1-20 OF 327 RESULTS FOR

Woodside Canyon

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
 Processed virtual outcrop model of Woodside Canyon, Utah, USA, showing lidar DEM textured with high-resolution digital imagery. Height of outcrop is approximately 100 m. This model can be used for accurate interpretation and visualization.
Published: 01 May 2008
Fig. 1.  Processed virtual outcrop model of Woodside Canyon, Utah, USA, showing lidar DEM textured with high-resolution digital imagery. Height of outcrop is approximately 100 m. This model can be used for accurate interpretation and visualization.
Image
Photographs to show the stratigraphic relationships between the Woodside Canyon incised-valley fill, marine shoreface parasequences, and the Sunnyside coal. (A + B) The northern margin of the Woodside Canyon incised-valley fill as seen on the southern side of Woodside Canyon; Sunnyside parasequence 3 is clearly removed by the sequence boundary that runs along the base of the valley fill. (C + D) The southern margin of the Woodside Canyon incised-valley fill as seen on the western side of the Beckwith Plateau; note that part of the coal extends over part of the valley fill and must therefore postdate the incision and filling of the valley.
Published: 01 July 2006
Figure 5 Photographs to show the stratigraphic relationships between the Woodside Canyon incised-valley fill, marine shoreface parasequences, and the Sunnyside coal. (A + B) The northern margin of the Woodside Canyon incised-valley fill as seen on the southern side of Woodside Canyon; Sunnyside
Image
Coal facies trends (denoted by arrows) and interpreted key sequence-stratigraphic surfaces superimposed on histograms to show variations in mineral content for seven sampled sections through the Sunnyside coal. The accompanying schematic logs (not to scale) summarize the relationship between packages of wetting- and drying-upward coal and key surfaces for each sampled section; lighter gray indicates drying-upward coal, darker gray indicates wetting-upward coal. Only one schematic log is shown for the Woodside Canyon sections (F, G) because of their similarity and close proximity; the diagonal shading in this log represents the part of the seam that is represented by coaly shale in the Woodside Canyon I section and by shale in the Woodside Canyon II section. See Figure 6 for location of sampling localities. See Figure 1 for a key to abbreviations.
Published: 01 July 2006
between packages of wetting- and drying-upward coal and key surfaces for each sampled section; lighter gray indicates drying-upward coal, darker gray indicates wetting-upward coal. Only one schematic log is shown for the Woodside Canyon sections (F, G) because of their similarity and close proximity
Image
 Detailed spectral gamma-ray data across the upper Sunnyside Sequence Boundary (sensuHowell & Flint 2003) at selected exposed sections: (a) Woodside Canyon No. 2, where the sequence boundary occurs within the Sunnyside Coal; (b) Woodside Canyon No. 3. Total gamma-ray, Th/K ratio, K content (% K) and sedimentological logs are shown. Inaccessible parts of the section, where spectral gamma-ray data could not be collected, are shown as gaps in the total gamma-ray, Th/K ratio, and K content (% K) logs. The incised valley fill interpreted in the Woodside Canyon No. 3 section is a multistorey fluvio-tidal sandstone with up to 20 m of basal erosional relief that truncates the underlying Sunnyside Coal (Howell & Flint 2003). The location and stratigraphic context of the sections are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Key to sedimentology as for Figure 8.
Published: 01 July 2005
Fig. 10.  Detailed spectral gamma-ray data across the upper Sunnyside Sequence Boundary ( sensu Howell & Flint 2003 ) at selected exposed sections: ( a ) Woodside Canyon No. 2, where the sequence boundary occurs within the Sunnyside Coal; ( b ) Woodside Canyon No. 3. Total gamma-ray, Th/K
Image
 Cross-plots showing the detailed Th–K characteristics of fluvial and fluvio-tidal sandstones (simple gamma-ray <70 API) in the non-marine Blackhawk Formation exposures (Figs 2 and 3). Fluvial and fluvio-tidal channel-fill sandstones are numbered from youngest to oldest at each locality, and localities are arranged from most proximal (Willow Creek; Figs 2 and 3) to most distal (Woodside Canyon No. 2; Figs 2 and 3). The stratigraphic position of each sandstone is shown in Figure 8a (Willow Creek), Figure 8b (Deadman Canyon), Figure 8c (Straight Canyon), Figure 9b (Whitmore Canyon) and Figure 10b (Woodside Canyon No. 2). Summary statistics are given for each group of sandstones, for comparison with the total population of fluvial sandstones in the exposures (Table 1, Fig. 7f).
