1-20 OF 1911 RESULTS FOR

Wolf Creek

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 14 February 2018
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2018) 24 (1): 75–88.
... methodologies, reducing overall costs, and improving designs. This continuous improvement can be seen in the evolution of USACE barrier wall construction designs and contracting methods. From the first Wolf Creek Dam barrier wall installed in the 1970s to the more recent Bolivar and East Branch Dam barrier wall...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 August 1987
Economic Geology (1987) 82 (5): 1334–1347.
...Ian M. Lange; Johnnie N. Moore; H. Roy Krouse Abstract Strata-bound silver-bearing copper sulfides occur in two thin green siltstone units, a thin phosphatic green siltstone bed and a stromatolitic oolitic carbonate bed, of the Spokane Formation near Wolf Creek, Montana. Red mudstone and fine...
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 1977
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (1977) xiv (4): 245–269.
...JOHN KELLBERG; MARVIN SIMMONS Abstract The geologic conditions at the Wolf Creek Damsite reflect past geologic processes which have been active in the region. A dominant percentage of the rocks underlying the Cumberland Basin are limestones which are subject to solutional erosion resulting in karst...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1967
American Mineralogist (1967) 52 (7-8): 1190.
...John S. White, Jr.; E. P. Henderson; Brian Mason Abstract Specimens of the Wolf Creek iron meteorite have been almost completely altered to secondary minerals by weathering. The specimens are a mixture of goethite and nickelian maghemite with small amounts of jarosite, apatite, lipscombite...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1963
American Mineralogist (1963) 48 (5-6): 597–613.
...E. Wm. Heinrich Abstract The Wolf Creek ultramafic pluton, in the southern Ruby Mountains in southwestern Montana, intrudes Prebeltian metamorphic rocks and is itself late Prebeltian in age. It consists chiefly of coarse-grained harzburgite which has been partly altered, chiefly to serpentinite...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1943
GSA Bulletin (1943) 54 (5): 625–650.
...ROBERT P. SHARP Abstract The heretofore unmapped rock sequence on Wolf Creek provides a useful section for correlation of Canadian Yukon and Alaskan formations. The oldest rock, massive Devonian marble at least 1000 feet thick, is overlain by several thousand feet of Devonian-Mississippian slate...
Image
—Generalized geologic map of the Divide Creek and Wolf Creek anticlines and part of the southern leg of the Grand Hogback monocline, southern Piceance basin, showing approximate locations of gravity and seismic surveys and drill-hole locations discussed in text. Line G = approximate location of gravity survey (from Abrams and Grout, 1987, 1990), Line S = approximate location of seismic survey; Tbb = Pliocene and Miocene basalt; Tmi = Middle Tertiary intrusive rocks; Tg = Tertiary Green River Formation; Tw = Tertiary Wasatch Formation; Kmv = Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group; Kmu = upper part of Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale; KTru = lower part of Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale through Upper Triassic Chinle Formation, undifferentiated; PIPm = Lower Permian and Pennsylvanian Maroon Formation; IPe = Middle Pennsylvanian Eagle Valley evaporite sequence. Geology from Tweto et al. (1978), Berry (1959), Tichy and Rettger (1962), and Johnson (1983). Gas fields (shaded) from Petroleum Information Corporation and Barlow and Haun, Inc. (1986).
Published: 01 February 1991
Figure 2 —Generalized geologic map of the Divide Creek and Wolf Creek anticlines and part of the southern leg of the Grand Hogback monocline, southern Piceance basin, showing approximate locations of gravity and seismic surveys and drill-hole locations discussed in text. Line G = approximate
Image
Grout leaks emerging through cracks in the work platform slab on Wolf Creek Dam.
Published: 17 November 2022
Figure 1. Grout leaks emerging through cracks in the work platform slab on Wolf Creek Dam.
Image
Grout leak through sheetpile retaining wall on work platform on Wolf Creek Dam and corresponding vibrating wire piezometer spikes measured during grouting operations.
Published: 17 November 2022
Figure 2. Grout leak through sheetpile retaining wall on work platform on Wolf Creek Dam and corresponding vibrating wire piezometer spikes measured during grouting operations.
