1-20 OF 3812 RESULTS FOR

Taylor Canyon

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
—Idealized hanging-wall sequence diagram of Taylor Canyon area. (1) Ogden thrust at base of Tintic Quartzite splays into bedding to south. Incipient Weber thrust isolates block k. (2) Resulting geometry of block k after ramping. Ogden thrust is folded and footwall units form a lateral ramp. Incipient Taylor thrust isolates block t. (3) Resulting geometry of block t after ramping. Weber thrust is folded and horse rides on Cambrian shale-limestone decollement. Incipient floor thrust isolates block u. (4) Final geometry of Taylor Canyon area. Block u has folded Weber and Taylor thrusts. Higher thrusts ride piggy-back on lower thrusts. Note lateral splay relationships, and lateral folds in blocks k, t, and u, due to original lateral ramps.
Published: 01 May 1988
Figure 8 —Idealized hanging-wall sequence diagram of Taylor Canyon area. (1) Ogden thrust at base of Tintic Quartzite splays into bedding to south. Incipient Weber thrust isolates block k. (2) Resulting geometry of block k after ramping. Ogden thrust is folded and footwall units form a lateral
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2010
Rocky Mountain Geology (2010) 45 (1): 1–22.
... along Taylor Canyon 20 km north of Gunnison, Colorado, crystallized at 1697 ± 7 Ma. It cuts across high-temperature deformational fabrics in metavolcanic and metasedimentary country rocks, thus bracketing at least one Paleoproterozoic tectonic event locally. This granite also contains a well-developed...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1993
GSA Bulletin (1993) 105 (7): 953–967.
..., siltstone, and fine-grained sandstone containing tephra derived from the eruptions of the ∼2.1 Ma tuff of Taylor Canyon and the ∼2.0 Ma Huckleberry Ridge Tuff. The drilling logs record numerous thick beds of clay and sandy clay inferred to be deep-water lacustrine deposits. Pluvial Lake Rennie fluctuated...
Image
The distribution of facies associations in Bayfill units 1–6. Twenty-four individual bayfill successions are identified, and labeled A to S. BC, Bar Canyon; BIC, Bitter Creek; BRC, Bryson Canyon; DC, Dry Canyon; EC, East Canyon; ECW, East Canyon Window; FC, Fault Canyon; HC, Hay Canyon; JC, Jim Canyon; MC, Middle Canyon; SAC, San Arroyo Canyon; TC, Taylor Canyon.
Published: 16 October 2024
; JC, Jim Canyon; MC, Middle Canyon; SAC, San Arroyo Canyon; TC, Taylor Canyon.
Image
—Generalized geologic map of Cuyama oil district, Caliente basin. Oil fields are (1) South Cuyama, (2) Russell Ranch, (3) Morales and Taylor Canyon.
Published: 01 March 1978
FIG. 7 —Generalized geologic map of Cuyama oil district, Caliente basin. Oil fields are (1) South Cuyama, (2) Russell Ranch, (3) Morales and Taylor Canyon.
Image
Figure 9. (A) Finely laminated, “paper” shale in the California Mountain paleovalley (Fig. 8). (B) Photo looking west at an ∼6-km–wide, 500-m–deep swale in the Independence Mountains west of the exposed paleovalley sequence near California Mountain (Fig. 8). The swale is probably the western continuation of the paleovalley. (C) Rounded, 6-m–wide boulder of chert-pebble conglomerate in basal Tertiary conglomerate of the Nanny Creek paleovalley (Fig. 10). (D) Well-rounded, 1-m–wide boulder of quartzite in the Nanny Creek paleovalley (Fig. 10). (E) Isolated block of tuff of Big Cottonwood Canyon in megabreccia in Nanny Creek paleovalley (Fig. 10). (F) Scattered blocks of tuff of Big Cottonwood Canyon in megabrecccia in Taylor Canyon paleovalley (Fig. 3). Compaction foliation is oriented differently in each block, showing that each is a separate block.
