1-20 OF 3406 RESULTS FOR

Three Forks Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 08 May 2018
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2018) 88 (5): 583–612.
...Alyssa Franklin; J. Frederick Sarg Abstract The Three Forks Formation, composed of intrashelf deposits, is the chronostratigraphic equivalent of the greater Palliser Formation (Wabamum Formation in the subsurface, western Canada) ramp and shelf deposits. These sub-equatorial Famennian (Late...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 04 December 2017
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.17.121
EISBN: 9781944966362
... by the Bakken Formation. The Three Forks consists of one overall deepening upward third-order sequence consisting of continental sabkha dolostones and anhydrites at the base changing to supratidal dolostones in the middle part to intertidal dolostones and mudstones in the upper part. The unit is subdivided...
FIGURES | View All (21)
Image
Three Forks Formation average x-ray diffraction mineralogy, Statoil Charlie Sorenson 17-8 3TFH core. Dolomite is the most abundant mineral in all rock types, followed by clay and quartz.
Published: 01 August 2018
Figure 4. Three Forks Formation average x-ray diffraction mineralogy, Statoil Charlie Sorenson 17-8 3TFH core. Dolomite is the most abundant mineral in all rock types, followed by clay and quartz.
Image
Different anhydrite (anhy) habits in the Three Forks Formation. (A) Depositional rock type (DRT) 7, massive anhy (Statoil William 25-36 1H, 10,835.5 ft [3303 m]). (B) Nodular and cement anhy (Statoil William 25-36 1H, 10,864 ft [3311 m]). (C) Fracture filling anhy (Continental Natalie 2-2H, 11,242 ft [3427 m]). (D) Anhydrite variations in Statoil Charlie Sorenson 17-8 3TFH core and (E) x-ray diffraction (% by volume). (F) Reaction to HCl confirms presence of calcite (cal) (Mariana Trust 12×-20G2, 11,357.4 ft [3462 m]). (G) Photomicrograph showing proximity of anhy and cal suggesting cal may be an alteration product (Statoil William 25-36 1H core, 10,827.6 ft [3300 m], 50× magnification). Core depths are designated in feet (1 ft is 0.305 m). dol = dolomite.
Published: 01 August 2018
Figure 12. Different anhydrite (anhy) habits in the Three Forks Formation. (A) Depositional rock type (DRT) 7, massive anhy (Statoil William 25-36 1H, 10,835.5 ft [3303 m]). (B) Nodular and cement anhy (Statoil William 25-36 1H, 10,864 ft [3311 m]). (C) Fracture filling anhy (Continental Natalie
Image
Cross sections showing geological variability from Three Forks Formation cores (see full well name in Table 1 and map of locations in Figure 3). Track 1, gamma ray wire-line log (from 0 to 150 units); track 2, depositional rock types (DRTs); track 3, anhydrite facies; track 4, halite crust on core surface; track 5, calcite; track 6, fractures. Black lines correspond to boundaries of first to fourth benches. For DRT legend, see Figure 5. Datum: top of Three Forks Formation.
Published: 01 August 2018
Figure 14. Cross sections showing geological variability from Three Forks Formation cores (see full well name in Table 1 and map of locations in Figure 3 ). Track 1, gamma ray wire-line log (from 0 to 150 units); track 2, depositional rock types (DRTs); track 3, anhydrite facies; track 4
Image
Upper Devonian paleogeography of the Three Forks Formation, modified from Patchett et al. (1999) (left). Facies belts of the Palliser Platform (inset, Canadian side) are modified from Halbertsma (1994), Root (2001), and Peterhänsel and Pratt (2008). U.S.-side facies belts are interpreted from outcrop data in Nekhorosheva (2011) and Schietinger (2013) and regional studies that incorporate biostratigraphic data from Sandberg and Klapper (1967) and Sandberg et al. (1988a). The Potlach evaporite basin (Sandberg et al. 1988a) is inferred to be a southward extension of the microbial-mud belt. Frasnian structures include the Peace River Arch (PR) and theWestern Alberta Ridge (WA). Major stuctures active during Three Forks time include the Sweetgrass Arch (SG), the Swift Current Platform (SC), and the Cedar Creek Anticline (CC). The Transcontinental Arch (TA) was emergent southwest of the greater continental interior.
