1-20 OF 91 RESULTS FOR

Wilrich Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1989
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1989) 37 (2): 182–197.
...Cathy A. Connolly ABSTRACT The diagenesis and thermal history of the Wilrich Member, Spirit River Formation, in the Deep Basin of Alberta is modelled in the context of tectonic and stratigraphic histories. During the Laramide Orogeny (Late Cretaceous to mid-Tertiary), the Wilrich was buried...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1997
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1997) 45 (2): 194–217.
... end, but mudstones are more prevalent at the northeastern end. All six valley fills are truncated by a major bounding discontinuity, overlain by a thin coarse lag, in turn overlain by open marine mudstones of the Wilrich Formation. The combination of deep channelling, sandstones in the southwest...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1991
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1991) 39 (2): 222–223.
... and shelf sandstones in inter-valley regions. A transgressive erosional surface and accompanying sandstone lag occurs at the top of the Bluesky Formation. Bluesky sediments are overlain by offshore shales of the Wilrich Formation. Twenty-two lithofacies were identified from 54 cored wells within the study...
Image
GIP estimates for the ORB unit (A) and the Garbutt-Moosebar-Wilrich formations and the equivalents (B).
Published: 01 March 2008
Fig. 16. GIP estimates for the ORB unit (A) and the Garbutt-Moosebar-Wilrich formations and the equivalents (B).
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2010
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2010) 58 (2): 159–172.
... lithological units in the Gething Formation in the study area possess good reservoir properties. Additionally, the Gething is encased by fine-grained, organic-rich stratal units (Cretaceous Wilrich Formation above and Triassic Montney Formation below) that serve as both hydrocarbon sources ( Chalmers...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Preliminary assessment of ichnofacies in the Gethi...
Second thumbnail for: Preliminary assessment of ichnofacies in the Gethi...
Third thumbnail for: Preliminary assessment of ichnofacies in the Gethi...
Image
A) Typical expression of HETGL at the Bluesky Formation/Wilrich Member contact, displaying very robust Diplocraterion traces. Well 05-29-082-16W5M, depth 668.0 m. B-I, mudstone dominated facies (MD). B) Massive to laminated mudstone of MDRL with thin very fine-grained sandstone lenses. Trace fossils are diminutive and rare, and include Asterosoma, Chondrites, and Planolites. Well 12-09-084-16W5M, depth 666.1 m. C) Robust Teichichnus within facies MDRL. Well 12-09-084-15W5M, depth 644.75–644.95 m. D) Laminated to lenticular mudstone of MDLM showing soft-sediment deformation and shell lags. Well 06-03-084-16W5M, 662.5–662.75 m. E) Core sleeve expression of facies MDRL displaying common very-fine sandstone lenses and sporadic bioturbation. Red box shows the location of photo B. Well 12-09-084-16W5M, depth 663.5–664.25 m. F) Highly bioturbated MDBB with very low diversity, and diminution of traces. Well 10-18-084-16W5M, depth 725.80 m. G) Bioturbated silty to sandy mudstone with low diversity and moderate to high BI (4). Traces include Cylindrichnus, Planolites, Teichichnus, and Skolithos. Well 05-29-082-16W5M, depth 693.1 m. H) Highly bioturbated expression of MDMB with robust Zoophycos, and subordinate Asterosoma, Chondrites, Planolites, and Thalassinoides. Well 10-36-083-17W5M, depth 625.1 m. I) Highly bioturbated expression of B8 with robust Teichichnus, and subordinate Asterosoma, Chondrites, and Planolites. Well 10-36-083-17W5M, depth 625.8 m.
Published: 01 September 2016
Figure 7 A) Typical expression of HET GL at the Bluesky Formation/Wilrich Member contact, displaying very robust Diplocraterion traces. Well 05-29-082-16W5M, depth 668.0 m. B-I, mudstone dominated facies (MD). B) Massive to laminated mudstone of MD RL with thin very fine-grained sandstone
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2008
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2008) 56 (1): 22–61.
...Fig. 16. GIP estimates for the ORB unit (A) and the Garbutt-Moosebar-Wilrich formations and the equivalents (B). ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Lower Cretaceous gas shales in northeastern Britis...
Second thumbnail for: Lower Cretaceous gas shales in northeastern Britis...
Third thumbnail for: Lower Cretaceous gas shales in northeastern Britis...
Image
Normal incidence model illustrating sensitivity to changes in the Wilrich and the coal section by reference to two wells. (a) The log cross section, where the central well of the model is Well A with only the Wilrich sand zone from Well B used as replacement (replaced Well A). The thickness of the Spirit River Formation is held constant. (b) The normal incidence model illustrating the minimal differences caused by the Wilrich sand changes, and the big differences caused by changes in the coal.
