1-20 OF 223 RESULTS FOR

Urumieh-Dokhtar Arc

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 07 July 2025
Journal of the Geological Society (2025) 182 (5): jgs2024-154.
...Iman Rahmani Moghadam; Seyed Mohsen Tabatabaei Manesh; Nargess Shirdashtzadeh; Thomas C. Meisel This study explores the Oligocene–Miocene subduction-related plutonic rocks (OMPs) from the central UrumiehDokhtar Magmatic Arc (UDMA) in the centre of the Alpine–Himalayan Orogenic Belt (AHOB). OMPs...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Subduction-related magmatism (SRM) and its effect ...
Second thumbnail for: Subduction-related magmatism (SRM) and its effect ...
Third thumbnail for: Subduction-related magmatism (SRM) and its effect ...
Journal Article
Published: 29 January 2020
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2020) 57 (9): 1048–1065.
...Ghosoun Zheira; Fariborz Masoudi; Bahman Rahimzadeh Two different types of igneous rock formed during separate Cenozoic magmatic phases in the Varan-Naragh area in the central part of the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (UDMA) of Iran as a part of the Alpine-Himalayan system. The first phase comprises...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Geochemical constraints on Eocene–Miocene geodynam...
Second thumbnail for: Geochemical constraints on Eocene–Miocene geodynam...
Third thumbnail for: Geochemical constraints on Eocene–Miocene geodynam...
Journal Article
Published: 15 December 2020
Geological Magazine (2021) 158 (7): 1289–1304.
...Fatemeh Sarjoughian; Bahareh Zahedi; Hossein Azizi; Wenli Ling; David R. Lentz; Yoshihiro Asahara Abstract The Golshekanan granitoid body is situated in the central part of the UrumiehDokhtar magmatic arc (UDMA) in central Iran, and includes granite and granodiorite with minor monzonite...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Zircon U–Pb ages, geochemistry and Sr–Nd isotopes ...
Second thumbnail for: Zircon U–Pb ages, geochemistry and Sr–Nd isotopes ...
Third thumbnail for: Zircon U–Pb ages, geochemistry and Sr–Nd isotopes ...
Journal Article
Published: 09 January 2019
Geological Magazine (2019) 156 (9): 1510–1526.
...Davoud Raeisi; Hassan Mirnejad; Maryam Sheibi Abstract Granitoid stocks crop out in the Ghahan and Sarbadan areas near Tafresh city, which is situated in the central part of the UrumiehDokhtar Magmatic Arc, Iran. The stocks, consisting of porphyritic and sub-granular diorite and granular...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Emplacement mechanism of the Tafresh granitoids, c...
Second thumbnail for: Emplacement mechanism of the Tafresh granitoids, c...
Third thumbnail for: Emplacement mechanism of the Tafresh granitoids, c...
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 December 2006
Economic Geology (2006) 101 (8): 1455–1496.
... Eocene-Miocene Urumieh-Dokhtar calk-alkaline volcanic arc, which hosts several large porphyry Cu deposits (e.g., Sar Cheshmeh, Meiduk). Rocks of the Takab belt are also distinctly more alkaline than the Urumieh-Dokhtar rocks. Viewed in the context of plate tectonic models for Neogene closure of a Neo...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Geology of the Sari Gunay Epithermal Gold Deposit,...
Second thumbnail for: Geology of the Sari Gunay Epithermal Gold Deposit,...
Third thumbnail for: Geology of the Sari Gunay Epithermal Gold Deposit,...
Image
Schematic model showing the generation of the Sabzevar-Torbat-e-Heydarieh ophiolites. (A) Subduction initiation and Neotethys sinking caused strong extension in the region above the sinking lithosphere, leading to seafloor spreading and forming the proto–fore-arc crust. Strong extension in the Iranian continental crust lead to extensional basins opening and nucleation of the Sabzevar-Torbat-e-Heydarieh ophiolites (STHO) back-arc basin. UDMD—Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Belt. (B) Beginning of true subduction (ca. 100 Ma), and formation of the Urumieh-Dokhtar arc and the STHO back-arc basin. SCLM—subcontinental lithospheric mantle.
