1-20 OF 2590 RESULTS FOR

Van Horn Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1994
GSA Bulletin (1994) 106 (3): 413–423.
...KRISTIAN SOEGAARD; DAVID M. CALLAHAN Abstract The latest Middle Proterozoic Hazel Formation near Van Horn in the Trans-Pecos region of west Texas is an orogenic elastic wedge that provides insight into paleotectonic evolution of the southern margin of the Laurentian craton. The Hazel Formation...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2014
GSA Bulletin (2014) 126 (7-8): 1117–1128.
...–1.6 Ga Yavapai/Mazatzal provinces. These data, combined with sedimentological data, permit interpreting those formations as the proximal and distal deposits, respectively, of a molasse shed into the Grenvillian foreland basin. Detrital zircons as young as ca. 520 Ma show that the Van Horn Formation...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Stratigraphy of the Mesoproterozoic to Cambrian rocks of the Franklin Mountains and Van Horn areas (after Davidson, 1980; Bickford et al., 2000). Westward onlap of the Van Horn Formation inferred from this study. Radiometric ages (marked with stars) are from Shannon et al. (1997) and Bickford et al. (2000). Locations of detrital zircon samples used in this study are marked with circles. ID-TIMS—isotope-dilution–thermal ionization mass spectromety; ICP-MS—inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry.
Published: 01 July 2014
Figure 3. Stratigraphy of the Mesoproterozoic to Cambrian rocks of the Franklin Mountains and Van Horn areas (after Davidson, 1980 ; Bickford et al., 2000 ). Westward onlap of the Van Horn Formation inferred from this study. Radiometric ages (marked with stars) are from Shannon et al. (1997
Image
Schematic sedimentary model for the depositional setting of (A) the proximal (Hazel Formation) and distal (Lanoria Formation) deposits of the Grenvillian foreland (after Seeley, 1999; Soegaard and Callahan, 1994) and (B) the Van Horn Formation for the Sauk Sequence transgression in west Texas. Paleocurrent information is taken from Seeley (1999) and Soegaard and Callahan (1994) for A, and from Stewart et al. (2001) and McGowen and Groat (1971) for B.
Published: 01 July 2014
Figure 8. Schematic sedimentary model for the depositional setting of (A) the proximal (Hazel Formation) and distal (Lanoria Formation) deposits of the Grenvillian foreland (after Seeley, 1999 ; Soegaard and Callahan, 1994 ) and (B) the Van Horn Formation for the Sauk Sequence transgression
Image
(A) 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U ages (in Ma) of multiple analyses of the youngest detrital zircons within the upper Van Horn Formation (sample CS12-3). The 1:1 line represents perfect concordance between the 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U ages, and the dashed lines represent ±2% discordance. Uncertainties are 2σ (absolute). (B) Weighted mean plots of the youngest zircon ages (206Pb/238U, in Ma) from sample CS12-3. Uncertainties are 2σ (absolute). White bars were analyzed in December 2012 and dark gray bars in November 2013. Thick medium-gray bars represent the weighted mean of multiple analyses of single grains. MSWD—mean square weighted deviation (i.e., reduced chi-squared statistic). (C) Inverted color cathodoluminescence images of the grains analyzed. Letters and numbers represent 25-μm-diameter analytical spots from the December 2012 and November 2013 analytical sessions, respectively. Spots from the first session were re-polished to reanalyze the same location.
Published: 01 July 2014
Figure 7. (A) 206 Pb/ 238 U and 207 Pb/ 235 U ages (in Ma) of multiple analyses of the youngest detrital zircons within the upper Van Horn Formation (sample CS12-3). The 1:1 line represents perfect concordance between the 206 Pb/ 238 U and 207 Pb/ 235 U ages, and the dashed lines represent ±2
Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.5382/GB.08.ch03
EISBN: 9781934969618
... are located a few miles north of Van Horn. The Milwhite talc deposit is reached by an unpaved road that traverses Red Valley and Hackberry Creek and crosses the Van Horn Sandstone, Hazel and Allamoore formations. In addition to the talc...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1940
AAPG Bulletin (1940) 24 (1): 143–156.
..., constituting the Allamoore and Hazel formations. These were afterwards deformed, and were overridden from the south by a thrust block of an older formation, the Carrizo Mountain schist. After the deformed rocks were deeply eroded, the clastic, unfossiliferous Van Horn sandstone was laid down over them. Its age...
