1-20 OF 1859 RESULTS FOR

Ty Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2007
DOI: 10.1306/1209855M873269
EISBN: 9781629810072
... Abstract Evidence is presented for the widespread presence of sand injectites in mudstone- prone units in the deep-water sandstones of the Ty formation (Paleocene). Pressure communication throughout the field during production demonstrates that the laterally extensive shale layers...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Gravimetric response of the Ty Formation. Note the smaller scale of the vertical axis compared to Figures 5a, 5b, 8a, and 8b.
Published: 09 March 2015
Figure 9. Gravimetric response of the Ty Formation. Note the smaller scale of the vertical axis compared to Figures  5a , 5b , 8a , and 8b .
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 20 November 2008
Geophysics (2008) 73 (6): WA155–WA161.
... production and water influx in the Ty Formation, and C O 2 injection in the Utsira Formation. Simultaneous matches to models for these effects have been made. The latest simulation model of the Ty Formation was fitted by permitting a scale factor, and the gravity contribution from the C O 2 plume...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Joint likelihood for CO2 density and dissolution (a and c) show the 2005 data and (b and d) show the 2009 data. In panels (a and b), the Ty Formation is not included, whereas in panels (c and d), the Ty Formation is included. Note that the colorbar denotes likelihood; thus, no units are specified.
Published: 09 March 2015
Figure 11. Joint likelihood for CO 2 density and dissolution (a and c) show the 2005 data and (b and d) show the 2009 data. In panels (a and b), the Ty Formation is not included, whereas in panels (c and d), the Ty Formation is included. Note that the colorbar denotes likelihood
Image
Bulk composition of investigated samples from the Hermod and Ty formations of the Nini Field. Mineral composition was determined by point counting of 500 points across each entire thin section. Macro-porosity was determined by image analysis when porosity threshold is equal to macro-porosity determined from Pc measurements. Micro-porosity is the difference between helium porosity and image porosity.
Published: 01 May 2011
Fig. 6 Bulk composition of investigated samples from the Hermod and Ty formations of the Nini Field. Mineral composition was determined by point counting of 500 points across each entire thin section. Macro-porosity was determined by image analysis when porosity threshold is equal to macro
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2011
Petroleum Geoscience (2011) 17 (2): 111–125.
...Fig. 6 Bulk composition of investigated samples from the Hermod and Ty formations of the Nini Field. Mineral composition was determined by point counting of 500 points across each entire thin section. Macro-porosity was determined by image analysis when porosity threshold is equal to macro...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 2001
AAPG Bulletin (2001) 85 (5): 861–883.
... of Paleocene and Eocene age. These sands (Balder, Heimdal, and Ty formations) pinch out to the east in blocks 25/8 (Jotun field) and 25/11 (Balder and Grane fields) and along the western margin of the Utsira High to form a combination of stratigraphic and structural traps. Marine sands of Middle and Late...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Image
(a) Crossplot of porosity and permeability for greensand (modified after Hossain et al., 2011a). Samples from the Hermod Formation have higher porosity and permeability, whereas the samples from Ty sand are more scattered. The model curves represent equal specific surface of pores (Sp) as determined by using Kozeny’s equation, (b) BSE images of weakly cemented sandstone from the Hermod Formation, (c) Cemented sandstone from the Ty Formation. (d) Laboratory-measured permeability versus predicted permeability by using Kozeny’s equation from specific surface area predicted from image analysis. Samples from the Ty formation contains berthierine and/or microcrystalline quartz cements, resulting in a relatively poor permeability prediction using Kozeny equation.
Published: 05 December 2014
Figure 8. (a) Crossplot of porosity and permeability for greensand (modified after Hossain et al., 2011a ). Samples from the Hermod Formation have higher porosity and permeability, whereas the samples from Ty sand are more scattered. The model curves represent equal specific surface of pores
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 09 March 2015
Interpretation (2015) 3 (2): SP1–SP10.
...Figure 9. Gravimetric response of the Ty Formation. Note the smaller scale of the vertical axis compared to Figures  5a , 5b , 8a , and 8b . ...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
(a)–(d) Air brine capillary pressure curves including saturation error compared with NMR derived capillary pressure including saturation error. Saturation error corresponds to the error associated with porosity measurements. The NMR derived capillary pressure curves are based on surface relaxivity value of 20.4 µm s–1 for Hermod Formation and 28.4 µm s–1 for Ty formation. Deviation between average surface relaxivity (solid line) and surface relaxivity for predicting Pc NMR (dashes line) are shown (e) for Hermod Formation and (f) for Ty Formation.
Published: 01 May 2011
on surface relaxivity value of 20.4 µm s –1 for Hermod Formation and 28.4 µm s –1 for Ty formation. Deviation between average surface relaxivity (solid line) and surface relaxivity for predicting P c NMR (dashes line) are shown ( e ) for Hermod Formation and ( f ) for Ty Formation.
Image
The North Sea Volve Village Seismic Data, inline 10127. The black line is the top of the Ty Formation, the magenta line is the base of the Hugin Formation, and the red dashed line is the projected position of the well.
Published: 01 July 2023
Figure 4. The North Sea Volve Village Seismic Data, inline 10127. The black line is the top of the Ty Formation, the magenta line is the base of the Hugin Formation, and the red dashed line is the projected position of the well.