Published: 15 October 2019
extension in the Iranian continental crust lead to extensional basins opening and nucleation of the Sabzevar-Torbat-e-Heydarieh ophiolites (STHO) back-arc basin. UDMD—Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Belt. (B) Beginning of true subduction (ca. 100 Ma), and formation of the Urumieh-Dokhtar arc and the STHO back-arc
Image
Schematic structural map of the Zagros Mountains. From top right to bottom left: Central Iranian block and micro-continents, Urumieh-Dokhtar Arc, Sanandaj Sirjan Zone, Imbricate Zone, Simply Folded Belt, Foreland basin. Study area indicated by rectangular box (top left).
Published: 01 August 2011
Fig. 1 Schematic structural map of the Zagros Mountains. From top right to bottom left: Central Iranian block and micro-continents, Urumieh-Dokhtar Arc, Sanandaj Sirjan Zone, Imbricate Zone, Simply Folded Belt, Foreland basin. Study area indicated by rectangular box (top left).
Image
(A) Quick Bird Satellite image of the Anaran Anticline, Simply Folded Belt, Lurestan, Iran. (B) Simplified structural map of the different tectonic units of the Zagros Mountain (redrawn after Homke et al. 2009). In the red box is the position of the study area. M.F.B., Mesopotamian Foreland Basin; D.F., deformation front; M.F.F., Mountan Flexure Front; D.F., Dezful Embayment; S.F.B., Simply Folded Belt; I.Z.; S.S.Z., Sanandaj Sirjan Zone; U.-D. A., Urumieh-Dokhtar Arc; C.I.B., Central Iran Block.
Published: 01 August 2011
Foreland Basin; D.F., deformation front; M.F.F., Mountan Flexure Front; D.F., Dezful Embayment; S.F.B., Simply Folded Belt; I.Z.; S.S.Z., Sanandaj Sirjan Zone; U.-D. A., Urumieh-Dokhtar Arc; C.I.B., Central Iran Block.
Image
Map showing the distribution of the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, the Qom Formation outcrops, suture zones of Paleotethys and Neotethys in Iran, and the location of the sections studied within the Austrian/German cooperation project (after Mohammadi et al., 2013, Mohammadi, 2023a). 1 = Abadeh; 2 = Zefreh; 3 = Qom; 4 = Chalheghareh.
Published: 26 July 2024
Figure 1. Map showing the distribution of the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, the Qom Formation outcrops, suture zones of Paleotethys and Neotethys in Iran, and the location of the sections studied within the Austrian/German cooperation project (after Mohammadi et al., 2013 , Mohammadi, 2023a
Image
(a) A map showing the distribution of the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, the Qom Formation outcrops, suture zones of Paleotethys and Neotethys in Iran, two proposed scenarios (green and dashed violet arrows) to show the Tethyan Seaway transgression over the Iranian Plate, and the location of the study sections (after Mohammadi, 2022). (b) Simplified map of access roads to the study sections.
