1-20 OF 1593 RESULTS FOR

Seattle Basin

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2002
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2002) 92 (5): 1737–1753.
... by the boxcar shape of the shoreline uplift from the last major earthquake on the fault zone. The Seattle Basin is interpreted as a flexural basin at the footwall of the Seattle fault zone. Basin stratigraphy and the regional tectonic history lead us to suggest that the Seattle fault zone initiated as a reverse...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 January 1994
Geology (1994) 22 (1): 71–74.
...Samuel Y. Johnson; Christopher J. Potter; John M. Armentrout Abstract Analysis of seismic reflection data reveals that the Seattle basin (Washington) is markedly asymmetric and consists of ∼9-10 km of Eocene and younger deposits. The basin began as a discrete geologic element in the late Eocene...
Journal Article
Published: 27 March 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (3): 1230–1242.
... ( V S ) data at depths that capture the extent of the sedimentary column (usually greater than 30 m), which can be difficult to obtain. We acquired microtremor array data at 11 sites in the Seattle basin, Washington, and applied the wavenumber‐normalized spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method (krSPAC...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2007
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2007) 97 (5): 1432–1448.
...Catherine M. Snelson; Thomas M. Brocher; Kate C. Miller; Thomas L. Pratt; Anne M. Tréhu Abstract Recent observations indicate that the Seattle sedimentary basin, underlying Seattle and other urban centers in the Puget Lowland, Washington, amplifies long-period (1–5 sec) weak ground motions...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2006
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2006) 96 (2): 553–571.
...Qin Li; William S. D. Wilcock; Thomas L. Pratt; Catherine M. Snelson; Thomas M. Brocher Abstract We used waveform data from the 1999 ships (Seismic Hazard Investigation of Puget Sound) seismic refraction experiment to constrain the attenuation structure of the Seattle basin, Washington State. We...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2003
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2003) 93 (2): 533–545.
... sedimentary basin in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. For weak ground motions from the Chi-Chi earthquake, the Seattle basin amplified 0.2- to 0.8-Hz waves by factors of 8 to 16 relative to bedrock sites west of the basin. The amplification and peak frequency change during the Chi-Chi coda: the initial S -wave...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2009
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2009) 99 (3): 1579–1611.
...Arthur Frankel; William Stephenson; David Carver Abstract Seismograms of local earthquakes recorded in Seattle exhibit surface waves in the Seattle basin and basin-edge focusing of S waves. Spectral ratios of S waves and later arrivals at 1 Hz for stiff-soil sites in the Seattle basin show...
FIGURES | View All (35)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2002
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2002) 92 (6): 2090–2109.
...Arthur D. Frankel; David L. Carver; Robert A. Williams Abstract We used recordings of the M 6.8 Nisqually earthquake and its M L 3.4 aftershock to study site response and basin effects for 35 locations in Seattle, Washington. We determined site amplification from Fourier spectral ratios...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2011
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2011) 101 (5): 2162–2175.
... that are sensitive to shallow-basin structure. This new V S model for the Seattle basin is constructed using direct observations rather than using P -wave velocity ( V P ) observations and a V P / V S ratio as all previous 3D models at this scale have been constructed. Our results reveal greater detail in the upper...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Published: 01 June 2002
Figure 6. Step-by-step geometric restoration of the Seattle fault zone, Seattle Basin, and Kingston Arch to their preshortened positions. Thin and thick black lines, fold axis or an earlier, steeper fault than fault A. See text for detailed explanation. Uplift of Kingston Arch is dotted
Image
Published: 01 August 2024
Figure 13. Basin boundaries, defining sites inside and outside of the Seattle basin in Table 4 .
Image
Published: 01 August 2024
Figure 18. Figures (a) and (c) plot the station-event pairs inside the Seattle basin and the reference stations used to compute the average BAF shown in Figures (b) and (d). The red lines in (a) and (c) illustrate the azimuths for the source-site pairs used for the respective data sets. The gray
Image
Published: 04 May 2021
Figure 2. Three‐component seismograms from Seattle basin station LAWT and Tualatin basin station KEEL showing the different converted phase arrival times. Z, R, and T labels correspond to the vertical, radial, and transverse components, respectively.
Image
Published: 04 May 2021
Figure 3. Estimated depth to basement at stations in (a) the Seattle basin and (b) the Tualatin basin based on this study (colored circles). Basement depth contours in the Seattle basin were taken from the Stephenson et al. (2017) CVM; Tualatin basin basement depth contours were taken from
Image
Published: 11 February 2020
Figure 2. Spectral ratios computed from observed waveforms within the Seattle basin relative to reference station SEW (left‐hand column) and BRI (right‐hand column) for (a,b) the Nisqually earthquake, (c,d) event 1, and (e,f) event 3. Dark lines are the geometric average of all spectral ratios
Image
Published: 01 August 2019
Figure 5. BAF Sa for Seattle basin locations within 2 km of the Z 2.5,i = 7 km contour computed using different reference Z 2.5,o : (a) locations on the Z 2.5 contour line equal to 1 km and (b) locations on the Z 2.5 contour line equal to 3.0 km.
Image
Published: 07 August 2018
Figure 22. Response spectra from 3D synthetics for QAW (in Seattle basin) and SP2 (just outside Seattle basin). Solid lines show values from a 3D velocity model without randomness. Dashed and dotted lines show response spectra for synthetics in a 3D model with small‐scale random variations
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Figure 5. Lines represent paths for Rayleigh waves used to image the Seattle basin. The period is indicated at the lower right of each panel. Triangles represent stations of the SHIPS array.
Image
Published: 01 June 2009
Figure 5. Seismograms from station LAP (in the Seattle basin) for event 2 from the southwest (see Fig.  1 ). Top: unfiltered accelerograms, Bottom: seismograms band-pass-filtered at 0.8–1.2 Hz. Note basin surface wave ( SW ) apparent after the S wave on the filtered seismograms.
Image
Published: 01 June 2009
Figure 3. 1 Hz amplification for sites within the Seattle basin as a function of the back azimuth to the earthquake (measured in degrees clockwise from north). Each panel uses a different reference site (rock or thin soil) outside the Seattle basin, as denoted by WRT (with respect to). Only