1-20 OF 264 RESULTS FOR

Turkish-Iranian Plateau

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 24 June 2022
Geosphere (2022) 18 (4): 1377–1393.
...Ayoub Kaviani; Eric Sandvol; Wenfei Ku; Susan L. Beck; Niyazi Türkelli; A. Arda Özacar; Jonathan R. Delph Abstract The Turkish-Iranian Plateau and the Zagros highlands are among the most prominent physiographic features in the Middle East and were formed as a result of continental collision between...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
Simplified tectonic map of the Turkish-Iranian Plateau and the eastern Mediterranean. WAP—Western Anatolian province; CAP—Central Anatolian Plateau; EAP—East Anatolian Plateau; BS—Bitlis suture; DSF—Dead Sea fault; NAF—Northern Anatolian fault; EAF—Eastern Anatolian fault; ZFTB—Zagros fold-and-thrust belt; MZT—Main Zagros thrust; SSZ—Sanandaj-Sirjan zone; UDMA—Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic arc. Red triangles represent Quaternary volcanoes. G. and L. Caucasus stand for Greater and Lesser Caucasus.
Published: 24 June 2022
Figure 1. Simplified tectonic map of the Turkish-Iranian Plateau and the eastern Mediterranean. WAP—Western Anatolian province; CAP—Central Anatolian Plateau; EAP—East Anatolian Plateau; BS—Bitlis suture; DSF—Dead Sea fault; NAF—Northern Anatolian fault; EAF—Eastern Anatolian fault; ZFTB—Zagros
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 April 2014
Geology (2014) 42 (4): 291–294.
... and the peridotite solidus produce small-scale convection at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary and magmatism that follows the spatially and temporally scattered style and volumes typical for collision magmatism, such as the late Cenozoic volcanism of the Turkish-Iranian Plateau. An inherent feature in small...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1997
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1997) 87 (2): 396–413.
... with segments beneath the Turkish plateau and northern Iranian plateau, consistent with a previous study by Kadinsky-Cade et al. (1981). This study finds that the zone of inefficient Sn propagation coincides with a zone of low Pn velocities (<7.9 km/sec) determined by Hearn and Ni (1994) from Pn tomography...
Published: 01 January 2007
DOI: 10.1130/2007.1200(04)
... Mountains where thick-skinned thrusting and simple folding has resulted in a relatively small amount of crustal shortening (50–70 km) with almost no metamorphic or magmatic consequences. Burial metamorphism may be occurring presently at deep levels of the internal zone and the Turkish-Iranian Plateau where...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Published: 01 January 2006
DOI: 10.1130/2006.2409(01)
... alkaline volcanism both in the Aegean extensional province and in the Turkish-Iranian plateau since the late Miocene shows chemical evidence for an enriched asthenospheric mantle melt source; in both regions postcollisional slab break-off events have played a major role in providing this asthenospheric...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 September 2002
Geology (2002) 30 (9): 775–778.
... in the Arabia-Eurasia collision at that time, possibly following the construction of the Turkish-Iranian Plateau. 17 05 2002 08 03 2002 16 05 2002 Geological Society of America 2002 Anticlines in the sedimentary cover of the South Caspian basin form the principal hydrocarbon traps...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Distribution of Middle Miocene to recent (16–0 Ma) volcanic centers of Turkish-Iranian Plateau; background is topography map (modified after Neill et al., 2013). See the Data Repository (see footnote 1) for numeric values and references for ages.
Published: 01 April 2014
Figure 1. Distribution of Middle Miocene to recent (16–0 Ma) volcanic centers of Turkish-Iranian Plateau; background is topography map (modified after Neill et al., 2013 ). See the Data Repository (see footnote 1 ) for numeric values and references for ages.
