1-20 OF 59 RESULTS FOR

Xiayoushashan Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Representative seismic profile B–B′ across the northern Qaidam basin. (A) Uninterpreted. (B) Interpreted. The location of this seismic profile is shown in Figure 3. Q—Quaternary; SZ—Shizigou Formation; SY—Shangyoushashan Formation; XY—Xiayoushashan Formation; SG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XG—Xiaganchaigou Formation; LL—Lulehe Formation; K—Cretaceous; J—Jurassic.
Published: 26 November 2024
Figure 6. Representative seismic profile B–B′ across the northern Qaidam basin. (A) Uninterpreted. (B) Interpreted. The location of this seismic profile is shown in Figure 3 . Q—Quaternary; SZ—Shizigou Formation; SY—Shangyoushashan Formation; XY—Xiayoushashan Formation; SG—Shangganchaigou
Image
Stratigraphy of the Dahonggou Section of the Qaidam Basin, northeast Tibetan Plateau, correlated to the recent magnetostratigraphic ages of Wang et al. (2017). GPTS—geomagnetic polarity time scale (Hilgen et al., 2012); VGP—virtual geomagnetic polarity; SZG—Shizigou Formation; SYSS—Shangyoushashan Formation; XYSS—Xiayoushashan Formation; SGCG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XGCG—Xiaganchaigou Formation.
Published: 13 December 2024
—Shangyoushashan Formation; XYSS—Xiayoushashan Formation; SGCG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XGCG—Xiaganchaigou Formation.
Image
Comparison diagram of the thickness-distance (T-D) plots and corresponding hinge points of each period (see Fig. 6A for locations). The vertical and horizontal axes indicate the normalized thickness (TN) and distances away from the basin margin (ATF), respectively. TN is obtained following the equation TN = (T–TMin)/(TMax–TMin), where T, TMax, and TMin represent the true, the maximum, and the minimum strata thicknesses in a certain period, respectively. Eroded portions are marked as dotted lines. The shaded blue and gray areas are used to highlight the tendencies of the T-D curves during the stages of the Upper Xiaganchaigou–Xiayoushashan formations and the Shangyoushashan–Shizigou formations, respectively. 1—Lulehe Formation (LLH); 2—Lower Xiaganchaigou Formation (LXG); 3—Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation (UXG); 4—Shangganchaigou Formation (SG); 5—Xiayoushashan Formation (XY); 6—Shangyoushashan Formation (SY); 7—Shizigou Formation (SZG). It is evident that the hinge points are located relatively farther away (by >10 km) from the Altyn Tagh fault on the major anticline belts after ca. 15 Ma compared to the previous stage (panels A, B, and D).
Published: 01 June 2016
the tendencies of the T-D curves during the stages of the Upper Xiaganchaigou–Xiayoushashan formations and the Shangyoushashan–Shizigou formations, respectively. 1—Lulehe Formation (LLH); 2—Lower Xiaganchaigou Formation (LXG); 3—Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation (UXG); 4—Shangganchaigou Formation (SG); 5
Image
Structural cross section based on surface geology and seismic data. The line location is shown in Figure 1B. , Paleocene Lulehe Formation; , Eocene Xiaganchaigou Formation; , Oligocene Shangganchaigou Formation; , Miocene Xiayoushashan Formation; , Miocene Shangyoushashan Formation; , Pliocene Shizigou Formation and Pleistocene Qigequan Formation.
Published: 01 November 2012
Figure 3 Structural cross section based on surface geology and seismic data. The line location is shown in Figure 1B . , Paleocene Lulehe Formation; , Eocene Xiaganchaigou Formation; , Oligocene Shangganchaigou Formation; , Miocene Xiayoushashan Formation; , Miocene Shangyoushashan
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic section across the northern Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E32 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N21 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Published: 15 March 2019
Figure 8. (A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic section across the northern Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E 3 2 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N 1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N 2 1 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic section across the middle of the Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E32 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N21 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Published: 15 March 2019
Figure 9. (A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic section across the middle of the Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E 3 2 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N 1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N 2 1 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic section across the southern Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E32 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N21 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Published: 15 March 2019
Figure 10. (A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic section across the southern Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E 3 2 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N 1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N 2 1 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Image
Seismic section 1 showing a typical strike-slip flower structure in the Yingxiongling range, where salt is absent. See Figure 2 for location. E32 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N21 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Published: 15 March 2019
Figure 14. Seismic section 1 showing a typical strike-slip flower structure in the Yingxiongling range, where salt is absent. See Figure 2 for location. E 3 2 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N 1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N 2 1 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic strike section across the hanging wall of the Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E32 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N21 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Published: 15 March 2019
Figure 11. (A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic strike section across the hanging wall of the Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E 3 2 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N 1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N 2 1 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted versions of a three-dimensional seismic strike section across the hanging wall and footwall of the Shizigou salt structure. See Figure 5 for location. E32 = Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation; N1 = Shangganchaigou Formation; N21 = Xiayoushashan Formation.
