1-20 OF 71 RESULTS FOR

Tuscahoma Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
 (a) Measured section through the upper Tuscahoma Formation in the lower Harrell Core indicating major facies types and sampling position for both isotopes and sporomorphs. (b) Measured section through the upper Tuscahoma Formation in the Wahalak #2 Core indicating major facies types and sampling positions. Section redrawn from Mancini (1981). In both (a) and (b), the top represents the contact with the Bashi–Hatchetigbee formations.
Published: 01 March 2004
Fig. 3.  ( a ) Measured section through the upper Tuscahoma Formation in the lower Harrell Core indicating major facies types and sampling position for both isotopes and sporomorphs. ( b ) Measured section through the upper Tuscahoma Formation in the Wahalak #2 Core indicating major facies types
Image
 Summary diagrams of the upper Tuscahoma Formation at (a) the Red Hot Truck Stop (data from Harrington 2003b), (b) the lower Harrell Core and (c) the Wahalak #2 Core. Also shown in (b) and (c), from left to right, are kaolinite content (per cent of clay mineral suite), δ13C content of lignites, major vegetation types and dominant taxa, Eocene first occurrence taxa (marked with ± and with 50% confidence intervals plotted on their bases), Palaeocene last occurrences (with 50% confidence intervals), rarefied sample richness at 401 grains, square chord distance from the lowest sample in the section (marked by a circled star) and Bray–Curtis similarity from the lowest sample in the section (marked by a circled star). Grey lines represent a five-point moving average through the samples.
Published: 01 March 2004
Fig. 4.  Summary diagrams of the upper Tuscahoma Formation at ( a ) the Red Hot Truck Stop (data from Harrington 2003 b ), ( b ) the lower Harrell Core and ( c ) the Wahalak #2 Core. Also shown in ( b ) and ( c ), from left to right, are kaolinite content (per cent of clay mineral suite), δ 13
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (9): 1429–1430.
...Norman O. Frederiksen; Thomas G. Gibson; Laurel M. Bybell ABSTRACT The Paleocene-Eocene boundary in Alabama has been placed at various levels within the Tuscahoma Formation and the overlying Bashi Formation. The location of this boundary is important because both lignite- and petroleum-bearing...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2004
Journal of the Geological Society (2004) 161 (2): 173–184.
...Fig. 3.  ( a ) Measured section through the upper Tuscahoma Formation in the lower Harrell Core indicating major facies types and sampling position for both isotopes and sporomorphs. ( b ) Measured section through the upper Tuscahoma Formation in the Wahalak #2 Core indicating major facies types...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Palaeocene–Eocene paratropical floral change in No...
Second thumbnail for: Palaeocene–Eocene paratropical floral change in No...
Third thumbnail for: Palaeocene–Eocene paratropical floral change in No...
Journal Article
Journal: Paleobiology
Published: 01 January 2012
Paleobiology (2012) 38 (1): 15–39.
..., using sporomorph (pollen and spore) data from the late Paleocene Calvert Bluff and Tuscahoma Formations of the formerly paratropical U.S. Gulf Coast (Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama). The data set comprises 139 sporomorph taxa recorded from 56 samples. Additive diversity partitioning, nonmetric...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Regional-scale spatial heterogeneity in the late P...
Second thumbnail for: Regional-scale spatial heterogeneity in the late P...
Third thumbnail for: Regional-scale spatial heterogeneity in the late P...
Image
Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots of GCP samples using incidence data and the Jaccard coefficient. Open symbols are Tuscahoma Formation samples, closed symbols are Calvert Bluff Formation samples, triangles are clastic samples, and circles are lignite samples.
Published: 01 January 2012
F igure 5. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots of GCP samples using incidence data and the Jaccard coefficient. Open symbols are Tuscahoma Formation samples, closed symbols are Calvert Bluff Formation samples, triangles are clastic samples, and circles are lignite samples.
