1-20 OF 140 RESULTS FOR

Stoney Creek

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1992
AAPG Bulletin (1992) 76 (9): 1325–1343.
... with the more mature and more porous sandstones of the Stoney Creek oil and gas field. The Albert Formation sediments are generally believed to have been deposited in a lacustrine and associated fluvial-deltaic environment ( Gussow, 1953 ; Greiner, 1962 ; Howie, 1979 ; St. Peter, 1982 ; Pickerill et al...
FIGURES | View All (22)
Image
Geological cross-sections of the onshore Mississippian Stoney Creek oil field (A–A′) and McCully gas field (B–B′) in the Moncton Sub-basin in New Brunswick (field locations in Fig. 18; modified from Fyffe and St. Peter, 2006).
Published: 01 March 2011
Fig. 21. Geological cross-sections of the onshore Mississippian Stoney Creek oil field (A–A′) and McCully gas field (B–B′) in the Moncton Sub-basin in New Brunswick (field locations in Fig. 18 ; modified from Fyffe and St. Peter, 2006 ).
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1991
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1991) 39 (4): 315–331.
...Ali H. Chowdhury; Martin G. Fowler; James P.A. Noble ABSTRACT The Stoney Creek oil and gas field of the Moncton Subbasin, southern New Brunswick is the only area of onshore Atlantic Canada to have commercially-produced hydrocarbons. These hydrocarbons are reservoired within the Late Devonian...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1993
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1993) 41 (4): 422–436.
... of the samples are similar to Stoney Creek oils and their lacustrine carbonate source rock (Albert Shale) of the Moncton Subbasin, New Brunswick. Thus the source rock of the Lake Ainslie bitumens is also interpreted to be a carbonate deposited in a lacustrine setting, probably within the Strathlorne Formation...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1988
AAPG Bulletin (1988) 72 (10B): 49–58.
..., or Newfoundland in 1987. Production from Stoney Creek field in New Brunswick declined to 495 m 3 of oil (3,113 bbl) and 1.737 million m 3 (61.34 mmcf) of natural gas. © 1988 American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved 1988 American Association of Petroleum Geologists 1...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1987
AAPG Bulletin (1987) 71 (10B): 47–59.
... in 1986, and it was abandoned without encountering any hydrocarbons. Production from Stoney Creek field totaled 640 m 3 (4,025 bbl) of oil and 1.822 million m 3 (64.3 mmcf) of natural gas. There was no drilling onshore Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, or Prince Edward Island in 1986. 1 Manuscript...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1986
AAPG Bulletin (1986) 70 (10): 1243–1254.
... was due almost entirely to new production from Trenton-Black River carbonates. In New Brunswick, 4 wells were drilled in 1985. Three of these wells are waiting on completion; the fourth, a development well completed in Stoney Creek field, was abandoned as a dry hole. In Quebec, drilling activity increased...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1983
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1983) 53 (3): 947–971.
...?) transgressive-regressive cycles. The Lewiston Member represents a nearly symmetrical cycle of deepening (units A-C) and shallowing (units C-E), while the upper units (Burleigh Hill, Stoney Creek) reflect aspects of an asymmetrical, shallowing-upward hemicycle. During the last event, allodapic carbonate...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1968
GSA Bulletin (1968) 79 (12): 1859–1866.
... gneisses, 10; Glastonbury and Maromas gneisses, 7; Stoney Creek, Clinton, and Sterling granitic gneisses, 8; and Canterbury gneiss, 7. The minor and trace elements included: Ag, Ba, Be, Ca, Cu, Ga, Mn, Pb, Sn, Ti, and Zr. Major element data, as interpreted from the infrared spectra, included: (1) obliquity...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1968
AAPG Bulletin (1968) 52 (6): 927–939.
