1-20 OF 609 RESULTS FOR

Southern Peru earthquake 2001

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2010
Earthquake Spectra (2010) 26 (2): 499–524.
...Adrian Rodriguez-Marek; James A. Bay; Kwangsoo Park; Gonzalo A. Montalva; Adel Cortez-Flores; Joseph Wartman; Rubén Boroschek The M w 8.4 23 June 2001 Southern Peru earthquake generated intense ground motions in a large region encompassing southern Peru and northern Chile. The earthquake...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2001
Seismological Research Letters (2001) 72 (6): 673–678.
..., subsequent analysis is needed to: On 23 June 2001, at 20:33 UTC, a major earthquake occurred near the coast of southern Peru, about 190 km west of Arequipa (16.15°S, 73.40°W). A revised magnitude of 8.4 was computed for this earthquake by the United States Geological Survey, NEIC (see http...
FIGURES
Image
Focal mechanism solutions proposed for the 2001 southern Peru earthquake. The top beach ball is the final Harvard solution, available from http://www.seismology.harvard.edu/CMTsearch.html The other solutions were obtained in quasireal time by, respectively, the QUICK algorithm at Harvard, USGS (http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/FM/previous/0106.html), the Preliminary Determination of Focal Mechanism at Papeete, Tahiti (Reymond and Okal, 2000), and Kikuchi and Yamanaka (2001).
Published: 01 November 2002
Figure 2. Focal mechanism solutions proposed for the 2001 southern Peru earthquake. The top beach ball is the final Harvard solution, available from http://www.seismology.harvard.edu/CMTsearch.html The other solutions were obtained in quasireal time by, respectively, the QUICK algorithm
Image
Distribution of strong motion data for interface subduction zone earthquakes. Data taken from electronic supplement to Atkinson and Boore (2003) for data prior to 2001, Rodriguez-Marek et al. (2010) for the 2001 Southern Peru earthquake, Zhao (2011) for the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake, and Boroschek et al. (2012) for the Maule earthquake.
Published: 01 March 2013
Figure 1. Distribution of strong motion data for interface subduction zone earthquakes. Data taken from electronic supplement to Atkinson and Boore (2003) for data prior to 2001, Rodriguez-Marek et al. (2010) for the 2001 Southern Peru earthquake, Zhao (2011) for the 2003 Tokachi-oki
Image
Figure 1. Seismotectonic setting of northern Chile and southern Peru. Gradients in interseismic global positioning system velocities (vector scale I; from Bevis et al., 2001) and coseismic displacements (vector scale C; from Klotz et al., 1999) demonstrate shortening and extension, respectively. Epicenters of great earthquakes are shown as black dots; approximate rupture areas are enclosed by ellipses (2001 rupture area is outlined by dashed line). Box near Salar Grande shows area of Figure 2. SA—South America
Published: 01 December 2005
Figure 1. Seismotectonic setting of northern Chile and southern Peru. Gradients in interseismic global positioning system velocities (vector scale I; from Bevis et al., 2001 ) and coseismic displacements (vector scale C; from Klotz et al., 1999 ) demonstrate shortening and extension, respectively
Image
Published: 01 November 2016
Table 1 Finite fault models for earthquakes recorded from Chilean stations EQID Earthquake name/year Primary choice Others 50001 Valparaiso/1985 Mendoza et al. (1994) 50003 Antofagasta/1995 Shao and Ji (UCSB) 50020 Southern Peru/2001 Shao and Ji (UCSB
Image
Situation map of northern Chile–southern Peru. The terminations of the 1995 Antofagasta (Mw 8.0) and 2001 Arequipa (Mw 8.4) interplate earthquake ruptures are indicated, as well as the 2005 Tarapaca (Mw 7.8) intermediate-depth earthquakes rupture zone (hatched surfaces labeled 1995, 2001, and 2005, respectively, Ruegg et al., 1996; Delouis et al., 1997; Pritchard et al., 2006; Bilek and Ruff, 2002; Delouis and Legrand, 2007). The gray contoured areas in the rectangular frame correspond to the surface projection of the slip model obtained in this study for the 2007 Tocopilla earthquake. The double dashed line AB indicates the cross-section line of (b). Also displayed, the focal mechanism here determined for the Tocopilla mainshock, in black, and the focal mechanisms of the 1995, 2001, and 2006 events, in gray (Delouis et al., 1997; Bilek and Ruff, 2002; Delouis and Legrand, 2007). Black diamonds are the six strong-motion stations that recorded the 2007 mainshock diamonds: Iquique (IQUI), Pica (PICA), Tocopilla (TOCO), Calama (CALA), Mejillones (MEJI), and Antofagasta (ANTO). Dashed line: G1, seismic gap before the 2007 rupture and remaining gap for the occurrence of a very large (M>8.5) event; G2, reduced gap, most likely place for the next large (M>7.5) underthrusting event. (b) Cross section showing background seismicity from 1991 to 1994 well recorded by a local network between latitude 24.5° S and 22.5° S. Same longitude scale as in (a). The black line indicates the main slip zone during the 2007 Tocopilla event. The dashed line corresponds to the shallower part of the slip distribution in the southern part of the rupture (same horizontal and vertical scale).