Image
Published: 01 January 2012
T able 1. Sample details. Sample level  =  height from base of section for Calvert Bluff Formation samples, and core depth for OSM#2 Wahalak core (Tuscahoma Formation) samples; n  =  sample count; S  =  raw within-sample species richness; R 150  =  rarefied within-sample species richness
Image
Two-way cluster dendrogram plot of GCP samples (upper dendrogram) and taxa (right dendrogram). Taxa are denoted by an ID number; see Appendix for taxon names. Biostratigraphic marker taxa are highlighted in gray. Samples are denoted by their formation and lithology. Tu, Tuscahoma Formation; C.B., Calvert Bluff Formation; C, clastic; L, lignite. See also Supplementary Figure 1 for a large-scale version with taxon and sample names included.
Published: 01 January 2012
F igure 7. Two-way cluster dendrogram plot of GCP samples (upper dendrogram) and taxa (right dendrogram). Taxa are denoted by an ID number; see Appendix for taxon names. Biostratigraphic marker taxa are highlighted in gray. Samples are denoted by their formation and lithology. Tu, Tuscahoma
Image
FIGURE 2—Diagrammatic stratigraphy of the Tuscahoma and Bashi/Hatchetigbee Formations, eastern US Gulf Coast. Note that the diagram is not to scale because the actual stratigraphic thickness of sediments varies geographically on the eastern US Gulf Coast with greater strata thickness in Mississippi. (A) Magnetostratigraphic data from Rhodes (1995), and Rhodes et al. (1999); (B) Sequence stratigraphy of Mancini and Tew (1995); (C) Planktonic foraminiferal ages of Berggren et al. (1995) from data presented in Mancini and Oliver (1981), and Gibson and Bybell (1994); (D) Calcareous nannofossil data from Gibson and Bybell (1994); (E) Bashi/Hatchetigbee cycles from Gibson and Bybell (1994), mammalian data from Beard et al. (1995), pollen data from Frederiksen (1998) and Harrington, unpublished data. Hatchetigbee Bluff lies in the fourth Bashi/Hatchetigbee cycle (T. Gibson, pers. comm., 2000). Black bands represent lignite beds in the terrestrial upper Tuscahoma Formation and banded layers represent marl beds
Published: 01 June 2001
FIGURE 2 —Diagrammatic stratigraphy of the Tuscahoma and Bashi/Hatchetigbee Formations, eastern US Gulf Coast. Note that the diagram is not to scale because the actual stratigraphic thickness of sediments varies geographically on the eastern US Gulf Coast with greater strata thickness
Image
Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots of each formation separately. A, Calvert Bluff Formation: open symbols indicate samples from the base of the formation, closed symbols indicate samples from the top of the formation, triangles indicate clastic samples, and circles indicate lignite samples. B, Tuscahoma Formation: numbers indicate sample level in OSM#2 Wahalak core (1  =  base, 26  =  top), Red Hills Mine samples are denoted by their sample number. Ringed numbers are lignite samples. Note the different axis scales on the two plots.
Published: 01 January 2012
indicate lignite samples. B, Tuscahoma Formation: numbers indicate sample level in OSM#2 Wahalak core (1  =  base, 26  =  top), Red Hills Mine samples are denoted by their sample number. Ringed numbers are lignite samples. Note the different axis scales on the two plots.
Image
Distance-decay plots for Holocene biomes. The x-axis shows the geographical distance between samples, and the y-axis shows the natural logarithm of the Jaccard similarity coefficient. Symbols denote data points, and lines denote least-squares linear regression models. Solid line and circles, tropical forest; dashed line and squares, warm mixed forest; dotted line and triangles, temperate forest; cross, mean intersample compositional similarity between the Calvert Bluff and Tuscahoma Formations, plotted against the geographic distance between the formation sample midpoints. Vertical line shows bootstrapped 95% confidence interval. A, Individual Holocene sites. B, Pooled Holocene sites to simulate spatial averaging.