Image
Lithostratigraphy of the greater Utsira High area. Significant discoveries have been made in the Paleocene Balder, Heimdal, and Ty formations and in the Jurassic Draupne and Hugin formations. The Upper Jurassic Draupne and Heather formations are the main source rocks for oil and gas.
Published: 01 May 2001
Figure 2 Lithostratigraphy of the greater Utsira High area. Significant discoveries have been made in the Paleocene Balder, Heimdal, and Ty formations and in the Jurassic Draupne and Hugin formations. The Upper Jurassic Draupne and Heather formations are the main source rocks for oil and gas.
Image
(a), (c) Capillary pressure curves and (b), (d) NMR T2 distribution curves of greensand samples. (a) Pc curves of Hermod Formation samples are shifted towards low irreducible water saturation, whereas (c) the Ty Formation samples have relatively high irreducible water saturation. This pattern compares to the relatively high permeability of Hermod sand relative to the low permeability of Ty sand (Fig. 3). T2 distribution of all samples shows two peaks. The peak close to 1 ms represents micro-porosity and the peak close to 100 ms represents macro-porosity.
Published: 01 May 2011
Fig. 7 ( a ), ( c ) Capillary pressure curves and ( b ), ( d ) NMR T 2 distribution curves of greensand samples. (a) P c curves of Hermod Formation samples are shifted towards low irreducible water saturation, whereas (c) the Ty Formation samples have relatively high irreducible water
Image
BSE images of greensand samples. (a) Sample 1–4 from Hermod Formation and (b) sample 1A-142 from Ty Formation. Scale bar is 200 µm. Q, quartz; Gl, glauconite; H, heavy minerals, M, mica; PF, pore-filling clay minerals. Porosity, permeability and irreducible water saturation are 37 p.u., 530 mD and 26% for sample 1-4 and 29 p.u., 150 mD and 38% for sample 1A-142.
Published: 01 May 2011
Fig. 1 BSE images of greensand samples. ( a ) Sample 1–4 from Hermod Formation and ( b ) sample 1A-142 from Ty Formation. Scale bar is 200 µm. Q, quartz; Gl, glauconite; H, heavy minerals, M, mica; PF, pore-filling clay minerals. Porosity, permeability and irreducible water saturation are 37 p.u
Image
(A) Photograph of the Cualac formation in the Tlaxiaco area, showing the typical geometry of the architectural elements Gravel Bars and Bedforms (GB) and Sediment-Gravity-Flow Deposits (SG). The conglomerate deposits of GB show lens-shaped beds that cut into each other both laterally and vertically, whereas the conglomerate deposits of SG show a sharp and non-erosional relationship with the underlying deposit. (B) Photograph of the Cualac formation in the Tezoatlán area, showing GB and FF elements, as well as its bounding surfaces. (C) Photograph of meter-thick sheet-like deposits of the Floodplain Fines (FF) of the lower Tecocoyunca group in the Tlaxiaco area. (D) Plant roots perpendicular to bedding are present in the lower Tecocoyunca group deposits.
Published: 21 June 2021
Figure 6. (A) Photograph of the Cualac formation in the Tlaxiaco area, showing the typical geometry of the architectural elements Gravel Bars and Bedforms (GB) and Sediment-Gravity-Flow Deposits (SG). The conglomerate deposits of GB show lens-shaped beds that cut into each other both laterally
Image
Stratigraphic section of the Punta Noguera Formation and location of the type sample of Chiloguembelina noguerensis n. sp. (modified after Olivero and others, 2002).
Published: 01 October 2009
F igure 1. Stratigraphic section of the Punta Noguera Formation and location of the type sample of Chiloguembelina noguerensis n. sp. (modified after Olivero and others, 2002 ).
Image
—Map of Granny Creek field showing completions in the Price Formation by type of well, location of well shown in Figure 6, and location of cross section shown in Figure 7.
Published: 01 June 1997
Figure 4 —Map of Granny Creek field showing completions in the Price Formation by type of well, location of well shown in Figure 6 , and location of cross section shown in Figure 7 .
Image
—Columnar section of Cadna-owie Formation and Mt. Anna Sandstone Member (type section) near Mt. Anna. See Figure 9 for section location.
Published: 01 March 1970
Fig. 20. —Columnar section of Cadna-owie Formation and Mt. Anna Sandstone Member (type section) near Mt. Anna. See Figure 9 for section location.
Image
Migrated section from profile 07, tying the seismic data to the North Oxen-le-Fields borehole. The strong reflection event corresponds to the interface between the Roxby Formation and the Seaham Formation. Depth to the top surface of the limestone is estimated as 47 m at the start of the profile and 75 m at the end of the profile, tying in with the borehole record. Trace spacing is 1 m.
Published: 01 February 2009
Fig. 5 Migrated section from profile 07, tying the seismic data to the North Oxen-le-Fields borehole. The strong reflection event corresponds to the interface between the Roxby Formation and the Seaham Formation. Depth to the top surface of the limestone is estimated as 47 m at the start
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 July 2023
The Leading Edge (2023) 42 (7): 492–501.
...Figure 4. The North Sea Volve Village Seismic Data, inline 10127. The black line is the top of the Ty Formation, the magenta line is the base of the Hugin Formation, and the red dashed line is the projected position of the well. ...
FIGURES | View All (12)