1-20 OF 177 RESULTS FOR

Wilmington Anticline

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1973
AAPG Bulletin (1973) 57 (4): 809.
...John N. Truex ABSTRACT Isopach maps of the major zones of the East Wilmington field shed significant light on the structural evolution of the Wilmington anticline. A minor ancestral basement high marked the location of the Wilmington anticline at the close of the early Mohnian, but the structure...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1974
AAPG Bulletin (1974) 58 (12): 2398–2410.
...John N. Truex ABSTRACT The structural evolution of the Wilmington anticline in the Los Angeles basin, California, began with middle Miocene folding which probably was not coincident with the present anticlinal axis. The ancestral fold was truncated prior to the start of late Miocene deposition...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Structural Evolution of <span class="search-highli...
Second thumbnail for: Structural Evolution of <span class="search-highli...
Third thumbnail for: Structural Evolution of <span class="search-highli...
Image
The 3D model of the PVFZ and Wilmington anticline interaction. Within this region, the steep forelimb of the Wilmington anticline occurs in the footwall of the PVFZ. Data constraints used to build the model are as follows: seismic data sources (Long Beach 3D Seismic Survey and PacSeis 2D Seismic Line), well data (CalGEM database), and fault and horizon maps (Wright, 1991; Otott et al., 1996; Brankman and Shaw, 2009; Wolfe et al., 2019). Vertical scales are provided by depth contours on the PVFZ and Wilmington and Torrance anticline surfaces. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 14 July 2022
Figure 5. The 3D model of the PVFZ and Wilmington anticline interaction. Within this region, the steep forelimb of the Wilmington anticline occurs in the footwall of the PVFZ. Data constraints used to build the model are as follows: seismic data sources (Long Beach 3D Seismic Survey and PacSeis
Image
Sections across the Wilmington anticline showing (a) and (c) dilatational strain (negative indicates contraction) calculated from 8.8 m maximum subsidence tapering to zero at ±5 km from center of depression. Observed surface subsidence and calculated subsurface uplift are shown schematically in purple (&lt;10 µm uplift at 8 km depth). Panels (b) and (d) show regions of enhanced Coulomb failure for optimal faulting mechanisms as indicated (such that positive stress change favors reverse faulting and negative stress change favors normal faulting). By 1936 maximum Coulomb stress exceeded 1 MPa in the Jurassic basement 2.5 km directly below the field. Panel (c) illustrates the relatively minor increase in lateral reach of dilatational strain associated with stacked reservoir depletion (right portion of figure), and panel (d) illustrates the approximate maximum magnitudes attainable with dip-slip ruptures if those ruptures are confined to the zones where their sense of faulting is favored in the stress field induced by reservoir depletion.
Published: 01 February 2018
Figure 3. Sections across the Wilmington anticline showing (a) and (c) dilatational strain (negative indicates contraction) calculated from 8.8 m maximum subsidence tapering to zero at ±5 km from center of depression. Observed surface subsidence and calculated subsurface uplift are shown
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1968
AAPG Bulletin (1968) 52 (3): 540.
... of the unconformity between the lower Pliocene Repetto beds and the upper Pliocene middle Pico Formation conceals the Wilmington anticline from the surface. The effectiveness of the faults as barriers to oil and gas accumulation in the field is shown by signifuant variations in edgewater conditions, subsurface...