Published: 01 January 2012
and circles, tropical forest; dashed line and squares, warm mixed forest; dotted line and triangles, temperate forest; cross, mean intersample compositional similarity between the Calvert Bluff and Tuscahoma Formations, plotted against the geographic distance between the formation sample midpoints. Vertical
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2007
Journal of the Geological Society (2007) 164 (2): 323–332.
... suggested that it lies in the upper Tuscahoma Formation in Mississippi, based on the presence in the Harrell Core of typical ‘Eocene’ palynomorphs such as Interpollis microsupplingensis and Brosipollis spp. (see Tschudy 1973 ; Elsik 1974 ; Frederiksen 1980 ; Harrington 2003 b ). The Early Eocene...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Paratropical floral extinction in the Late Palaeoc...
Second thumbnail for: Paratropical floral extinction in the Late Palaeoc...
Third thumbnail for: Paratropical floral extinction in the Late Palaeoc...
Image
LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Published: 01 October 1961
wrapper and echinoid plate (e) filled by glauconite. I-8. 25× Tuscahoma formation at Sta. 9. Sandy limestone. Compare size of glauconite (dark) with quartz (white). I-9. 500× Matrix in Stone City formation at Sta. 69. Cement includes siderite and glauconite.
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1995
DOI: 10.2110/pec.95.04.0281
EISBN: 9781565760912
... depositional sequence), the Tuscahoma Sand (in part, the TAGC-2.1 and the TAGC-2.2 and TAGC-2.3 sequences), and the Hatchetigbee Formation (TAGC-2.4 depositional sequence). These cycles are interpreted to result from changes in sea level and coastal onlap during the late Paleocene and early Eocene epochs...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (4): 502.
.... The Tuscahoma Sand is overlain by the Bashi Marl Member of the Hatchetigbee Formation. The Bashi contains a diverse lower Eocene marine fossil assemblage. © 1984 American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved 1984 American Association of Petroleum Geologists ...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (9): 1430.
... of the Tuscahoma is assigned to Zone NP9 and the Morozovella velascoensis Interval zone (late Paleocene). The Hatchetigbee and Bashi Formations are of earliest Eocene age (Zone NPIO and lower part of Morozovella subbotinae Interval zone). A major unconformity separates these formations from the overlying...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1968
AAPG Bulletin (1968) 52 (3): 546–547.
...William R. Reynolds ABSTRACT The Alabama Tertiary rock units studied include, in ascending order, the Clayton, Porters Creek, and Naheola Formations of the Paleocene, and the Nanafalia Formation, Tuscahoma Sand, and the Hatchetigbee and Tallahatta Formations of the lower Eocene. Throughout the area...
Book Chapter

Author(s)
Claire E. Aubourg
Series: AAPG Studies in Geology
Publisher: American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Datapages
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1306/13281374St621291
EISBN: 9781629810256
... ). In the Wilcox Group, the Gravel Creek and the Tuscahoma lignite deposits occur in the Coal Bluff Marl Member of the Nanafalia Formation and the Tuscahoma Sand Member of the Tuscahoma Sand Formation, respectively (Figure 2 ). The Gravel Creek lignite occurs in central and eastern Alabama, and the Oak Hill...
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 December 2007
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.07.27.0232
EISBN: 978-0-9836096-3-6
... of the Clayton, Porters Creek, Naheola, Nanafalaya, Tuscahoma, and Hatchetigbee formations. Results of this investigation illustrate the potential utility of the methods for detailed stratigraphic studies in the Gulf Basin. We plan to extend our Gulf Basin magnetic susceptibility chronology through the Eocene...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (2): 307.
..., Tuscahoma Sand, and lower Hatchetigbee Formation (in part) correlate to the Selandian Stage. The Hatchetigbee (in part) and lower Tallahatta correlate to the Ypresian Stage; the upper Tallahatta and most of the Lisbon and Cook Mountain Formations correlate to the Lutetian Stage. The upper Lisbon and Cook...