Published: 15 March 2019
= Xiayoushashan Formation.
Image
Stratigraphic columns for major depositional environments of the Wulan section in the northern Tibetan Plateau. Age assignment of the sediment units were from Lu et al. (2012). (A) Braided and meandering fluvial deposits of the early Miocene Xiayoushashan Formation. (B) Lacustrine deposits of the late Miocene Shangyoushashan Formation.
Published: 12 May 2022
Figure 7. Stratigraphic columns for major depositional environments of the Wulan section in the northern Tibetan Plateau. Age assignment of the sediment units were from Lu et al. (2012) . (A) Braided and meandering fluvial deposits of the early Miocene Xiayoushashan Formation. (B) Lacustrine
Image
(A) Regional seismic section V and (B) related geological interpretation, showing folding associated with local plastic flow of the Lulehe Formation and thrusts soling into the Shangyoushashan Formation, as well as the neighboring Shizigou and Xiayoushashan Formations. (C) Details of growth strata in the Dongchaishan anticline. (D) Details of the thrust soling into the Shangyoushashan Formation. (E) Details of growth strata in the Dafengshan anticline. (F) Details of the décollement in the Lulehe Formation below the Heiliangzi and Changweiliang anticlines. TWTT—two-way traveltime; GS—growth strata. Section location is shown in Figure 3.
Published: 04 April 2024
Figure 8. (A) Regional seismic section V and (B) related geological interpretation, showing folding associated with local plastic flow of the Lulehe Formation and thrusts soling into the Shangyoushashan Formation, as well as the neighboring Shizigou and Xiayoushashan Formations. (C) Details
Image
Interpreted seismic profile (1) in time domain. T0 to T6 are regionally correlative reflectors; T0 at the top of the Shizigou Formation, T1 at the top of the Shangyoushashan Formation, T2 at the top of the Xiayoushashan Formation, T3 at the top of the Shangganchaigou Formation, TR at the top of the Lulehe Formation, and T6 at the top of the Jurassic-Cretaceous strata. GS-1 and GS-2 are two growth-strata sequences associated with the development of the triangle zone and later synclinal folding. TWTT—two-way travel time.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 12. Interpreted seismic profile (1) in time domain. T0 to T6 are regionally correlative reflectors; T0 at the top of the Shizigou Formation, T1 at the top of the Shangyoushashan Formation, T2 at the top of the Xiayoushashan Formation, T3 at the top of the Shangganchaigou Formation, TR
Image
Seismic profiles in the southwestern Qaidam Basin; see Figure 2 for location. (A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted seismic profiles in the SW–NE direction; (C) uninterpreted and (D) interpreted seismic profiles in NW–SE direction. Note that the growth strata since the Xiayoushashan Formation (N21xy) indicate the intense tectonic movement of the Altyn Tagh fault during middle Miocene time.
Published: 01 June 2015
Figure 10. Seismic profiles in the southwestern Qaidam Basin; see Figure 2 for location. (A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted seismic profiles in the SW–NE direction; (C) uninterpreted and (D) interpreted seismic profiles in NW–SE direction. Note that the growth strata since the Xiayoushashan
Image
(continued). (A) Isopach map of the Lulehe Formation (E1+2). (B) Isopach map of the lower Xiaganchaigou Formation (E3-1). (C) Isopach map of the upper Xiaganchaigou Formation (E3-2). (D) Isopach map of the Shanggan-chaigou Formation (N1). (E) Isopach map of the Xiayoushashan Formation (N2-1). (F) Isopach map of the Shangyoushashan Formation (N2-2). (G) Isopach map of the Shizigou Formation (N2-3). (H) Isopach map of Quaternary sediments (Q). See Table 1 for age assignment of each unit.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 12. ( continued ). (A) Isopach map of the Lulehe Formation (E1+2). (B) Isopach map of the lower Xiaganchaigou Formation (E3-1). (C) Isopach map of the upper Xiaganchaigou Formation (E3-2). (D) Isopach map of the Shanggan-chaigou Formation (N1). (E) Isopach map of the Xiayoushashan
Image
Proportions of the environmentally sensitive components of the Cenozoic strata of the Dahonggou Section of the Qaidam Basin on the northeast Tibetan Plateau. (A) Mean size (in Φ values) in 10-point running average. (B) Fine grain (of eolian origin) proportion in 10-point running average. (C) Coarse grain (of hydatogenic origin) proportion in 10-point running average. (D) Global deep-sea oxygen isotope (δ18O‰) records (500-point smoothing) (Westerhold et al., 2020). Red shadow—ca. 9 Ma; gray shadow—mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum (MMCO). SZG—Shizigou Formation; SYSS—Shangyoushashan Formation; XYSS—Xiayoushashan Formation; SGCG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XGCG—Xiaganchaigou Formation.
Published: 13 December 2024
Formation; XYSS—Xiayoushashan Formation; SGCG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XGCG—Xiaganchaigou Formation.