FIGURES
Book Chapter

Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.5382/GB.08.ch09
EISBN: 9781934969618
... and crop out in a discontinuous belt about 20 miles long from Tumbledown Mountain, about 8 miles north-northwest of Van Horn, to the Streeruwitz Hills, about 5 miles northwest of Eagle Flat (Fig. 1). Talc production began in 1952...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 March 1995
Geology (1995) 23 (3): 269–272.
... in the Millican Hills, near Van Horn, Trans-Pecos Texas. Available data for the Van Horn region indicate that the age of the Allamoore Formation is ∼1250 Ma. The sediment-filled tubes are most likely the feeding traces of animals grazing on algal mats in shallow subtidal or intertidal environments. Geological...
Image
Lower part of the section at Gillberga showing the sampled levels and stratigraphic ranges of conodont taxa. Heavy horizontal lines separate zones and subzones in the lithological column. The basal part of the section belongs to the Bruddesta Formation of van Wamel (1974); samples Öl95–1 to Öl94–9 have lithologies typical of the Horns Udde Formation (van Wamel, 1974); samples Öl94–8 to Öl94–6 are intermediate between the Horns Udde Formation and the succeeding ‘Formation A’ of Stouge & Bagnoli (1990). The latter extends approximately up to the discontinuity surface near sample Öl92–2, about a metre below the base of the L. variabilis Zone. Above that the section is represented by ‘Formation B’ of Stouge & Bagnoli (1990).
Published: 01 January 2000
Öl95–1 to Öl94–9 have lithologies typical of the Horns Udde Formation ( van Wamel, 1974 ); samples Öl94–8 to Öl94–6 are intermediate between the Horns Udde Formation and the succeeding ‘Formation A’ of Stouge & Bagnoli (1990) . The latter extends approximately up to the discontinuity surface
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2000
GSA Bulletin (2000) 112 (7): 1134–1148.
... at Van Horn were correlative with the Castner Marble. In addition, McLelland (1996) proposed that the Mundy Breccia in the Franklin Mountains and the basaltic agglomerate in the Tumbledown Formation at Van Horn are equivalent on the basis of comparable geochemistry and close temporal ties...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Figure 6. Summary of Precambrian geochronology for Van Horn and Franklin Mountains in Trans-Pecos Texas. See text for proposed correlation of stratigraphic units between the two outcrop areas. MTS.—Mountains; Fm.—Formation; Defm.—deformation.
Published: 01 July 2000
Figure 6. Summary of Precambrian geochronology for Van Horn and Franklin Mountains in Trans-Pecos Texas. See text for proposed correlation of stratigraphic units between the two outcrop areas. MTS.—Mountains; Fm.—Formation; Defm.—deformation.
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1994
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1994) 31 (4): 709–720.
... beneath the Central basin platform (Texas and New Mexico), intrusions which crop out at the Pajarito Mountain in the Sacramento Mountains (New Mexico), a basaltic debris flow in the Franklin Mountains (Texas), basalt flows at Van Horn (Texas), and the Crosbyton geophysical anomaly (east of Lubbock, Texas...
Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.5382/GB.08.ch02
EISBN: 9781934969618
... FR 2185 descending southward into the Salt Flat graben, traversing Wild Horse Flat, an irrigated farming area, to Van Horn. ...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1960
AAPG Bulletin (1960) 44 (11): 1785–1792.
.... The Castner limestone may be equivalent to the Allamoore limestone of the Van Horn area, 100 miles to the east. However, other Precambrian formations in the two areas are so unlike that positive correlation can not be made. 2 United States Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado. G. O. Bachman aided...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 March 1951
Economic Geology (1951) 46 (2): 163–192.
... metasedimentary rocks of the Mica Mine area, Van Horn Mountains, Texas. Zoned bodies have a core of perthite and quartz and a plagioclase-quartz-perthite-muscovite wall zone. The pegmatites contain numerous schist inclusions, and some show evidence of contamination by biotite schist and amphibolite.Intimate...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1931
AAPG Bulletin (1931) 15 (9): 1059–1085.