Image
Cross‐section B–B′ (location indicated in Fig. 17) same as Figure 18. Locations along the profile are indicated in (a): Afar Hotspot, ArSh, Arabian Shield; ArPl, Arabian Platform; MF, Mesopotamian Foredeep; Cenozoic volcanic centers (volc.) in the Turkish–Iranian Plateau, Caucasus Mountains (Cauc.), and Eurasian plate. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 28 February 2024
Figure 19. Cross‐section B–B′ (location indicated in Fig.  17 ) same as Figure  18 . Locations along the profile are indicated in (a): Afar Hotspot, ArSh, Arabian Shield; ArPl, Arabian Platform; MF, Mesopotamian Foredeep; Cenozoic volcanic centers (volc.) in the TurkishIranian Plateau, Caucasus
Image
Cross‐section C–C′ (location indicated in Fig. 17) same as Figure 18. Locations along the profile are indicated in (a): Black Sea, Cenozoic volcanic centers (volc.) in the Turkish–Iranian Plateau, Zagros Mountain Belt, OL, Oman Line (OL); M, Makran subduction zone; ArSea, Arabian Sea. Makran subducting slab location from Hayes (2018) is indicated by the green dashed line. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 28 February 2024
Figure 20. Cross‐section C–C′ (location indicated in Fig.  17 ) same as Figure  18 . Locations along the profile are indicated in (a): Black Sea, Cenozoic volcanic centers (volc.) in the TurkishIranian Plateau, Zagros Mountain Belt, OL, Oman Line (OL); M, Makran subduction zone; ArSea, Arabian
Image
Regional map of the Turkish-Caucasus-Iranian collision zone showing the main tectonic features and suture zones, modified after Sosson et al. (2010) and Mouthereau et al. (2012). The distribution of Cenozoic and Mesozoic magmatism is compiled from Chiu et al. (2013), Kuşcu et al. (2013), Mederer et al. (2013), and Delibaş et al. (2016). Spatial and temporal distribution of porphyry Cu ± Mo ± Au deposits along the Turkish-Iranian plateau is reported after Richards (2015a), Moritz et al. (2016b), and Delibaş et al. (2019). Large and small dots indicate, respectively, deposits with &gt;100 Mt resources and with &lt;100 Mt resources. Names of major deposits are indicated. Abbreviations: BPM = Bitlis-Püturge massif, GC = Greater Caucasus, LC = Lesser Caucasus, SAB = South Armenian block, SKB = Somkheto-Karabagh belt, SSZ = Sanandaj-Sirjan zone, TAB = Tauride-Anatolian block, UDMA = Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic arc.
Published: 01 November 2019
. (2013), Mederer et al. (2013) , and Delibaş et al. (2016) . Spatial and temporal distribution of porphyry Cu ± Mo ± Au deposits along the Turkish-Iranian plateau is reported after Richards (2015a) , Moritz et al. (2016b) , and Delibaş et al. (2019) . Large and small dots indicate, respectively
Image
Nb/element ratios showing the rear arc enrichment of Nb at Tunupa and plateau lavas from the central Andes, Iran-Turkey, and Tibet compared to the frontal arc of the southern Altiplano. P&amp;A refers to the frontal arc composite volcanoes of Parinacota and Aucanquilcha (Hora et al., 2009; Grunder et al., 2008; Walker, 2011), whereas the remaining symbols are for rear arc, Pliocene and younger monogenetic rear arc lavas of the southern Altiplano (Davidson and de Silva, 1995; Hoke and Lamb, 2007; McLeod et al., 2012; Jiménez and López-Velásquez, 2008); Peru—Quaternary potassic lavas from the northern Altiplano rear arc (Carlier et al., 2005); Uturuncu volcano (Sparks et al., 2008); NW Argentina—potassic lavas from the northern Puna (Déruelle, 1991; Schreiber and Schwab, 1991); Tuzgle volcano (Coira and Kay, 1993); Puna mafic—late Miocene and younger potassic lavas from the southern Puna rear arc (Drew et al., 2009); Iran—Quaternary lavas from the Turkish-Iranian Plateau (Allen et al., 2013); Tibet—Miocene and younger lavas from the northern Tibetan Plateau (Williams et al., 2004). Note that the Cretaceous, mantle lithosphere–derived, alkaline lavas that erupted in what is now the Eastern Cordillera of Bolivia between 19°S and 21°S are too high in Nb/La, Nb/Ba, Nb/Zr, and Nb/Th to plot on the diagrams (Nb = 90–144 ppm; Lucassen et al., 2007).