Image
Wolf Creek Dam geologic section—view looking upstream (Kellberg and Simmons, 1977).
Published: 14 February 2018
Figure 1. Wolf Creek Dam geologic section—view looking upstream ( Kellberg and Simmons, 1977 ).
Image
Grouting completed at Wolf Creek Dam prior to the barrier wall construction.
Published: 14 February 2018
Figure 2. Grouting completed at Wolf Creek Dam prior to the barrier wall construction.
Image
Location of features on the second Wolf Creek barrier wall, including original ICOS wall—view looking downstream.
Published: 14 February 2018
Figure 3. Location of features on the second Wolf Creek barrier wall, including original ICOS wall—view looking downstream.
Image
Location of Wolf Creek walls with contract sections of the original wall identified.
Published: 14 February 2018
Figure 5. Location of Wolf Creek walls with contract sections of the original wall identified.
Image
Typical plan (top) and section (bottom) of the original Wolf Creek wall. Secondary elements were excavated into rock under slurry.
Published: 14 February 2018
Figure 7. Typical plan (top) and section (bottom) of the original Wolf Creek wall. Secondary elements were excavated into rock under slurry.
Image
Fig. 3.
Published: 08 August 2013
Fig. 3. ( a ) Outcrop of Wolf Creek ultramafic with coarse orthopyroxene in orthopyroxene–olivine groundmass. ( b ) Thin section of ultramafic viewed in plane polarized light showing preserved igneous texture of dark spinel intergrown with orthopyroxene laths. The euhedral spinel in the image
Image
Placement of impervious fill in the Wolf Creek cut-off trench during the original construction. Note the use of the dozer in the trench (Southwestern Power Administration, USDOE, 2008).
Published: 01 February 2013
Figure 9 Placement of impervious fill in the Wolf Creek cut-off trench during the original construction. Note the use of the dozer in the trench ( Southwestern Power Administration, USDOE, 2008 ).
Image
Examples of tidal features in the Upper Eagle succession at Wolf Creek. a) Sigmoidal bedding, b) tidal couplets, c) flasers and possible flaser forks. Photo (a) courtesy of Shaun O’Connell.
Published: 01 June 2003
Fig. 7. Examples of tidal features in the Upper Eagle succession at Wolf Creek. a) Sigmoidal bedding, b) tidal couplets, c) flasers and possible flaser forks. Photo (a) courtesy of Shaun O’Connell.
Image
—Interpreted time-migrated seismic section across Wolf Creek anticline (approximate location shown on Figure 2). Top of units, picked by seismic reflectors, shown as dark lines. Tw = Tertiary Wasatch Formation; Kmv = Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group; Km = Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale; Kd = Upper Cretaceous Dakota Sandstone; PIPwm = Lower Permian to Middle Pennsylvanian Weber Sandstone and Maroon Formation; IPm = Middle Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation; IPbe = Middle Pennsylvanian Belden Formation, including Middle Pennsylvanian Eagle Valley evaporite sequence; M€r = Mississippian through Cambrian rocks, undivided; p€ = Precambrian metamorphic basement rocks. Solid and dashed lines that cut across units indicate thrust faults. Wells used for stratigraphic control are shown at top of section.
Published: 01 February 1991
Figure 6 —Interpreted time-migrated seismic section across Wolf Creek anticline (approximate location shown on Figure 2 ). Top of units, picked by seismic reflectors, shown as dark lines. Tw = Tertiary Wasatch Formation; Kmv = Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group; Km = Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1991
AAPG Bulletin (1991) 75 (2): 205–218.
...Figure 2 —Generalized geologic map of the Divide Creek and Wolf Creek anticlines and part of the southern leg of the Grand Hogback monocline, southern Piceance basin, showing approximate locations of gravity and seismic surveys and drill-hole locations discussed in text. Line G = approximate...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1964
DOI: 10.2110/pec.64.01.0169
EISBN: 9781565761414
...,” and Lance Formations of the Hayden section. Pollen species reported from the Paleocene of Montana and New Mexico are found in the Fort Union Formation at Hayden and in the unnamed lower member of the Wasatch Formation at Meeker. Comparison of microfossil s from the Meeker and Wolf Creek sections...