Published: 01 February 2008
in megabreccia in Nanny Creek paleovalley (Fig. 10) . (F) Scattered blocks of tuff of Big Cottonwood Canyon in megabrecccia in Taylor Canyon paleovalley (Fig. 3) . Compaction foliation is oriented differently in each block, showing that each is a separate block.
Image
Published: 01 April 2003
F ig . 15. Schematic longitudinal projection through the southern parts of the Jerritt Canyon mining district, Nevada, between approximately Taylor Canyon and Mill Creek, showing the distribution of Carlin-type gold deposits above and below the Water Pipe Canyon Formation in thrust-faulted Eastern
Image
—View of Star Mountain northwest from Limpia Canyon, showing Taylor sedimentary flats, thick basal rhyolite lava, and overlying succeeding flows.
Published: 01 October 1938
Fig. 2. —View of Star Mountain northwest from Limpia Canyon, showing Taylor sedimentary flats, thick basal rhyolite lava, and overlying succeeding flows.
Image
Correlation chart showing the four successions and the dominant lithofacies (see table 1 for details). The pattern of vertical lines on the left of the diagram denotes missing strata in the more cratonward sections. Inset map shows the location of the stratigraphic columns in the Great Basin. For specific details on the measured columns, see Shapiro (1998). MH = Mohawk Hill, California; NR = Nopah Range, California; DM = Delamar Mountains, Nevada; SP = Shingle Pass, Nevada; WW = Wah Wah Summit, Utah; TC = Taylor Canyon, Utah; LC = Lawson Cove, Utah. Late Cambrian stage boundaries, shown on the right, are approximate. Ma = Marjuman stage; St = Steptoean stage; Su = Sunwaptan stage; Sk = Skullrockian stage.
Published: 01 March 2000
in the Great Basin. For specific details on the measured columns, see Shapiro ( 1998 ). MH = Mohawk Hill, California; NR = Nopah Range, California; DM = Delamar Mountains, Nevada; SP = Shingle Pass, Nevada; WW = Wah Wah Summit, Utah; TC = Taylor Canyon, Utah; LC = Lawson Cove, Utah. Late Cambrian
Image
Photographs from the middle Neslen interval. A) Bayfill Unit 1, inner Bryson Canyon: upward-coarsening bayhead delta. The finer-grained intervals represent clinoform surfaces. B) Bayfill units 5 and 6, northern wall of Dry Canyon: bayhead delta (orange arrow) with a distributary channel (yellow arrow) that was the sediment source for the bayhead delta. Green arrow indicates the channel cut. Clinoform surfaces in the bayhead delta are dipping towards the east (right). On top is a coarsening-upward, wave-dominated bayfill (blue arrow). C) Bayfill Unit 2, Fault Canyon: bed with convolute bedding in the sandy part of a bayhead delta. D) Bayfill Unit 3, East Canyon: bayhead delta with clinoform surfaces (red arrow). Blue arrow shows the top of the bayhead delta. E) Bayfill Unit 6, Taylor Canyon: upwards-coarsening wave-dominated bayfill. The heterolithic lower part is overlain by a small-scale hummocky cross-stratified sandstone bed (red arrow). A fair-weather period with wave-ripple cross-lamination is preserved (blue arrow). This is eroded by the successive storm event with deposition of small-scale hummocky cross-sets (red arrow), and the wave-rippled bed is totally removed towards the left part of the picture. A thin interval with current ripple cross-lamination (yellow arrow) indicates proximity to a bayhead delta. On top is a completely bioturbated sandstone interval. F) Bayfill Unit 2, East Canyon: small-scale hummocky cross-stratification in the upper part of a wave-dominated bayfill. G) Bayfill Unit 3, East Canyon: small-scale hummocky cross-stratification (red arrow) overlain by wave-ripple cross-laminated sandstone (blue arrow). H) Bayfill Unit 2, Middle Canyon: lenticular to wavy-bedded, heterolith with a low degree of bioturbation in the lower part of a wave-dominated bayfill. Ripples are dominantly generated by wave action, but current-generated ripples are also present (green arrow). Syneresis cracks are abundant. I) Bayfill Unit 6, East Canyon Window: mudstone completely bioturbated by Teichichnus from the lowermost part of a wave-dominated bayfill. J) Bayfill 5 Unit, East Canyon: sanding-upwards, heterolith deposits in a subbay. Green arrows indicate base and top. Heteroliths are wave-ripple cross-laminated, and highly bioturbated by Planolites, Diplocraterion, and Arenicolites, and rich in organic debris. K) Bayfill Unit 5, Dry Canyon: organic-rich heterolithic deposit in a subbay with no vertical trend in grain size. The degree of bioturbation is low. Red arrow indicates beds with small-scale hummocky cross-stratification. Yellow arrow points at an interval with wave-modified current ripples. Green arrow shows a layer with syneresis cracks.