... months of geologic surveying in the sedimentary area of the province. In the Atlantic region, 4 exploratory tests were reported from New Brunswick. Both oil and gas production from the Stoney Creek field showed a considerable increase from 1966. Secondary-recovery operations probably account...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
—Hamilton to Niagara Gorge stratigraphic cross section. Datum used is base of Whirlpool formation. Terms in quotation marks are those used by Fisher in that stratigraphic position. Dotted lines indicate Fisher’s extrapolation of Manitoulin dolomite from Stoney Creek to dolomite in Niagara Gorge (thicknesses after Fisher). Pinch-out of the Manitoulin shown between Stoney Creek and Grimsby. (Drafted as overlay for Fig. 2 of Fisher, 1954).
Published: 01 January 1956
Fig. 4. —Hamilton to Niagara Gorge stratigraphic cross section. Datum used is base of Whirlpool formation. Terms in quotation marks are those used by Fisher in that stratigraphic position. Dotted lines indicate Fisher’s extrapolation of Manitoulin dolomite from Stoney Creek to dolomite in Niagara
Image
—Plot of hydrogen index (HI) vs. oxygen index (OI) of Albert Formation fine-grained sediments (from surface to total drilled depth) to characterize kerogen type. Cross-plots of HI vs. OI show a large variation in kerogen types in the different wells and areas of the subbasin. I, II, III = type of organic matter, 7 = Irving Chevron East Stoney Creek 1, 8 = Irving Chevron Stoney Creek 1, 9 = Irving Chevron Hillsborough 1, 15 = Irving Chevron Lee Brook 1.
Published: 01 September 1992
= type of organic matter, 7 = Irving Chevron East Stoney Creek 1, 8 = Irving Chevron Stoney Creek 1, 9 = Irving Chevron Hillsborough 1, 15 = Irving Chevron Lee Brook 1.
Image
Range chart generated from presence and absence data for the Georgian Bay Formation (GB), lower Manitoulin member (LM), upper Manitoulin member (UM), and Cabot Head Formation (CH). Data from the Georgian Bay Formation from the Clay Cliffs collection by Foerste (1924). Data for lower Manitoulin from Owen Sound and Horning’s Mills collections by Bolton (1957). Data for upper Manitoulin from the Stoney Creek and Hamilton collections by Bolton (1957). Data for Cabot Head are from Stoney Creek collection by Bolton (1957). Brachiopod fauna names were updated using Stott and Jin (2007a). Species that are labeled as Cin. are also found within strata from the Cincinnatian series of the Cincinnati Arch region. Species that are labeled as Wen. persist into the Wenlock Epoch of the Silurian.
Published: 18 December 2023
Manitoulin from Owen Sound and Horning’s Mills collections by Bolton (1957) . Data for upper Manitoulin from the Stoney Creek and Hamilton collections by Bolton (1957) . Data for Cabot Head are from Stoney Creek collection by Bolton (1957) . Brachiopod fauna names were updated using Stott and Jin (2007
Image
—Porosity vs. permeability cross-plot from core data of the Albert Formation reservoir sandstones in Irving Chevron Stoney Creek 1. Permeability is not lithofacies controlled. Completely filled circles = massive sandstones, half-filled circles = pebbly sandstones, open circles = planar-tabular/trough-cross-bedded sandstones.
Published: 01 September 1992
Figure 11 —Porosity vs. permeability cross-plot from core data of the Albert Formation reservoir sandstones in Irving Chevron Stoney Creek 1. Permeability is not lithofacies controlled. Completely filled circles = massive sandstones, half-filled circles = pebbly sandstones, open circles = planar
Image
The simplified geological map of the Moncton sub‐basin in southern New Brunswick. The map illustrates the complex relationships between the Devonian–Permian succession and the pre‐Devonian crystalline basement uplifts. The Stoney Creek (oil) and McCully (gas) fields are shown. The positions of the seven seismograph stations are shown. Modified from St. Peter and Johnson (2009).
