1-20 OF 187 RESULTS FOR

ZMAP

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2001
Seismological Research Letters (2001) 72 (3): 373–382.
... (and many others). ZMAP , developed by Stefan Wiemer, allows the user to examine an earthquake catalog from many different angles. Not only does it include the traditional map, cross-section, and time sequence parameters, but also several others, such as event size and mechanism. These can be combined...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
A magnitude-completeness graph obtained using the  <span class="search-highlight">ZMAP</span>  program in the Cal...
Published: 01 August 2011
Figure 7. A magnitude-completeness graph obtained using the ZMAP program in the California example. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
Snapshots of some  <span class="search-highlight">ZMAP</span>  windows. The upper left frame shows the cumulative...
Published: 01 May 2001
Figure 1. Snapshots of some ZMAP windows. The upper left frame shows the cumulative number of events (0 < M < 1.2; thick line) for the creeping section of the San Andreas Fault north of Parkfield. The thin line is the z value, which measures the significance of a seismicity rate change
Image
Cumulative distribution of burst magnitudes (136 unique events). The distri...
Published: 01 June 2009
Figure 10. Cumulative distribution of burst magnitudes (136 unique events). The distribution cannot be fit with standard Gutenberg–Richter models. We attempted to fit the curve with least-squares (MC LS [Zmap, see the Data and Resources section]), maximum likelihood (MC MLE [Zmap, see the Data
Image
(a) Cumulative and binned number of earthquakes versus magnitude. (b) Numbe...
Published: 01 March 2013
Figure 6. (a) Cumulative and binned number of earthquakes versus magnitude. (b) Number of earthquakes per day versus time from mainshock. Zmap software was used to make these plots ( Wiemer, 2001 ).
Image
(a) Magnitude versus time plot for the background seismicity shown in  Fig....
Published: 01 May 2002
Figure 5. (a) Magnitude versus time plot for the background seismicity shown in Fig. 4a . (b) Magnitude versus time plot showing the Hector Mine foreshocks and aftershocks. This figure was made using ZMAP ( Wiemer, 2000 ).
Journal Article
Published: 06 January 2015
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2015) 105 (1): 167–176.
..., including 1153 earthquakes shallower than 100 km with body‐wave magnitude of 5.0≤ m b ≤6.7. A detailed analysis of the earthquake catalog using a gridding technique ( ZMAP ) shows the quiescent area is located between 3° and 6° N, which covers the southeastern part of the focal area, including the rupture...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2006
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2006) 96 (1): 321–327.
... deviation with a mean value of 314 events per month. There was also a consistent trend of decreasing regional b -value as well as notable increases of seismic activity in areas surrounding the Chi-Chi earthquake source region via the Z-test map ( zmap ) analysis. 08 04 2005 Copyright © 2006...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
Magnitude–time distribution of  M  w ≥4 earthquakes that occurred in northe...
Published: 01 May 2014
and the corresponding uncertainty estimated by Woessner and Wiemer (2005) using ZMAP ( Wiemer, 2001 ).
Image
Magnitude-frequency plot for the first five days of aftershocks of the San ...
Published: 01 March 2004
to the cumulative frequency plot, with M c the magnitude of completeness. The zmap tool was used to make this figure ( Wiemer and Wyss, 2002 ).
Image
Mapped    b   ‐values with the difference in percentage with respect to the...
Published: 08 July 2020
Figure 6. Mapped b ‐values with the difference in percentage with respect to the background for two different periods: (a) between M w  6.4 and M w  7.1; (b) the first week after M w  7.1. The original maps were produced by ZMAP ( Wiemer, 2001 ; Reyes and Wiemer
Image
Curves of probability densities of earthquakes of different magnitudes in o...
Published: 02 July 2019
denote the probability densities of M ≥ 4.7 events deleted by using both the methods of Gardner and Knopoff (1974) and Reasenberg (1985) on the ZMAP platform ( Wiemer, 2001 ), respectively. PDF, probability density function.
Image
b -value map of Southern California as calculated by the entire magnitude r...
Published: 01 October 2008
Figure 1. b -value map of Southern California as calculated by the entire magnitude range method ( Woessner and Wiemer, 2005 ) with the software package zmap ( Wiemer, 2001 ), using 100 bootstraps on a 0.1°×0.1° grid with 100 earthquakes per grid node and 30 earthquakes above the completeness
Image
Magnitude–frequency distribution and completeness magnitude for earthquakes...
Published: 24 December 2014
Figure 6. Magnitude–frequency distribution and completeness magnitude for earthquakes located in (a) area A and (b) area B during the period 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013. Calculations are made by software ZMAP using the EMR method ( Woessner and Wiemer, 2005 ). Magnitude is local
Image
Stress tensor inversion results for three focal mechanism subsets: west (W)...
Published: 29 May 2019
of trend/plunge) of the maximum, intermediate, and minimum principal stress axis, respectively. R and Phi are the magnitude of the ratio of intermediate principal stress to the maximum and minimum stress, respectively, as originally defined by Gephart (1990) and implemented in ZMAP code ( Wiemer
Image
Cumulative number of earthquakes versus magnitude using different catalogs ...
Published: 26 September 2017
Figure 7. Cumulative number of earthquakes versus magnitude using different catalogs ( Benouar, 1994 ; Ayadi and Bezzeghoud, 2015 ) using Zmap software ( Wiemer, 2001 ) to obtain the magnitude of completeness = 3.6 ± 0.19 using the maximum‐likelihood estimate. Uncertainties
Image
Magnitude frequency distribution for earthquakes on the Shoreline fault. (a...
Published: 01 February 2013
, and Gutenberg–Richter distribution parameters, a and b , found using the ZMAP software ( Wiemer, 2001 ) and the EMR method of Woessner and Wiemer (2005) . (b) Number of events per year, black line from the catalog and gray line from extrapolation using the Gutenberg–Richter parameters. The extrapolation
Image
(a) Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN)‐detected events (pick‐based ...
Published: 18 May 2016
are shown in red, whereas the template‐matching events are shown in blue bins. We used ZMAP ( Wiemer, 2001 ) to determine b ‐values that range from 0.86 to 1.01 (for magnitude of completeness, M c  0.8 and 1.4), which is similar to the average b ‐value for southern California ( Hutton et al. , 2010
Journal Article
Published: 07 September 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (1): 66–74.
..., the effective completeness magnitude. The description and detailed explanation are mentioned in the ZMAP tutorial documentation ( Wiemer, 2001 ). The declustering, as expected, reduces the number of earthquakes in the catalog. From the declustered catalog, the magnitude of completeness ( M c...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 23 October 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (2A): 601–610.
... and phase picks are from the Alaska Earthquake Center Catalog. Maps are made with Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) package (GMT version 4 [v.4], https://www.soest.hawaii.edu/gmt/ ). Frequency–magnitude and magnitude of completeness estimates are done with MATLAB‐based ZMAP software package (ZMAP v.7, Wiemer...
FIGURES | View All (10)