Published: 16 October 2024
with convolute bedding in the sandy part of a bayhead delta. D) Bayfill Unit 3, East Canyon: bayhead delta with clinoform surfaces (red arrow). Blue arrow shows the top of the bayhead delta. E) Bayfill Unit 6, Taylor Canyon: upwards-coarsening wave-dominated bayfill. The heterolithic lower part is overlain
Image
Morphostratigraphic zonation used in this study. A, Typical representation of microbialite forms for each zone. Solid black bars represent occurrences; dotted bars are used between separate occurrences of a similar form. Ma = Marjuman stage; St = Steptoean stage; Su = Sunwaptan stage; Sk = Skullrockian stage. B, Chart showing the correlation of the morphozones. Patterned squares within each zone show measurable units containing morphotypes indicative of that zone. Units <10 m thick are not shown at this scale but were used for constraining the tie lines. Inset map shows the location of the stratigraphic columns in the Great Basin. MH = Mohawk Hill, California; NR = Nopah Range, California; DM = Delamar Mountains, Nevada; SP = Shingle Pass, Nevada; WW = Wah Wah Summit, Utah; TC = Taylor Canyon, Utah; LC = Lawson Cove, Utah. Late Cambrian stage boundaries, shown on the right, are approximate. Ma = Marjuman stage; St = Steptoean stage; Su = Sunwaptan stage; Sk = Skullrockian stage.
Published: 01 March 2000
the location of the stratigraphic columns in the Great Basin. MH = Mohawk Hill, California; NR = Nopah Range, California; DM = Delamar Mountains, Nevada; SP = Shingle Pass, Nevada; WW = Wah Wah Summit, Utah; TC = Taylor Canyon, Utah; LC = Lawson Cove, Utah. Late Cambrian stage boundaries, shown
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2012
DOI: 10.1306/13291390M953450
EISBN: 9781629810096
... Basin, Utah ( Taylor and Ritts, 2004 ; Moore et al., 2012 ). The first group consists of models based on two-dimensional (2-D) geologic descriptions of outcrops in Parley Canyon ( Taylor and Ritts, 2004 ). These descriptions, combined with petrophysical data from measured sections to produce a three...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Series: DNAG, Centennial Field Guides
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-5402-X.287
EISBN: 9780813754086
... Abstract The site encompasses that portion of the Kolob Canyon ssection of Zion National Park, in southwestern Utah, that is visible from the 5-mi-long (8-km) park highway (Fig. 1). The park road is suitable for passenger cars and other vehicles. Kolob Canyons offer spectacular views of slopes...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1979
AAPG Bulletin (1979) 63 (4): 693.
...Walter C. Riese; Douglas G. Brookins Abstract The Mount Taylor uranium deposit is located at the extreme eastern end of the Ambrosia Lake district in the Grants mineral belt of New Mexico. Ores are confined to the Westwater Canyon Member of the Jurassic Morrison Formation and are spatially related...
