1-20 OF 94 RESULTS FOR

UCERF3-ETAS model

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 04 March 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (3): 1567–1578.
... min of the 4 July 2019 M 6.4 Searles Valley earthquake. UCERF3ETAS, an extension of the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3), is the first comprehensive, fault‐based, epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. It produces ensembles of synthetic aftershock sequences both...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 09 September 2021
The Seismic Record (2021) 1 (2): 117–125.
...Edward H. Field; Kevin R. Milner; Morgan T. Page; William H. Savran; Nicholas van der Elst Abstract We describe recent improvements to the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast ETAS Model (UCERF3ETAS), which continues to represent our most advanced and complete earthquake forecast...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 28 February 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (3): 1049–1081.
... to the previously published time‐independent and long‐term time‐dependent forecasts. This combined model, referred to as UCERF3ETAS, collectively represents a relaxation of segmentation assumptions, the inclusion of multifault ruptures, an elastic‐rebound model for fault‐based ruptures, and a state‐of‐the‐art...
FIGURES | View All (27)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2017
Earthquake Spectra (2017) 33 (4): 1279–1299.
...Edward Field, M. EERI; Keith Porter, M. EERI; Kevin Milner, M. EERI We present a prototype operational loss model based on UCERF3-ETAS, which is the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast with an Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) component. As such, UCERF3-ETAS represents...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Same as Figures  4b  and  5b  but with the no‐faults <span class="search-highlight">UCERF3</span>‐<span class="search-highlight">ETAS</span> <span class="search-highlight">model</span>. (a)...
Published: 04 March 2020
Figure 6. Same as Figures  4b and 5b but with the no‐faults UCERF3ETAS model. (a) Probabilities for 30 days immediately following the M  7.1 earthquake and (b) for 30 days starting seven days after the M  7.1 earthquake. The color version of this figure is available only
Journal Article
Published: 18 April 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (4): 1420–1434.
... developed the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (UCERF3ETAS) model. We find that the inclusion of faults only makes a difference for hazard and risk metrics that are dominated by large‐event likelihoods. We also show how the ShakeMap of a mainshock...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Mean depths for bins with more than 20 earthquakes for <span class="search-highlight">UCERF3</span>‐<span class="search-highlight">ETAS</span> (one hun...
Published: 13 February 2018
Figure 4. Mean depths for bins with more than 20 earthquakes for UCERF3ETAS (one hundred 1000‐yr catalogs) and the real catalog. By construction, the UCERF3ETAS model does not have depth variation that is present in the real catalog. However, mean depths are not constant in UCERF3ETAS
Journal Article
Published: 13 February 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (2): 729–741.
...Figure 4. Mean depths for bins with more than 20 earthquakes for UCERF3ETAS (one hundred 1000‐yr catalogs) and the real catalog. By construction, the UCERF3ETAS model does not have depth variation that is present in the real catalog. However, mean depths are not constant in UCERF3ETAS...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 21 July 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (4): 1799–1817.
... sequences (UCERF3ETAS) in a pseudoprospective sense. For comparison, we include a version of the model without explicit faults more closely mimicking traditional ETAS models (UCERF3‐NoFaults). We evaluate the forecasts with new metrics developed within the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 05 October 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (1): 527–537.
...Edward H. Field; Kevin R. Milner; Nicolas Luco ABSTRACT We use the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model (UCERF3ETAS) to evaluate the effects of declustering and Poisson assumptions on seismic hazard estimates. Although...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Number of earthquakes expected to occur at <span class="search-highlight">UCERF3</span> paleoseismic sites over a...
Published: 09 September 2021
Figure 2. Number of earthquakes expected to occur at UCERF3 paleoseismic sites over a 100 yr time period for (a) UCERF3‐TI (time‐independent model), (b) UCERF3‐TD (time‐dependent model), and (c) UCERF3ETAS. The implied chance of detecting zero events in a generic 100 yr period is 0.5%, 1.7
Image
(a) An example 100 yr time series of  M  ≥ 2.5 monthly rates from the Third...
Published: 05 October 2021
Figure 1. (a) An example 100 yr time series of M ≥ 2.5 monthly rates from the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast–epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (UCERF3ETAS; red), compared with that for Poisson model (black) created by randomizing the origin time of each event
Journal Article
Published: 03 November 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (1): 391–397.
... of ∼ 11    km ( Fletcher et al. , 2016 ). (However, this large of a jump is allowed in the UCERF3 epidemic type aftershock sequence [UCERF3ETAS] model as a separate, triggered event.) To give a second example, the cumulative azimuth filter in UCERF3 (known colloquially as the “squirrelly‐ness...
FIGURES
Image
An example 100-year <span class="search-highlight">UCERF3</span>-<span class="search-highlight">ETAS</span> simulation (red) and comparison to a Poisso...
Published: 01 November 2017
Figure 2. An example 100-year UCERF3-ETAS simulation (red) and comparison to a Poisson model (black), where event times have been randomized to produce the latter. The top panel shows the occurrence times of M ≥ 6 earthquakes and the lower panel shows monthly M ≥ 2.5 rates. The red spikes
Image
<span class="search-highlight">UCERF3</span>‐<span class="search-highlight">ETAS</span> forecasted magnitude–number distribution for one week following...
Published: 04 March 2020
Figure 3. UCERF3ETAS forecasted magnitude–number distribution for one week following the 4 July M  6.4 earthquake (point source). (a) Results from the default UCERF‐ETAS model, which is anticharacteristic in this region and (b) the no‐faults model, which follows a Gutenberg–Richter (GR
Journal Article
Published: 12 July 2017
Seismological Research Letters (2017) 88 (5): 1259–1267.
... model, UCERF3‐TI ( Field et al. , 2014 ); a long‐term time‐dependent refinement based on Reid‐renewal statistics, UCERF3‐TD ( Field et al. , 2015 ); and a short‐term clustering model based on ETAS statistics, UCERF3ETAS ( Field et al. , 2017 ). The model is hierarchical in the sense that the TD...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Cumulative number of    M  ≥  3.5    events over time for the region mapped...
Published: 04 March 2020
. Extrema from 100,000 simulations are plotted with thin dotted black lines, and 2.5%, 16%, 84%, and 97.5% percentiles are plotted with thin black lines. (a) UCERF3ETAS results for the default model and (b) with the same inputs except sequence‐specific parameters. The time at which the parameters for panel
Journal Article
Published: 06 November 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (1): 438–451.
... forecasting models were used to explore these two respective end‐member cases: a temporal epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model ( Ogata, 1988 ) and the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3)‐ETAS model ( Field, Milner, et al. , 2017 ). The temporal ETAS model is a statistical...
FIGURES
Image
(a) The average number of  M  ≥ 2.5 aftershocks (in 2-by-2 km geographic ce...
Published: 01 November 2017
Figure 8. (a) The average number of M ≥ 2.5 aftershocks (in 2-by-2 km geographic cells) in 10 years following the M 7.1 Hayward fault scenario (the USGS HayWired scenario; Detweiler and Wein, 2017 ), as inferred from 200,000 UCERF3-ETAS simulations. (b) Results for a no-fault ETAS model
Image
Results obtained from 1000‐year <span class="search-highlight">UCERF3</span>‐<span class="search-highlight">ETAS</span> simulations based on default pa...
Published: 28 February 2017
Figure 12. Results obtained from 1000‐year UCERF3ETAS simulations based on default parameter settings, in which results represent averages from 500 different runs. (a)  M ≥ 2.5 nucleation rates throughout the region at a resolution of 0.02° in latitude and longitude. (b) Ratio