Published: 01 July 2005
locality, and localities are arranged from most proximal (Willow Creek; Figs 2 and 3 ) to most distal (Woodside Canyon No. 2; Figs 2 and 3 ). The stratigraphic position of each sandstone is shown in Figure 8a (Willow Creek), Figure 8b (Deadman Canyon), Figure 8c (Straight Canyon), Figure 9b
Image
Images illustrating the difference between tabular and erosive offshore transition-zone deposits. (a) Tabular and parallel-sided, hummocky cross-stratified sandstone beds interbedded with tabular siltstone beds, Grassy G2 parasequence in Woodside Canyon. (b) Overview of tabular and continuous interbedded sandstone and siltstone beds of the tabular offshore transition, Grassy G2 parasequence, Woodside Canyon. (c) Erosive, pinching and swelling, hummocky cross-stratified sandstone beds interbedded with siltstone beds in OTZe in the Grassy G2 parasequence, Tusher Canyon. Person for scale is approximately 1.8 m tall. Small arrows highlight particularly erosive parts. (d) Steep-walled gutter cast filled with hummocky cross-stratified sandstone eroding approximately 50 cm down into a siltstone bed.
Published: 20 January 2015
Fig. 7. Images illustrating the difference between tabular and erosive offshore transition-zone deposits. ( a ) Tabular and parallel-sided, hummocky cross-stratified sandstone beds interbedded with tabular siltstone beds, Grassy G2 parasequence in Woodside Canyon. ( b ) Overview of tabular
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2006
AAPG Bulletin (2006) 90 (7): 1121–1140.
...Figure 5 Photographs to show the stratigraphic relationships between the Woodside Canyon incised-valley fill, marine shoreface parasequences, and the Sunnyside coal. (A + B) The northern margin of the Woodside Canyon incised-valley fill as seen on the southern side of Woodside Canyon; Sunnyside...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: High-resolution sequence-stratigraphic correlation...
Second thumbnail for: High-resolution sequence-stratigraphic correlation...
Third thumbnail for: High-resolution sequence-stratigraphic correlation...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1940
AAPG Bulletin (1940) 24 (4): 617–635.
.... On the west, in southeastern Utah and northeastern Arizona, thick light-colored sandstone units are intercalated in the redbeds of the Cutler formation. Still farther west at the Grand Canyon in Arizona the Permian consists, in ascending order, of the Supai and Hermit formations (redbeds), the Coconino...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Permian in Parts of Rocky Mountain and Colorado Pl...
Second thumbnail for: Permian in Parts of Rocky Mountain and Colorado Pl...
Third thumbnail for: Permian in Parts of Rocky Mountain and Colorado Pl...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (7): 949.
...William A. Shoemaker ABSTRACT Raymond Canyon is located on the west side of the Sublette Range, Lincoln County, Wyoming. The study area is just east of the Idaho border and 10 mi (16 km) southeast of Geneva, Idaho. It contains an ideal view of a thrust fault (Tunp thrust), excellent exposures...
Image
—View northward across the mouth of Franson Canyon into mouth of upper Weber Canyon, Coalville Quadrangle, Utah. In ridge between canyons may be seen light-colored Phosphoria formation overlain by red Woodside shale. Ridge beyond Weber Canyon is capped by “Nugget sandstone.”
Published: 01 January 1939
FIG. 3. —View northward across the mouth of Franson Canyon into mouth of upper Weber Canyon, Coalville Quadrangle, Utah. In ridge between canyons may be seen light-colored Phosphoria formation overlain by red Woodside shale. Ridge beyond Weber Canyon is capped by “Nugget sandstone.”
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1971
AAPG Bulletin (1971) 55 (11): 1976–2007.
... chart for southwest Utah and adjacent areas. McIntyre tongue of Woodside Formation in Millard and Summit Counties, Utah, should be Mackentire Tongue. Fig. 3. —Stratigraphic cross section A-A′, Havasu Canyon, T32N, R4W, Arizona, to Shell North Springs No. 1, Sec. 27, T15S, R9E, Utah. McIntyre...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Stratigraphic Analysis of Upper Permian and Lower ...
Second thumbnail for: Stratigraphic Analysis of Upper Permian and Lower ...
Third thumbnail for: Stratigraphic Analysis of Upper Permian and Lower ...
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2005
Journal of the Geological Society (2005) 162 (4): 603–621.
...Fig. 10.  Detailed spectral gamma-ray data across the upper Sunnyside Sequence Boundary ( sensu Howell & Flint 2003 ) at selected exposed sections: ( a ) Woodside Canyon No. 2, where the sequence boundary occurs within the Sunnyside Coal; ( b ) Woodside Canyon No. 3. Total gamma-ray, Th/K...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Use of spectral gamma-ray data to refine subsurfac...
