1-20 OF 40 RESULTS FOR

Yafo Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 December 2010
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.10.30.0482
EISBN: 978-0-9836096-0-5
... of formation had prominent bathymetric expression. These Yafo Sand member features are interpreted to have been deformed due to the remobilization of finer grained clastics and subsequent upward injection ( Fig. 3 ) ( Frey-Martinez et al ., 2007 ). The remobilized sediment is sourced from turbidite sands...
Image
Published: 01 April 1982
Table 4. Cross Regression between Upper and Lower Parts of Yafo Formation and Bathymetry, Depths, Seismic Interval Velocities, and Thicknesses of Yafo and Mavqi’im Formations.*
Image
Seismic profile across continental slope showing separation of top and bottom reflections of Mavqi’im Formation to M and N reflectors along westward trend. Zone of separation of reflectors is Pelusium Line. Note that Mavqi’im Formation is intensively faulted at Pelusium Line. Vertical scale is reflection time in seconds, b. Interpreted depth section across continental slope. Yafo Formation pinches westward and Mavqi’im Formation pinches eastward; N and M reflectors merge east of Pelusium Line. Discontinuities and diffractions due to faulting interfered with velocity analyses at Pelusium Line zone. Interval velocity of Yafo Formation increases with bathymetry, and interval velocity of Mavqi’im Formation increases with thickness (Table 3). Depth is in meters and lateral distance in kilometers. For location, see Figure 1.
Published: 01 April 1982
scale is reflection time in seconds, b. Interpreted depth section across continental slope. Yafo Formation pinches westward and Mavqi’im Formation pinches eastward; N and M reflectors merge east of Pelusium Line. Discontinuities and diffractions due to faulting interfered with velocity analyses
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (4): 460–470.
...Table 4. Cross Regression between Upper and Lower Parts of Yafo Formation and Bathymetry, Depths, Seismic Interval Velocities, and Thicknesses of Yafo and Mavqi’im Formations.* ...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
—Seismic profile across continental slope showing reflectors L and M. Reflector L divides Yafo Formation into upper and lower parts. Reflector M in this part of continental slope combines reflections from top and bottom of Mavqi’im Formation. Vertical scale is reflection time in seconds. For location, see Figure 1.
Published: 01 April 1982
Fig. 2 —Seismic profile across continental slope showing reflectors L and M. Reflector L divides Yafo Formation into upper and lower parts. Reflector M in this part of continental slope combines reflections from top and bottom of Mavqi’im Formation. Vertical scale is reflection time in seconds
Image
—Interpreted depth section across the continental slope off Sinai. Note that thickness of Yafo Formation increases westward, probably due to proximity of Nile River. Westward increase of interval velocity was apparently caused by load compaction. At this part of slope, reflector M comprises both top and bottom reflections of Mavqi’im Formation. For location, see Figure 1.
Published: 01 April 1982
Fig. 6 —Interpreted depth section across the continental slope off Sinai. Note that thickness of Yafo Formation increases westward, probably due to proximity of Nile River. Westward increase of interval velocity was apparently caused by load compaction. At this part of slope, reflector M
Image
—Seismic profile across continental slope off Sinai, showing thick sequence of Yafo Formation overlying reflector M. Mavqi’im Formation does not reach thickness where top and botton reflections are separated, and reflector N is not discernible. However, faults correlated to Pelusium Line can be seen in center of profile (arrows), indicating tectonic origin of this feature. Vertical scale is reflection time in seconds. For location, see Figure 1.
Published: 01 April 1982
Fig. 5 —Seismic profile across continental slope off Sinai, showing thick sequence of Yafo Formation overlying reflector M. Mavqi’im Formation does not reach thickness where top and botton reflections are separated, and reflector N is not discernible. However, faults correlated to Pelusium Line
Image
—Interpreted depth section across lower continental slope off southern Israel. Yafo Formation is divided into upper and lower parts, and reflector L is well discerned. Interval velocity of upper part is considerably slower than that of lower part (Table 2), but both increase westward (Table 4). Mavqi’im Formation becomes thicker northwestward, and merging zone between M and N reflectors is Pelusium Line. Depth is in meters and lateral distance in kilometers. For location, see Figure 1.
Published: 01 April 1982
Fig. 4 —Interpreted depth section across lower continental slope off southern Israel. Yafo Formation is divided into upper and lower parts, and reflector L is well discerned. Interval velocity of upper part is considerably slower than that of lower part ( Table 2 ), but both increase westward
Image
 Section AA′ from Gvirtzman et al. (2005) showing the north Sharon graben, which preserves a complete section of the Mount Scopus and Avedat groups and a 600–100 m thick Bet Guvrin (lower Saqiye) section. The faults bounding that graben are detected seismically and mapped in the top Judea Group structural map (Fleischer & Gafsou 2003). They are buried by the undisturbed Quaternary Kurkar Group and possibly also by the Pliocene Yafo Formation that wedges out west of the Pardes Hanna well. Stratigraphic correlation with a nearby outcrop (section BB′) indicates that faulting probably occurred during the Miocene (upper part of the Bet Guvrin Formation).
Published: 01 March 2008
Judea Group structural map ( Fleischer & Gafsou 2003 ). They are buried by the undisturbed Quaternary Kurkar Group and possibly also by the Pliocene Yafo Formation that wedges out west of the Pardes Hanna well. Stratigraphic correlation with a nearby outcrop (section BB′) indicates that faulting
Image
(A) Generalized geological map of the study area with the northern part taken from Sneh et al. (1996) and the southern from Ilani (1985). (B) Base Kurkar Group subcrop map obtained by stripping off the Kurkar Group (Pliocene–Pleistocene). (C) Base Pliocene subcrop map by stripping off the Yafo Formation (Pliocene). Note that the base Pliocene unconformity surface cuts the Or Akiva fault, which does not reach the surface as seen in the present geological map of A. Also note that the base Pliocene unconformity surface truncates deeper into older units toward the SE, but its present-day dip trends southwestward (structural contours in black). Altogether, this indicates that after inland uplift and erosion and after faulting, the entire region was tilted to the southwest.
