1-20 OF 127 RESULTS FOR

Shaler Supergroup

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Regional stratigraphy and paleogeography of the lower Shaler Supergroup, containing the Nelson Head Formation and bounding strata. A–E) Schematic stratigraphy of representative exposures of the Nelson Head Formation; modified from Rainbird et al. (1996a). Paleogeography of northwest Laurentia during Nelson Head times, showing the pan-continental drainage originating from the Grenville Orogen, and inferred depositional belts in the Amundsen Basin and adjoining areas; derived from Baragar and Donaldson (1973), Miall (1976), Rainbird et al. (1992b, 1994, 1996b), and Conly (1993).
Published: 01 March 2016
Fig. 16.— Regional stratigraphy and paleogeography of the lower Shaler Supergroup, containing the Nelson Head Formation and bounding strata. A – E) Schematic stratigraphy of representative exposures of the Nelson Head Formation; modified from Rainbird et al. (1996a) . Paleogeography
Image
Stratigraphic column of the Shaler Supergroup showing major mafic sills (after Hulbert et al., 2005).
Published: 01 May 2014
Figure 2. Stratigraphic column of the Shaler Supergroup showing major mafic sills (after Hulbert et al., 2005 ).
Image
Detrital zircon histograms from Shaler Supergroup, a major potential clastic source for younger strata (Fig. 5). (A) Thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) data compiled from Rainbird et al. (1992, 1997). (B) Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) data, Killian Formation, Victoria Island, probability distribution. (C) SIMS data, Fort Collinson Formation (upper Reynolds Point Group), Victoria Island, probability distribution. The SIMS data are two examples that illustrate the variability in a compilation of new data (after Rayner and Rainbird, 2013).
Published: 01 March 2014
Figure 7. Detrital zircon histograms from Shaler Supergroup, a major potential clastic source for younger strata ( Fig. 5 ). (A) Thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) data compiled from Rainbird et al. (1992 , 1997) . (B) Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) data, Killian Formation
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 30 June 2017
GSA Bulletin (2017) 129 (11-12): 1408–1423.
...Robert H. Rainbird; N.M. Rayner; T. Hadlari; L.M. Heaman; A. Ielpi; E.C. Turner; R.B. MacNaughton Abstract We present detrital zircon U-Pb data from mainly fluvial sandstones of the Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup, Yukon (four samples), and the Shaler Supergroup, Northwest Territories (seven samples...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Zircon provenance data record the lateral extent o...
Second thumbnail for: Zircon provenance data record the lateral extent o...
Third thumbnail for: Zircon provenance data record the lateral extent o...
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 2000
EISBN: 9781565761896
... of the Bitter Springs Formation was deposited in a marine environment. The evidence for this interpretation includes isotopes of strontium, carbon, and sulfur, and biomarkers. 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios in the Gillen Member are comparable to the lowest ever recorded from the Shaler Supergroup of Canada, of similar...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1996
GSA Bulletin (1996) 108 (4): 454–470.
... stratigraphic studies of Succession B, along with improved geochronology, allow extension and refinement of existing correlation schemes for northwestern Canada and Alaska. Succession B strata include the Shaler Supergroup of the Amundsen Basin, Mackenzie Mountains supergroup of the Mackenzie Mountains fold...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2012
GSA Bulletin (2012) 124 (7-8): 1155–1168.
... of the signatures from Mackenzie Mountains and Great Bear Lake south suggests that there were two distinct sources of detrital zircon available to the northern Northwest Territories during the Cambrian. Detrital zircon ages from Cambrian strata of Victoria Island appear to be a mixture of Shaler Supergroup, Slave...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Two detrital zircon signatures for the Cambrian pa...
Second thumbnail for: Two detrital zircon signatures for the Cambrian pa...
Third thumbnail for: Two detrital zircon signatures for the Cambrian pa...
Image
Stratigraphic comparison between the late Mesoproterozoic Coppermine River Group/Shaler Supergroup and the Bylot Supergroup and Fury and Hecla Group. Modified from Greenman et al. (2021). Ages for the Shaler Supergroup from Rainbird et al. (2020) and references cited therein; ages for the Bylot Supergroup from Gibson et al. (2018); and ages for the Fury and Hecla Group from Greenman et al. (2021). Basaltic unit 2a from the Fury and Hecla Group is exaggerated to be visible.
