1-20 OF 182 RESULTS FOR

Xigaze Basin

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1996
GSA Bulletin (1996) 108 (6): 669–684.
...Sören B. Dürr Abstract The Xigaze Group of south Tibet was deposited in a fore-arc basin produced by northward subduction of the Neotethys under Eurasia during middle Cretaceous time. Clasts of andesite from the Gangdese magmatic belt to the north and limestone clasts from a shelf rimming...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 March 2015
GSA Bulletin (2015) 127 (3-4): 409.
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 November 2014
GSA Bulletin (2014) 126 (11-12): 1595–1613.
... the revision of current models for the geological evolution of the Asian active margin during the Cretaceous. The Xigaze forearc basin began to form in the late Early Cretaceous, south of the Gangdese arc, during the initial subduction of the Neotethyan oceanic lithosphere under the Lhasa terrane. Well...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2016
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2016) 86 (8): 894–913.
...Devon A. Orme; Andrew K. Laskowski Abstract: The Xigaze forearc basin records the evolution of the southern Lhasa terrane convergent margin, largely affected by Neo-Tethyan subduction processes, prior to the Paleocene Tethyan Himalaya–Eurasia collision. New geologic mapping and U-Pb detrital-zircon...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 28 February 2017
European Journal of Mineralogy (2017) 29 (5): 821–837.
... . 170 km and a maximum width of 20 km ( Fig. 1 ). Previous studies proposed that the Xigaze ophiolite formed in a marginal intra-oceanic transtensional basin. It developed by subduction of the Tethys ocean in response to the convergence of the Indian and Eurasian plates during the Jurassic...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 19 January 2021
Journal of the Geological Society (2021) 178 (2): jgs2020-208.
.... 1981 ). The original tectonic setting of the Xigaze ophiolite remains controversial, ranging from a slow-spreading ridge ( Nicolas et al. 1981 ; Girardeau et al. 1985 ) to forearc ( Dai et al. 2013 ; Maffione et al. 2015 ) and back-arc (e.g. Hébert et al. 2012 ) basins. The Jiding...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2017
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2017) 47 (2): 188–207.
...Marcelle K. BouDagher-Fadel; Xiumian Hu; G. David Price; Gaoyuan Sun; Jian-Gang Wang; Wei An Abstract This study of mid-Cretaceous foraminifera from the Linzhou, the Coqen and the Xigaze Basins in the southern Tibetan Plateau has provided the first high resolution biostratigraphic description...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
Comparisons of the Cretaceous strata in the <b>Xigaze</b> forearc <b>basin</b>, Linzhou B...
Published: 01 July 2015
Figure 14. Comparisons of the Cretaceous strata in the Xigaze forearc basin, Linzhou Basin, southern Nima Basin, Selin Co Basin, and Coqen Basin (this study). The strata and time scale in ordinate are referred to in An et al. (2014) , Leier et al. (2007a) , DeCelles et al. (2007b) , and Zhang
Image
Diagram showing the stratigraphy of the <b>Xigaze</b> forearc <b>basin</b> with lithofaci...
Published: 01 November 2014
Figure 3. Diagram showing the stratigraphy of the Xigaze forearc basin with lithofacies, biostratigraphic data, age distribution, and maximum depositional age (YC1δ[2+] age; after Dickinson and Gehrels, 2009 ). Geological time scale is after Gradstein et al. (2012) ; biozones of the Ngamring
Image
Main sedimentary structures in the <b>Xigaze</b> forearc-<b>basin</b> strata: (A–B) depos...
Published: 01 November 2014
Figure 7. Main sedimentary structures in the Xigaze forearc-basin strata: (A–B) depositional contact between Xigaze forearc basalt and the overlying Chongdui Formation (Naxia section; rectangle in A is expanded in B; hammer for scale); (C) debris-flow conglomerate in the lower Ngamring Formation
Image
Triangular diagrams for <b>Xigaze</b> forearc-<b>basin</b> sandstones. (A) QtFL diagram a...
Published: 01 November 2014
Figure 9. Triangular diagrams for Xigaze forearc-basin sandstones. (A) QtFL diagram after Dickinson (1985) . (B) LvPK diagram. (C) LmLv/10Ls diagram. Qt—total quartz; F—feldspars (P—plagioclase; K—K-feldspar); L—lithic fragments (Lm—metamorphic; Lv/10—volcanic, divided by 10; Ls—sedimentary
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 02 November 2020
Lithosphere (2020) 2020 (1): 8835259.
... to the region around and west of Xigaze City. Whether the eastern segment of the arc had a corresponding forearc basin is yet to be resolved. In this study, a field-based stratigraphic study, detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology (15 samples), and Hf isotopic analyses (11 of the 15 samples) were carried out...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
Stratigraphy of the Sangzugang Formation in the Sangzugang section, <b>Xigaze</b> ...
Published: 01 April 2017
Figure 2.  Stratigraphy of the Sangzugang Formation in the Sangzugang section, Xigaze Basin, showing the samples’ position and occurrence of main LBF of biozone TLK1c.
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 November 2019
GSA Bulletin (2020) 132 (5-6): 1273–1290.
... for newly discovered adakitic dikes in the Xigaze area, southern Lhasa subterrane. Based on the K 2 O and Na 2 O contents, the Xigaze dikes can be divided into K-rich and Na-rich dikes. Zircon U-Pb dating for the Xigaze K- and Na-rich dikes yielded ages of ca. 10.31 Ma and 14.78–12.75 Ma, respectively...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Schematic sections illustrating the envisaged evolution of the <b>Xigaze</b> forea...
Published: 01 November 2014
Figure 14. Schematic sections illustrating the envisaged evolution of the Xigaze forearc basin from Albian to Campanian times.
Image
Geological model for the geodynamic evolution of rodingites from the <b>Xigaze</b>...
Published: 28 February 2017
Fig. 6 Geological model for the geodynamic evolution of rodingites from the Xigaze ophiolite, southern Tibet (BAB = back-arc basin). (Online version in color.)
Image
Paleogeographic reconstruction of the Lazi region of the <b>Xigaze</b> forearc bas...
Published: 01 August 2016
Fig. 12.— Paleogeographic reconstruction of the Lazi region of the Xigaze forearc basin shown in Figure 1 . A) Reconstruction of the basin ca. 110 Ma during the initial stages of forearc sedimentation based on the interpreted depositional environments of Section A. B) Time-transgressive
Image
Tentative correlation diagram for measured sections in the <b>Xigaze</b> forearc b...
Published: 01 August 2016
Fig. 11.— Tentative correlation diagram for measured sections in the Xigaze forearc basin, northeast of Lazi. See Figure 1 for locations of sections. Relative horizontal position is maintained from Figure 1 .
Image
Tectonic model for generation of the <b>Xigaze</b> ophiolite and other Early Creta...
Published: 05 August 2021
Figure 13. Tectonic model for generation of the Xigaze ophiolite and other Early Cretaceous ophiolites in the Yarlung Zangbo ophiolite. (A) Pre-Cretaceous subduction: Middle–Late Jurassic ophiolite formed by forearc extension; the Zedang arc and Xiazha Formation were generated in a marginal basin
Image
Multidimensional scaling (MDS;  Vermeesch, 2013 ) results for all <b>Xigaze</b> Gr...
in > Geology
Published: 06 September 2019
Figure 3. Multidimensional scaling (MDS; Vermeesch, 2013 ) results for all Xigaze Group forearc strata and Rongmawa Formation trench basin strata (southern Tibet), with interpreted boundary (dashed line) between samples displaying local Gangdese magmatic arc provenance and samples displaying