1-20 OF 144 RESULTS FOR

Waverly Arch

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
—Upper Mississippian stratigraphic relationships on Waverly arch show effects of uplift. (A) Wedges of unconformities characterize both sides of arch (modified after Ettensohn, 1981). (B) Wedge of unconformities on western flank shows overstepping intersection points of merging unconformities (Dever et al, 1977), suggesting uplift and eastward migration. Location of these two cross sections is shown on map insert.
Published: 01 July 1986
Figure 5 —Upper Mississippian stratigraphic relationships on Waverly arch show effects of uplift. (A) Wedges of unconformities characterize both sides of arch (modified after Ettensohn, 1981 ). (B) Wedge of unconformities on western flank shows overstepping intersection points of merging
Image
—Axis of “Waverly arch” of Woodward (1961).
Published: 01 June 1974
FIG. 5 —Axis of “Waverly arch” of Woodward (1961) .
Image
—Map and cross section showing Waverly arch. Modified from Woodward (1961). Depths in feet.
Published: 01 July 1965
Fig. 12. —Map and cross section showing Waverly arch. Modified from Woodward (1961) . Depths in feet.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1961
AAPG Bulletin (1961) 45 (10): 1634–1655.
... by pre-Chazy erosion that also cut deeply into the Upper Cambrian below the Beekmantown. This arch, here named the Waverly Arch, lies about 60 miles east of the Cincinnati anticline which was apparently absent in pre-Trenton time. Many paleogeographic and structural relations hitherto assigned...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1972
AAPG Bulletin (1972) 56 (10): 2108.
... suggest that the Irvine-Paint Creek fault system is largely postdepositional and that hinge-line development actually occurred along the intersecting Waverly arch. This flexure was identified by Woodward in 1961 in lower Paleozoic rocks of Ohio and northeastern Kentucky, but the extent and thickness...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1974
AAPG Bulletin (1974) 58 (6): 957–972.
...FIG. 5 —Axis of “Waverly arch” of Woodward (1961) . ...
FIGURES | View All (11)
... The autochthonous Appalachian basin is located in western West Virginia, southern Ohio, eastern Tennessee, and eastern Kentucky. It is bounded on the east and the south by detachment fronts formed in the Alleghenian orogeny and to the west by the uplifts of the Cincinnati arch and Waverly arch...
Image
—Basin dynamics controlled distribution of Carboniferous depositional systems in eastern Kentucky. Episodic uplift of Waverly arch during Mississippian is reflected in deposition of shoal-water deposits such as Slade limestone and Carter Caves Sandstone (after Dever et al, 1977). Pennsylvanian intervals form basinward-thickening wedges, which mimic foreland basin geometry. In this example, depoaxis of Magoffin marine zone is parallel with trend of basin-margin arch (Magoffin distribution courtesy of C. L. Rice). However, younger Pine Mountain thrust fault is discordant to this structural grain. Preconvergence listric normal faults were reactivated in a strike-slip sense during Alleghenian compression, and offset Waverly arch.
Published: 01 July 1986
Figure 4 —Basin dynamics controlled distribution of Carboniferous depositional systems in eastern Kentucky. Episodic uplift of Waverly arch during Mississippian is reflected in deposition of shoal-water deposits such as Slade limestone and Carter Caves Sandstone (after Dever et al, 1977
Image
—Evolution of Appalachian basin on a viscoelastic lithosphere. Late Mississippian paleogeographies were characterized by quiescence of orogenic belt, which starved basin of terrigenous sediments. Deposition on Waverly arch was dominated by limestones. Relaxation caused uplift and shoaling, and resulted in multiple unconformities. During Middle Pennsylvanian, renewed overthrust loading and arch depression are correlated with deposition of immature terrigenous clastics. Basin fluctuated between underfilled and overfilled conditions. Uplift of flexural arch was insufficient to form major unconformities. Bold arrows indicate overthrust and forebulge migration; half arrows show active overthrusting; open triangles are reference points for forebulge behavior. Legend same as in Figure 7.
Published: 01 July 1986
Figure 14 —Evolution of Appalachian basin on a viscoelastic lithosphere. Late Mississippian paleogeographies were characterized by quiescence of orogenic belt, which starved basin of terrigenous sediments. Deposition on Waverly arch was dominated by limestones. Relaxation caused uplift
Image
(A) Location map of central Appalachian basin, major faults, and study area (green box). General area of thick Bedford–Berea area (yellow) based on Floyd (2015). In (A), blue lines are arches. Red lines are faults. Dashed lines represent where both are inferred. (B) Berea oil and gas wells in eastern Kentucky (KY). The northern oil play is shown by the newer horizontal wells. In (B), dotted lines are state boundaries. The Rome trough is bordered by the Kentucky River fault system (KRFS) and Rockcastle River fault system (RRFS). CA = Cincinnati arch; IPCFS = Irvine–Paint Creek fault system; LFS = Lexington fault system; OH = Ohio; PMTF = Pine Mountain thrust fault; VA = Virginia; WA = Waverly arch; WV = West Virginia.