Second thumbnail for: Use of spectral gamma-ray data to refine subsurfac...
Third thumbnail for: Use of spectral gamma-ray data to refine subsurfac...
Image
Figure 2. Equal-area projections of site-mean ChRM directions in geographic and stratigraphic (tilt-corrected) coordinates. Filled squares are in lower hemisphere; open circles are in upper hemisphere. Site-mean directions labeled with diagonal line were not used for determination of vertical-axis rotation. Observed section-mean direction in normal-polarity format is shown by circle surrounded by 95% confidence limits in projection at right. Expected direction is indicated by square in projection at right. Vertical-axis rotation, indicated by difference between observed and expected directions and 95% confidence limits (R ± ΔR), is indicated on projection at right. A: Ankareh Formation of north margin of salient. B: Woodside Shale of north margin. C: Ankareh Formation of central part of salient. D: Woodside Shale of south margin at Bear Canyon. E: Woodside Shale of south margin of salient near Rees Flat.
Published: 01 December 2003
and 95% confidence limits ( R ± Δ R ), is indicated on projection at right. A: Ankareh Formation of north margin of salient. B: Woodside Shale of north margin. C: Ankareh Formation of central part of salient. D: Woodside Shale of south margin at Bear Canyon. E: Woodside Shale of south margin of salient
Image
Figure 3. Distribution of vertical-axis rotations. A: Tectonic map illustrating major faults bounding and within Charleston-Nebo salient. UBMB—Uinta Basin–Mountain Boundary thrust; CT—Charleston thrust; NT—Nebo thrust. Localities: 1—Willow Creek (Ankareh Formation); 2—Bjorkman Hollow (Woodside Shale);. 3—Ankareh Formation in central salient; 4—Woodside Shale near Rees Flat. B: Declination deviation vs. strike deviation. Declination deviation is observed declination (D) minus expected declination (Dx). Strike deviation is local strike at sampling locality (S) minus regional strike of Sevier fold-thrust belt (Sr = N15°E). Thin line of unit slope is predicted if declination deviation is entirely due to secondary curvature of local strike from regional strike. Bold gray line is linear regression of data shown by open circles; datum from Woodside Shale of Bear Canyon was not used in regression.
Published: 01 December 2003
of Sevier fold-thrust belt ( S r = N15°E). Thin line of unit slope is predicted if declination deviation is entirely due to secondary curvature of local strike from regional strike. Bold gray line is linear regression of data shown by open circles; datum from Woodside Shale of Bear Canyon was not used
Image
Photographs of different outcrops in the SFB, showing variations in dominant lithologies and sedimentary thicknesses encountered throughout the basin. (a) Panorama of Rock Canyon (RC) outcrop, showing the plurimetric beds of conglomerates from the basal Moenkopi Group. (b) Detail photograph of the conglomerate from Rock Canyon. (c) Photograph of the terrigenous red beds of the Moenkopi Group at Lower Weber Canyon (LWC). (d) Panorama of the limestones beds of the Thaynes Group limestones at Lower Weber Canyon. (e) Panorama of the Moenkopi Group at Minersville (M), showing succession of terrigenous red beds and microbial limestones. (f) Panorama of the transition between Moenkopi and Thaynes Group showing succession of microbial limestones and bioclastic limestones at Minersville. (g) Photograph of the marine siltstones of the Dinwoody and Woodside Formation at Hot Springs (HS). (h) Panorama of the Hot Springs section, showing succession of limestone levels of the Thaynes Group bioclastic limestones.
