1-20 OF 68 RESULTS FOR

Unconformites

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2000
Journal of the Geological Society (2000) 157 (2): 483–492.
... formed NW‐SE to north–south striking thrusts and folds. Cross‐cutting structures, reactivation of structures, syn‐sedimentary deformation and unconformites help to constrain the relative timing of structural events. At least five episodes of predominantly NNW–SSE to NE–SW oriented compression interrupted...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Structural evolution of the Li Basin, northern Tha...
Second thumbnail for: Structural evolution of the Li Basin, northern Tha...
Third thumbnail for: Structural evolution of the Li Basin, northern Tha...
Published: 01 January 1981
DOI: 10.1130/MEM154-p393
... is evidenced by boundaries of differential structural deformation in seismic reflection profiles. In middle to late Miocene time, while orogenic activity affected the inland Andean Cordillera, the upper-slope Lima Basin subsided and began its depositional record. Unconformites in shelf basins apparently...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (2): 429–430.
... unconformites, even between series and systems. The two major unconformities shown on the cross section are at the base of the Pennsylvanian and at the base of the Woodford or the Misener. © 1956 American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved 1956 American Association of Petroleum...
Image
Stratigraphic column with key tectonic events. MMU, Mid-Miocene Unconformity; LCU, Late Cimmerian Unconformity; BPU, Base Permian Unconformity.
Published: 17 February 2025
Fig. 2. Stratigraphic column with key tectonic events. MMU, Mid-Miocene Unconformity; LCU, Late Cimmerian Unconformity; BPU, Base Permian Unconformity.
Image
Well correlation diagram for the studied wells from the breakup unconformity to the K137 seismic marker, flattened on the J163 seismic marker. Map at lower right shows location of the transect in red. DT = sonic transit time; GAM = gamma ray; MD = measured depth; MFS = maximum flooding surface; u/c = unconformity; Up. = Upper.
Published: 01 January 2024
Figure 3. Well correlation diagram for the studied wells from the breakup unconformity to the K137 seismic marker, flattened on the J163 seismic marker. Map at lower right shows location of the transect in red. DT = sonic transit time; GAM = gamma ray; MD = measured depth; MFS = maximum flooding s
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1970
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1970) 18 (4): 463–468.
... time . It was probably a part of the Late Cretaceous to Tertiary rifting episode that was wide- J. W. KERR PLATE 1 LEGEND Glacial gravels, morainal debris, silty, clay, stream sediments , marine beach deposits ANGULAR UNCONFORMIT Y Goose Fiord Formation ; dolomite, light grey to cream coloured, vuggy...
Image
Diagrams showing graphite contents (vol%) vs. distance from the unconformity. No significant trend is discernable, especially if the top 10 m is excluded. See text for discussion. (Color online.)
Published: 01 November 2022
Figure 6. Diagrams showing graphite contents (vol%) vs. distance from the unconformity. No significant trend is discernable, especially if the top 10 m is excluded. See text for discussion. (Color online.)
Image
Representative photographs of the main facies associations: (a) unconformity between Precambrian strata and alluvial fan conglomerate, Bréhec; (b) fluvial sandstones showing a channel (CH) cutting into flat-bedded strata (Sh), Alderney Sandstone Formation, Alderney; (c) hummocky cross-stratified delta-front sandstone, La Hague; (d) Rusophycus and Cruziana trace fossils on bedding surface, Rozel; (e) burrows in sandstone and siltstone, Carteret (pencil is 15 cm long); (f) Arumberia on bedding surface in delta-front sandstones, Bréhec; (g) thin-section photomicrograph of super-mature quartz arenite (cross-polarized light), Erquy; (h) granular, very-coarse-grained sandstone bed (between dashed lines) with a wave-formed rippled top, in very-fine-grained marine sandstone and siltstone, Lessay (compass is 7 cm wide).
Published: 22 June 2020
Fig. 4. Representative photographs of the main facies associations: (a) unconformity between Precambrian strata and alluvial fan conglomerate, Bréhec; (b) fluvial sandstones showing a channel (CH) cutting into flat-bedded strata (Sh), Alderney Sandstone Formation, Alderney; (c) hummocky cross-stra
Image
Fig. 16.