Published: 20 March 2014
A). The thickness of the Spirit River Formation is held constant. (b) The normal incidence model illustrating the minimal differences caused by the Wilrich sand changes, and the big differences caused by changes in the coal.
Image
Palynofacies in Gething, Bluesky and Wilrich strata, modified from Dolby et al. (2013). Palynomorph associations shown here are prevalent in marginal-marine strata of the Gething Formation, Bluesky Formation, Glossifungites surface, and Wilrich Member. An expanded version of this palynofacies scheme was developed by Dolby et al. (2013) to characterize the McMurray Formation and Wabiskaw Member. Palynofacies abbreviations are discussed in text.
Published: 01 September 2018
Figure 4. Palynofacies in Gething, Bluesky and Wilrich strata, modified from Dolby et al. (2013) . Palynomorph associations shown here are prevalent in marginal-marine strata of the Gething Formation, Bluesky Formation, Glossifungites surface, and Wilrich Member. An expanded version
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2018
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2018) 66 (3): 695–724.
...Figure 4. Palynofacies in Gething, Bluesky and Wilrich strata, modified from Dolby et al. (2013) . Palynomorph associations shown here are prevalent in marginal-marine strata of the Gething Formation, Bluesky Formation, Glossifungites surface, and Wilrich Member. An expanded version...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Calibrating micropaleontology with sedimentology a...
Second thumbnail for: Calibrating micropaleontology with sedimentology a...
Third thumbnail for: Calibrating micropaleontology with sedimentology a...
Image
Stratigraphic chart showing the relationship of the Bluesky, Gething formations, and Wilrich Member. The green line demarcating the boundary between the Bluesky and Wilrich represents a Glossifungites-demarcated surface of erosion, while the red line represents a compound transgressive ravinement surface and sub-areal unconformity.
Published: 01 September 2016
Figure 1 Stratigraphic chart showing the relationship of the Bluesky, Gething formations, and Wilrich Member. The green line demarcating the boundary between the Bluesky and Wilrich represents a Glossifungites -demarcated surface of erosion, while the red line represents a compound transgressive
Image
—Typical gamma-ray log (well 11-3-70-11W6) through Spirit River Formation, with generalized lithologic pattern indicated. Spirit River is subdivided into Wilrich, Falher, and Notikewin Members, which may also be split into cycles or sequences. Wilrich Member as defined for use in this paper is consistent with cycle boundaries. Other geologists have used term “Wilrich” for shaly sediments at base of Spirit River, but this definition causes problems because lithologic units of this type cross cycle boundaries in a south-to-north traverse.
Published: 01 April 1983
FIG. 2 —Typical gamma-ray log (well 11-3-70-11W6) through Spirit River Formation, with generalized lithologic pattern indicated. Spirit River is subdivided into Wilrich, Falher, and Notikewin Members, which may also be split into cycles or sequences. Wilrich Member as defined for use
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1990
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1990) 38A (1): 196–217.
... of formation fluid flow systems were identified by Toth (1978) in the Red Earth region, which lies in the northeast corner of the study area (Fig. 1). He showed that two upper systems (Meso-Cenozoic: post- Clearwater/Wilrich ydrostratigraphic units; and Paleo- Mesozoic I: post-Ireton to Clearwater/Wilrich...
Image
Stratigraphic chart of strata from the study area. Samples from the upper Gething Formation, Bluesky Formation, and Wilrich Member were analyzed for their micropaleontological content. Samples were also collected from a thin, transgressive unit (referred to as the “Glossifungites surface” in this study) that separates Bluesky Formation strata from the Wilrich Member. This unit contains Glossifungites assemblages and demarcates a stratigraphic discontinuity (transgressive surface of erosion). Deposits of the Peace River oil sands are coeval with strata of the Athabasca oil sands. The approximate ages of the formations are provided here, but this study indicates that modification to the time scale may be necessary as the Bluesky and Gething formations may be older than previously thought (see text for discussion). Modified from Core Laboratories Geological Sciences Department-Canada 2016.
Published: 01 September 2018
Figure 1. Stratigraphic chart of strata from the study area. Samples from the upper Gething Formation, Bluesky Formation, and Wilrich Member were analyzed for their micropaleontological content. Samples were also collected from a thin, transgressive unit (referred to as the “Glossifungites
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1999
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1999) 47 (3): 270–297.
.... Original oil migration into Lower Cretaceous strata at Peace River accumulated in a large stratigraphic trap, sealed by overlying Wilrich Member shales of the Spirit River Formation. Mississippian carbonates, although saturated with bitumen locally, in effect provided the bottom seal to the reservoir over...
Book Chapter

Group(s)
Milner
... member Harmon shale member Spirit River formation Notikewin sandstone member Falher member Wilrich member Bluesky formation Bullhead group The Shaftesbury formation is a dark marine shale. The Peace River formation contains fairly distinct units consisting of the Paddy continental sandstone containing...