Published: 08 May 2018
Fig. 2.— Upper Devonian paleogeography of the Three Forks Formation, modified from Patchett et al. (1999) (left). Facies belts of the Palliser Platform (inset, Canadian side) are modified from Halbertsma (1994) , Root (2001) , and Peterhänsel and Pratt (2008) . U.S.-side facies belts
Image
Published: 08 May 2018
Table 1.— Summary of facies associations and lithofacies of the Three Forks Formation. Hummocky cross stratification is abbreviated as HCS. TCS stands for trough-cross stratification. BI stands for bioturbation index .
Image
Seven significant factors were identified for the Three Forks Formation, representing at least 95% of the cumulative variance. The porosity-fluid bins are defined by cutoffs (blue and red arrows) placed between the significant factors, resulting in seven bins for the Three Forks. The bound-fluid/free-fluid cutoff (red arrow) is interpreted to be lower than the 33 ms that is traditionally used, resulting in additional interpreted free fluid.
Published: 18 April 2016
Figure 11. Seven significant factors were identified for the Three Forks Formation, representing at least 95% of the cumulative variance. The porosity-fluid bins are defined by cutoffs (blue and red arrows) placed between the significant factors, resulting in seven bins for the Three Forks
Image
Map showing the Three Forks Formation assessment units (AU), the Williston Basin Province boundary, Bakken Total Petroleum System (TPS), and major structural features.
Published: 01 April 2015
Figure 5 Map showing the Three Forks Formation assessment units (AU), the Williston Basin Province boundary, Bakken Total Petroleum System (TPS), and major structural features.
Image
Lithofacies map of lower third of Three Forks Formation (mostly Logan Gulch Member).
Published: 01 December 1966
Fig. 13.— Lithofacies map of lower third of Three Forks Formation (mostly Logan Gulch Member).
Image
Lithofacies map of middle third of Three Forks Formation (mostly Trident Member).
Published: 01 December 1966
Fig. 14.— Lithofacies map of middle third of Three Forks Formation (mostly Trident Member).
Image
Isopachous map of Logan Gulch and Trident Members of Three Forks Formation.
Published: 01 December 1966
Fig. 15.— Isopachous map of Logan Gulch and Trident Members of Three Forks Formation.
Image
—Isopachous map of Three Forks Formation.
Published: 01 November 1965
FIG. 23. —Isopachous map of Three Forks Formation.
Image
—Standard subsurface section of Three Forks formation.
Published: 01 October 1958
Fig. 8. —Standard subsurface section of Three Forks formation.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 2015
AAPG Bulletin (2015) 99 (4): 639–660.
...Figure 5 Map showing the Three Forks Formation assessment units (AU), the Williston Basin Province boundary, Bakken Total Petroleum System (TPS), and major structural features. ...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Image
The weighting factor evaluation for the Bakken and Three Forks formations. Track 1 shows the deterministic results from Figure 10. Track 2 shows the bulk modulus log compared with the VR bound model computed from track 1 and the triaxial test results. The intermediate reference curves (w = [0.34, 0.45]; Simone et al., 2020) for the Bakken Formation are plotted. The weighting factor curve is shown in track 3.
Published: 21 January 2022
Figure 12. The weighting factor evaluation for the Bakken and Three Forks formations. Track 1 shows the deterministic results from Figure  10 . Track 2 shows the bulk modulus log compared with the VR bound model computed from track 1 and the triaxial test results. The intermediate reference
Image
Measured section through the Jefferson and Three Forks Formations, measured at outcrops in northwest Wyoming near Grand Targhee Ski Resort (base at longitude −110.9097 W, latitude 43.7839 N).
Published: 01 January 2010
Figure 8. Measured section through the Jefferson and Three Forks Formations, measured at outcrops in northwest Wyoming near Grand Targhee Ski Resort (base at longitude −110.9097 W, latitude 43.7839 N).
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1958
AAPG Bulletin (1958) 42 (10): 2293–2334.
...Fig. 8. —Standard subsurface section of Three Forks formation. ...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 2018
AAPG Bulletin (2018) 102 (8): 1455–1488.
...Figure 4. Three Forks Formation average x-ray diffraction mineralogy, Statoil Charlie Sorenson 17-8 3TFH core. Dolomite is the most abundant mineral in all rock types, followed by clay and quartz. ...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Publisher: Society for Sedimentary Geology
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.2110/sepmsp.107.12
EISBN: 9781565763456
... basins. The Jefferson Formation Birdbear Member and Three Forks Formation in Montana are correlated to the Jefferson Grandview Dolomite in Idaho using regional sequence stratigraphic surfaces. A new stratigraphic framework defines three widely deposited latest Frasnian sequences and Early Famennian...
FIGURES | View All (12)