Published: 18 April 2019
Fig. 16. ( a ) Geological map of the metamorphosed basement units at the unconformity with the overlying sandstones at the uranium site. Provided by Cameco. ( b ) Complexly folded geological surfaces in the metamorphosed basement at the uranium site. ( c ) Geological model outlining the basement c
Image
Published: 30 May 2018
TABLE 4. UNCERTAINTIES IN AGE AND VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT FOR DIXIE VALLEY UNCONFORMITIES AND CORRESPONDING STILLWATER RANGE KNICKPOINTS
Image
Photographs from the South Pamir terrane. (A) Cimmerian angular unconformity (ang. uncf.) beneath the Darbasatash Group (Gr.) (ridge location: 37.73N, 73.83E). (B) Representative stratigraphy of the South Pamir terrane (peak location: 38.0N, 74.07E). (C) Basal conglomerate (cong.) in the Darbasatash Group (hammer height is ∼42 cm; location: 37.77N, 73.245E). (D) Distinctive red and yellow clasts in the Darbasatash Group (pen height is ∼14 cm; location: 74.05N, 37.75E). (E) Monomict limestone karst breccia in the upper Gurumdi Group (hammer height ∼33 cm; location: 37.95N, 74.0E). (F) Paleokarst in the upper Gurumdi Group (ridge location: 37.92N, 74.06E). (G) Faulted strata of the Murghab Basin and basalt flow; Jurassic(?) rocks are conglomerates of the Central Pamir terrane (hillside location: 38.26N, 74.06E). (H) Growth strata in the Mamazair conglomerate displaying progressive bedding rotation and internal angular unconformities (ball-stick symbols show bedding dip; filled symbols are upright bedding; hollow symbols are overturned; hillside location: 37.843N, 74.096E). (I) Similar location to H. Folded Mamazair conglomerate in the footwall of the Mamazair fault (M. Gadoev for scale; outcrop in foreground location: 37.842N, 79.091E). (J) Recycled conglomerate clasts in the Mamazair conglomerate (hammer height ∼33 cm; location same as H). (K) Informal units of the Mamazair conglomerate in the footwall of the Kyzylrabot fault (hillside location: 37.47N, 74.76E). (L) Volcanic pebble-cobble conglomerate in the Mamazair conglomerate. Part of Unit 3 shown in photo K (hammer height ∼33 cm; location similar to photo K). Fm.—Formation.
Published: 18 April 2018
Figure 5. Photographs from the South Pamir terrane. (A) Cimmerian angular unconformity (ang. uncf.) beneath the Darbasatash Group (Gr.) (ridge location: 37.73N, 73.83E). (B) Representative stratigraphy of the South Pamir terrane (peak location: 38.0N, 74.07E). (C) Basal conglomerate (cong.) in the
Image
(a) The Metaconglomerato di Muravera Formation above the Sardic Unconformity. (b) Centimetre-scale cross-laminated sandstone in the Arenarie di San Vito Formation, with sharp erosive contact that indicates an overturned younging direction. (c) Phycodes circinatum on an overturned limb of the Arenarie di San Vito Formation that lies directly below the same unconformity. All the outcrops are located in the Riu Ollastu area.
Published: 14 September 2017
Figure 5. (a) The Metaconglomerato di Muravera Formation above the Sardic Unconformity. (b) Centimetre-scale cross-laminated sandstone in the Arenarie di San Vito Formation, with sharp erosive contact that indicates an overturned younging direction. (c) Phycodes circinatum on an overturned limb
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1967
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1967) 15 (2): 208.
...) recently presented evidence that in the Vernon map-area the original rocks and the super imposed metamorph ism (1959, p. 47-49 and p. 28-29) five different localities where unconformit ies sep- arate Shuswap rocks of the Monashee and Chapperon Groups f rom rocks of the Cache Creek Group of Permian age...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1967
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1967) 15 (2): 208.