Series: SEPM Core Workshop Notes
Published: 01 January 1992
DOI: 10.2110/cor.92.01.0033
EISBN: 9781565760974
... Abstract Bluesky sandstones and shales occupy a transitional stratigraphic position between coastal plain sediments of the underlying Gething Formation and open marine shales of the Wilrich Member. The sedimentology and ichnology indicate that the Bluesky Formation in the Karr area consists...
Image
Fig. 1.Lenticulina bayrocki Mellon and Wall. Side view, Spirit River from Wilrich Member 1139.9–1142.9 m (3740–3750 ft). ×133. Fig. 2.Marginulinopsis collinsi Mellon and Wall. Side view, Spirit River from Falher Member 997.9–998.6 m (3274–3276.5 ft). ×113. Fig. 3.Saracenaria sp. A. Side and apertural views, Spirit River from Falher Member 997.9–998.6 m (3274–3276.5 ft); fig. 3a, ×122; fig. 3b, ×119. Fig. 4.Saracenaria projectura Stelck and Wall. Opposite side views, Spirit River from Wilrich Member 1050.6–1051.8 m (3447–3451 ft); fig. 4a, ×126; fig. 4b, ×128. Fig. 5.Globulina lacrima canadensis Mellon and Wall. Opposite side views, Spirit River from Wilrich Member 1092.0–1093.9 m (3583–3589 ft); fig. 5a, ×140; fig. 5b, ×137. Fig. 6.Saracenaria sp. B. Opposite side views, Spirit River from Wilrich Member 1060.3–1063.4 m (3479–3489 ft); fig. 6a, ×135; fig. 6b, ×132. Figs. 7, 8.Discorbis norrisi Mellon and Wall. (7) Umbilical and dorsal views, Spirit River from Falher Member 986–986.7 m (3235–3237.5 ft); fig. 7a, ×145; fig. 7b, ×141. (8) Umbilical and dorsal views, Spirit River from Wilrich Member 1139.9–1142.9 m (3740–3750 ft); fig. 8a, ×216; fig. 8b, ×236. Figs. 9, 10.Quadrimorphina albertensis Mellon and Wall. (9) Dorsal and umbilical views, Spirit River from Falher Member 997.9–998.6 m (3274–3276.5 ft); fig. 9a, ×193; fig. 9b, ×194. (10) Dorsal and umbilical views, Spirit River from Wilrich Member 1128.6–1129.4 m (3703–3705.5 ft); fig. 10a, ×195; fig. 10b, ×216. Figs. 11, 12.Gyroidina sp. cf. Gyroidina nitida (Reuss). (11) Oblique side views, Spirit River from Fahler Member 997.9–998.6 m (3274–3276.5 ft); fig. 11a, ×144; fig. 11b, ×147. (12) Dorsal view, Spirit River from Wilrich Member 1128.6–1129.4 m (3703–3705.5 ft). ×181. Fig. 13. Unidentified calcareous species. Side view, Spirit River from Bluesky Formation 1158.5–1159.7 m (3801–3805 ft). ×161. Fig. 14. Unidentified calcareous species. Side views, Fort Augustus from Upper Mannville Group 863.5–866.2 m (2833–2842 ft); fig. 14a, ×170; fig. 14b, ×182.
Published: 01 January 2000
River from Wilrich Member 1128.6–1129.4 m (3703–3705.5 ft). ×181. Fig. 13. Unidentified calcareous species. Side view, Spirit River from Bluesky Formation 1158.5–1159.7 m (3801–3805 ft). ×161. Fig. 14. Unidentified calcareous species. Side views, Fort Augustus from Upper Mannville Group 863.5–866.2
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2004
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2004) 52 (1): 23–38.
... sandstone to upper shoreface and foreshore coarse-grained pebbly sandstone and conglomerate ( Cant, 1984 ). These individual coarsening-upward successions are typical of the interval between the base of the Wilrich/Moosebar formations to the top of the Notikewin Formation (Fig. 1 ). Although some early...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Exploration potential of the Falher G shoreface co...
Second thumbnail for: Exploration potential of the Falher G shoreface co...
Third thumbnail for: Exploration potential of the Falher G shoreface co...
Image
—Cretaceous stratigraphic column for the northwest plains/deep basin of Alberta (modified from MacQueen and Leckie, 1992). The formation ages were interpolated from MacQueen and Leckie (1992). Formation names in parentheses (Dunvegan, Paddy, Cadotte, and Wilrich) were not available in all 99 wells and were not used in the SAWVEC analysis.
Published: 01 May 1995
Figure 4 —Cretaceous stratigraphic column for the northwest plains/deep basin of Alberta (modified from MacQueen and Leckie, 1992 ). The formation ages were interpolated from MacQueen and Leckie (1992) . Formation names in parentheses (Dunvegan, Paddy, Cadotte, and Wilrich) were not available