Published: 01 April 2011
off the Yafo Formation (Pliocene). Note that the base Pliocene unconformity surface cuts the Or Akiva fault, which does not reach the surface as seen in the present geological map of A. Also note that the base Pliocene unconformity surface truncates deeper into older units toward the SE, but its
Image
 Stratigraphic table of the study area based on previous publications (Bein & Gvirtzman 1977; Ginzburg & Gvirtzman 1979; G. Gvirtzman 1990; Buchbinder et al. 1993; Buchbinder & Zilberman 1997; Fleischer & Varshavsky 2002; Z. Gvirtzman 2003). Absolute ages for the Jurassic and Cretaceous after Gradstein et al. (1995) and for the Cenozoic after Berggren et al. (1995). Highlighted surfaces are base Kurkar Group, base Yafo Formation, and base Saqiye Group, which refer to the structural maps of Figure 5; and also the base Mount Scopus Group, which refers to the structural map of Figure 6 and the highlighted horizon of Figure 8. The significant modification introduced in this chronostratigraphic scheme relative to previous ones is that the absence of Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary sediments in the coastal plain is interpreted as the result of late Tertiary erosion at the eastern rim of the Jaffa Basin rather than a lack of deposition.
Published: 01 March 2008
for the Jurassic and Cretaceous after Gradstein et al . (1995) and for the Cenozoic after Berggren et al . (1995) . Highlighted surfaces are base Kurkar Group, base Yafo Formation, and base Saqiye Group, which refer to the structural maps of Figure 5 ; and also the base Mount Scopus Group, which refers
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2008
Journal of the Geological Society (2008) 165 (2): 563–578.
... Judea Group structural map ( Fleischer & Gafsou 2003 ). They are buried by the undisturbed Quaternary Kurkar Group and possibly also by the Pliocene Yafo Formation that wedges out west of the Pardes Hanna well. Stratigraphic correlation with a nearby outcrop (section BB′) indicates that faulting...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2005
Journal of the Geological Society (2005) 162 (6): 909–926.
... the Pliocene and Pleistocene, the re-establishment of normal marine conditions resulted in the deposition of a thick wedge of siliciclastic sediments in the Levant Basin and continental margin (Yafo Formation). 30 5 2005 19 10 2004 © 2005 The Geological Society of London 2005 Eastern...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2007
DOI: 10.1306/1209849M873255
EISBN: 9781629810072
... of the eastern Mediterranean showing the main structural elements, tectonic plates, and study area. Modified from Garfunkel (1998) . The mounded structures are confined to the lower Yafo Formation (lower Pliocene; Figure 2 ) and are restricted to an area underlain by the Afiq submarine canyon ( Figure 3...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
Published: 01 April 1982
Table 3. Cross Regression of Seafioor and Depth, Seismic Velocity, and Thickness of Yafo and Mavqi’im Formations.
Image
 Stratigraphic chart showing the main formations observed in the study area (after Garfunkel & Almagor 1987; Druckman et al. 1995), their age and the correlation with the seismic-stratigraphic units described in this paper. The lithological data are derived from unpublished stratigraphic well reports. Fm, Formation; YSM, Yafo Sand Member.
Published: 01 December 2005
stratigraphic well reports. Fm, Formation; YSM, Yafo Sand Member.
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 01 April 2011
Lithosphere (2011) 3 (2): 95–109.
... off the Yafo Formation (Pliocene). Note that the base Pliocene unconformity surface cuts the Or Akiva fault, which does not reach the surface as seen in the present geological map of A. Also note that the base Pliocene unconformity surface truncates deeper into older units toward the SE, but its...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2010
Journal of the Geological Society (2010) 167 (1): 203–216.
... . 2008 ) have shown that these regional changes were accompanied by a renewal of tectonism along the southeastern Levant continental margins. This unit represents the Pliocene to present sedimentary section and is composed of the Yafo Formation and the Kurkar Group (Fig. 2 ). This unit began...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
A: Location map of study area in Levant Basin, southeastern Mediterranean Sea, showing locations of three-dimensional (3-D) seismic surveys used (gray shading) and regional two-dimensional line (dotted). Wavy black line is outline of Afiq Canyon (from Druckman et al., 1995; Bertoni and Cartwright, 2006). B: Simplified stratigraphic column showing Messinian age Mavqiim Formation overlain by Yafo Sand Member (YSM), and underlain by largely clay-dominated canyon fill sequence (Ziqim and Bet Guvrin Formations). TWT—two-way traveltime. C: Regional seismic traverse extracted from two 3-D seismic surveys showing wedge-like geometry of Messinian evaporites.
Published: 01 March 2013
and Cartwright, 2006 ). B: Simplified stratigraphic column showing Messinian age Mavqiim Formation overlain by Yafo Sand Member (YSM), and underlain by largely clay-dominated canyon fill sequence (Ziqim and Bet Guvrin Formations). TWT—two-way traveltime. C: Regional seismic traverse extracted from two 3-D
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 March 2013
Geology (2013) 41 (3): 371–374.
... and Cartwright, 2006 ). B: Simplified stratigraphic column showing Messinian age Mavqiim Formation overlain by Yafo Sand Member (YSM), and underlain by largely clay-dominated canyon fill sequence (Ziqim and Bet Guvrin Formations). TWT—two-way traveltime. C: Regional seismic traverse extracted from two 3-D...
FIGURES