...) recently presented evidence that in the Vernon map-area the original rocks and the super imposed metamorph ism (1959, p. 47-49 and p. 28-29) five different localities where unconformit ies sep- arate Shuswap rocks of the Monashee and Chapperon Groups f rom rocks of the Cache Creek Group of Permian age...
Image
Geometrical sketch of the Serra Spinella ridge. The progressive unconformities of the growth structure and the dip directions of the single sedimentary bodies are the result of an E-W oriented left-lateral strike-slip motion, as also shown by the complex fault association at the northern basin boundary.
Published: 23 December 2013
Fig. 13 Geometrical sketch of the Serra Spinella ridge. The progressive unconformities of the growth structure and the dip directions of the single sedimentary bodies are the result of an E-W oriented left-lateral strike-slip motion, as also shown by the complex fault association at the northern b
Image
Field photographs showing paleotopography of the intra-Chicotte unconformity (broken line) and overlying rocky shoreline deposits. (A) Paleotopographic depression with about 5 m of relief along the intra-Chicotte unconformity filled and draped by massive biostromal limestones, 3.2 km east of the mouth of the Aux Rats River. (B) Close-up of (A), showing massive biostromal limestones abutting against a paleocliff associated with the intra-Chicotte unconformity. (C) Close-up of (A), showing partially exhumed highrelief paleokarren. Note the presence of buried paleokarren (arrows) overlain by biostromal limestones in the upper right corner. Metre rule for scale. (D) Bedding plane view showing large abraded domal stromatoporoids in a crinoidal matrix. (E) Bedding plane view showing the smooth scalloped surface of the intra-Chicotte unconformity infested by Trypanites borings.
Published: 02 October 2006
Fig. 4. Field photographs showing paleotopography of the intra-Chicotte unconformity (broken line) and overlying rocky shoreline deposits. (A) Paleotopographic depression with about 5 m of relief along the intra-Chicotte unconformity filled and draped by massive biostromal limestones, 3.2 km east
Image
 Deep seismic profile (SOEKOR data), also showing major regional unconformities off Hondeklip Bay of the Orange Basin succession and the extent and depth of penetration of shallow seismic data, in relation to the overall basin stratigraphy (see Fig. 1 for location).
Published: 01 March 2004
Fig. 2.  Deep seismic profile (SOEKOR data), also showing major regional unconformities off Hondeklip Bay of the Orange Basin succession and the extent and depth of penetration of shallow seismic data, in relation to the overall basin stratigraphy (see Fig. 1 for location).
Image
Correlation of the 3 wells studied. The Maastrichtian/Oligocene unconformity, and the late Oligocene interval are based only on the log analyses, therefore they are tentative.
Published: 01 January 2003
Text-Figure 8. Correlation of the 3 wells studied. The Maastrichtian/Oligocene unconformity, and the late Oligocene interval are based only on the log analyses, therefore they are tentative.
Image
 Figure 5. Structure contour map drawn on the Tertiary-Paleozoic unconformity in the  Oak Creek Canyon–I-17 area of the Mogollon Rim; contour points and faults obtained  from Weir et al. (1989) and author (unpublished map). Contours show a pediment under  I-17 that embays the ancestral Mogollon Rim. After pedimentation, ancestral Oak Creek  deposited an alluvial fan that is up to 140 m thick. Sheet flows from T-Six Mountain that  entered ancestral Oak Creek followed it to the pediment and merged with flows that  poured over the ancestral rim
Published: 01 November 2001
Figure 5. Structure contour map drawn on the Tertiary-Paleozoic unconformity in the Oak Creek Canyon–I-17 area of the Mogollon Rim; contour points and faults obtained from Weir et al. (1989) and author (unpublished map). Contours show a pediment under I-17 that embays the ancestral Mogollon Rim
Image
—Schematic map and structural cross section showing the angular unconformity between the Leticia Formation and younger, subhorizontal Cenozoic beds, just north of Cabo Irigoyen. See Figure 2 for location.
Published: 01 February 1999
Figure 4 —Schematic map and structural cross section showing the angular unconformity between the Leticia Formation and younger, subhorizontal Cenozoic beds, just north of Cabo Irigoyen. See Figure 2 for location.