Image
Model of the Wilmington blind‐thrust. 3D perspective of Wilmington anticline showing correspondence between horizons mapped from the offshore 3D seismic survey (Fig. 5b) and folding of Pleistocene aquifers (Long Beach C horizon shown) in A–A′ (Fig. 5a) along the trend of the underlying Wilmington anticline (Fig. 2). A map view version of the interpreted Long Beach C horizon is provided as Ⓔ Figure S2. Seismic data source: Long Beach 3D Seismic Survey, January 1995 (Otott et al., 1996), see Data and Resources. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 06 August 2019
Figure 6. Model of the Wilmington blind‐thrust. 3D perspective of Wilmington anticline showing correspondence between horizons mapped from the offshore 3D seismic survey (Fig.  5b ) and folding of Pleistocene aquifers (Long Beach C horizon shown) in A–A′ (Fig.  5a ) along the trend
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 1970
DOI: 10.1306/M14368C7
EISBN: 9781629812250
... and character, but some production is obtained from the basement schist and overlying conglomerate beds. Approximately 1,800-2,000 ft of nearly horizontal beds on top of the unconformity between the lower Pliocene Repetto Formation and the upper Pliocene middle Pico Formation conceals the Wilmington anticline...
Published: 01 January 2009
DOI: 10.1130/2009.2454(5.4)
... by the ancestral Los Angeles River as broad channels that occupied a paleovalley incised into the coastal plain during the last glacio-eustatic highstand. The underlying sequences are deformed into a broad anticlinal fold that occurs parallel to, but ~2 km north of, the axis of the Pliocene Wilmington anticline...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1983
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (1983) xx (1): 9–94.
... within the city include the Wilmington oil field structural complex, and the Wardlow-Airport, Richfield, and Los Alamitos faults. Major folds in the city include the buried Wilmington anticline and Long Beach (Signal Hill) anticline which lies along the Newport-Inglewood structural zone. The city lies...
Image
The 3D model demonstrating the warping of the PVFZ by the Wilmington anticline. (a) An initial planar PVFZ is modeled across the offshore–onshore transition. The late Miocene strata (blue surface) are deposited flat before the reactivation of the WBT (Wolfe et al., 2019) (b) Final result of our 3D kinematic modeling of the growth of the Wilmington anticline, which folds the PVFZ and rotates it counterclockwise (see Fig. S1 for description of modeling procedure). In the shallow subsurface, the PVFZ is much steeper onshore than offshore, where it is further away from the Wilmington anticline. Map axes coordinates are shown in NAD27/UTM Zone 11N (m). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 14 July 2022
Figure 7. The 3D model demonstrating the warping of the PVFZ by the Wilmington anticline. (a) An initial planar PVFZ is modeled across the offshore–onshore transition. The late Miocene strata (blue surface) are deposited flat before the reactivation of the WBT ( Wolfe et al. , 2019 ) (b) Final
Image
Depth and thickness map of the Bent Spring and Lower Wilmington formations. (a,b) Both the Bent Spring and Lower Wilmington formations are folded along the trend of the Wilmington anticline. (c) The Bent Spring formation (top) thins onto the crest of the structure and thickens into the forelimb and backlimbs, indicating that it was deposited syntectonically, whereas the (d) Lower Wilmington formation (bottom) does not show this trend, indicating that it was deposited during the period of tectonic quiescence. Dashed lines and arrows are the position of the Wilmington anticline fold axis. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 06 August 2019
Figure 8. Depth and thickness map of the Bent Spring and Lower Wilmington formations. (a,b) Both the Bent Spring and Lower Wilmington formations are folded along the trend of the Wilmington anticline. (c) The Bent Spring formation (top) thins onto the crest of the structure and thickens
Image