Published: 17 May 2023
Fig. 9. Stratigraphic comparison between the late Mesoproterozoic Coppermine River Group/Shaler Supergroup and the Bylot Supergroup and Fury and Hecla Group. Modified from Greenman et al. (2021) . Ages for the Shaler Supergroup from Rainbird et al. (2020) and references cited therein; ages
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 2014
GSA Bulletin (2014) 126 (5-6): 759–772.
...Figure 2. Stratigraphic column of the Shaler Supergroup showing major mafic sills (after Hulbert et al., 2005 ). ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Numerical constraints on degassing of metamorphic ...
Second thumbnail for: Numerical constraints on degassing of metamorphic ...
Third thumbnail for: Numerical constraints on degassing of metamorphic ...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 March 2009
GSA Bulletin (2009) 121 (3-4): 448–473.
...-thick Neoproterozoic carbonate succession exposed in the northeastern Brooks Range of Arctic Alaska. These strata have previously been correlated with the pre–723 Ma Shaler Supergroup of the Amundson Basin. Herein we report new composite δ 13 C profiles and detrital zircon ages that test this connection...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Neoproterozoic glaciation on a carbonate platform ...
Second thumbnail for: Neoproterozoic glaciation on a carbonate platform ...
Third thumbnail for: Neoproterozoic glaciation on a carbonate platform ...
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 2000
EISBN: 9781565761896
...INTRODUCTION GEOLOGICAL SETTING Fig. 1. —(A) North America with general location of study area. (B) Map of Victoria Island, southern Banks Island and adjacent mainland illustrating the location of the early Neoproterozoic Shaler Supergroup. (C) Generalized geological map...
Image
Geological map of the Minto Inlier on Victoria Island showing the major units of the Shaler Supergroup and the overlying Paleozoic rocks (after Hulbert et al., 2005; Bédard et al., 2012). Heavy northwest-trending lines show Proterozoic vertical faults that have guided emplacement of sill-feeding dikes (not shown) into the Shaler Supergroup. Uhuk Massif and northern feeder dike (NFD) complex localities are discussed in this paper. The southern feeder dike (SFD) complex was discussed by Bédard et al. (2012) and Nabelek et al. (2013). The inset shows schematic locations of other Franklin-age intrusions, most of which are dikes, in the Canadian Arctic region and Greenland (after Buchan et al., 2010). The Minto Inlier on Victoria Island is highlighted by a rectangle in the inset.
Published: 01 May 2014
Figure 1. Geological map of the Minto Inlier on Victoria Island showing the major units of the Shaler Supergroup and the overlying Paleozoic rocks (after Hulbert et al., 2005 ; Bédard et al., 2012 ). Heavy northwest-trending lines show Proterozoic vertical faults that have guided emplacement
Image
(A) Location of the study area in the Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup in western Northwest Territories, Canada. (B) Exposure areas of the Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup and the time-equivalent Shaler Supergroup in Northwest Territories. Dotted line indicates territorial border. (C) Location of three measured sections of the Ten Stone Formation in the Mackenzie Mountains (open circle indicates the formation’s southeasternmost known exposure). (D) Stratigraphic position of the gypsite-dominated, sulfate-first Ten Stone Formation in Neoproterozoic stratigraphy of the Mackenzie Mountains; CM indicates carbonate marker. (E) Stratigraphy of the Shaler Supergroup (northern mainland of Northwest Territories). (F) Field photo of halite casts in the Dodo Creek Formation, a halite-first succession. Annotations indicate the stratigraphic levels of a halite-first evaporitic unit (Dodo Creek Formation) and overlying sulfate-first evaporite successions (Ten Stone, Minto Inlet, non-marine–marine[?] Redstone River, and Kilian Formations). The marine Kilian Formation shows clear evidence of evaporative drawdown to halite saturation after deposition of a significant thickness of gypsite. Radiometric dates are from Jefferson and Parrish (1989), Heaman et al. (1992), and Leslie (2009).
Published: 01 January 2016
Figure 2. (A) Location of the study area in the Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup in western Northwest Territories, Canada. (B) Exposure areas of the Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup and the time-equivalent Shaler Supergroup in Northwest Territories. Dotted line indicates territorial border. (C
Image
Probability density distribution-histogram plot of 207Pb/206Pb ages of detrital zircons from early Neoproterozoic quartzarenites from northwestern Canada, including the Shaler Supergroup, Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup and Hematite Creek Group (ID-TIMS data from Rainbird et al. 1997).