Image
Grain-size parameters of the Cenozoic strata of the Dahonggou Section of the Qaidam Basin on the northeast Tibetan Plateau. See the text for the detailed calculations of these parameters. The calculations of the parameters and their categories follow Blott and Pye (2001) and Folk and Ward (1957). (A) Mean size (in Φ values). (B) Sorting. (C) Skewness. (D) Kurtosis. (E) Global deep-sea oxygen isotope (δ18O‰) (500-point smoothing) (Westerhold et al., 2020). Blue lines—raw data; black lines—10-point running average; red shadow—ca. 9 Ma; gray shadow—mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum (MMCO). SZG—Shizigou Formation; SYSS—Shangyoushashan Formation; XYSS—Xiayoushashan Formation; SGCG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XGCG—Xiaganchaigou Formation.
Published: 13 December 2024
(MMCO). SZG—Shizigou Formation; SYSS—Shangyoushashan Formation; XYSS—Xiayoushashan Formation; SGCG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XGCG—Xiaganchaigou Formation.
Image
Sketches showing the deposition of the three décollement layers and the associated influence on deformation in the Qaidam Basin interior. (A) Deposition of fine-grained mudstone and siltstone of the Lulehe Formation in a subbasin confined by basement faults and marginal uplift (A1). In the depositional period of the Xiayoushashan to Shangyoushashan Formations (ca. 11–5.8 Ma), continuous NE-SW shortening induced ductile flow (A2), resulting in the development of some décollement anticlines (such as the Dafengshan and Nanyishan anticlines). These anticlines created some other small subbasins with deposition of fine-grained mudstone (A3). During the deposition of the Shizigou-Qigequan Formations, NE-SW shortening was intensified, and some detachment thrusts soling into the Shangyoushashan Formation developed to form the fault-propagation folds observed at the surface (A4). (B) Some preexisting faults such as the Alar, Niuzhong, and Niubei faults became active, creating some subbasins within the basin (B1). The fine-grained mudstone with evaporites of the Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation was deposited in a subbasin confined by basement faults (B2). After fast burial by subsequent deposition of the Shangganchaigou-Xiayoushashan Formations that generated an overpressure environment, some anticlines developed by the thrusts soling downward into the Upper Xiaganchaigou décollement under continuous tectonic loading (B3). Intense deformation occurred, but it was decoupled by the weak layer in the Upper Xiaganchaigou Formation (B4). Please see Table 1 for stratigraphic unit symbols. Formation abbreviations as in Figure 13.
Published: 04 April 2024
). In the depositional period of the Xiayoushashan to Shangyoushashan Formations (ca. 11–5.8 Ma), continuous NE-SW shortening induced ductile flow (A2), resulting in the development of some décollement anticlines (such as the Dafengshan and Nanyishan anticlines). These anticlines created some other small subbasins
Image
Examples of seismic lines used in this study. (A) Section 7. (B) Southernmost segment of section 3. (C) Northernmost segment of section 4. See Figure 3 for locations. T0 to T6 are regionally correlative seismic reflectors; their relationships to Mesozoic and Cenozoic stratigraphic units are shown in Table 1. TWTT—two-way traveltime. T0 to T6 are regionally correlative reflectors. T0 at the top of the Shizigou formation, T1 at the top of the Shangyoushashan formation, T2 at the top of the Xiayoushashan formation, T3 at the top of the Shangganchaigou formation, T4 at the top of the Upper Xiagangchaigou formation, T5 at the top of the Lower Xiaganchaigou formation, TR at the top of the Lulehe formation, and T6 at the top of the Jurassic-Cretaceous strata.
Published: 01 July 2008
units are shown in Table 1 . TWTT—two-way traveltime. T0 to T6 are regionally correlative reflectors. T0 at the top of the Shizigou formation, T1 at the top of the Shangyoushashan formation, T2 at the top of the Xiayoushashan formation, T3 at the top of the Shangganchaigou formation, T4 at the top
Image
Contributing percentages of the grain-size components of the Cenozoic strata of the Dahonggou Section of the Qaidam Basin on the northeast Tibetan Plateau. Categorizing classes follow Udden (1914) and Wentworth (1922). (A) Clay. (B) Silt. (C) Very fine sand. (D) Fine sand. (E) Medium sand. (F) The mixture of coarse sand and granule. (G) The cumulative percentage of all grain-size compositions. (H) Global deep-sea oxygen isotope (δ18O‰) (500-point smoothing) (Westerhold et al., 2020). Colored lines—raw data; black lines—10-point running average; pink shadow—ca. 9 Ma; gray shadow—mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum (MMCO at ca. 17–14 Ma). SZG—Shizigou Formation; SYSS—Shangyoushashan Formation; XYSS—Xiayoushashan Formation; SGCG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XGCG—Xiaganchaigou Formation.
Published: 13 December 2024
shadow—mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum (MMCO at ca. 17–14 Ma). SZG—Shizigou Formation; SYSS—Shangyoushashan Formation; XYSS—Xiayoushashan Formation; SGCG—Shangganchaigou Formation; XGCG—Xiaganchaigou Formation.