The 2D kinemaitc modeling of the evolution of the Palos Verdes (PV) restraining bend. (a) Initial model setup, including annotated folding vector and prefolding flat Miocene horizon and planar PVFZ. Multiple initial dips for the PVFZ are shown and consistent with previous assessments of the San Pedro Bay segment (Brankman and Shaw, 2009). The preferred dip 45° is shown as a bold red line. The green dashed lines represent the dip of the velocity field in this modeling procedure. These are the orientations of the axial surfaces measured to bound the forelimb of the Wilmington anticline. The dashed blue line represents the target of the forward modeling procedure carried out in Petroleum Experts MOVE Software. The Miocene horizon is not shown to be offset by the PVFZ here for simplicity. The goal of the model is to document the growth of the Wilmington anticline and its effect on the geometry of the PVFZ. (b) Intermediate steps demonstrating the progressive folding of the PVFZ and growth of the Wilmington anticline. (c) Final outcome, demonstrating the steep, uppermost segments of the folded PVFZ and significant map‐based translation that occurred during this process, which is equivalent to counterclockwise rotation. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 14 July 2022
of the San Pedro Bay segment ( Brankman and Shaw, 2009 ). The preferred dip 45° is shown as a bold red line. The green dashed lines represent the dip of the velocity field in this modeling procedure. These are the orientations of the axial surfaces measured to bound the forelimb of the Wilmington anticline
Image
Map‐ and cross‐section‐based schematic model of the PVFZ and Wilmington anticline interaction. (a) Where the WBT fault and PVFZ converge onshore, the PVFZ undergoes a counterclockwise rotation and reorients in a more northwesterly direction. The main splays of the PVFZ onshore are labeled with yellow indicators. Map axes coordinates are shown in NAD27/UTM zone 11N (m). (b) The map‐based rotation is due to imbrication of the PVFZ by the underlying WBT fault, where the PVFZ is located directly above the forelimb of the Wilmington anticline. The effecct of imbrication on the hanging‐wall stratigraphy of the PVFZ is not demonstrated for simplicity. Only an approximate vertical scale bar is provided here for this conceptual model. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 14 July 2022
Figure 3. Map‐ and cross‐section‐based schematic model of the PVFZ and Wilmington anticline interaction. (a) Where the WBT fault and PVFZ converge onshore, the PVFZ undergoes a counterclockwise rotation and reorients in a more northwesterly direction. The main splays of the PVFZ onshore
Image
High‐resolution 2D seismic interpretation. Folding and thinning of Quaternary strata imaged in 2D seismic lines across the strike of the Wilmington anticline. (a) A forelimb folded panel bounded by axial surfaces (dashed lines) is interpreted in all units above the underlying Wilmington blind‐thrust. (b) It is shown that the deformation above the underlying Wilmington blind‐thrust is separate from that due to the Palos Verdes fault. Thinning onto the crest of the Wilmington anticline is interpreted in the Upper Wilmington B (∼434–536  ka), Bent Spring (∼295–340  ka), Harbor (∼186–248  ka), Pacific (∼97–133  ka), Mesa (∼20–80  ka), and Dominguez (&lt;18  ka) formations, indicating that they were deposited syntectonically and that deformation has persisted in recent times. The orientation of the axial surface suggests growth stratigaphy; sedimentary drape is characterized by an axial surface that dips toward the fold crest. Uninterpreted versions of these seismic sections are provided as Ⓔ Figure S3. Data sources: (a) USGS’s National Archive of Marine Seismic Surveys and (b) provided by Legg Geophysical. See Data and Resources. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 06 August 2019
Figure 7. High‐resolution 2D seismic interpretation. Folding and thinning of Quaternary strata imaged in 2D seismic lines across the strike of the Wilmington anticline. (a) A forelimb folded panel bounded by axial surfaces (dashed lines) is interpreted in all units above the underlying Wilmington
Image
The Torrance anticline. Interpreted seismic reflection line tied to oil wells demonstrating the steep forelimb of the Torrance anticline located directly in the footwall of the PVFZ. The overal morphology of the anticline is consistent with the forelimb of the Wilmington anticline imaged offshore in 3D seismic reflection data and suggests these are continuous features (Wolfe et al., 2019). The location of this seismic reflection line is shown in Figure 3. The location of the Main and Southern splays are tied to the surface traces of the faults. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 14 July 2022
Figure 4. The Torrance anticline. Interpreted seismic reflection line tied to oil wells demonstrating the steep forelimb of the Torrance anticline located directly in the footwall of the PVFZ. The overal morphology of the anticline is consistent with the forelimb of the Wilmington anticline
Image
Location of the study area near the San Pedro shelf, as well as the main faults, epicenters (epoch 1978-1998; Astiz and Shearer [2000]), and bathymetry. The short-dashed line labeled “WA” shows the axis of the Wilmington anticline.
