1-20 OF 101 RESULTS FOR

Suffield

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (8): 1004–1023.
...Barbara J. Tilley; Fred J. Longstaffe ABSTRACT Hydrocarbon distribution in the Lower Cretaceous Glauconitic sandstone in the Suffield area of southeastern Alberta is controlled by three factors: sedimentology, structure, and mineralogy. The Glauconitic sandstone consists of six lithological facies...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (5): 636–637.
...B. J. Tilley; F. J. Longstaffe The Suffield heavy oil sands are found in the glauconitic sandstone of the Mannville Group in two major north-south-trending sand belts ranging in thickness from 15 to 20 m. The study area is centered around a heavy oil pilot site which is a joint venture operated...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1975
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1975) 23 (4): 715–752.
..., with a north-northwest trend. Copyright © 1975, The Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists 1975 BULLETIN OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM GEOLOG Y VOL . 23, NO . 4 (DEC . 1975), P . 715-75 2 DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF THE VIKING FORMATION , SUFFIELD AREA, ALBERTA, CANADA P. G. TIZZARD I and J . F . LERBEKMO 2 ABSTRAC...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1968
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1968) 5 (2): 185–198.
...H. S. Hasegawa Abstract The present investigation is a continuation of the Suffield Experimental Station seismic program concerned primarily with a study of the propagation characteristics of the large-amplitude seismic waves in the vicinity of multiton, unconfined, chemical explosions...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1967
AAPG Bulletin (1967) 51 (2): 285.
Image
—Location of Suffield Heavy Oil Pilot project. Main study area surrounds pilot project site and includes Townships 19 to 21, Ranges 7 to 9.
Published: 01 August 1984
Fig. 1. —Location of Suffield Heavy Oil Pilot project. Main study area surrounds pilot project site and includes Townships 19 to 21, Ranges 7 to 9.
Image
—Gamma ray and electric log cross section through Suffield Block and Medicine Hat field (fields shown in Fig. 14) in southeastern Alberta showing correlation of lower Upper Cretaceous rocks and pay zones. Scale for all resistivity logs is 0-20 Ω m2/m. Datum is top of Milk River equivalent. Depths shown as feet below kelly bushing.
Published: 01 July 1980
Fig. 16. —Gamma ray and electric log cross section through Suffield Block and Medicine Hat field (fields shown in Fig. 14 ) in southeastern Alberta showing correlation of lower Upper Cretaceous rocks and pay zones. Scale for all resistivity logs is 0-20 Ω m 2 /m. Datum is top of Milk River
Image
—Significant discoveries in western provinces of Canada in 1975. Areas of intensive exploration for shallow Cretaceous gas: A, Suffield block; B, Haig River-Keg River areas.
Published: 01 August 1976
Fig. 2 —Significant discoveries in western provinces of Canada in 1975. Areas of intensive exploration for shallow Cretaceous gas: A, Suffield block; B, Haig River-Keg River areas.
Image
North-south structural cross section through the East Randolph oil pool and traversing the Akron-Suffield fault system. Line of cross section is shown in Figure 11.
Published: 01 April 2002
Figure 16 North-south structural cross section through the East Randolph oil pool and traversing the Akron-Suffield fault system. Line of cross section is shown in Figure 11 .
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (12): 1918.
...H. Coohan Alan; L. L. Heath Abstract The Mississippian Berea Sandstone is a reservoir for shallow gas in Randolph and Suffield townships of Portage County, Ohio. The Berea Sandstone is well known in Ohio from its outcrops at the outskirts of Cleveland. It is among the more productive formations...
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1984
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1984) 21 (10): 1105–1113.
...C. J. Rebollar; E. R. Kanasewich; E. Nyland Abstract Seismic records at Edmonton (EDM) and Suffield (SES) between January 1976 and February 1980 show 220 events with magnitudes less than 4 originating near Rocky Mountain House. Many of these events show well defined S n , S g , and P g phases...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1980
AAPG Bulletin (1980) 64 (9): 1510–1517.
... trend, with emphasis on the westward extension of Elmworth into British Columbia. In eastern Alberta, shallow gas exploration is proceeding strongly at Suffield and Primrose Lake. Major British Columbia gas strikes were made in the southwest corner of the explored area at Sukunka and Monias...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1972
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1972) 9 (9): 1099–1109.