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 December 2016
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.15.35.0380
EISBN: 978-1-944966-10-2
... of the Navarro-Taylor supersequence at the top of the Cretaceous are more easily distinguished and it can be inferred that the seismically dim Hosston equivalent section comprises some part of the asymmetric expulsion rollovers throughout Mississippi Canyon. Mapping of the Hosston section in the Mississippi...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1983
GSA Bulletin (1983) 94 (3): 413–422.
... of the Sailor Canyon Formation. The volcanic sequence consists of submarine felsic pyroclastic debris flows and tuffaceous slate of the Late Devonian Sierra Buttes Formation, andesitic turbidites of the Taylor Formation, a lower tuff-siltstone member and an upper chert member of the Peale Formation, and fine...
Image
Longitudinal depth profiles along the Kushiro Submarine Canyon (A) and the Hiroo Submarine Channel (B) with curves fitted by nonlinear least-squares estimates. Arrows indicate points where tributaries join the main canyon and channel. (C) Comparison of the Kushiro Submarine Canyon with other submarine canyons developed upon active tectonic margins. Data for Aoga Shima Canyon, Monterey Canyon, and the San Antonio Submarine Canyon are derived from Klaus and Taylor (1991), Greene et al. (2002), and Hagen (1996), respectively.
Published: 01 May 2008
with other submarine canyons developed upon active tectonic margins. Data for Aoga Shima Canyon, Monterey Canyon, and the San Antonio Submarine Canyon are derived from Klaus and Taylor (1991) , Greene et al. (2002) , and Hagen (1996) , respectively.
Image
A) Map placing the Book Cliffs (Utah and Colorado, USA) in the Western Interior Seaway context, and showing the position of the Crescent Canyon study area and of other visited locations (modified after Taylor et al. 2000). B) Location of outcrops in Crescent Canyon numbered according to the numeration followed in the text (USGS 2011 US Topo 7.5-minute map, Floy Canyon South, UT; contour interval 40 feet).
Published: 01 May 2016
Fig. 2.— A) Map placing the Book Cliffs (Utah and Colorado, USA) in the Western Interior Seaway context, and showing the position of the Crescent Canyon study area and of other visited locations (modified after Taylor et al. 2000 ). B) Location of outcrops in Crescent Canyon numbered
Image
Location maps of the study area. A) Map illustrating the position of the study area along the Book Cliffs (modified after Taylor and Machent 2011). B) Location of each study locality projected onto a west–east transect; (WF, West Floy Canyon; EF, East Floy Canyon; WM, West Crescent Mine; CC, Crescent Canyon; RHC, Right Hand Crescent Canyon; EC, East Crescent Canyon; WB, West Blaze Canyon; BC, Blaze Canyon; WT, West Thompson Canyon; ES, East Sego Canyon; SW, Salt Wash; ESW, East Salt Wash; SC, Sagers Canyon). Each study locality is composed of measured vertical profiles (Fig. 5) and stratigraphic panels. Line of transect is indicated, and is shown in Figures 5 and 8.
Published: 01 February 2017
Fig. 4.— Location maps of the study area. A) Map illustrating the position of the study area along the Book Cliffs (modified after Taylor and Machent 2011 ). B) Location of each study locality projected onto a west–east transect; (WF, West Floy Canyon; EF, East Floy Canyon; WM, West Crescent
Image
Figure 11. (A) Grainstone, flat-pebble conglomerate, and shale of Glenwood Canyon Member of Dotsero Formation. Scale has 10 cm divisions. (B) Taylor Pass Member of Manitou Formation (TP) and underlying Glenwood Canyon Member (GC) of Dotsero Formation at Sheep Mountain. (C) Close-up of B showing karstic dolostone bed at top of Glenwood Canyon Member (GC). Note irregular karst fill to right of hammer
Published: 01 June 2003
Figure 11. (A) Grainstone, flat-pebble conglomerate, and shale of Glenwood Canyon Member of Dotsero Formation. Scale has 10 cm divisions. (B) Taylor Pass Member of Manitou Formation (TP) and underlying Glenwood Canyon Member (GC) of Dotsero Formation at Sheep Mountain. (C) Close-up of B showing