Published: 01 April 2004
Figure 1. Location of the study area near the San Pedro shelf, as well as the main faults, epicenters (epoch 1978-1998; Astiz and Shearer [ 2000 ]), and bathymetry. The short-dashed line labeled “WA” shows the axis of the Wilmington anticline.
Image
Regional seismicity, the projected surface trace of the Wilmington blind‐thrust, and surface traces of other active structures in the area. Hypocenters are those greater than Mw 2 from the Waveform Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Southern California (1981–2018) (Hauksson et al., 2012). The size of the hypocenter scales linearly with the magnitude of the earthquake event. Fault traces are from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States (U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey, 2006). The Wilmington blind‐thrust underlies the Wilmington anticline and oil field and is part of the larger THUMS‐Huntington Beach fault system that also includes the Torrance and Huntington Beach segments. The Torrance segment of the Wilmington blind‐thrust is dashed to represent an inferred fault trace. The Pacific Coast Highway fault, mapped by Ponti et al. (2007), is shown in Figure 5a. Dashed lines to the northeast of the Wilmington blind‐thrust represent axial traces that were interpreted through a 2D seismic survey in the Los Angeles basin. Coordinates: NAD83/UTM Zone 11N (m). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 06 August 2019
‐thrust underlies the Wilmington anticline and oil field and is part of the larger THUMS‐Huntington Beach fault system that also includes the Torrance and Huntington Beach segments. The Torrance segment of the Wilmington blind‐thrust is dashed to represent an inferred fault trace. The Pacific Coast
Image
Map view of the kinematic modeling results. Results of 3D kinematic modeling demonstrate the map‐based rotation of the PVFZ that occurred while it was warped by the underlying Wilmington anticline. The purple dashed line represents the initial trace of the PVFZ. The transparent purple envelope encompassing the thin purple lines represents the range of outcomes from our 3D kinematic modeling procedure. The thin purple lines are the position of the PVFZ in the individual trial runs. The bathymetry is from Gardner and Dartnell (2002). The surface trace of the WBT north of the intersection with the PVFZ is not shown for simplicity. As shown in Figure 4, the WBT continues northward beneath the Torrance anticline and is located in the footwall of the PVFZ. Map axes coordinates are shown in NAD27/UTM Zone 11N (m). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 14 July 2022
Figure 8. Map view of the kinematic modeling results. Results of 3D kinematic modeling demonstrate the map‐based rotation of the PVFZ that occurred while it was warped by the underlying Wilmington anticline. The purple dashed line represents the initial trace of the PVFZ. The transparent purple
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1978
AAPG Bulletin (1978) 62 (12): 2492–2495.
...John N. Truex I demonstrated the probability of ancestral middle Miocene folding under the Wilmington anticline and the presence of an angular unconformity at the base of the upper Miocene ( Truex, 1972 , p. 1936; 1974, p. 2398-2399, 2409-2410). Mayuga (1970) arrived at the same conclusion...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Pliocene-Pleistocene Diastrophism of Santa Monica ...
Second thumbnail for: Pliocene-Pleistocene Diastrophism of Santa Monica ...
Journal Article
Published: 06 August 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (5): 1890–1906.
...Figure 6. Model of the Wilmington blind‐thrust. 3D perspective of Wilmington anticline showing correspondence between horizons mapped from the offshore 3D seismic survey (Fig.  5b ) and folding of Pleistocene aquifers (Long Beach C horizon shown) in A–A′ (Fig.  5a ) along the trend...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: The <span class="search-highlight">Wilmington</spa...
Second thumbnail for: The <span class="search-highlight">Wilmington</spa...
Third thumbnail for: The <span class="search-highlight">Wilmington</spa...