Published: 01 January 2024
Fig. 1. (a) A map showing the distribution of the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc, the Qom Formation outcrops, suture zones of Paleotethys and Neotethys in Iran, two proposed scenarios (green and dashed violet arrows) to show the Tethyan Seaway transgression over the Iranian Plate
Image
Generation of SW Iranian ophiolites as part of a forearc formed during subduction initiation, modified for the Late Cretaceous evolution of southern Eurasia after Stern (2004). Left panels are sections perpendicular to the evolving plate boundary, and right panels are map views. (A–B) Initial (>95 Ma) configuration. Two lithospheres of differing density (buoyant Eurasia, dense Tethys) are juxtaposed across a transform fault or fracture zone. (C–D) Old, dense lithosphere sinks asymmetrically, with maximum subsidence nearest the transform fault or fracture zone. Asthenosphere migrates over the sinking lithosphere and propagates in directions that are both orthogonal to the original trend of the transform/fracture zone as well as in both directions parallel to it. Strong extension in the region above the sinking lithosphere leads to seafloor spreading, forming infant arc crust of the proto-forearc. This is when the Dehshir ophiolite and other SW Iranian ophiolites form, ca. 93 Ma. (D) This panel shows that this process is asynchronous along the margin; ophiolite ages indicate that subduction propagated from E (Oman) to W (Cyprus) between 95 and 90 Ma. (E–F) Beginning of downdip motion of the lithosphere marks the beginning of true subduction (<90 Ma). Strong extension in the forearc and trenchward migration of asthenosphere ends, cooling the subforearc mantle, which becomes forearc lithosphere; further addition of water leads only to serpentinization. The locus of igneous activity retreats ∼200 km away from the trench, to the region where asthenospheric advection continues, forming the Urumieh-Dokhtar arc. This forearc today defines the Oman (Om), SW Iran (SI), and Cyprus (Cy) ophiolites.
Published: 01 September 2010
activity retreats ∼200 km away from the trench, to the region where asthenospheric advection continues, forming the Urumieh-Dokhtar arc. This forearc today defines the Oman (Om), SW Iran (SI), and Cyprus (Cy) ophiolites.
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 June 2010
Economic Geology (2010) 105 (4): 855–865.
... metals—characteristics which are critical to the formation of magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits ( Candela, 1992 ). 12 02 2010 13 01 2010 © 2010 Society of Economic Geologists, Inc. 2010 The ~2,000-km-long and 5- to 25-km-wide Urumieh-Dokhtar arc system was interpreted by Dewey...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: COPPER MINERALIZATION PREVENTED BY <span class="se...
Second thumbnail for: COPPER MINERALIZATION PREVENTED BY <span class="se...
Third thumbnail for: COPPER MINERALIZATION PREVENTED BY <span class="se...
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 December 2005
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.05.25.0342
EISBN: 978-0-9836096-5-0
... Sea). Recently published radiometric and biostratigraphic ages, outcrop studies, and reflection seismic profiles more tightly constrain the evolution of this rift system. The principal driving force for separation of Arabia from Africa was slab-pull beneath the approaching Urumieh-Dokhtar volcanic arc...
Image
(a) Simplified geological map of Iran showing Cadomian rocks, the main Mesozoic ophiolites and Cenozoic magmatic rocks. Line A–B shows the position of the cross-section in (b). (b) Cross-section showing the present-day position of the Neotethyan palaeo-trench, the outer belt forearc ophiolites, the Sanandaj–Sirjan zone with Jurassic to Early Cretaceous intrusive rocks (with composition changing from gabbro to leucogranites), the inner belt (the presumed back-arc) ophiolites and the Urumieh–Dokhtar (Late Cretaceous to) Cenozoic magmatic arc. UDMB, Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Belt; MZT, Main Zagros Thrust; SCLM, sub-continental lithospheric mantle.
Published: 26 October 2023
ophiolites, the Sanandaj–Sirjan zone with Jurassic to Early Cretaceous intrusive rocks (with composition changing from gabbro to leucogranites), the inner belt (the presumed back-arc) ophiolites and the UrumiehDokhtar (Late Cretaceous to) Cenozoic magmatic arc. UDMB, UrumiehDokhtar Magmatic Belt; MZT, Main
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2022
Journal of the Geological Society (2023) 180 (1): jgs2022-020.
... mantle signatures in gabbroic to granitic rocks from the UrumiehDokhtar arc, south Ardestan, Iran . International Geology Review , 59 , 1590 – 1608 , https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2017.1286613 Bea , F. , Pereira , M.D. and Stroh , A. 1994 . Mineral/leucosome trace-element...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Latest Oligocene adakitic rocks in western Iran: i...
Second thumbnail for: Latest Oligocene adakitic rocks in western Iran: i...
Third thumbnail for: Latest Oligocene adakitic rocks in western Iran: i...