Published: 10 June 2015
Figure 2. The simplified geological map of the Moncton sub‐basin in southern New Brunswick. The map illustrates the complex relationships between the Devonian–Permian succession and the pre‐Devonian crystalline basement uplifts. The Stoney Creek (oil) and McCully (gas) fields are shown
Image
—A contour map of average TOC (wt. %) distribution of the Albert Formation fine-grained sediments in the Moncton subbasin. High TOC values (up to 8.76%) are observed in the south and southeast end of the subbasin. In the Stoney Creek oil and gas field, the TOC value is less than 2%. In the central and the western part of the subbasin, TOC value is less than 1%.
Published: 01 September 1992
Figure 13 —A contour map of average TOC (wt. %) distribution of the Albert Formation fine-grained sediments in the Moncton subbasin. High TOC values (up to 8.76%) are observed in the south and southeast end of the subbasin. In the Stoney Creek oil and gas field, the TOC value is less than 2
Image
—Stratigraphic distribution of helium porosity over two cored depth intervals of the Albert Formation in the East Stoney Creek 1 well. The porosity is erratic within the sandstone intervals bounded by shales (high gamma ray peak), and no porosity enhancement occurs at the shale contact. Density porosity is plotted for comparison with the helium porosity. Density porosity shows reasonable matching with helium porosity, except in shaly sandstones.
Published: 01 September 1992
Figure 7 —Stratigraphic distribution of helium porosity over two cored depth intervals of the Albert Formation in the East Stoney Creek 1 well. The porosity is erratic within the sandstone intervals bounded by shales (high gamma ray peak), and no porosity enhancement occurs at the shale contact
Image
—Map showing location of the studied wells and outcrop sections in the Stoney Creek oil and gas field and in other parts of the Moncton subbasin. Northeast-southwest-directed sets of fault systems are shown by thick solid lines. Pre-Carboniferous basement uplifts border the Moncton subbasin in the south and east. The New Brunswick platform, which is largely covered by Pennsylvanian sediments (after Gussow, 1953; St. Peter, 1982), is in the north. Open circles mark major towns in the map area.
Published: 01 September 1992
Figure 1 —Map showing location of the studied wells and outcrop sections in the Stoney Creek oil and gas field and in other parts of the Moncton subbasin. Northeast-southwest-directed sets of fault systems are shown by thick solid lines. Pre-Carboniferous basement uplifts border the Moncton
Image
Location map. (A) Key tectonic elements of the Pacific-Australian plate boundary, including the Alpine fault through the continental South Island of New Zealand. Topography is after Sandwell and Smith (1997). White box illustrates location of B. (B) More detailed map of the Alpine fault (red line), illustrating locations mentioned in the text. Orange lines are roads; gray lines are topographic contours. (C) Composite schematic section through a typical Alpine fault oblique thrust segment, illustrating the sequence of fault rocks exposed in the hanging wall, modified after Norris and Cooper (2007). Outcrops at Stoney Creek, Hare Mare Creek/Waikukupa River, and Havelock Creek are particularly characteristic. DFDP—Deep Fault Drilling Project.
Published: 01 April 2015
and Cooper (2007) . Outcrops at Stoney Creek, Hare Mare Creek/Waikukupa River, and Havelock Creek are particularly characteristic. DFDP—Deep Fault Drilling Project.
Image
—Density log-derived porosity distribution at different stratigraphic intervals of the Albert Formation. Density porosity is slightly higher in the two Stoney Creek oil and gas field wells (wells numbered 7 and 8). No increase in sandstone porosity is observed with increased burial depth (e.g., in wells numbered 9 and 15) or in the bottom sandstone (sand unit III). The sonic log-derived porosity plotted over a small section (solid circles) is lower than density porosity probably due to vuggy nature of the pore spaces.
Published: 01 September 1992
Figure 5 —Density log-derived porosity distribution at different stratigraphic intervals of the Albert Formation. Density porosity is slightly higher in the two Stoney Creek oil and gas field wells (wells numbered 7 and 8). No increase in sandstone porosity is observed with increased burial depth