Published: 02 January 2003
Figure 4. Probability density distribution-histogram plot of 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ages of detrital zircons from early Neoproterozoic quartzarenites from northwestern Canada, including the Shaler Supergroup, Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup and Hematite Creek Group (ID-TIMS data from Rainbird et al
Image
Location of study area and generalized geology of Minto inlier on Victoria Island (VI), Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada, where rocks of early Neoproterozoic Shaler Supergroup are exposed. Numbers in parentheses are approximate thicknesses.
Published: 26 February 2019
Figure 2. Location of study area and generalized geology of Minto inlier on Victoria Island (VI), Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada, where rocks of early Neoproterozoic Shaler Supergroup are exposed. Numbers in parentheses are approximate thicknesses.
Image
Stratigraphy of late Mesoproterozoic successions highlighting penecontemporaneous shale deposition ca. 1090–1050 Ma and interpreted unconformity in basins from Arctic Canada. Ages for the Shaler Supergroup are from Rainbird et al. (2020, and references therein); Bylot Supergroup are from Gibson et al. (2018); Midcontinent Rift are from Cumming et al. (2013) and Swanson Hysell et al. (2019). Sgp.—Supergroup; Gp.—Group; Fm.—Formation.
Published: 26 March 2021
Figure 3. Stratigraphy of late Mesoproterozoic successions highlighting penecontemporaneous shale deposition ca. 1090–1050 Ma and interpreted unconformity in basins from Arctic Canada. Ages for the Shaler Supergroup are from Rainbird et al. (2020, and references therein); Bylot Supergroup
Image
A 50-m-thick gabbro sill (dark brown) of the Franklin large igneous province intruding Lower Neoproterozoic platformal dolostones (gray/beige) of the Shaler Supergroup, Brock River canyon, east of Paulatuk, mainland Northwest Territories, Canada. Photo: R.H. Rainbird, Geological Survey of Canada.
Published: 04 May 2022
Figure 8. A 50-m-thick gabbro sill (dark brown) of the Franklin large igneous province intruding Lower Neoproterozoic platformal dolostones (gray/beige) of the Shaler Supergroup, Brock River canyon, east of Paulatuk, mainland Northwest Territories, Canada. Photo: R.H. Rainbird, Geological Survey
Image
Merged detrital zircon U-Pb age spectra for Cambrian samples from Mackenzie Mountains, Great Bear Lake south, and Victoria Island (this study) compared with spectra from Neoproterozoic Mackenzie Mountains and Shaler Supergroups (Rainbird et al., 1992, 1996, 1997; Villeneuve et al., 1998).
Published: 01 July 2012
Figure 6. Merged detrital zircon U-Pb age spectra for Cambrian samples from Mackenzie Mountains, Great Bear Lake south, and Victoria Island (this study) compared with spectra from Neoproterozoic Mackenzie Mountains and Shaler Supergroups ( Rainbird et al., 1992 , 1996 , 1997 ; Villeneuve et al
Image
Generalized late Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic stratigraphy and geochronology of the Shaler Supergroup in the Amundsen Basin, Northwest Territories. Age data are from LeCheminant and Heaman (1989) and Heaman et al. (1992) (U-Pb igneous rocks), van Acken et al. (2013) (Re-Os on shales), and Rayner and Rainbird (2013) (U-Pb detrital zircon on sandstones).
Published: 30 June 2017
Figure 3. Generalized late Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic stratigraphy and geochronology of the Shaler Supergroup in the Amundsen Basin, Northwest Territories. Age data are from LeCheminant and Heaman (1989) and Heaman et al. (1992) (U-Pb igneous rocks), van Acken et al. (2013) (Re-Os
Image
(A) Grant Young observing rocks of the early Neoproterozoic Shaler Supergroup from the cliffs above Glenelg Bay, Victoria Island, Nunavut, Canada, 1972. (B) Grant Young making field notes, Victoria Island, 1975. (C) Grant Young explaining the mysteries of the Huronian to students from the University of Western Ontario, from an exposure of the Lorrain Formation on La Cloche Mountain, near Whitefish Falls, Ontario. Photos A and B by D. Long; photo C by R. Rainbird.
Published: 01 July 2023
Fig. 1. (A) Grant Young observing rocks of the early Neoproterozoic Shaler Supergroup from the cliffs above Glenelg Bay, Victoria Island, Nunavut, Canada, 1972. (B) Grant Young making field notes, Victoria Island, 1975. (C) Grant Young explaining the mysteries of the Huronian to students from