Image
(a) This simplified geological map of Iran highlights the presence of Cadomian rocks, significant Mesozoic ophiolites and Cenozoic magmatic formations. The A–B line indicates the location of the cross-section depicted in Figure 1b. (b) The cross-section illustrates the current position of the Neotethyan palaeo-trench (Main Zagros Thrust = MZT), outer belt ophiolites, the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone featuring Jurassic to Early Cretaceous intrusive rocks (ranging from gabbro to leucogranites), the inner-belt ophiolites and the Urumieh–Dokhtar Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic magmatic arc. Abbreviations: UDMB, Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Belt; MZT, Main Zagros Thrust; SCLM, Sub-Continental Lithospheric Mantle.
Published: 22 April 2024
position of the Neotethyan palaeo-trench (Main Zagros Thrust = MZT), outer belt ophiolites, the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone featuring Jurassic to Early Cretaceous intrusive rocks (ranging from gabbro to leucogranites), the inner-belt ophiolites and the UrumiehDokhtar Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic magmatic arc
Image
Shaded relief and main tectonic features of the Arabia–Eurasia convergence. Bold black lines, major faults; arrows, GPS velocities from Vernant et al. (2004) and Masson et al. (2007); white circles, Sahneh (S) and Neyriz (N) ophiolitic complexes; white rectangle, location of Figure 2. SSZ, Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone; UDMA, Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc; ABS, Apsheron–Balkan Sill; MZT, Main Zagros Thrust; HZ, High Zagros; EAF, East Anatolian Fault; NAF, North Anatolian Fault; DSF, Dead Sea Fault; F.Z, fracture zone. Grey-filled areas indicate the approximate geographical extent of the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc.
Published: 01 January 2012
of Figure 2 . SSZ, Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone; UDMA, UrumiehDokhtar Magmatic Arc; ABS, Apsheron–Balkan Sill; MZT, Main Zagros Thrust; HZ, High Zagros; EAF, East Anatolian Fault; NAF, North Anatolian Fault; DSF, Dead Sea Fault; F.Z, fracture zone. Grey-filled areas indicate the approximate geographical extent
Image
Subduction zone of the Neotethys oceanic lithosphere under the Central Iran and formation of the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc in the southwestern margin of Central Iran, at the end of the Mesozoic. (a) Subduction-related magmatism of the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Arc started in Upper Mesozoic caused by sinking the cold, old and dense lithosphere of Neotethyan oceanic crust beneath Central Iran. The fluid flux released from the hydrated subducting slab caused partial melting of metasomatized mantle and generated ascending mafic melts. (b) Slab rollback caused mantle upwelling and subduction-related magmatism flared up from Middle Eocene to late Miocene. (c) Ascending calc-alkaline melts contaminated and fractionated in the crustal magma chambers. Slab breakoff in the middle Miocene caused hot asthenospheric melts intrusion and the progressive slab partial melting. (d) As the subduction zone deepened (increasing pressure–temperature, pressure–temperature conditions), mantle metasomatism by fluids released from the subducting slab enhanced magma fertility. The fertile melt input affects the magma chamber composition.
Published: 07 July 2025
Fig. 8. Subduction zone of the Neotethys oceanic lithosphere under the Central Iran and formation of the UrumiehDokhtar Magmatic Arc in the southwestern margin of Central Iran, at the end of the Mesozoic. ( a ) Subduction-related magmatism of the UrumiehDokhtar Magmatic Arc started in Upper
Image
Shaded topographic relief map of Iran with main tectonic elements and Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic arc parallel to the Zagros suture. White frame indicates location of the Natanz composite intrusion.
Published: 01 June 2010
F ig . 1. Shaded topographic relief map of Iran with main tectonic elements and Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic arc parallel to the Zagros suture. White frame indicates location of the Natanz composite intrusion.
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 03 April 2025
GSA Bulletin (2025)
... to early Miocene (25−17 Ma), what is now the Iranian Plateau was mainly occupied by a vast epicontinental sea, and both the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc and the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone underwent some uplift due to the initial Arabia-Eurasia collision. During the middle Miocene (17−13 Ma), the source material...