1-20 OF 49 RESULTS FOR

Spatangoida

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2022
Italian Journal of Geosciences (2022) 141 (3): 426–448.
... Limestone Member (LGLM/LGL), the Lower Main Phosphorite Conglomerate Bed (LMPC Bed), and the basal part of the Middle Globigerina Limestone Member (MGLM) ( Gatt, 2006a , b ) (see Fig. 3 ). Order Spatangoida L. Agassiz, 1840 Studied material. Eight specimens: MNAZ OR3955a; MNAZ OR4698a, b, c, d...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: Paleobiology
Published: 01 January 2000
Paleobiology (2000) 26 (1): 56–079.
..., with contrasts among the sister groups Holasteroida and Spatangoida, their paraphyletic stem group Disasteroida, and the more inclusive clade, the superorder Atelostomata. A 38-dimensional landmark-based morphospace representing test architecture was used to describe morphological evolution in terms of total...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
Figure  17 —Geographic distribution of Maastrichtian and Danian <span class="search-highlight">Spatangoida</span>...
Published: 01 November 2005
Figure 17 —Geographic distribution of Maastrichtian and Danian Spatangoida. Map base modified from Smith et al. (1981) and Scotese et al. (1988)
Image
Figure  3. Disparity of the order <span class="search-highlight">Spatangoida</span> during the Cretaceous: influe...
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 3. Disparity of the order Spatangoida during the Cretaceous: influence of timescale. A, Use of amalgamated stages. B, Stage-level analysis. Taxa are sampled at genus level, one species representing each genus. Range-through method is applied when time range of genus exceeds the duration
Image
Figure  4. Diversity patterns of the order <span class="search-highlight">Spatangoida</span>. A, Number of genera...
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 4. Diversity patterns of the order Spatangoida. A, Number of genera at subepoch resolution. B, Number of genera at stage resolution. C, Number of species at subepoch resolution. D, Number of species at stage resolution
Image
Figure  5. Disparity of the order <span class="search-highlight">Spatangoida</span> during the Cretaceous: influe...
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 5. Disparity of the order Spatangoida during the Cretaceous: influence of timescale. A, Use of amalgamated stages. B, Stage-level analysis. Taxa are sampled at species level, with sampling of 30–50% of species known per genus, and one to four specimens representing each species. Range
Image
Figure  6. Disparity of the order <span class="search-highlight">Spatangoida</span> during the Cretaceous: influe...
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 6. Disparity of the order Spatangoida during the Cretaceous: influence of morphological descriptor and statistical treatment. Genus-level taxonomic sampling was used throughout. One species is taken as representative for each genus. Range-through method is applied, at stage-level temporal
Image
Figure  7. Disparity of the order <span class="search-highlight">Spatangoida</span> during the Cretaceous: effect...
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 7. Disparity of the order Spatangoida during the Cretaceous: effect of reference empirical morphospace. A, Pattern of spatangoid disparity calculated from a data set including the orders Disasteroida, Holasteroida, and Spatangoida (data from Eble 2000a ). B, Pattern of spatangoid disparity
Image
Figure  6. The origin of the orders Holasteroida and <span class="search-highlight">Spatangoida</span> against th...
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 6. The origin of the orders Holasteroida and Spatangoida against the backdrop of ancestral disasteroid disparity. Figure shows a frequency distribution of bootstrapped total disasteroid disparity (1000 iterations), against which the disparity of several samples is compared. The 5 rightmost
Image
Figure  7. Plastral disparity for the superorder Atelostomata and the order...
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 7. Plastral disparity for the superorder Atelostomata and the orders Disasteroida, Holasteroida, and Spatangoida. Disparity through time was calculated from partitioning of character matrix into character complexes with different functional and developmental implications (see text
Journal Article
Journal: Paleobiology
Published: 04 May 2015
Paleobiology (2015) 41 (3): 436–459.
.... A, Two highly contrasting apical systems observed in regular echinoids (left) and Spatangoida (right). Left: Example of the regular echinoid Diplocidaris gigantea (L Agassiz) – (after Kier 1974 : Fig. 42A). Genital plates (dark gray) are labeled G1 to G5...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2021
Journal of Paleontology (2021) 95 (3): 613–623.
...Steven Byrum; Bruce S. Lieberman Abstract Members of the echinoid order Spatangoida, a highly diverse and abundant marine invertebrate clade, were important denizens of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway (WIS), an epicontinental seaway that divided North America in two during an interval...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
Echinoid apical plating and associate graphical representations. A, Two hig...
Published: 04 May 2015
Figure 2 Echinoid apical plating and associate graphical representations. A, Two highly contrasting apical systems observed in regular echinoids (left) and Spatangoida (right). Left: Example of the regular echinoid Diplocidaris gigantea (L Agassiz) – (after Kier
Journal Article
Journal: Paleobiology
Published: 01 January 2004
Paleobiology (2004) 30 (4): 652–665.
...Figure 3. Disparity of the order Spatangoida during the Cretaceous: influence of timescale. A, Use of amalgamated stages. B, Stage-level analysis. Taxa are sampled at genus level, one species representing each genus. Range-through method is applied when time range of genus exceeds the duration...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Figure  8. Nonplastral disparity for the superorder Atelostomata and the or...
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 8. Nonplastral disparity for the superorder Atelostomata and the orders Disasteroida, Holasteroida, and Spatangoida. Nonplastral character complex corresponds to ambulacral, ambitus (including frontal furrow), and periproct landmarks. Same conventions as in Figure 7 .
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1968
Journal of Paleontology (1968) 42 (5): 1272–1288.
...; Cassiduloida; Disasteroida, new; Holasteroida; Pourtalesioida, new; Spatangoida. Disasteroida includes the families: Pygorhytidae; Collyritidae; Disasteridae; Tithoniidae, new; Acrolusiidae, new. GeoRef, Copyright 2004, American Geological Institute. Reference includes data from Bibliography and Index...
Image
Figure  1. Stratigraphic and phylogenetic framework for the irregular echin...
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 1. Stratigraphic and phylogenetic framework for the irregular echinoid orders Holasteroida, Spatangoida, and Disasteroida. Disasteroids appear in the Middle Jurassic and range to the mid-Cretaceous. Spatangoids and holasteroids appear coevally in the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian) and range
Image
Rose diagrams showing contact frequency between pairs of apical plates in f...
Published: 04 May 2015
Figure 6 Rose diagrams showing contact frequency between pairs of apical plates in five echinoid groups: the regular echinoids (A), basal Irregularia (B), basal Atelostomata (C), Holasteroida (D), and Spatangoida (E). Bold and circled plate numbers
Journal Article
Published: 10 March 2023
Geological Magazine (2023) 160 (5): 941–954.
... Spatangoida Agassiz, 1840. Unfortunately, a complete taxonomic description is not possible because the specimens can only be studied in cross-sections. The assignment to Spatangoida is based on the cross-section of the corona (Fig.  6 a), which revealed the presence of aboral petal grooves (Fig.  6 b...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Table  2. Disparity and the origin of the orders Holasteroida and Spatangoi...
Published: 01 January 2000
Table 2. Disparity and the origin of the orders Holasteroida and Spatangoida. Shown are p -values for various comparisons to the distribution of resampled total disasteroid disparities, generated by 1000 bootstrap replications. The disasteroid sample is dominated by Late Jurassic and Early