Published: 01 February 2009
Figure 1. Situation map of northern Chile–southern Peru. The terminations of the 1995 Antofagasta ( M w  8.0) and 2001 Arequipa ( M w  8.4) interplate earthquake ruptures are indicated, as well as the 2005 Tarapaca ( M w  7.8) intermediate-depth earthquakes rupture zone (hatched surfaces
Image
Map of the southern Peru aera, showing the main shock Mw = 8.4 earthquake (circled black star), the focal mechanism, the main aftershock Mw = 7.6 (little black star), and the aftershocks (small open circles) as determined by the USGS.The observed coseismic displacement vector in AREQ associated with the main shock is shown by awestward open arrow and the modeled vector by awestward thin arrow. The interseismic velocity vectors for AREQ and other regional GPS sites are shown by eastward-pointing thin arrows (a: Norabuena et al. [1998]: b: from Bevis et al. [1999]; c: from Angerman et al. [1999]: d: from Ruegg et al. [preprint, 2001]), The modeled rupture zone contour is shown by ablack rectangle.
Published: 01 November 2001
Figure 1. Map of the southern Peru aera, showing the main shock M w = 8.4 earthquake (circled black star), the focal mechanism, the main aftershock M w = 7.6 (little black star), and the aftershocks (small open circles) as determined by the USGS.The observed coseismic displacement vector
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2008
Seismological Research Letters (2008) 79 (4): 510–515.
... areas, such as the event that occurred in southern Peru on 23 June 2001 ( Mw = 8.2), which affected an area of 370 × 70 km 2 between the towns of Atico (Arequipa) and Ilo (Moquegua) ( Tavera et al. 2006 ). The earthquake that is the subject of this article occurred on 15 August 2007...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 08 February 2024
Seismological Research Letters (2024) 95 (4): 2464–2484.
... and Gomberg, 2014 ; Palano et al. , 2015 ; Gaidzik et al. , 2016 ; Hoskins et al. , 2021 ; examples of large crustal earthquakes in southern Peru: Benavente et al. , 2021 , 2022 ), and cause severe damage and losses to the local population. The interactions between specific seismic events can...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2006
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2006) 96 (5): 1634–1648.
...) , Nishenko (1985) , Beck and Ruff (1989) , Dorbath et al. (1990) , and Rabinovich et al. (2001) in central and southern Peru. On Figure 6 , we adapt Dorbath et al. ’s (1990) figure 6 , and update it to include the 2001 earthquake. We then attempt to define a return time for the major earthquakes...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2002
Seismological Research Letters (2002) 73 (5): 732–738.
... within an area of about 6,500 km 2 , including parts of eleven counties in Illinois and adjacent parts of southern Wisconsin and eastern Iowa. Within two weeks of the event, two separate intensity surveys were initiated to investigate the effects of this earthquake. The surveys showed that Modified...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 January 2009
Geology (2009) 37 (1): 23–26.
... , p. 1241 – 1253. Keefer D.K. Moseley M.E. 2004 , Southern Peru desert shattered by the great 2001 earthquake: Implications for paleoseismic and paleo-El Niño–Southern Oscillation...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 14 November 2024
Seismological Research Letters (2025) 96 (3): 1687–1702.
... – 10,428 . Tavera H. , and Buforn E. 2001 . Source mechanisms of earthquakes in Peru , J. Seismol. 5 , 519 – 539 . Waldhauser F. 2001 . HypoDD: A computer program to compute double‐difference earthquake locations , U.S. Geol. Surv. Open‐File Rept. 2001‐113 . ...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2011
Seismological Research Letters (2011) 82 (5): 629–637.
... the Juan Fernandez and Iquique ridges. The largest earthquakes on record (1877 and 1922, Figure 7 ) ruptured only the northern and southern halves. The 2001 M w 8.4 Peru earthquake started near the top of the Nazca fracture zone lateral ramp, climbed down the ramp, and broke also the adjacent flat...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 07 July 2021
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (6): 3349–3359.
... the city of Pucallpa (Peru) and the southern region of Ecuador, it is confirmed that the internal deformation of the plate in this area is very high ( Tavera and Buforn, 2001 ; Wagner and Okal, 2019 ). In this study, we analyze the macroseismic intensities of the Loreto earthquake, the orientation of its...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2002
Seismological Research Letters (2002) 73 (6): 907–920.
...Figure 2. Focal mechanism solutions proposed for the 2001 southern Peru earthquake. The top beach ball is the final Harvard solution, available from http://www.seismology.harvard.edu/CMTsearch.html The other solutions were obtained in quasireal time by, respectively, the QUICK algorithm...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2012
Seismological Research Letters (2012) 83 (6): 1007–1013.
... for central and southern Peru, and strong motion simulation of the 2007 Pisco earthquake , 2nd Japan—Peru Workshop on Enhancement of Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster Mitigation Technology , 9 March 2011 , Tokyo, Japan . Schneider J. Sack S. Huaco D. Ocola L. Norabuena E. Flores...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 December 2005
Geology (2005) 33 (12): 973–976.
...Figure 1. Seismotectonic setting of northern Chile and southern Peru. Gradients in interseismic global positioning system velocities (vector scale I; from Bevis et al., 2001 ) and coseismic displacements (vector scale C; from Klotz et al., 1999 ) demonstrate shortening and extension, respectively...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2015
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2015) 105 (6): 3050–3067.
... spectral accelerations for shallow crustal earthquakes , PEER Report , May 2013, 135  pp. Boroschek R. Comte D. ( 2004 ). Time–frequency characteristics of the 2001 southern Peru, M w  8.4 earthquake , 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering , Vancouver, British Columbia , 1–6...
FIGURES | View All (17)