1-20 OF 2297 RESULTS FOR

Union Wash Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 August 2008
PALAIOS (2008) 23 (8): 514–524.
... closely but represent a crucial piece of the postextinction puzzle since they provide an end member to which studies of open marine environments can be compared. The Lower Member of the Lower Triassic (Smithian-Spathian) Union Wash Formation is a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic succession deposited...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 December 2000
PALAIOS (2000) 15 (6): 535–545.
...ADAM D. WOODS; DAVID J. BOTTJER Abstract The Lower Triassic (Smithian-Spathian) Union Wash Formation (east-central California), deposited along the western edge of Pangea, is generally barren of macrofossils with the exception of ammonoids. To better understand the paleoenvironmental conditions...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Published: 01 February 2013
FIGURE 6— SEM mosaic images of the Johnnie Formation and the Union Wash Formation made using the electron backscatter detector (EBSD). A) Crystal orientation map within a single aragonite pseudomorph from the Johnnie Formation (3 µm window). This example shows a calcite mosaic fabric has replaced
Image
Published: 01 August 2008
FIGURE 1 —Stratigraphic position and age of the Union Wash Formation. Modified from Stone et al. (2000)
Image
Published: 01 December 2000
FIGURE 1 —Locality map for the Union Wash Formation of east-central California, showing both the Darwin Hills and Union Wash localities
Image
Published: 01 December 2000
FIGURE 11 —Proposed paleoenvironmental history for the Union Wash Formation. (A) Lower Member: Meekoceras Bed deposition. (B) Lower Middle Member: Onset of anoxic conditions and a shallow ACD. Preservation of ammonoids at Darwin Hills locality as steinkerns. (C) Middle Member: Growth of seafloor
Image
Published: 01 August 2008
FIGURE 10 —Paleoenvironmental summary for Lower Member of Union Wash Formation: grain-rich carbonates from tidal-dominated distributary channels of Subunit 1 grade into shallow lagoonal micrite and grain-rich bars of Subunit 2 and Subunit 5, with laminated micrites and storm washover beds from
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 July 1999
Geology (1999) 27 (7): 645–648.
... has been thought to be limited to the Proterozoic, when seawaters were highly oversaturated with calcium carbonate compared to average Phanerozoic values. Outer shelf to slope deposits of the Lower Triassic Union Wash Formation in east-central California, deposited in oxygen-restricted settings...
Image
Published: 01 December 2000
FIGURE 2 —Stratigraphy, ammonoid occurrences, and paleoxygenation of the Union Wash Formation at the Darwin Hills and Union Wash localities. Paleoxygenation data from Woods (1998) ; stratigraphy of the Union Wash Formation from Stone et al. (1991) . Ammonoid-bearing intervals contain scattered
Image
Published: 01 August 2008
FIGURE 11 —(A) Scattered echinoid spines and ossicles from Lower Member of Union Wash Formation are typically poorly preserved and occur in a micrite matrix. Spines in outcrop lack ornamentation and exhibit calcite cleavage, which can make them look superficially like microgastropods. (B
Image
Published: 01 October 2002
Figure 4. Photograph of the south side of Strange Hill showing the major geologic features. Dev—Devonian rock, Miss—Kearsarge Formation, Tr—Union Wash Formation. Strange Hill thrust is marked with standard thrust symbols.
Image
Published: 01 October 2002
Figure 6. Diagrammatic cross section showing the shape of the Mule Spring syncline and Strange Hill thrust prior to deposition of the Triassic Union Wash Formation. Symbols as in Figure 3 .
Image
Published: 01 August 2008
FIGURE 2 —Locality map showing location of measured section of Lower Member of Lower Triassic Union Wash Formation used for this study. Modified from Stone et al. (1991)
Image
Published: 01 August 2008
FIGURE 3 —Measured section through Lower Member of Lower Triassic Union Wash Formation. Lower Member is comprised of mixed carbonate-siliciclastic sedimentary rocks deposited in a back-barrier setting and contains a fauna dominated by echinoids, with occasional bivalves and a single microgastropod
Image
Published: 13 October 2020
—Mississippian Perdido Formation; Mrs—Mississippian Rest Spring Shale; UW—Union Wash Formation; WTS—White-Top Stock. See text for references.
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 October 2002
GSA Bulletin (2002) 114 (10): 1210–1221.
...Figure 4. Photograph of the south side of Strange Hill showing the major geologic features. Dev—Devonian rock, Miss—Kearsarge Formation, Tr—Union Wash Formation. Strange Hill thrust is marked with standard thrust symbols. ...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
Published: 01 June 2004
Thaynes Formation ( Collinson et al., 1976 ); Smithian Union Wash Formation ( Stone et al., 1991 ); Spathian Virgin Limestone Member, Moenkopi Formation ( Jenson, 1984 ); (2) Greenland: Griesbachian Wordie Creek Formation ( Twitchett et al., 2001 ); (3) Italy: Griesbachian–Smithian Werfen Formation
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1964
DOI: 10.2110/pec.64.01.0169
EISBN: 9781565761414
..., Williams Fork, “Lewis,” Lance, and Fort Union Formations of the Sand Wash Basin to the Iles, Williams Fork, and lower Wasatch Formations of the Piceance Basin. Approximate time lines drawn from Hayden to Meeker divide the Williams Fork Formation at Meeker into equivalents of the Williams Fork, “Lewis...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1995
AAPG Bulletin (1995) 79 (9): 1320–1336.
... matter) be distinguished from ash-free coal density. Coal and coal gas resources of the Williams Fork and Fort Union formations in the Sand Wash basin, determined from modified resource equations, are 291 billion tons (short tons) (264 billion t [metric ton]) and 79 Tcf * (2.2 Tm 3 ). These resources...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1979
AAPG Bulletin (1979) 63 (2): 194–217.
...Edward A. Beaumont Abstract The Fort Union Formation in the Sand Wash basin of northwestern Colorado is composed of subarkosic medium to fine-grained sandstone interbedded with siltstones, shales, and subbituminous coals. Surface and subsurface studies indicate that sandstones generally dominate...
FIGURES | View All (16)