... is probably represented by cherts and novaculites. The pre-Carboniferous rocks of the district are of geosynclinal facies, with terrigenous clastic members. They have little in common, in either lithology or faunas, with the sections near by. at Van Horn, Big Lake, or the Llano-Burnet uplift. They have many...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
(A) Generalized stratigraphic time-space diagram representative of the Neoproterozoic to Ordovician sedimentary units across south-central Laurentia. The ages of the youngest highly concordant detrital and rift-related igneous zircons (in Ma) are plotted as additional depositional constraints (see Table 2) (disc—discordant). In the case of the Bliss Formation, the ages of the youngest three concordant zircon analyses are plotted (from Amato and Mack, 2012). The weighted averages of multiple analyses of the youngest three zircons are plotted for the Van Horn Formation (see Fig. 7). Uncertainty is displayed at 2σ. Various rock types and general depositional settings are as per the following references: Death Valley stratigraphy—Heaman and Grotzinger (1992), Prave (1999), Corsetti and Kaufman (2003), Hogan et al. (2011); Death Valley detrital zircons—Stewart et al. (2001); Sonora stratigraphy—Stewart et al. (2002), Farmer et al. (2005), Stewart (2005), Sour-Tovar et al. (2007); Grand Canyon stratigraphy—Karlstrom et al. (2000, and references therein); south-central and southeast Arizona stratigraphy—Hayes (1972); south-central and southeast Arizona detrital zircons—Stewart et al. (2001); southern New Mexico stratigraphy—Hayes (1972); southern New Mexico detrital/igneous zircons—Amato and Mack (2012); west Texas stratigraphy—Lemone (1969), Hayes (1972); west Texas detrital zircons—this study; rift-related zircons from the Wichita Mountains—Gilbert and Hogan (2010); Precordillera stratigraphy—Finney et al. (2005); Pie de Palo stratigraphy and detrital zircons—Naipauer et al. (2010); southern Appalachians stratigraphy—Tollo et al. (2010), Tull et al. (2010), Chakraborty et al. (2012); central Appalachians stratigraphy—Astini (1995), Southworth et al. (2009), Burton and Southworth (2010), Tollo et al. (2010); central Appalachians rift-related zircons—Aleinikoff et al., (1995, recalculated by Burton and Southworth, 2010), Southworth et al. (2009). Position of Sonora is restored along the Mojave megashear as per Stewart (2005) and Precordillera/Pie de Palo restored within the Ouachita embayment of Thomas (2006). Geologic time scale is after Walker et al. (2012). (B) Diagrammatic cross-section of the Sauk Sequence through central North America. Note that the datum in the section is the base of the Tippecanoe Sequence. Redrawn from Bally (1989) and Burgess (2008).
Published: 01 July 2014
constraints (see Table 2 ) (disc—discordant). In the case of the Bliss Formation, the ages of the youngest three concordant zircon analyses are plotted (from Amato and Mack, 2012 ). The weighted averages of multiple analyses of the youngest three zircons are plotted for the Van Horn Formation (see Fig. 7
Image
(A) Simplified geologic map of the Precambrian exposures in Van Horn area (modified from Soegaard et al., 1993). Inset map of Texas shows other Proterozoic rocks exposed in central and west Texas, and location of the Grenville Front (Llano Front of Mosher, 1993). (B) Schematic cross section across the foreland showing metamorphic rocks of the Carrizo Mountain Group (CMG) thrust over Allamoore and Hazel Formations along the Streeruwitz thrust. Note the overturned folded structure of the Allamoore and Hazel Formations; the interfolding of the CMG with the Allamoore in the hanging wall is inferred, not observed (after King and Flawn, 1953).
Published: 01 June 2015
Figure 1. (A) Simplified geologic map of the Precambrian exposures in Van Horn area (modified from Soegaard et al., 1993 ). Inset map of Texas shows other Proterozoic rocks exposed in central and west Texas, and location of the Grenville Front (Llano Front of Mosher, 1993 ). (B) Schematic cross
Image
Rodinian paleogeography modified after Timmons et al. (2005) showing inferred fluvial connections between source terranes (see Table 1) and Unkar Basin during deposition of Hakatai, Shinumo, and Dox formations. GC = Grand Canyon, FM = Franklin Mountains, VH = Van Horn area, SDC = Sierra del Cuervo, PMIC = Pecos Mafic Intrusive Complex, LU = Llano Uplift. Solid arrows represent dominant source (Grenville Orogenic Front) during Hakatai and Dox deposition. Open arrows represent dominant source(s) during Shinumo deposition (Yavapai–Mazatzal and Southern Granite Rhyolite). Seaway boundaries are speculative.
Published: 01 September 2006
Figure 1 Rodinian paleogeography modified after Timmons et al. (2005) showing inferred fluvial connections between source terranes (see Table 1 ) and Unkar Basin during deposition of Hakatai, Shinumo, and Dox formations. GC = Grand Canyon, FM = Franklin Mountains, VH = Van Horn area, SDC