... discontinuity.Upper mantle velocities vary along the profile from about 8.0 km/s west of the Rocky Mountains to 8.3 km/s in the region between Vulcan and Suffield where the profile crosses the Sweetgrass Arch. The data indicate a crustal root under the Rocky Mountains of about 5 km thickness.Comparisons between...
Image
Isopach map of the Beekmantown dolomite in parts of Portage and Stark counties, Ohio. Note the abrupt change in the subcrop and the Beekmantown isopach contours at the Akron-Suffield fault system, showing apparent left-lateral strike-slip movement. Faults defining the Atwater pool are from Rike (1997). U = up; D = down.
Published: 01 April 2002
Figure 15 Isopach map of the Beekmantown dolomite in parts of Portage and Stark counties, Ohio. Note the abrupt change in the subcrop and the Beekmantown isopach contours at the Akron-Suffield fault system, showing apparent left-lateral strike-slip movement. Faults defining the Atwater pool
Image
—Structural cross section illustrating effect of structural movements on relative position of oil/water interface in a Suffield hydrocarbon trap. Possible pay zone in 14-27 well is only 9 m (30 ft) thick; pay zone in 6-34 well is 21 m (69 ft). GR = gamma-ray log; R = resistivity log.
Published: 01 August 1984
Fig. 13. —Structural cross section illustrating effect of structural movements on relative position of oil/water interface in a Suffield hydrocarbon trap. Possible pay zone in 14-27 well is only 9 m (30 ft) thick; pay zone in 6-34 well is 21 m (69 ft). GR = gamma-ray log; R = resistivity log.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1980
AAPG Bulletin (1980) 64 (7): 969–987.
...Fig. 16. —Gamma ray and electric log cross section through Suffield Block and Medicine Hat field (fields shown in Fig. 14 ) in southeastern Alberta showing correlation of lower Upper Cretaceous rocks and pay zones. Scale for all resistivity logs is 0-20 Ω m 2 /m. Datum is top of Milk River...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Image
—Map showing location of biogenic gas fields in United States and Canada: (1) Suffield Block; (2) Tiger Ridge, Lohman, Black Coulee, and Cassady; (3) Leroy; (4) Bowdoin; (5) Guinn; (6) Hardin; (7) Liscom Creek; (8) Cedar Creek; (9) Bell Creek; (10) West Short Pine Hills; (11) Wildcat, Sec. 22, T19N, R39W; (12) Wildcat, Sec. 14, T16N, R33W; (13) Armel, Beecher Island, Republican, Vernon, and Whisper; (14) Wildcat, Sec. 10, T95N, R40W; (15) San Luis basin; (16) Wagon Mound; (17) Offshore Gulf of Mexico. Fields are listed in Table 5.
Published: 01 January 1981
Fig. 9 —Map showing location of biogenic gas fields in United States and Canada: (1) Suffield Block; (2) Tiger Ridge, Lohman, Black Coulee, and Cassady; (3) Leroy; (4) Bowdoin; (5) Guinn; (6) Hardin; (7) Liscom Creek; (8) Cedar Creek; (9) Bell Creek; (10) West Short Pine Hills; (11) Wildcat, Sec
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 2002
AAPG Bulletin (2002) 86 (4): 539–555.
...Figure 16 North-south structural cross section through the East Randolph oil pool and traversing the Akron-Suffield fault system. Line of cross section is shown in Figure 11 . ...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1974
AAPG Bulletin (1974) 58 (11): 2227–2244.
... ) reveals the same pattern of doming on the International Boundary and long narrow ridges pointing northward into the Suffield saddle as seen on the Cambrian map. Plunging southward from the North Battleford arch are three similar ridge lines. Fig. 5 —Contours on top Devonian System, southeast...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1981
AAPG Bulletin (1981) 65 (1): 5–25.
...Fig. 9 —Map showing location of biogenic gas fields in United States and Canada: (1) Suffield Block; (2) Tiger Ridge, Lohman, Black Coulee, and Cassady; (3) Leroy; (4) Bowdoin; (5) Guinn; (6) Hardin; (7) Liscom Creek; (8) Cedar Creek; (9) Bell Creek; (10) West Short Pine Hills; (11) Wildcat, Sec...
FIGURES | View All (12)