Published: 01 April 2015
lavas from the southern Puna rear arc ( Drew et al., 2009 ); Iran—Quaternary lavas from the Turkish-Iranian Plateau ( Allen et al., 2013 ); Tibet—Miocene and younger lavas from the northern Tibetan Plateau ( Williams et al., 2004 ). Note that the Cretaceous, mantle lithosphere–derived, alkaline lavas
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1999
Journal of the Geological Society (1999) 156 (5): 929–941.
... as indicators of active tectonics Tectonophysics 1983 92 335 367 Sengör A.M.C. Kidd W.S.F. Post-collisional tectonics of the Turkish-Iranian plateau and a comparison with Tibet Tectonophysics 1979 55 361 376 Sengör A.M.C. Yilmaz Y. Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2007
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2007) 97 (1B): 151–161.
... al. (1997) found that the lowest Q -values, <350, all lie within the Tethyan orogenic belt, which includes the Turkish-Iranian Plateau, and that moderately low Q -values are found in the Arabian Peninsula (350–500). Cong and Mitchell (1998) using 2° × 2° cells found that Q 0...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2001
Seismological Research Letters (2001) 72 (1): 60–69.
... ; Saunders et al. , 1998 ; Sandvol et al. , 1998 ). The presence of S n suggests that there is not partial melt in the mantle, as has been suggested for the central Turkish-Iranian plateau. Surface-wave velocities are about 4.2 km/s ( Mindevalli and Mitchell 1989 ). These velocities are also lower than...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 28 February 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (3): 1365–1391.
...Figure 19. Cross‐section B–B′ (location indicated in Fig.  17 ) same as Figure  18 . Locations along the profile are indicated in (a): Afar Hotspot, ArSh, Arabian Shield; ArPl, Arabian Platform; MF, Mesopotamian Foredeep; Cenozoic volcanic centers (volc.) in the TurkishIranian Plateau, Caucasus...
FIGURES | View All (23)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2013
Seismological Research Letters (2013) 84 (4): 579–593.
... of the TurkishIranian Plateau. Several authors have interpreted systems of strike‐slip faults as absorbing most of this north–south contraction ( Jackson and McKenzie, 1984 ; Taymaz et al. , 1991 ; Koçyiğit et al. , 2001 ; Şengör et al. , 2003 ; Copley and Jackson, 2006 ). Many of the earthquakes within...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1997
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1997) 87 (6): 1622–1636.
... . Hearn T. Ni J. (1994) . Pn velocities beneath continental collision zones: the Turkish-Iranian Plateau , Geophys. J. Int. 117 , 273 - 283 . Huang J...
Journal Article
Published: 05 July 2011
Geological Magazine (2011) 148 (5-6): 692–725.
...P. AGARD; J. OMRANI; L. JOLIVET; H. WHITECHURCH; B. VRIELYNCK; W. SPAKMAN; P. MONIÉ; B. MEYER; R. WORTEL Abstract This paper presents a synthetic view of the geodynamic evolution of the Zagros orogen within the frame of the Arabia–Eurasia collision. The Zagros orogen and the Iranian plateau...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 August 2008
Geology (2008) 36 (8): 619–622.
.... 355 – 404, doi: 10.1016/S0377-0273(98)00063-8. 0956-540X(2005)160[1068:SWTOTT]2.0.CO;2 Maggi A. Priestley K. 2005 , Surface waveform tomography of the Turkish Iranian plateau...
FIGURES | View All (4)