Published: 18 April 2017
Figure 5. Photographs of different outcrops in the SFB, showing variations in dominant lithologies and sedimentary thicknesses encountered throughout the basin. (a) Panorama of Rock Canyon (RC) outcrop, showing the plurimetric beds of conglomerates from the basal Moenkopi Group. (b) Detail
Image
Examples of shoreface-incised channels that are interpreted as IVFs elsewhere in the Blackhawk Formation. A) Top Kenilworth Member K4 parasequence “IVF,” Woodside–Price River Canyon. Heterolithic-matter-to-sandstone-rich channel fill. Cuts into thick upper-shoreface sandstones of the K4 parasequence. B) Herringbone cross-bedded sandstones resting on top of rhythmically laminated carbonaceous-matter-rich mudstone and fine-grained sandstone, K4 parasequence shoreface-incised channel fill, Woodside–Price River Canyon. Rock-hammer handle for scale in lower right. C) “IVF” in Kenilworth Member parasequence K4, NE of Desert Siding. D) Thick shoreface sandstones of Sunnyside Member parasequence S3 cut by an “IVF” (O'Byrne and Flint 1995; Davies et al. 2006). Mudstone-filled IVF is approximately 18 m deep. E) Two examples of “IVFs” at two different levels: G1 and S3, South of Price River. Thick Grassy Member G1 parasequence shoreface package, cut by mudstone-filled IVF. Also the prominent Sunnyside S3-CH or “S3-IVF” is observed throughout this area. Mudstone-filled IVF. The entire S3 parasequence is cut out, with the incision going into the upper part of the S2 parasequence. F) Classic IVF interpretation for Grassy Member G2 parasequence shoreface-incised channel, North Wall entrance, Tusher Canyon. Mudstone-filled IVF. G) Grassy Member “pods” (arrows) at the top of the G2 parasequence, west face, Horse Mesa. O'Byrne and Flint (1995) interpreted these “pods” as dendritic small-scale channel incisions linked to a large-scale “G2-IVF” complex. Note the thin-bedded sandstones in the upper part of G2 and the convex-up geometry on the top of the pods. Approximately 15 km down depositional dip (east) of the Tusher Canyon photo shown in Part F. H) HCS sandstone bed passing from within a G2 pod (left) to outside of the G2 pod (right), west wall, Horse Canyon. This is clearly an iron-cemented diagenetic concretion, rather than a channel.
Published: 26 December 2018
Fig. 11.— Examples of shoreface-incised channels that are interpreted as IVFs elsewhere in the Blackhawk Formation. A) Top Kenilworth Member K4 parasequence “IVF,” Woodside–Price River Canyon. Heterolithic-matter-to-sandstone-rich channel fill. Cuts into thick upper-shoreface sandstones
Image
SEM images of aciniform carbon (AC/soot) and black carbon. A–E, AC/soot from the Younger Dryas boundary impact layer at Murray Springs, Arizona (A), Arlington Canyon, California (B), Bull Creek, Oklahoma (C), Blackville, South Carolina (D), and Halls Cave, Texas (E). F, Preoxidation carbonaceous residue from the 66 Ma Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-Pg) impact boundary layer at Woodside Creek, New Zealand (Wolbach and Anders 1989). G, The same carbonaceous residue from the K-Pg impact boundary layer at Woodside Creek, New Zealand, after 60 h of dichromate oxidation to remove kerogen. The characteristic “grape-bunch” structure of AC/soot, initially masked by a kerogen film, becomes clearly visible after oxidation (Wolbach and Anders 1989). H, Processed K-Pg AC/soot from Agost, Spain (Kring and Durda 2003). I, J, Cabot Corporation’s Monarch 120 carbon black, unoxidized.
Published: 01 March 2018
Figure A5. SEM images of aciniform carbon (AC/soot) and black carbon. A – E , AC/soot from the Younger Dryas boundary impact layer at Murray Springs, Arizona ( A ), Arlington Canyon, California ( B ), Bull Creek, Oklahoma ( C ), Blackville, South Carolina ( D ), and Halls Cave, Texas ( E ). F
Image
Fig. 10.
Published: 01 November 1969
Mountain, Hoback Canyon, and Munger Mountain sections). Silty claystone facies and part of lower platy facies are correlative with at least part of Woodside Formation on west.
Journal Article
Published: 20 January 2015
Petroleum Geoscience (2015) 21 (1): 55–73.
...Fig. 7. Images illustrating the difference between tabular and erosive offshore transition-zone deposits. ( a ) Tabular and parallel-sided, hummocky cross-stratified sandstone beds interbedded with tabular siltstone beds, Grassy G2 parasequence in Woodside Canyon. ( b ) Overview of tabular...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Sedimentology and reservoir properties of tabular ...
Second thumbnail for: Sedimentology and reservoir properties of tabular ...
Third thumbnail for: Sedimentology and reservoir properties of tabular ...
Image
—Diagrammatic section eastward along a line from Big Cottonwood Canyon, type section of “Park City formation” to Ashley Creek, Uinta County, Utah, showing general stratigraphic relations of members of Phosphoria formation and lower member of “Park City formation.” Number with each locality is distance in miles of point of projection of locality on line from type section. WS, Woodside shale; RM, Rex member of the Phosphoria formation; PSM, phosphatic shale member of Phosphoria formation; AM, Mackentire “red-beds” tongue of Phosphoria formation; WPC, lower member of “Park City formation”; WSS, Weber sandstone; WQ, Weber quartzite.
Published: 01 January 1939
FIG. 2. —Diagrammatic section eastward along a line from Big Cottonwood Canyon, type section of “Park City formation” to Ashley Creek, Uinta County, Utah, showing general stratigraphic relations of members of Phosphoria formation and lower member of “Park City formation.” Number with each