Published: 15 March 2021
system; LFS = Lexington fault system; OH = Ohio; PMTF = Pine Mountain thrust fault; VA = Virginia; WA = Waverly arch; WV = West Virginia.
Image
—Map showing major tectonic features, line of section XX′, and the location of oil and rock samples used in this investigation. Major tectonic features are identified as follows: AA = Algonquin arch, ASF = Allegheny structural front, ASHFZ = Akron-Suffield-Highlandtown fault zone, CA = Cincinnati arch, CmA = Cambridge arch, CS = Cumberland saddle, FA = Findlay arch, KA = Kankakee arch, LD = Lexington dome, ND = Nashville dome, OWVHZ = Ohio-West Virginia hinge zone, TFZ = Transylvania fault zone, WA = Waverly arch. Selected counties are identified as follows: (Ohio) a = Ashland, ab = Ashtabula, c = Coshocton, ca = Carroll, d = Delaware, e = Erie, g = Geauga, gu = Guernsey, h = Hocking, ho = Holmes, hu = Huron, l = Lake, m = Morrow, mo = Morgan, r = Richland, s = Stark, sa = Sandusky, t = Tuscarawas, vw = Van Wert, w = Wayne; (Indiana) g = Grant; (West Virginia) j = Jackson, ma = Marion, m = Mingo, and w = Wood. Additional data regarding wells, oils, and potential source rocks are listed in Tables 1 and 2.
Published: 01 March 1998
= Cincinnati arch, CmA = Cambridge arch, CS = Cumberland saddle, FA = Findlay arch, KA = Kankakee arch, LD = Lexington dome, ND = Nashville dome, OWVHZ = Ohio-West Virginia hinge zone, TFZ = Transylvania fault zone, WA = Waverly arch. Selected counties are identified as follows: (Ohio) a = Ashland, ab
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1975
AAPG Bulletin (1975) 59 (5): 879–880.
...Warren L. Calvert It was not the purpose of the paper to discuss Woodward, but only the “Waverly arch” and similar misconceptions. It is regrettable that Bates believes it was an objective of my paper to discredit or disregard Woodward’s work. If readers were left with this impression, I offer...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1975
AAPG Bulletin (1975) 59 (5): 878–879.
...Robert L. Bates Calvert is convinced that the Waverly arch, a north-trending Cambrian and Early Ordovician feature of east-central Ohio, delineated and named by Woodward (1961), never existed. Principal evidence for its nonexistence is a series of four isopach maps (Calvert’s Figure 4A, B, C, D...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1986
AAPG Bulletin (1986) 70 (7): 853–868.
...Figure 5 —Upper Mississippian stratigraphic relationships on Waverly arch show effects of uplift. (A) Wedges of unconformities characterize both sides of arch (modified after Ettensohn, 1981 ). (B) Wedge of unconformities on western flank shows overstepping intersection points of merging...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1962
AAPG Bulletin (1962) 46 (4): 553.
... that data not available to its author when the article was written (October, 1960) now suggest that the Beekmantown covers more of the southern part of the Waverly arch than thought by Woodward. Rather than pursue formal discussion in print, the present note merely records this exchange of correspondence...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1975
AAPG Bulletin (1975) 59 (6): 1022–1023.
...? Unfortunately my insoluble residue logs have been removed from the Ohio Division of Geological Survey. From this basic research data I determined that during Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician time an arch (Waverly) was present ( Shearrow and Preston, 1965 ). References: Calvert , W. L. , 1974...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1975
AAPG Bulletin (1975) 59 (6): 1023.
... structure map ( Calvert, 1974 , Fig. 7) which shows the true structure of the Knox. Figure 8 shows that the thinning, on which the “Waverly arch” concept was based, occurs at the top of the Knox as a result of erosion. The isopach maps presented in Figure 4 substantiate this conclusion. No structural...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1975
AAPG Bulletin (1975) 59 (9): 1689.
... by his Figure 1 when selecting a datum for a cross section or an interval for an isopach map. Thinning also may be caused by relatively slow sedimentation or erosion, as well as by nondeposition over an arch. As examples of misinterpretations, he cites the “Waverly arch” in Ohio and the “Sangamon...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1965
AAPG Bulletin (1965) 49 (7): 894–904.
...Fig. 12. —Map and cross section showing Waverly arch. Modified from Woodward (1961) . Depths in feet. ...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1981
AAPG Bulletin (1981) 65 (9): 1551–1567.
... features include the Pine Mountain thrust, Waverly arch, Rome trough, and Kentucky River and Irvine-Paint Creek fault systems ( Fig. 4 ). Assessment of the area by Landsat MSS Imagery ( Figs. 5 , 6 ) shows four major linear trends. The first parallels the Pine Mountain thrust and the imbricate thrust...
FIGURES | View All (13)