_4a_4_4; (3) SY2 2.0_4a_4_4; (d) SY2 2.0_1f_2_6; (e) YB 0.6_2a_1; (f) YB 0.4_2a_3_1; (g) YB 0.6_2a_1; (h) SY2 1.4_1d_11_3; (i) SY2_-0.3_2f_1_1; (j) YB -3.7_2a_9; (k) SY2 0.7_4b_1_4; (l) SY2 -3.1_1e_1_2.
Published: 13 February 2017
Figure 2. Thin-section photomicrographs of Cambrian acanthomorphic acritarchs from the Yanjiahe Formation. (a–c) Asteridium tornatum ; (d) A. tornatum (upper and lower right) and H. ampliatum (lower right); (e–g) Heliosphaeridium ampliatum ; (h) A. tornatum (left) and H. ampliatum
Journal Article
Published: 02 December 2019
Geological Magazine (2020) 157 (7): 1087–1096.
...Alison M. Murray; Donald B. Brinkman; Michael G. Newbrey; Andrew G. Neuman Abstract Fossil material from the Maastrichtian part of the Scollard Formation is identified as belonging to an acanthomorph fish. An articulated specimen, preserved in part and counterpart, is a member...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
Published: 01 March 2024
Table 3. Summary of occurrence and abundance data for acanthomorphs, herkomorphs, and selected sphaeromorphs from the Krol A Formation. Number of specimens from each fossiliferous horizon is reported, with empty cells representing absence. A* = acanthomorphs; H* = herkomorphs; S* = sphaeromorphs
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2024
Journal of Paleontology (2024) 98 (S95): 1–79.
...Table 3. Paleoenvironmental distribution of reported acanthomorphic acritarchs from the Doushantuo Formation in South China. Numbers in each cell refer to data sources, as detailed below. Hashtag sign (#) indicates that the reported specimen was mistakenly assigned to Briareus vasformis Liu...
FIGURES | View All (42)
Image
Representative localities from Ediacaran basins where acanthomorphs have been reported. Also included are terminal Ediacaran to early Cambrian assemblages from the Lena-Anabar Basin (Grazhdankin et al., 2020) and the Khuvsgul Basin (Anderson et al., 2017, 2019). Ediacaran acanthomorphs were reported from the Zavkhan material (Ragozina et al., 2016), but the published illustrations are not convincing. (1) Localities on a modern geographic map. The scarcity of Ediacaran acanthomorphs in the western hemisphere is likely due to poor sampling intensity. (2) Localities on a ca. 600 Ma paleogeographic map (Merdith et al., 2021). The paleogeographic location of Svalbard is uncertain, but it probably was close to Greenland (Gasser, 2013). Note that Ediacaran acanthomorphs are concentrated in low latitudes and the possibility of two paleobiogeographic provinces (Gondwana vs. Laurentia-Baltica-Siberia). Also note the paleogeographic proximity between Lesser Himalaya and South China (particularly Liujing and Weng'an). Maps were generated using the software gplate.
Published: 01 March 2024
Figure 35. Representative localities from Ediacaran basins where acanthomorphs have been reported. Also included are terminal Ediacaran to early Cambrian assemblages from the Lena-Anabar Basin (Grazhdankin et al., 2020 ) and the Khuvsgul Basin (Anderson et al., 2017 , 2019 ). Ediacaran
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2024
Journal of Paleontology (2024) 98 (2): 159–220.
...Table 1. Summary of previous reports of acanthomorphic acritarchs from the Infra-Krol and Krol A formations in Lesser Himalaya. ...
FIGURES | View All (35)
Image
Published: 01 November 2024
Table 2. Summary of acanthomorph occurrence and abundance data at the nine studied sections. Each occurrence is denoted by fossiliferous sample name and number of specimens. For example, “21DC-4, 1” means one acanthomorph specimen recovered from the sample 21DC-4. Notes for superscripts: (1
Image
Rarefaction analysis of Doushantuo acanthomorphs. (1) Rarefaction curves with 1σ error bars of Doushantuo acanthomorph assemblages published with abundance data from 10 sections in inner shelf, shelf-lagoon, and slope facies. (2) Magnification of gray box in bottom-left of (1), showing rarefied species richness with subsampled size of 1–40 specimens. Sample sizes of Lianghekou section and basinal facies sections are small, therefore they were not rarefied. Rather, observed specimen number and species richness are plotted for Lianghekou section and pooled basinal facies data.
Published: 01 November 2024
Figure 40. Rarefaction analysis of Doushantuo acanthomorphs. ( 1 ) Rarefaction curves with 1σ error bars of Doushantuo acanthomorph assemblages published with abundance data from 10 sections in inner shelf, shelf-lagoon, and slope facies. ( 2 ) Magnification of gray box in bottom-left of ( 1
Image
Comparison of acanthomorph diversity among different depositional facies at species and genus levels.
Published: 01 November 2024
Figure 39. Comparison of acanthomorph diversity among different depositional facies at species and genus levels.
Image
Published: 01 March 2024
Table 4. Summary of measurements of acanthomorphs, herkomorphs, and selected sphaeromorphs from the Krol A Formation.